Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

Filed HBASE-26387 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2021年10月21日周四 上午9:49写道： > Done. > > Let me file an issue to update our HEADER.html. > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2021年10月21日周四 上午8:41写道： > >> I think we have reached an agreement here to move the stable pointer >> 2.4.x. >> >> Since 2.4.7 has been released, let's move

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

Done. Let me file an issue to update our HEADER.html. 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2021年10月21日周四 上午8:41写道： > I think we have reached an agreement here to move the stable pointer 2.4.x. > > Since 2.4.7 has been released, let's move the stable pointer to 2.4.7. > > Will do this later today. > > Thanks all for

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

I think we have reached an agreement here to move the stable pointer 2.4.x. Since 2.4.7 has been released, let's move the stable pointer to 2.4.7. Will do this later today. Thanks all for helping! Viraj Jasani 于2021年10月12日周二 下午2:59写道： > Sounds good. Created HBASE-26352 >

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

Sounds good. Created HBASE-26352 , will get to it after completing some additional testing. On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:47 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > I was thinking we can add these things to the upgrade section. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

I like Nick's elucidation. +1 from me. As 2.4 RM I've had good experiences with it in chaos testing and have found nothing that would not recommend it. On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:58 AM Nick Dimiduk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Sean Busbey wrote: > > > > > Personally, I view the

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

I was thinking we can add these things to the upgrade section. https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade2.0.rolling.upgrades Nick Dimiduk 于2021年10月11日周一 下午10:59写道： > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:24 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) > wrote: > > > Could you please file an issue to add these to our ref guide? I

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:24 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > Could you please file an issue to add these to our ref guide? I think these > are all very important experiences for our end users. > Question: Is the ref guide the place where we want to document what community testing has been performed

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Sean Busbey wrote: > > Personally, I view the "stable" pointer as simply a way to say "if you > are new to our community we'd like you to use this release." I > personally think 2.4.z currently meets that standard and we need not > block updating on something more

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

+1 I'm in favor of moving the stable pointer to 2.4. On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 11:24 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > Could you please file an issue to add these to our ref guide? I think these > are all very important experiences for our end users. > > Thanks. > > Viraj Jasani 于2021年10月11日周一 下午3:46写道：

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

Could you please file an issue to add these to our ref guide? I think these are all very important experiences for our end users. Thanks. Viraj Jasani 于2021年10月11日周一 下午3:46写道： > Moreover, I have also tested rollback from 2.4 to 1.6 and after taking care > of some rsgroup ordering issues as

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

+1 on moving to 2.4. Viraj Jasani 于2021年10月11日周一 下午3:40写道： > I have done some chaos testing as well as ingestion testing 3-4 times on > the recent 2.4 versions, each spanning the duration of around 8-10 hr. And > also tested rolling upgrade from 1.6 to 2.4 a couple of times after > applying the

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

Moreover, I have also tested rollback from 2.4 to 1.6 and after taking care of some rsgroup ordering issues as part of the downgrade, we have seen smooth downgrade as well (with the only exception that last RS that stays on 2.4 needs to be shutdown non-gracefully or killed, because of

Re: [DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

I have done some chaos testing as well as ingestion testing 3-4 times on the recent 2.4 versions, each spanning the duration of around 8-10 hr. And also tested rolling upgrade from 1.6 to 2.4 a couple of times after applying the recent fixes on adding missing CFs in meta table as part of the

[DISCUSS] move stable pointer to 2.4.6+

Hi folks! I'd like us to move the stable pointer from 2.3.z releases to 2.4.6+ releases. The last time we talked about doing so[1] there was a desire to get some documentation together on what we as a community expect from the "stable" release line. We have an issue tracking those needs[2], but