* Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
There has been an ongoing problem with httpd and system package build
scripts. Over time, changes have been backported to the build system
(autoconf, etc) which breaks packaging scripts and files such as the RPM
spec file.
The packaging files are then
* 14 Congreso Científico Internacional wrote:
unsubscribed this spammer from test-cvs and test-dev.
added to the deny list.
nd
--
Umfassendes Werk (auch fuer Umsteiger vom Apache 1.3)
-- aus einer Rezension
http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ *) core: Error out on sections that are missing an argument instead of
+ silently consuming the section. PR 25460.
+ [Geoffrey Young, Paul Querna]
:-( Actually, for IfDefine I've sold that that as feature, since it's the
only reliable way to produce
Another Perl Hacker;
# Andr Malo, http://www.perlig.de/ #
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Nov 29 02:09:15 2004
New Revision: 106899
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=106899
Log:
Add missing pcreposix.h from vendor/pcre/5.0.
*argh*. Revert this. It isn't missing. If you had followed the recent
commits, you'd have
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While running my script to adjust the docs revision references, I'm getting
an error, while retrieving a property:
svn propget cvs2svn:cvs-rev -r 103423 \
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/manual/mod/mod_authz_default.xml
Never mind,
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN.
I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies,
etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page
for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the context of markup filtering, I've created a new SSI implementation
that decouples SSI handling from HTML parsing.
Ehm, is it coupled in any way?
This is designed to be
re-usable in filters driven by general markup parsers such as expat and
* Torsten Förtsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 18:49, André Malo wrote:
I want to use SSI with CGI scripts. Thus, I have configured the INCLUDES
filter for my cgi-bin. But my CGI scripts generate not only text/html
* Mathias Herberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've come up with the included patch to add a RequestHeader directive to
mod_headers in the 1.3 tree.
We're going more and more to not adding new features to 1.3, so it's
unlikely that the patch will go into that branch.
It's considered *stable*, so
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can I get some votes for:
Index: modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c,v
retrieving revision 1.135.2.33
diff -u -r1.135.2.33
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rüdiger Plüm) wrote:
Hi all,
does anybody know how to regenerate the html version of the manual once I
made changes to the xml sources of the manual?
Sure. See http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html. If you have
questions, just follow to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
joe++
:)
!
;-)
nd
--
Solides und umfangreiches Buch
-- aus einer Rezension
http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) it's not particularly useful to be able to retrieve byteranges of the
output of some SSI, CGI or PHP script output, if the output may change
for each request anyway.
Not agreed. It is, especially for download scripts very useful (which e.g.
count the
* Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried searching the mailing list quickly, but I didn't see any
reasoning why mod_cgi{d} uses an internal redirect for these cases.
because it's a different request with a different filter chain.
The easy solution is to make mod_cgi{d} create a full
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair warning:
As the first stage of a simplification of the default config in 2.1
(only!), I'm going to remove all the html files under
httpd-2.1/docs/docroot/ and replace them with an index.html file
containing only htmlbodyh1It
* Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple months the IfModule block was modified so that it can use
foo_module instead of the Source File name (ie foo.c).
I believe that using the ${name}_module syntax is clearer than using the
source file name. I would like to encourage using this
* Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we merge multiple Host headers? I am getting wierd things like
this for headers_in host: www.cnn.com, www.cnn.com
This may be correct, but it caught me by surprise!
Well, it is an invalid HTTP request. The question is, should be
fix
* Rici Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, ap_directory_walk will, under certain circumstances, attempt
to read an .htaccess file from a complete filepath; that is, given the
path /path/to/file, it will *also* try /path/to/file/.htaccess. This is
not because it has been lied to by the
* Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose a 1.3.32 release with a TR either late this
week or early next.
Sounds good.
Though I'd like to point to the 2.0 status file,
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, people don't look for 1.3 patches in the 2.0 STATUS file
and vice-versa :)
As far as I can see, the current way to make changes is 2.1 - 2.0 - 1.3.
So it makes sense for me to look into 2.0 for possible 1.3 changes, but not
vice versa ;-)
* Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
Actually I'm talking about the two proposals on the top. If you are
interested in backport voting, you need to touch the STATUS file anyway
and should follow the commits there.
I'd still
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose a 1.3.32 release with a TR either late this
week or early next.
Sounds good.
Though I'd like to point to the 2.0 status file, where a bugfix (to 2.0
and 1.3) is waiting for approval :)
nd
--
Solides und umfangreiches Buch
* Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Two mod_rewrite patches:
attached httpd-2.0.50-rewrite-args.patch will no longer omit
$QUERY_STRINGs of [P]-proxypassed requests after their rewriting and [QSA]
possibly merging a new QUERY_STRING.
I'm going to look deeper at this later this
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
attached httpd-2.0.50-rewrite-args.patch will no longer omit
$QUERY_STRINGs of [P]-proxypassed requests after their rewriting and [QSA]
possibly merging a new QUERY_STRING.
I'm going to look deeper at this
* Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I have no time to spend on it. From a quick look at the code, it
seems that it is possible for the errfn to log header fields which is why I
choose to escape the string.
Sure...
Why wouldn't you want to escape the string just
to be safe? The
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/08/25 13:15:25
Modified:docs/manual/style build.properties lang-targets.xml
docs/manual/style/css manual-zip.css
docs/manual/style/lang de.xml en.xml fr.xml ja.xml ko.xml
ru.xml
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2004/08/23 18:49:59
Modified:modules/generators mod_cgi.c
Log:
Escape bytes returned by the errfn because it might be from an untrusted
source
Could you ifndef AP_UNSAFE_ERROR_LOG_UNESCAPED it for those who don't want it?
nd
--
Gib' mal
* Shaun Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This isn't about the source code but I thought this could be useful to
somebody on here.
Please find attached a number of files (in tar.gz) that I have made to
help improve the Apache HTTP Server website.
This improvement uses validated XHTML, CSS
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ nd: oops... This already went into the include recursion stopper
+ backport. Any objections? ;-)
I'm very sorry for this accident.
If we get another +1, this entry can be deleted...
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
[EMAIL
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Shouldn't we still set Vary: Accept-Encoding if no-gzip is set?
Hmmm, makes sense. +1
Nope. mod_deflate doesn't know whether it depends on the request (more than
the URL).
Location /foo
SetEnv no-gzip
* Mathihalli, Madhusudan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: It might make sense to increase the compile-time default
: while retaining 8k as the config-file default. (But this
: would probably require changing the name of the constant to
: avoid confusing people.)
It's precisely what I was
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working backwards and allowing a little time for slip:
Nov 1: Planned final RC tarball for release of 2.2.0
Oct 1: Code freeze of all new features in 2.1-dev (for a month till we
branch head to 2.2.0 and bless HEAD as 2.3-dev)
* Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question to backport is IMO more political then technological. The users
will switch to 2.1/2.2 no mater if the ASF artificially 'hides' the
technology from 2.0. Of course the pragmatism will make a 2.0 alive for
couple of years (as well as 1.3), but
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurs to me that a similar situation arises with CGI and chunked
input. The CGI spec guarantees a content-length header,
ah, no.
| * CONTENT_LENGTH
|
| The length of the said content as given by the client.
That's rather, *if* the client says
* Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, August 7, 2004, at 01:17 PM, André Malo wrote:
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurs to me that a similar situation arises with CGI and chunked
input. The CGI spec guarantees a content-length header,
ah, no.
| *
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
A CGI script therefore should never trust Content-Length, but just read
stdin until it meets an EOF.
That is well-known to fail in CGI. A CGI must use Content-Length.
Hmm. any pointers where this
* Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A CGI script therefore should never trust Content-Length, but just
read
stdin until it meets an EOF.
That is well-known to fail in CGI. A CGI must use Content-Length.
Hmm. any pointers where this is specified? I didn't have any problems
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niq 2004/08/02 04:28:04
Modified:docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in
Log:
Fix Bug 22684 and add some additional charsets.
Provides a better workaround for Bug 23421.
Now we have your additional charsets twice...
nd
--
Winnetous Erbe:
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Andr_ Malo wrote:
Now we have your additional charsets twice...
Erk! So we do. I guess the best fix is just another update to chop the
duplicates?
Sounds like a good idea ;-)
nd
--
Das Verhalten von Gates hatte mir
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niq 2004/08/02 05:23:44
Modified:docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in
Log:
Remove duplicate AddCharsets (both old and new:-)
I'm sorry to nitpick again... Though I have no personal experience with this
kind of case sensitivy, I think we should respect
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our shipping with AddDefaultCharset preconfigured is causing lots of
pages to be served with a bogus charset, typically where authors
rely on meta http-equiv ... and either don't know how to fix it
or lack permission.
*shrug*, removing AddDefaultCharset
* Marten Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working with Apache 1.3.29 and while testing with a self-build
http-client, I noticed that Apache doesn't respond correctly according
to the accept-encoding header. The RFCs say, that if the Accept-Encoding
header is empty or if Accept-Encoding
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to process apache logs to find the total of transferred data for
each member. The files are large and downloads are often stopped and
resumed, downloaded in segments, etc...
I noticed that %b directive in CustomLog *should* mean Bytes sent,
excluding
* Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great idea, Nick.
By the way: Is it possible to integrate it with mod_rewrite, of course
after extending mod_rewrite a little? This may save us the need to
invent new directives (e.g. FilterProvider, FilterDispatche, etc.).
After all, mod_rewrite has
* Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:19 PM +0200 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the old outdated NCSA config directives? We add and add and add code --
which is not actually bad. But where's the man with the broom?
Sounds a like job for
* Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
/* Scoreboard file, if there is one */
#ifndef DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@
typedef struct {
int server_limit;
int thread_limit;
+int
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
And in fine if we could have proxy_ajp included in Apache 2.x
distribution, we'll a great step in Apache2/Tomcat integration,
which should be a goal for ASF members we are.
Having proxy_ajp included in httpd v2.0 would be a
* Manni Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having proxy_ajp included in httpd v2.0 would be a good thing - there is
a base of users for it (with it's more advanced handling of things like
indicating secure connections, etc it's useful).
Hmm. I'd include rather in tomcat distribution than
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[replying to multiple posts]
André Malo wrote:
Having proxy_ajp included in httpd v2.0 would be a good thing - there is
a base of users for it (with it's more advanced handling of things like
indicating secure connections, etc it's useful).
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+f-ctx = ctx = (void*)-1;
I personally consider defining arbitrary pointer values as bad style, though
I'm not sure what the general opinion here is (if any).
I'd suggest to use a static pointer, like a global
static char foo_sentinel; /* choose a speaking
* Craig Woodford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These remarks are in reference to source code published at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/developer/request.html.
switch (ap_satisfies(r)) {
case SATISFY_ALL:
case SATISFY_NOSPEC:
...
Seems to me the case for SATISFY_ALL does nothing useful.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:.CHANGES
docs/manual/mod core.xml
include http_config.h http_core.h httpd.h
server config.c core.c request.c
Log:
Added 'AllowOverride Options=Indexes,MultiViews' to give an admin better
* Jean-Jacques Clar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: core.c
+char *w = strsep(p, ,);
strsep() seems to be platform dependant. That function does not
exist on NetWare, and I don't think it exists on Windows.
It should at least be made an APR function.
Uh, oh, right. There's
* Geoffrey Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can somebody just take a quick look at this backport patch to verify that
I'm doing the minor bump properly?
looks fine.
nd
--
sub the($){+shift} sub answer (){ord q
[* It is always 42! *] }
print the answer
# André Malo #
* Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for something like this - as I've had to manually hack things like this
in more than once to wack something like a broken Oracle/Orian SSO back in
line. However please make it general and either add it as a second
directive or have something
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(If this gets the thumbs up, I'll be happy to do the work:-)
In testing new code, it's often helpful to simulate different
browser requests, and responses.
For handlers and filters, mod_headers enables us to set up testcases
very easily, with the
* Kenneth Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the event someone hasn't already pointed this out, there doesn't appear
to be patch for CAN-2004-0488 (buffer overrun in mod_ssl) in Apache 2.0.50
as indicated on http://httpd.apache.org.
I quote:
This Announcement notes the significant
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, if you're going to be that way then consider my simple Win32 patch to
fix reporting of proper error by spawnl(), which needs another +1 :)
(see thread [1.3 PATCH] restore failing errno for Win32 spawn errors on
this list)
+1 from me for that
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
niq 2004/06/28 23:37:21
Modified:modules/proxy mod_proxy.c mod_proxy.h proxy_http.c
proxy_util.c
Log:
Fix for multiple proxy bugs - review please:
#10722 Reverse proxying cookies
#15207 Proxy passing
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:14 PM 7/2/2004, you wrote:
I'm floating the idea of releasing 1.3.32 shortly...
Comments or thoughts?
Let me get the mutex protection into mod_rewrite after this holiday
weekend - win32 1.3 mod_rewrite users can finally be happy :)
To
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enable AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK for BS2000
I'm not sure, if this is a good idea. The idea behind this define was to
make the enabling explicit, because of the security implications...
Oh well, Martin noted me, that the
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enable AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK for BS2000
I'm not sure, if this is a good idea. The idea behind this define was to
make the enabling explicit, because of the security implications...
nd
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC1) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
It's 2.1-dev.
nd
--
Das einzige, das einen Gebäudekollaps (oder auch einen
thermonuklearen Krieg)
* Jean-Jacques Clar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick: is minor mmn bump needed to reflect that API structure
was extended? Should the mmn be bumped up or not?Minor bump is to inform
developers that something has changed that they should be aware of. What
else?Will people that are more
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If Apache adds new field to end of request_rec, that is minor bump, correct?
Existing modules should continue to work unchanged but modules can choose to
look at MMN at compile time to see they are being built to work with newer
Apache and can look at
* Rajesh Munikuntla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list, Redhat is de-supporting Stronghold on Solaris
servers from next year. We use lot of Dynamo modules
configured in Apache, Anyone know a Vendor who
supports Apache?.
The is not the right place to ask. Please address this question to a user
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to confirm - are docs changes subject to RTC?
No.
nd
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*) mod_headers: Backport ErrorHeader directive (regression from 1.3)
modules/metadata/mod_headers.c: r1.44, 1.45, 1.51
+1: nd, trawick
+ 0: bnicholes
+ ErrorHeader seems to be confusing since the defined header
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A patch against 2.1 is attached. What do you think?
...
nd
--
I have tried using ErrorDocument 401, but doesn't work.
^
Oh dear. What does it do - lounge around on the couch all day drinking
beer and
* Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there is a proposal to backport this directive to the 2.0 branch,
would it make more sense to rename it to something else and avoid the
confusion before it is backported? It just seems a little strange to be
getting an error header back
* Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If an ErrorHeader is defined, shouldn't it only be included on
non-200 http responses (ie. only on 3xx,4xx,5xx responses as the
documentation states)?
No. The documentation states:
| This directive can replace, merge or remove HTTP response headers
* Andrew Boyce-Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering why the include directive does not allow wildcard
constructions in the directory path. For example, 'include
/etc/httpd/*/*.conf' will not work and will produce the error wildcard
patterns not allowed in Include
However
* Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
one of the recurring issues we've seen is with people who
want rotatelogs to do its thing at midnight *local* time.
easily enough done with the offset argument -- but that
gets messy around the daylight
* David Burry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we could use a new module that allows efficient on-the-fly
config parameter changes without restarting any processes? Kind of like
a config server that you connect to and issue commands that add and
remove apache directives, at least most of
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that apache-1.3 is moving to SVN, how about moving httpd-2.x
as well?
IMHO we should finish the 1.3-move first, look how it does, how the developers
deal with it and then think about moving 2.x :-)
nd
--
Da fällt mir ein, wieso gibt es eigentlich
* Joseph Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...Are the different tag directories necessarry or optional? Not that
every private tag gets its own...
in subversion, tag == copy.
this is probably the biggest conceptual difference between subversion
and
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's only one thing for us to decide; how to define the layout
under httpd/ in the SVN repository.
e.g.
.../
httpd/
trunk/
branches/
1.3.x/
2.0.x/
tags/
2.0.49/
...
* Jean-Jacques Clar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Jacques Clar 5/18/2004 10:57:40 AM
Just replaced tabs with spaces and reworked indentation within
brackets.
If no objections will commit later.
Just commit it to 2.1 (No need to ask for that). But please not to 2.0 or 1.3.
ezmlm-reject:
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose that the apache-1.3 tree be migrated over
to subversion.
I'm +1 on it.
nd
--
Real programmers confuse Christmas and Halloween because
DEC 25 = OCT 31. -- Unknown
(found in ssl_engine_mutex.c)
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The URL has been posted on slashdot :-(
:-( I'd say, let's move it away. It's not released yet. period.
nd
--
print Just Another Perl Hacker;
# André Malo, http://pub.perlig.de/ #
* Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it bad if people download the RC version and
test it?
Frankly, I really don't mind if slashdot or anyone
else broadcasts that we have an RC tarball available.
Our traffic fee does anyway. RC stuff in /dev/dist/ is not mirrored.
nd
--
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 03:05:45PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2004/05/05 09:29:59
Index: STATUS
*) Readd suexec setuid and user check (now APR supports it)
os/unix/unixd.c: r1.69
* Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
7. Elegance.
I tend to disagree.
XML configuration is not elegant. Especially when you need to start quoting
shell stuff and regexps for XML.
XML configs are huge. This will blow up a typical 8k configuration file at
least to 32k or more.
XML is slow and
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind the application I am thinking about is not webserver
that's trying to be a fileserver, but rather a fileserver that just
happens to use the DAV protocol. I don't see the security risks of
running Apache as root as being any different
In ap_directory_walk in server/request.c there are some points of failure,
which look like:
return r-status = res;
or
return r-status = HTTP_FORBIDDEN;
Why is that? (It's not in 1.3). Is it to avoid recursion (errodocument needs a
directory walk, too)?
The point is - it leads to strange
* Peter Van Biesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I removed the index.jsp from my DirectoryIndex and added it everywhere
I know there's one, so now it all seems to work, but I'm wondering :
is this a bug in the 2.0.46 or in the 2.0.49 ? Or should I change
something in my configuration ?
Not that I
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:51:50PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -200,10 +202,11 @@
*) mod_dav: Send an EOS at the end of the multistatus brigade.
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:.CHANGES
server core.c
Log:
accept URLs as ServerAdmin contact. If it's not recognized as an URL,
assume an email address and prepend it with mailto: in server outputs.
Careful with this, since I
* Sumeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[internal redirects in output filters]
Yes, I also find it unsafe. However, note that some standard modules do
that too. For example mod_include runs sub-requests from within its
output filters. In my opinion this shouldn't be allowed, because with
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
somehow I doubt there will be any problems at all getting it approved, but
nobody acted as a champion thus far and asked for approval themselves
In fact, I've thought it was by intention, because of the APR 1.0 atomic
calls ;-)
nd
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
somehow I doubt there will be any problems at all getting it approved, but
nobody acted as a champion thus far and asked for approval themselves
In fact, I've thought it was by
* Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Vincent Deffontaines wrote:
As this seems quite simple to implement, here is my question : would a
patch implementing env vars in RequestHeader be accepted?
I would support that patch.
Since you're new to this list, you'll have
* Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
Didn't we decide in the move to 2.0 that all directives would take an
argument?
Maybe I wasn't paying attention.
Win32DisableAcceptex seems to work just by being present in the
config with no argument.
True.
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: Why are we involved in this at all? Wouldn't people publishing
in these languages know much more about the relevant character sets and
the filename extensions that they want to use? Can't we just remove all
of these from httpd.conf (except
* Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your going to be forcing people to install some other piece of software.
while this might be fine for a lot of people, some won't or can't.
Some IDE's don't have SVN support yet, and some people have to deal with
sysadmins who think redhat 5.2 is
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook docs. Please put them
also into the next tag.
Thanks!
nd
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:02, André Malo wrote:
* Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
Please inform us of any problems you encounter. Thanks,
I'm going to backport the enableexceptionhook
* The Doctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you try running 'buildconf' from the top of the tree and see
if you get the same problem after that?
Tell me how and I will do it.
In the top src dir is a script 'buildconf'. You just run it before your
configure run. You need autoconf and
* Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:04:09PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project
codebase to the Subversion repository at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/.
-1
This will, at least for now,
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
