On Feb 5, 2008 1:45 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Caching experts -- why do memcache and diskcache have seemingly quite
different caching strategies when it comes to storing the headers ?
E.g. the cache_object_t * is populated with the status/date/etc data
in memcache -
On 6/27/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, do you know offhand what the difference is between the
perl-framework, and perl.apache.org's Apache::Test framework? I'm
familiar with the latter, and have found it to be an amazing tool for
testing Apache modules written in all
On 5/17/07, Akins, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Had a couple hours while on vacation after reading PiL. This makes
connection, server, and apr_table into real lua modules. I also separated
out the code and started playing with getters and setters.
I like the idea of doing the function
On 5/9/07, Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
currently from what I see we use:
Apache 2.0.x - has to use APR 0.9.x
Apache 2.2.x - has to use APR 1.2.x
Apache 2.3.x - has to use APR 1.3.x
is this now a mandatory relationship, or is it valid to:
build Apache 2.2.x with APR 1.3.x
On 5/2/07, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+If compiling (make) reports an error that it cannot find the
+libapreq2 header file, please tell me ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
+as
On 4/30/07, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patch to add information on building, running tests, and organize the
README into some actual docu.
+1, looks like a big improvement.
-garrett
On 2/14/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This proposed list of requirements for a 3.0 platform. this list enables
a 'base' level of performance and design decisions to be made. If others
can make designs work with 'lessor' requirements, all the better, but
I'm not worried about it.
On 2/14/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Rewrite how Brigades, Buckets and filters work. Possibly replace them
with other models. I haven't been able to personally consolidate my
thoughts on how to 'fix' filters, but I am sure we can plenty of long
threads about it :-)
I think a
On 2/14/07, Greg Marr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:33 AM 2/14/2007, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 2/14/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This proposed list of requirements for a 3.0 platform. this list
enables
a 'base' level of performance and design decisions to be made. If
others
can make
On 2/14/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dumb Question: Would all this mean a total(?) rewrite of APR as well?
A total rewrite of APR seems unlikely, but if there are changes people
want made to APR in order to better support new functionality in HTTPD
I don't see why it wouldn't
On 2/2/07, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a need to write a generic way to integrate apr_memcache into httpd.
Basically, I have several otehr modules taht use memcached as backend and want
to combine the boring stuff into a central place, ie configuration, stats,
etc. We talked a
On 12/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sun Dec 24 14:54:49 2006
New Revision: 490083
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=490083
Log:
Follow Garrett's example and provide a crypto notice in the README,
with specific details for removing the
On 12/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fielding
Date: Sun Dec 24 15:32:15 2006
New Revision: 490086
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=490086
Log:
BIS Notice for TSU exception
Note that this still needs to be registered with export-registry.xml
and the
On 11/26/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is a vote to import mod_wombat under the httpd pmc.
mod_wombat is currently located at:
http://svn.i-want-a-pony.com/repos/wombat/trunk/
If the vote passes, mod_wombat will fill out the
On 11/20/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to see wombat enter the ASF, but as an httpd-sponsored incubation
project. My question is, if we are punting mod_python out to a TLP, and
mod_perl is already a TLP -
On 11/8/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts?
Big +1 from me, although you probably saw that coming ;-)
Seriously though, I want to see mod_lua here at the ASF eventually. I
had originally thought of it as a good example of a labs type project
(assuming that labs.apache.org
On 11/8/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. I had thought it would be a good labs project, but as there is
already outside interest, I think a lab wouldn't be the right path
for it.
I figured as much. If there are people who aren't yet ASF committers
of some sort who are
On 10/2/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a bunch of new bug reports[1], detailing bugs of the form
if ((rv = do_something(args) == APR_SUCCESS))
for
if ((rv = do_something(args)) == APR_SUCCESS)
Of course, that's a C classic, and can be a *** to spot.
We can avoid this
On 9/29/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:15:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/generators/mod_cgi.c Thu Sep 28 13:15:42 2006
@@ -837,6 +837,11 @@
On 9/29/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 28 September 2006 18:29, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/28/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with DAV + SSL hardware.
It appears to be the issue described in
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-03/0549.shtml
On 9/28/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a problem with DAV + SSL hardware.
It appears to be the issue described in
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-03/0549.shtml
It seems to me that the ability to rewrite a request header
will fix that. As a generic fix, I've patched
On 9/25/06, snacktime [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have very little C programming experience, but I've decided to
tackle adding another load balancing method to mod_proxy_balancer.
The reason for a new lbmethod is to have something that works nicely
with ruby on rails. Both ruby and rails are not
On 9/25/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I've added the 'busy' struct element which
could be used for that... The orig intent was to add
the mod_jk busyness LB method, but it would also
serve as a flag that the member is busy ;)
As of now, neither Trunk or 2.2.x do anything
On 9/25/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After having a look in the code I am just wondering why we do not have any
locks around when changing this shared data / do not use atomics when increasing
e.g the value for the number of read bytes (worker-s-read). Is this correct?
That's a
On 9/19/06, Davi Arnaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove duplicated defines.
Applied in r448226. Thanks,
-garrett
On 9/7/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Topic for discussion: Add the FCGI proxy module to
the 2.2.x distro?
I'm split on the issue. On one hand, I'd like to have some evidence
that someone has actually used it in anger and it didn't blow up on
them. On the other hand I doubt
On 9/7/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Topic for discussion: Add the FCGI proxy module to
the 2.2.x distro?
I personally would like to get the local-process spawning done first, or
has everyone pretty much given up on ever doing that?
I don't personally plan on
On 7/31/06, Guy Hulbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 13:54 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Guy Hulbert wrote:
That's the ultimate case, after all :-)
Not necessarily. Google's answer is to throw tons of hardware at
stuff.
The point of contention was scalability ... from a
On 7/20/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I can't change the log entry anymore. All I can do is adjust the CHANGES
entry. Would that address your concerns?
Actually you can change the log entry. Try 'svn pedit --revprop -r REVISION'
-garrett
On 7/14/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 14:16, Joe Orton wrote:
This introduced compiler warnings:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
mod_proxy.c: In function `proxy_interpolate':
mod_proxy.c:427: warning: passing arg 1 of `ap_strstr' discards qualifiers
On 7/12/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since this morning, apr-util (trunk) is refusing to build:
Making all in apr-util
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `.make.dirs', needed by
`buckets/apr_brigade.lo'. Stop.
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: ***
On 7/4/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear, AFAIK, there was never a patch for mod_mbox -- it was a
Ruby file that only solved part of the problem. Again, AFAIK, no one
ever wrote a patch in C for mod_mbox to attempt to resolve this issue.
I offered. The response was, and I
On 7/4/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 7/4/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear, AFAIK, there was never a patch for mod_mbox -- it was a
Ruby file that only solved part of the problem. Again, AFAIK, no one
ever wrote a patch in C for mod_mbox
On 6/16/06, Shanti Subramanyam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Mads.
I've re-generated the PATCH with the Studio URL :
--- README.platformsFri Jun 16 13:58:10 2006
+++ README.platforms.orig Thu Jun 15 13:13:50 2006
@@ -95,12 +95,4 @@
On 6/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
One thing that seems odd, it looks like Makefile.win is still copying
docs/conf/httpd-win.conf to conf/httpd.conf.default, isn't the goal of
the previous changes to get a massaged version of httpd-std.conf.in
On 6/5/06, Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 01.06.2006, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Plüm, Rüdiger, VF
EITO:
As far as I remember there had been also a discussion on who owns a brigade.
So who has to call / should not call apr_brigade_destroy / apr_brigade_cleanup
in the
On 6/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
It looks like the trunk version of httpd has been busted on win32 ever
since the big authz refactoring in r368027. I'd be happy to make the
changes to get it working again, if someone would be so kind as to
point
On 6/1/06, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed May 31 22:42:13 2006
New Revision: 410761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=410761view=rev
Log:
That's the point, isn't it? All mpm's in one basket?
On 5/26/06, Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I need a specification that tells me what a filter must/should and must
not/should not do. Is there something alike?
My actual problem is that I have a filter that if nothing was modified
drops all content, sets f-r-status to 304 and sends
It looks like the trunk version of httpd has been busted on win32 ever
since the big authz refactoring in r368027. I'd be happy to make the
changes to get it working again, if someone would be so kind as to
point me to some sort of documentation on how exactly one goes from
The old way to The
On 5/25/06, Schwenker, Stephen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade a 3rd party module from 2.0 to 2.2 and I'm getting the
following errors. Can anyone help me figure out what the issue is? I'm not
sure where to start.
Thank you,
Steve.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2
On 5/13/06, Markus Schiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of r-uri == r-path_info, ap_add_cgi_vars sets SCRIPT_NAME to
PHP needs this one for backreference and http://cgi-spec.golux.com
states
it must be set.
An empty r-path_info (manually patched) would give me a SCRIPT_NAME
but removes
On 5/19/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone an idea why at least the httpd lists do not get refreshed any more in
the mod_mbox
archive on mail-archives.apache.org? The latest entries e.g. for
bugs@httpd.apache.org are
rather old.
Yeah, that was noticed yesterday, and
So I've got this module that works as an input filter. It sits in
front of mod_dav_svn and parses incoming REPORT requests, and when it
determines that something is wrong it sets r-status and
r-status_line and errors out by returning APR_EGENERAL.
In HTTPD 2.0.x this works as I expect, the
On 5/10/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There a few choices for what to do in the oom handler: 1.3 fprintf's to
stderr, then does exit(1), which doesn't seem particularly wise since
fprintf can itself malloc; could do similarly, could just exit(1) or
even just exit(APEXIT_CHILDSICK); but
On 5/10/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:53:50AM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I would personally prefer abort to exit...
is write()'ing a static error message an option too?
Perhaps, but where would you write() to?
-garrett
On 5/10/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:11:27AM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 5/10/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:53:50AM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I would personally prefer abort to exit...
is write
On 5/10/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:22:25AM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Which is likely to be redirected to /dev/null in most cases...
We redirect standard error to the main error log :) See ap_open_logs in
server/log.c :-) httpd -E also causes
On 4/22/06, Markus Schiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry it took me so long to get back to this. Got distracted with
other things, etc.
From my limited perspective r-filename should be set to
/opt/www/html/i.php
Any ideas?
mod_proxy_fcgi is talking to an arbitrary socket that could
On 5/8/06, Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
just had a report in debian that test/zb.c's license doesn't necessarily
allow you to modify and redistribute the code. A quick grep around doesn't
reveal any uses of this code in our tree, and given that we have
support/ab.c it seems strange to
On 5/8/06, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found on http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=80572view=rev
Does an archive of that apache-core mailing list mentioned above exist?
Yes, it does. The first few years of archives of the httpd pmc
mailing list are actually the archives of the
On 5/7/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, what about a platform that HAS_PTHREAD_KILL, but which uses some
other form of threading in its APR (isn't that at least an option on some
FreeBSD versions?) Wouldn't this break horribly when it pthread_kills a
non-pthread? Couldn't it even
On 5/7/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 23:07, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 5/7/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, what about a platform that HAS_PTHREAD_KILL, but which uses some
other form of threading in its APR (isn't that at least an option on some
On 4/28/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 03:44:07AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rooneg
Date: Fri Apr 21 20:44:05 2006
New Revision: 396063
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396063view=rev
Log:
Merge the fcgi-proxy-dev branch to trunk, adding
On 4/19/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
future.
Since everyone seems to be in favor of merging it I went ahead
On 4/19/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
of it being backported to 2.2.x and some not-too-distant
future.
Comments?
+1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to
On 4/19/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
I think that the Proxy FastCGI module is at a point where
we should consider folding it into trunk, with the hope
of it being backported to 2.2.x and some
On 4/19/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:06:56AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually
using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at
this point I'm not sure it
On 4/16/06, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google is about to start it's summer of code project
what does this mean for HTTP/APR ?
we need:
- mentors
I'd be willing to help mentor.
and
- project ideas.
A few ideas:
in APR:
- Improve the build system so that it can generate
On 4/17/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -0400, Rian A Hunter wrote:
I think a SoC project that profiles Apache (and finds out where we
fall short) so that we are able to compete with other lightweight HTTP
servers popping up these days would
On 4/17/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I suspect that a significant problem with this sort of project will be
lack of proper hardware for benchmarking purposes. From everything
I've heard it's not all that hard
On 4/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/src/smtp_util.c (original)
+++ httpd/mod_smtpd/trunk/src/smtp_util.c Mon Apr 3 09:40:17 2006
@@ -76,15 +76,17 @@
smtpd_run_on_reset_envelope(scr);
smtpd_clear_envelope_rec(scr);
}
-
+#if 0
On 4/1/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Topic for discussion: merge mod_proxy_fcgi into trunk...
I think we're pretty close...
+1
There are a number of improvements I'd like to make eventually
(fcgistarter needs a good way to let you signal the running fcgi
processes to restart or
On 3/31/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems this can be trivially solved by ensuring we defer this test until
after we invoke the sub-configure of apr and apr-util.
Comments?
Makes sense to me.
-garrett
On 3/31/06, Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could someone commit?
Committed in r390506, thanks.
-garrett
On 3/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ **
+ ** Version 2.3
+ ** SIGINT now triggers output_results().
+ ** Conributed by colm, March 30, 2006
You're missing a t in contributed.
-garrett
On 3/28/06, Rian A Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there is apr_sockaddr_info_get but this doesn't handle getting mx
records
(or other DNS record types). Should a resolver API be added to APR.
Actually I
think yes and I think I'm going to implement this. Any objections?
A resolver
On 3/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c Thu Mar 9 10:39:16 2006
@@ -218,6 +218,26 @@
}
}
}
+else if (!strcasecmp(key, ajpflushpackets)) {
On 3/7/06, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean there, in particular what you mean by 'assumes
that you can make multiple connections to back end fastcgi processes'
What I'm familiar with is apache 1.x with mod_fcgi. In that case, the
typical fastcgi program does
On 3/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the whole issue revolves around whether the balancer
should, or should not, pre-open connections and manage them
internally, or whether it should be one-shot. The real
power is being able to load balance, and implement
that in a
On 3/6/06, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
[snip]
Also, we tend to run most of our fastcgi's using a domain socket. I'm
sure others do that as well.
True, but that's actually fairly simple to implement. I've got a
scheme for making that work under proxy already
On 3/6/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I think the whole issue revolves around whether the balancer
should, or should not, pre-open connections and manage them
internally, or whether it should be one-shot. The real
power is being able to load
On 3/6/06, Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, we tend to run most of our fastcgi's using a domain socket. I'm
sure others do that as well.
Isn't that very unreliable?
Why should Unix domain sockets be unreliable?
Yeah, that's my question as well. Quite a few
On 3/6/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We actually have a way to do that, it's the close_on_recycle flag, and
I had to turn it on in order to get anything approaching reliability
for fastcgi. The problem with
On 3/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 3/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the whole issue revolves around whether the balancer
should, or should not, pre-open connections and manage them
internally, or whether it should be one
On 3/6/06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
von Garrett Rooney
Exactly, the pool of available backends needs to be managed globally,
which we don't currently have and it's not clear if that ability would
be useful outside of fastcgi.
But as connection pools are per worker
On 3/6/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 3/6/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
See, the issue for fastcgi isn't controlling persistence, persistent
connections are fine as long as you're actually making use
So, predictably, now that we've gotten mod_proxy_fcgi to the point
where it's actualy able to run real applications I'm starting to
question some basic assumptions we made when we started out along this
course.
The general idea was that we want to be able to get content from some
fastcgi
So I've been trying to make Rails work with mod_proxy_fcgi (since the
whole point of writing mod_proxy_fcgi was to make it easier to use
rails/django type web apps with httpd, and I'm more of a Ruby person
than a Python person), and I think I've made enough progress that it's
worth sharing with
On 3/4/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing more than this may or may not work. For example, if you use
rails scaffolding to create a model, view, and controller for some
object you'll be able to view some pages, but some will hang. Oddly,
clicking on links that direct you
On 2/14/06, System Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to recompile some modules from Apache 2.0 to use under 2.2.0,
and get the following:
In file included from /usr/local/apache2/include/ap_config.h:25,
from /usr/local/apache2/include/httpd.h:43,
On 2/4/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Historically, different platforms have different signal semantics.
I need to set up a signal handler. The primary targets are
Linux and Solaris, but I'd much prefer cross-platform. And I'd
like it to be MPM-agnostic in httpd, though the prime
On 2/2/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally vpath + symlink builds were broken, there is a set of patches
over on http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/ named fixbuild-n.n.patch where
-n.n is -2.0 -0.9, -2.2 -1.2, and -2.3 1.3 for the corresponding
httpd and apr-util
On 2/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ttmod_smtpd/tt started it's life as a 2005 Google Summer of Code
project
+taken on by strongRian Hunter/strong and strongJem Berkes/strong
with
+mentors strongNick Kew/strong and strongPaul Querna/strong. It
continues
+
On 2/1/06, Rian Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mod_smtpd needs a bouncing mechanism! I need some help with this
because I am not sure how to approach this. Should I implement an
entire SMTP client in mod_smtpd to bounce messages? Should I relegate
this responsibility to a sendmail command or
On 1/14/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix handle_headers so that it works when the \r\n\r\n is split into
two of the FastCGI records, or when a FastCGI uses \n\n without the
\r's.
This is done as of r371428.
-garrett
On 1/19/06, André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Branko Čibej wrote:
You're confusing the content of the SVN repository and hook scripts
stored on the local filesystem. Paths in the first are always encoded in
UTF-8. The latter naturally have to obey the server's locale.
I don't think
Is there any particular reason that httpd never does the
'setlocale(LC_ALL, );' magic necessary to get libc to respect the
various locale related environment variables? As far as I can tell,
despite system settings for locale (i.e. /etc/sysconfig/i18n on RHEL)
httpd always runs with a locale of
On 1/18/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:17:30AM -0800, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Is there any particular reason that httpd never does the
'setlocale(LC_ALL, );' magic necessary to get libc to respect the
various locale related environment variables? As far
On 1/18/06, André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Garrett Rooney wrote:
The specific problem I'm trying to fix is that mod_dav_svn fails to
run a pre-lock hook script when you try to lock a filename with double
byte characters. It never even gets to the point of trying to run the
script
On 1/16/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rooneg
Date: Sun Jan 15 15:47:19 2006
New Revision: 369283
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369283view=rev
Log:
Update svn:ignore properties so that generated files from a win32 VC++
On 1/15/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Need a way to use a unix domain socket or a pipe instead of a TCP socket.
Isn't this a filter problem?
mod_proxy in theory should not care that the source is a socket beyond
maybe knowing to insert the right filter
While playing around with httpd on win32 today, I noticed a small
warning in mod_usertrack.c.
cls-expires = modifier;
The problem here is that modifier is a time_t, and cls-expires is an
int, and Visual C++ Express 2005 is unthrilled about the possibility
for data loss there.
I threw
So I played around with getting HTTPD to build on a windows machine
today, using only the freely available Express version of Visual C++
that Microsoft released a little while back. It works, basically, but
it's not nearly as easy as it should be, for a few reasons.
The major problems is that
Just in case other people want to jump in and fix things, here's a
list of stuff I think needs to be done in order to make httpd +
mod_proxy_fcgi a good replacement for the current popular fcgi
solutions (httpd 1.3.x and mod_fcgi and lighttpd + it's fcgi module).
Note that this is split up into
On 1/13/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
r368730 encodes Rüdiger's name using UTF-8 in CHANGES.
When I look at it, I see junk in my default tools. I also see junk
when viewing it in viewcvs.cgi, which reports it as iso-8859-1.
Is that just a viewcvs bug and my local setup, or is there
On 1/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/aaa/config.m4 (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/aaa/config.m4 Fri Jan 13 16:13:22 2006
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
dnl keep the bad guys out.
APACHE_MODULE(authz_default, authorization control backstopper, ,
On 9/9/05, Daniel L. Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a code-clarity improvement only.
* server/request.c
(ap_process_request_internal): Check the return value of hook
functions against the constant OK -- defined in httpd.conf as
Module has handled this stage -- instead of
On 1/9/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With that in mind, does anyone object to the following patch?
Well, since nobody jumped up and down screaming NO, NO, DON'T DO IT
I committed this in r367906.
-garrett
As we get further into implementing this stuff, it seems more and more
silly to have more than one scheme for fastcgi. Any non-tcp mechanism
is going to require more info than we can easily get out of the URL
anyway, since we're already using the path portion of the URL for
calculating the
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
