: Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 6:36:51 AM
Subject: Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA
On 9/19/2011 8:42 PM, Keith Mashinter wrote:
Just a reminder about this, providing a way to phase out a server
by only accepting existing sessions
On 9/19/2011 8:42 PM, Keith Mashinter wrote:
Just a reminder about this, providing a way to phase out a server
by only accepting existing sessions/routed requests.
|51247|New|Enh|2011-05-23|Enhance mod_proxy and _balancer with worker
status
Jim did add this feature as indicated in that
Thanks, I'll try it out.
\|/- Keith Mashinter kmash...@yahoo.com
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:36:51
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA
On 9/19/2011 8:42 PM, Keith
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
- mod_lbmethod_bybusyness
- mod_lbmethod_byrequests
- mod_lbmethod_bytraffic
Do we really need full doccos for these sub modules?
No matter what, these would be easy to do since mod_proxy
and mod_proxy_balancer pretty much
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
Those two were mainly provided by Jean-Frederic (AFAIR).
I think these were Pauls…
- mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
As was this.
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
- mpm_simple
mpm_simple likely to get dropped for 2.4, see our main STATUS file
I hope to spent some time diving into mod_simple… I have some
uncommitted patches that I need to re-look at.
On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:58 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:17 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
- mod_lbmethod_bybusyness
- mod_lbmethod_byrequests
- mod_lbmethod_bytraffic
Do we really need full doccos for these sub modules?
No matter what, these would be easy to do
case to bring the functionality to the 2.2.x
stream for people to enjoy sooner rather than later.
\|/- Keith Mashinter
kmash...@yahoo.com
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 9:00:44 AM
Subject: Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA
On Sep 18
I think the windows accept filter issue is a real blocker. The only
alternative would be to release 2.4.0 without official support for
Windows.
I took a look at this in the AM, and it looks like the acceptfilter
none path is relying on data set only by AcceptEX (context-buffer) to
fill in
On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one.
Could you enumerate what you feel is lacking
On Sep 18, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the
On 19.09.2011 00:17, Rich Bowen wrote:
My current list is:
- mod_serf
mod_serf likely to get dropped for 2.4, see our main STATUS file
- mod_watchdog
Mainly written by Mladen, so maybe he can provide a few pointers
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:52:34 +0200
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
Not sure about socache, but docs are definitely needed, because you need
socache for mod_ssl session cache (which we also
On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
Not sure about socache, but docs are definitely needed, because you need
socache for mod_ssl session cache (which we also need to mention int the
mod_ssl
On 19.09.2011 01:37, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
- mod_socache_dbm
- mod_socache_memcache
- mod_socache_shmcb
Not sure about socache, but docs are definitely needed, because you need
socache for mod_ssl session cache (which we
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one.
Could you enumerate what you feel is lacking in the documentation? I know of
several modules that
support of the Windows x64 versions of httpd-2.4.x is very
important.
Regards,
Bing
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA
On Thursday 15 September 2011, Jeff
Accept filter issue is also with Vista+ 32/64
- Original Message -
From: Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: Pushing for httpd 2.4.0 GA
Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com] wrote on 发送时间: 2011年9月16日 3:46
I agree that it shouldn't be a blocker… I agree it would
Be Nice if it was bundled… Let me look at fcgid and
see what the current status is.
On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. I plan on adding
doccos for the ones that are currently lacking, but the
question is what to do about mod_fcgid… What's the best
way to accomplish folding
Hi,
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one.
What is about the Windows AcceptFilter issues?[1]
Greetz
Mario
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1155061
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. I plan on adding
doccos for the ones that are currently lacking, but the
On 9/15/2011 8:37 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one.
What is about the Windows AcceptFilter issues?[1]
With the security issues resolved, I'll look at this after a short
holiday for recuperation.
On Thursday 15 September 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I plan on push for a GA in Oct (of this year)…
The only 2 showstoppers I see as reasonable are the
documentation ones and the mod_fcgid one. I plan on adding
doccos for the ones that are currently lacking, but the
question is what to
24 matches
Mail list logo
