There is a PR (43472, http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43472)
that the test in is_socket_connected in proxy_util.c whether a backend
connection
is still alive or not does not work. I created a patch that seems to fix the
issue
on Solaris 9 (according to the reporter) and on
Oh buggers... Yep. apr_poll in most impls returns APR_TIMEUP
if the time limit expires (since poll returns 0).
Can't test on Windows...
On Sep 26, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
There is a PR (43472, http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
show_bug.cgi?id=43472)
that the test in
I'd like for us to consider a release of 2.2.7 in October
to address the Windows file handle issues as well
some other fixes that would be useful to get out quickly...
We really need to fix this issue of inappropriate DefaultTypes.
An approach that deals with this without loss of back-compatibility
is to hand the decision to systems administrators:
#to suppress setting content-type when the server has no information
DefaultType !
Any thoughts on this and the
On 9/26/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need to fix this issue of inappropriate DefaultTypes.
An approach that deals with this without loss of back-compatibility
is to hand the decision to systems administrators:
#to suppress setting content-type when the server has no
On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:14, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 9/26/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need to fix this issue of inappropriate DefaultTypes.
An approach that deals with this without loss of back-compatibility
is to hand the decision to systems administrators:
#to suppress
On Sep 26, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 9/26/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need to fix this issue of inappropriate DefaultTypes.
An approach that deals with this without loss of back-compatibility
is to hand the decision to systems administrators:
#to suppress
On 09/26/2007 05:14 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
On 9/26/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need to fix this issue of inappropriate DefaultTypes.
An approach that deals with this without loss of back-compatibility
is to hand the decision to systems administrators:
#to suppress
Hello,
I'm currently implementing an encrypted and authenticated client server
communication. I use the same mechanism as ssl does, ie resumed
sessions, using a memory cache where I store sessions. I did browse the
s3_clnt.c file and did not find anywhere the way old sessions are
retrieved.
On 09/26/2007 03:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like for us to consider a release of 2.2.7 in October
to address the Windows file handle issues as well
some other fixes that would be useful to get out quickly...
+1 as soon as the Windows file handle issues are fixed in
APR and probably in
You might want to check OpenSSL to see if the session caching and resume is
part of that code base.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:15:06 +0200
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not quite sure if the proxy patches Nick is currently
working on will fit into this timescale. Depending on their importance
we might need to have a look on the timescale again.
Of course it puts pressure on the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like for us to consider a release of 2.2.7 in October
to address the Windows file handle issues as well
some other fixes that would be useful to get out quickly...
How about 2 :)
I expect to have Windows fixes ready to backport next week after
the perlfolk confirm my
On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like for us to consider a release of 2.2.7 in October
to address the Windows file handle issues as well
some other fixes that would be useful to get out quickly...
How about 2 :)
I expect to have Windows
In the current log.c code, although the write-end of an initial error
logger is still held by the parent --- until the second logger process
has kicked off. It seems someone's inherited that write end. I have
a two line patch attached that
Needs some review before we kick off 2.2.7 into the
On 9/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Sep 26 07:26:19 2007
New Revision: 579664
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579664view=rev
Log:
Reinstate location walk for subrequests
PR 41960 (Jose Kahan)
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
On 9/26/07, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please ignore, mail client accident.
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Sep 26 07:26:19 2007
New Revision: 579664
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579664view=rev
Log:
Reinstate location walk for subrequests
PR 41960 (Jose Kahan)
I don't see how the comment matches the patch. We always had location walks
Jose wrote Re. New test: subrequests and content negotiation
on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:44:49 -0700
The test consists on overloading the charset to utf-8:
AddType text/html; charset=utf-8html/htm
I believe the mistaken assumption is that charset can be used in this way.
AddCharset
There is the ASF statement/promise:
Modules compiled for Apache 2.2 should continue to work for all 2.2.x
releases.
So I expect that modules have *not* to be new compiled.
It is quite confusing for our users en authors have to maintain in most
cases up to 4 versions. What about the Magic
Not really of my concern.
I want to give attention to
http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/apache-226/
May be agood time to reconsider the depency for example with APR.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 26
Steffen wrote:
There is the ASF statement/promise:
Modules compiled for Apache 2.2 should continue to work for all 2.2.x
releases.
***SHOULD*** is the operative word. There are always exceptions.
I have a half dozen examples where I've abused the microsoft foundation
classes in my code
Steffen wrote:
I want to give attention to
http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/apache-226/
May be agood time to reconsider the depency for example with APR.
Actually, I'm a fan of that idea - but not in the httpd 2.2.x cycle.
It would be great to see 2.4.0 (3.0.0?) presume the latest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * mod_proxy_ajp: Ignore any ajp13 flush packets that we may
+ receive before we send headers.
+ Trunk version of patch:
+http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=579707
+ Backport version for 2.2.x of patch:
+ Trunk version
Hello Bill,
Thanks for your reply.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 02:05:26PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I believe the mistaken assumption is that charset can be used in this way.
AddCharset should be used in this case.
If no AddCharset is applied, AddDefaultCharset takes over.
On 09/26/2007 07:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
In the current log.c code, although the write-end of an initial error
logger is still held by the parent --- until the second logger process
has kicked off. It seems someone's inherited that write end. I have
a two line patch attached
your patch happens to work (and you aren't sure why) the first question is
to dig deeply, and consult your peers, which is what Tom is engaged in.
Tom's done a great job of clarifying this to users downloading the
package,
but I'm afraid your messages aren't so on-target.
We are a team in
Hi nd,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Andr?? Malo wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579664view=rev
Log:
Reinstate location walk for subrequests
PR 41960 (Jose Kahan)
I don't see how the comment matches the patch. We always had location walks
for subrequests,
On Sep 26, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Steffen wrote:
There we go again Bill with your phrase above. I do not appreciate
that you communcate like this in Public, please stop it. More and
more I got the impression that you do not want AL in the scene,
fine, say it to me personal. You are oh so happy
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/26/2007 07:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
In the current log.c code, although the write-end of an initial error
logger is still held by the parent --- until the second logger process
has kicked off. It seems someone's inherited that write end. I have
a two
As some of you know, I'm working on fixing bugs in mod_proxy.
As part of this effort, I've signed up with a testing service
called Co-Advisor, at http://coad.measurement-factory.com/
(who is also responsible for a number of our long-standing bug
reports). This gives me use of a good range of
I'm working on extensions to an existing Apache module of my own to
add support for auth providers. Problem is that people who are trying
to compile it for Win32 have found that the ASF httpd 2.2.6 installer:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Is this an oversight in the packaging up of Win32 installer, or is the
presumption that one can use this package to compile modules against
which need auth provider support wrong?
Researching; I suspect that mod_auth.h isn't propagated into the include/
directory by
Roy really said everything necessary, I hesitated to even respond to you.
But I'll offer this so that my frustration is perfectly clear and we (you
and I, and for other devs in relation to other service providers as well)
can coexist peacefully.
Steffen wrote:
Tom's done a great job of
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-09-26 16:35:55 -0400 (Wed, 26 Sep 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-09-14 12:31:33 -0400 (Fri, 14 Sep 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
37 matches
Mail list logo
