Josh Elser created HBASE-17002:
--
Summary: [Master] Report quotas and active violations on Master UI
Key: HBASE-17002
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17002
Project: HBase
Issue
Josh Elser created HBASE-17001:
--
Summary: [RegionServer] Implement enforcement of quota violation
policies
Key: HBASE-17001
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17001
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-17000:
--
Summary: [RegionServer] Compute region filesystem space use
Key: HBASE-17000
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17000
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Josh Elser created HBASE-16999:
--
Summary: [Master] Inform RegionServers on size quota violations
Key: HBASE-16999
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16999
Project: HBase
Issue
Josh Elser created HBASE-16998:
--
Summary: [Master] Analyze table use reports and update quota
violations
Key: HBASE-16998
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16998
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-16997:
--
Summary: Collect table use information from RegionServers in Master
Key: HBASE-16997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16997
Project: HBase
Issue
Josh Elser created HBASE-16996:
--
Summary: Implement storage/retrieval of filesystem-use quotas into
quota table
Key: HBASE-16996
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16996
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-16995:
--
Summary: Build client Java API and client protobuf messages
Key: HBASE-16995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16995
Project: HBase
Issue Type
and patches starting
to land.
I'm also happy to entertain more discussion if anyone hasn't found the
time to read/comment yet.
Thanks!
- Josh
Josh Elser wrote:
Sure thing, Ted.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VtLWDkB2tpwc_zgCNPE1ulZOeecF-YA2FYSK3TSs_bw/edit?usp=sharing
Let me open
Josh Elser created HBASE-16976:
--
Summary: hbase-protocol-shaded module generates classes to wrong
directory
Key: HBASE-16976
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16976
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-16961:
--
Summary: FileSystem Quotas
Key: HBASE-16961
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16961
Project: HBase
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter
that people can comment on it ?
Is there a JIRA opened for this work ?
Please open one if there is none.
Thanks
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose the introduction of FileSystem quotas to HBase.
Here's a design doc[1] ava
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose the introduction of FileSystem quotas to HBase.
Here's a design doc[1] available which (hopefully) covers all of the
salient points of what I think an initial version of such a feature
would include.
tl;dr We can define quotas on tables and namespaces. Region
Sean Busbey wrote:
This would be a very big breaking change in release numbering that goes
against our compatibility guidelines. We only drop support for Java
versions on major releases.
If we want features that require newer jdks sooner, we should make major
releases sooner.
+1 On this
is
not good enough yet to be integrated into 2.0 branch?
-Vlad
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Sean Busbey<bus...@apache.org> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
So, the answer to Sean's original question is "as robust as snapshot
So, the answer to Sean's original question is "as robust as snapshots
presently are"? (independence of backup/restore failure tolerance from
snapshot failure tolerance)
Is this just a question WRT context of the change, or is it means for a
veto from you, Sean? Just trying to make sure I'm
(top-post since I can't find a better place to respond to everyone who
chimed in here)
Huge thanks, everyone! This was absolutely the best email thread (and
JIRA issue) I could've come back to after not keeping up with email for
the day.
Stack wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Sean
Thanks for the great reply, Andrew!
Andrew Purtell wrote:
I find the InterfaceAudience annotations on this really strange. How can
we have a Public audience Interface (o.a.h.h.c.Table) with Private methods?
I'm also not sure the Private annotations on the Table interface are that
useful.
Hi folks,
I just noticed a ticket over in Phoenix [1] in which some method
additions to the Table interface [2] breaks the source compatibility of
Phoenix with HBase 1.2.2.
My understanding of the current guidelines is that these are allowed as
they do not invalidate binary compatibility of
Josh Elser created HBASE-16376:
--
Summary: Document implicit side-effects on partial results when
calling Scan#setBatch(int)
Key: HBASE-16376
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16376
Josh Elser created HBASE-16043:
--
Summary: Backport SPNEGO support to 0.98
Key: HBASE-16043
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16043
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
Josh Elser created HBASE-15837:
--
Summary: More gracefully handle a negative memstoreSize
Key: HBASE-15837
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15837
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Josh Elser created HBASE-15660:
--
Summary: Printing extra refs in ITBLL.Verify reducer can cause
reducers to be killed due to lack of progress
Key: HBASE-15660
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15660
Stack wrote:
...
> Let's change our relationship slightly, dev community. If you're working on
> a fix, please also post a patch for branch-1.1.
It is a bit tough. That'd be a patch for four branches (at least), three of
which have diverged in key areas (master, branch-1 and branch-1.2, and
Josh Elser created HBASE-15232:
--
Summary: Exceptions returned over multi RPC don't trigger region
location reloads
Key: HBASE-15232
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15232
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-15221:
--
Summary: HTableMultiplexer improvements (stale region locations
and resource leaks)
Key: HBASE-15221
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15221
Project
I feel like I've seen this before myself on OSX, but didn't trace it
down either.
Mikhail Antonov wrote:
Checked signatures, package content, RAT, ran tests, notice repeated
failure:
tests in error:
TestRegionServerHostname.testRegionServerHostname:86 » TestTimedOut test
timed...
It
Ahh, thanks, gentlemen.
Andrew Purtell wrote:
Yeah, let's finish that.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ted Yu<yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14172
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Josh Elser created HBASE-14800:
--
Summary: Expose checkAndMutate via Thrift2
Key: HBASE-14800
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14800
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi,
In looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14800, I saw
that the current libthrift dependency on master was at 0.9.2, but the
generated code still has the 0.9.0 comments.
Is there a reason for that? Should the libthrift version defined in the
poms be the de-facto version
+1 (non-binding)
* Built from source
* Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was
problematic, might have just been me.
* Checked sigs/xsums
* Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick)
* Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new
Huge kudos to you, Stack, for making the time to run these down.
As a contributor, I'm very moved by the thought of treating what Jenkins
reports as truth.
Stack wrote:
Since I wrote the below, we've figured who the surefire-killer was
[HBASE-14589]. 9 of the last 10 1.2 builds passed (even
Josh Elser created HBASE-14594:
--
Summary: Use new DNS API introduced in HADOOP-12437
Key: HBASE-14594
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14594
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
IMO, they are very similar. Lots of smart people on both sides making
really good changes.
I think HBase has a lot more instrumentation and understanding on the
resources a cluster will use. For example, I think it's much clearer the
resources and threads that the RPC server will use. This is
Andrew Purtell wrote:
Last I tried to play with the cell-level security APIs in HBase, it
seemed very obtuse to me. Perhaps I was just dense and didn't find the
right sort of instructions.
I don't think anyone would debate that cell level security in HBase is a
work-in-progress. We'd really
Forgot to send out last night (figured I would now despite the -1)
Ignoring licensing issues, (non-binding) +1
* Checked sig/xsums
* Inspected compatibility report (thanks for including!)
* Built source
* Ran small+med tests (TestRegionServerHostname failed, passed on rerun)
Nick Dimiduk
Like I've said many times now, it's relative to your actual problem. If
you don't have that much data (or intend to grow into that much data),
it's not an issue. Obviously, this is the case for you.
However, it is an architectural difference between the two projects with
known limitations for
Oh, one other thing that I should mention (was prompted off-list).
(definition time since cross-list now: HBase regions == Accumulo tablets)
Accumulo will handle many more regions than HBase does now due to a
splittable metadata table. While I was told this was a very long and
arduous journey
He didn't ask just about security, FWIW
I am looking for real gap comparing HBase to Accumulo if there is any
so that I can be prepared to address them. This is not limited to the
security area.
Sean Busbey wrote:
Let's please stick to the topic Jerry asked about: security features.
We can
.
The HBase community hasn't been doing that so much. It would be great if they
did because
the HBase points on the graphs are old and it would be good to get new ones.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 02:30:58PM -0400, Josh Elser wrote:
Like I've said many times now, it's relative to your actual
results in their paper,
it just took longer for their experiments to run.
So, in this case, we had two different teams doing things different
ways and getting the same result, which is what we like to see.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 03:27:07PM -0400, Josh Elser wrote:
Alright, I have to ask... are you
+1
(Have been talking to Sean in private on the subject -- seems
appropriate to voice some public support)
I'd be interested in this for Accumulo and Slider. For Accumulo, we've
come a far way without a pre-commit build, primarily due to a CTR
process. We have seen the repeated questions of
Josh Elser created HBASE-13892:
--
Summary: Scanner with all results filtered out results in NPE
Key: HBASE-13892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13892
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Andrew Purtell wrote:
This is because the Accumulo shell is a custom built shell? If so, we had
one of those once and replaced it with the IRB based one. We didn't settle
on JRuby right away but, at the time, the consensus was we didn't want to
be in the business of maintaining yet another REPL
Agreed on these points, Sean. Having used both, I think both approaches
have their value and their drawbacks.
The ruby shell is _wonderful_ from having a full programming language to
interact with. Accumulo's shell would force you to use your standard
unix-toolbelt if you want to do any extra
Josh Elser created HBASE-13607:
--
Summary: TestSplitLogManager.testGetPreviousRecoveryMode
consistently failing
Key: HBASE-13607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13607
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-13603:
--
Summary: Write test asserting desired priority of RS-Master RPCs
Key: HBASE-13603
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13603
Project: HBase
Issue
Josh Elser created HBASE-13561:
--
Summary: ITBLL.Verify doesn't actually evaluate counters after job
completes
Key: HBASE-13561
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13561
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-13554:
--
Summary: Update book clarifying API stability guarantees
Key: HBASE-13554
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13554
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Task
, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Josh Elser
josh.el...@gmail.com
wrote:
Andy -- I understood your intent, but thanks for
clarifying.
(as
well
as
taking the time to break this discussion out in the first
place). I
agree
with your assessment.
re: Sean's comments, if it wasn't clear by me asking
Enis Söztutar wrote:
+1 to the proposal.
The problem is that we have a very big API surface especially with the
coprocessors included in the report. Even simple bug fixes can introduce
protected or public methods to base classes, which makes patch releases
very hard to maintain. I would not
Stack wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Purtellapurt...@apache.org wrote:
So we like semver, not we use semver?
and Sean's
No longer claiming semver would also have the added benefit of making it for
me to easier to explain our compatibility promises to people.
Yeah,
While I can understand the desire to want to add things, I do think it
makes things harder for users to reliably write code against versions of
HBase which (by their view) should be completely compatible with one
another.
Take this extremely hypothetical situation: I'm new to HBase and start
Andy -- I understood your intent, but thanks for clarifying. (as well as
taking the time to break this discussion out in the first place). I
agree with your assessment.
re: Sean's comments, if it wasn't clear by me asking in the first place,
I also think sticking as close as possible to
+1 (non-binding)
* Checked sigs/xsums
* Looked for binary files in source tarball (found none unexpected)
* Built/ran-tests from source
* Started instance from binary tarball, ran shell commands
* Perused japi report
One note... in the japi report, I was a little surprised when I noticed
Josh Elser created HBASE-13520:
--
Summary: NullPointerException in TagRewriteCell
Key: HBASE-13520
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13520
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Josh Elser created HBASE-13480:
--
Summary: ShortCircuitConnection doesn't short-circuit all calls as
expected
Key: HBASE-13480
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13480
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-13458:
--
Summary: Create/expand unit test to exercise htrace instrumentation
Key: HBASE-13458
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13458
Project: HBase
Issue
Josh Elser created HBASE-13381:
--
Summary: Expand TestSizeFailures to include small scans
Key: HBASE-13381
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13381
Project: HBase
Issue Type
Josh Elser created HBASE-13351:
--
Summary: Annotate internal MasterRpcServices methods with admin
priority
Key: HBASE-13351
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13351
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-13262:
--
Summary: ResultScanner doesn't return all rows in Scan
Key: HBASE-13262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13262
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Josh Elser created HBASE-13256:
--
Summary: HBaseConfiguration#checkDefaultsVersion(Configuration)
has spelling error
Key: HBASE-13256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13256
Project: HBase
Josh Elser created HBASE-13255:
--
Summary: Bad grammar in RegionServer status page
Key: HBASE-13255
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13255
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Improvement
Josh Elser created HBASE-13236:
--
Summary: Clean up m2e-related warnings/errors from poms
Key: HBASE-13236
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13236
Project: HBase
Issue Type
801 - 864 of 864 matches
Mail list logo
