AW: svn commit: r1841225 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c

2019-06-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 13:59 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1841225 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:06:42AM +, Plüm,

AW: svn commit: r1841225 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c

2019-06-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 10:45 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1841225 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 08:49:08AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > Unless I

AW: svn commit: r1841225 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c

2019-06-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton > Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:49 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1841225 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 09:54:21PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On

Questions with mod_proxy_http2

2019-05-13 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I recently started using mod_proxy_http2 and some questions popped up for me: 1. Why do we retry 5 times hardcoded (leading to AH10023 in case we fail)? The other protocols only try to retry once if the ping failed (additional Expect 100 header in the HTTP case, PING packet in the AJP case).

AW: eor bucket

2019-05-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 12:00 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: eor bucket > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:54 AM Yann Ylavic > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing > > wrote: > > > > > > > Am

AW: eor bucket

2019-05-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 11:54 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: eor bucket > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > > > Am 09.05.2019 um 11:32 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > > > > > The issue is

AW: eor bucket

2019-05-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I think your understanding is correct. Regards Rüdiger C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Mai 2019 11:02 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: eor bucket > > Could someone help me to check my understanding of the eor bucket >

AW: svn commit: r1787606 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c

2019-05-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Christophe JAILLET > Gesendet: Samstag, 4. Mai 2019 09:20 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1787606 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c > > Hi, > > In my perpetual effort to synch 2.4 and trunk, I have stopped

AW: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses

2019-04-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 14:40 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses > > > > > Am 10.04.2019 um 14:07 schrieb Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Gr

AW: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses

2019-04-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 14:04 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:03 PM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: > > >

AW: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses

2019-04-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 12:49 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 12:10 PM Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > > > Am 09.04.2019 um 18:48 schrieb Roy T.

AW: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses

2019-04-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2019 12:10 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: keep-alive and vary in 304 responses > > > > Am 09.04.2019 um 18:48 schrieb Roy T. Fielding : > > > >> > >> 2. Validation responses lose

AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

2019-03-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
up more readily on older OSs rather than newer ones. Plus, there's still a crap-ton of systems using CentOS5/RHEL5 On Mar 28, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group mailto:ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>> wrote: C2 General -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Jagielski ma

AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

2019-03-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Dennis Clarke > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:23 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39 > > On 3/28/19 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > > > >

AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

2019-03-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39 > An: httpd > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39 > > > > On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri > wrote: > > > > Hi, all; > > Please find below the proposed

AW: svn commit: r1853953 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c

2019-02-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
My bad. I misread the diff. It was there in stream_reqbody_chunked and stream_reqbody_cl. So the condition is correct. Regards Rüdiger C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2019 14:25 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: svn commit:

AW: svn commit: r1850745 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/config.m4

2019-01-16 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
C2 General > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2019 10:00 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1850745 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/filters/config.m4 > > > > > Am 16.01.2019 um 03:33 schrieb William A Rowe Jr

AW: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-29 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Just a quick and dirty idea and nothing beyond that worked out: How about to allow the balancer members to be configured via DNS SRV records? That should be very common in container environments. Regards Rüdiger Von: Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. November 2018 07:03 An:

AW: ap_request_core_filter issues

2018-10-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Oktober 2018 13:09 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: ap_request_core_filter issues > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:52 PM Joe Orton wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:51:06PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > >

AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
been added recently in r1841508) :) I definitely need to document how to generate and use test-coverage data when running the test framework. This helps to spot where new tests are needed. CJ > Message du 11/10/18 10:08 > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" >

AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-11 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Anyone else seeing t/modules/buffer.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 8, 12 ? I don't see this with trunk on the same machine. Issue seems to be if input filtering is on on large POSTs. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Daniel Ruggeri

AW: svn commit: r1834924 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2018-10-11 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Graham Leggett > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 19:12 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1834924 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > On 28 Aug 2018, at 12:17, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > >> On 07/20/2018 02:49 PM, Yann

AW: svn commit: r1842540 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c

2018-10-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Montag, 8. Oktober 2018 23:46 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1842540 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES > modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:49 PM Ruediger Pluem > wrote: > > > > > > > >

AW: svn commit: r1841225 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c

2018-09-26 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
t 09:30:25AM +, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: > > Thanks for reporting. Does the below patch cause the crash to go away? > > Yes, works for me!

AW: svn commit: r1841225 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/dav/main/props.c

2018-09-26 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Thanks for reporting. Does the below patch cause the crash to go away? Index: main/mod_dav.c === --- main/mod_dav.c (revision 1841799) +++ main/mod_dav.c (working copy) @@ -2059,10 +2059,10 @@

AW: minor nit in mod_ssl

2018-09-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
f: Re: minor nit in mod_ssl > >> > >> I am not opposed. However, there is an explanation added to the > request > >> error notes, which normally appears in the 403 response if I am not > >> mistaken? > >> > >> -Stefan > >> > >&g

AW: minor nit in mod_ssl

2018-09-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
e if I am not > mistaken? > > -Stefan > > > Am 20.09.2018 um 11:40 schrieb Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > : > > > > Can we have set it to info? Debug is very verbose for SSL just to find > out why a HTTP request was replied to with a 403. > > > > Regards

AW: minor nit in mod_ssl

2018-09-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Can we have set it to info? Debug is very verbose for SSL just to find out why a HTTP request was replied to with a 403. Regards Rüdiger Von: William A Rowe Jr Gesendet: Montag, 17. September 2018 22:27 An: httpd Betreff: Re: minor nit in mod_ssl On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:56 AM Stefan

AW: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 12:24 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:55 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: > > > > > -Urspr

AW: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 10:37 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 8:49 AM Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: > > > > I don't lik

AW: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Eric Covener > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 02:34 > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yann Ylavic > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener

AW: async mod_proxy_http

2018-09-13 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 01:59 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: async mod_proxy_http > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:53 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > > > Forking from the Cool Stuff thread. > > > > Have you noticed that the

AW: 2.4.x and 2.6.x ... next steps

2018-09-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: William A Rowe Jr Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2018 03:15 An: httpd Betreff: Re: 2.4.x and 2.6.x ... next steps On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 17:42 Graham Leggett mailto:minf...@sharp.fm>> wrote: On 11 Sep 2018, at 20:35, Jim Jagielski mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: We have never

AW: Buffer in apache

2018-08-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. August 2018 21:54 An: Hemant Chaudhary ; dev@httpd.apache.org; us...@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: Buffer in apache Le 21/08/2018 à 13:50, Hemant Chaudhary a écrit : Hi All, I want to use buffer of 512B in apache . I am using mod_proxy_http to

AW: Win build success httpd-trunk

2018-07-26 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: Apache Lounge Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2018 13:32 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Win build success httpd-trunk Build succeeded! Thanks Regards Rüdiger

AW: AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Can you try again with latest trunk including r1836613? This should make [2] obsolete. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Michal Karm > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2018 10:28 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org; Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > > Betreff: Re:

AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
r1836603 @Windows folks: Can you please try if trunk mod_proxy builds again on Windows? Regards Rüdiger Von: William A Rowe Jr Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018 18:16 An: httpd Betreff: Re: Current trunk win build error +1, looks great.

AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Jr Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2018 16:54 An: httpd Betreff: Re: Current trunk win build error I think it's simply the attached (couldn't apply the inline text patch). No need to change the hook name. On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group mailto:ruediger.pl

AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Replied in bugzilla. Question to our fellow Windows builders: Any issues to compile 2.4.34 currently in the way described in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62557#c5 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Michal Karm > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juli 2018

AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
: Re: Current trunk win build error I think it's simply the attached (couldn't apply the inline text patch). No need to change the hook name. On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group mailto:ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>> wrote: So something like the below? Regards R

AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
s use proxy_balancer_get_best_worker, and don't export that? That can be the delegate for ap_proxy_balancer_get_best_worker. We either keep callbacks local, or export them _NONSTD. All the *_DECLARE (without _NONSTD) are not usable as apr/httpd callbacks. On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:

AW: Current trunk win build error

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Apache Lounge > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2018 13:35 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Current trunk win build error > > > > > > Error C2440 'initializing': cannot convert from 'proxy_worker > *(__stdcall *)(proxy_balancer *,request_rec >

AW: mod_ssl and openssl 1.0.2 initialization

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2018 11:50 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: mod_ssl and openssl 1.0.2 initialization > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > Something fishy reported in > >

AW: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Wrong revision. Correct one is r1836472. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2018 11:26 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: AW: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34 &

AW: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
This is now backported to 2.4.x as r1555631 and will be part of the next release. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Frank Meier > Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 09:26 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34

AW: Bug in mod_ratelimit?

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juli 2018 10:52 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: Bug in mod_ratelimit? > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: > > > > > >> ---

AW: svn commit: r1836381 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ include/ modules/proxy/ modules/proxy/balancers/

2018-07-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: William A Rowe Jr Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Juli 2018 23:03 An: httpd Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1836381 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: ./ include/ modules/proxy/ modules/proxy/balancers/ On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 15:22 Ruediger Pluem wrote: BTW: We have the same load

AW: Bug in mod_ratelimit?

2018-07-22 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Eric Covener > Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Juli 2018 21:58 > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Betreff: Re: Bug in mod_ratelimit? > > > > You probably didn't test with chunked encoding (neither did I!), see > > > how ap_http_header_filter() adds

AW: ocsp_force_default initialized with UNSET in httpd 2.4.34

2018-07-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I can do tomorrow and make a proposal in STATUS. Looks like we are all aligned now how to resolve this. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2018 11:10 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: ocsp_force_default

AW: Time for 2.4.34?

2018-07-05 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 21:34 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: Time for 2.4.34? > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Yann Ylavic > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Seems to me that we are

AW: svn commit: r1682074 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ STATUS modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c

2018-07-02 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Christophe Jaillet > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. Juni 2018 14:08 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1682074 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ > STATUS modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c > > Le 27/05/2015 à 18:33, wr...@apache.org a écrit 

AW: Host header checking too strict?

2018-06-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Eric Covener > Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juni 2018 23:21 > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Betreff: Host header checking too strict? > > After CVE-2016-8743 we only accept hostnames that are valid in DNS, > which notably excludes underscores.

AW: Brigade memory lifetime & leaks

2018-06-05 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Juni 2018 14:48 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org; d...@apr.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Brigade memory lifetime & leaks > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:07:31PM +, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Gro

AW: Brigade memory lifetime & leaks

2018-06-05 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Juni 2018 13:27 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Cc: d...@apr.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Brigade memory lifetime & leaks > > > > > Am 05.06.2018 um 10:46 schrieb Joe Orton : > > > > In 2.4's http_request.c there

AW: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Eric Covener > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. April 2018 15:31 > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Betreff: Re: A proposal... > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >

AW: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Rainer Jung > Gesendet: Montag, 23. April 2018 16:47 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: A proposal... > > Am 23.04.2018 um 16:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > It seems that, IMO, if there was not so much concern about >

AW: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing > Gesendet: Montag, 23. April 2018 17:08 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: A proposal... > > Such undocumented and untested behaviour, which nevertheless is > considered a regression, cannot be

AW: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)

2018-04-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: David Zuelke > Gesendet: Montag, 23. April 2018 18:09 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost > configs) > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Graham Leggett

AW: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I am also more in the "ship when it is ready", then "ship when it is time" boat. We probably could have some automated "nightlyies" which are not releases in the ASF sense (as release requires voting), but only some sort of convenience transformation of an svn export / co that creates a tar

AW: "Most Popular Web Server?"

2018-04-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Daniel Ruggeri [mailto:drugg...@primary.net] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2018 02:22 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: "Most Popular Web Server?" > > On 4/18/2018 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Personally, I'd like to see the the

AW: /scheme/i sensitivity? (was: svn commit: r1829430 - /httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/core-check_errorlog_dir_syslog.patch)

2018-04-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. April 2018 18:49 > An: httpd > Betreff: /scheme/i sensitivity? (was: svn commit: r1829430 - >

AW: SNI normalization?

2018-04-11 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I guess this makes sense to avoid these kind of issues. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 11:49 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: SNI normalization? > > Feedback desired: > >

AW: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch

2018-03-07 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. März 2018 21:11 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch > > > On 02/22/2018 01:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 6:53 AM,

AW: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch

2018-02-21 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2018 16:51 > An: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Betreff: Re: [POLL] Final status of 2.2.x branch > > > In the absence of three active contributors,

AW: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2018-02-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 09:20 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >

AW: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

2018-02-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29 > An: httpd > Betreff: Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 - > /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS) > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at

AW: New ServerUID directive

2018-02-02 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Februar 2018 15:15 > An: httpd > Betreff: Re: New ServerUID directive > > Why? If it is designed to not change between restarts then > there are much easier ways to

AW: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c http2/mod_http2.c http2/mod_http2.h proxy/config.m4 proxy/proxy_util.c

2018-02-01 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 16:15 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1822878 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: > http2/h2_config.c http2/h2_config.h http2/h2_conn.c

AW: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2018-02-01 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the review. Does r1822858 address your concern? > > I have a different one :p > > Couldn't we have a helper (optional fn) from mod_http2 which give the &

AW: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

2018-02-01 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Thanks for the review. Does r1822858 address your concern? Regards Rüdiger Von: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 09:01 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1822849 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at

AW: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-26 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2017 10:31 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?) > > I like this "attic" idea better,

AW: [Proposal] 2.5.x -> 2.6.0/3.0.0 transition guidelines

2017-10-25 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 19:00 > An: httpd > Betreff: [Proposal] 2.5.x -> 2.6.0/3.0.0 transition guidelines > > I'd like to propose the following, so we can decide on

AW: svn commit: r1813167 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c

2017-10-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Same here: I don't see why the lbmethods rely on it between 1 and 100 and why they cannot work with 100 till 1 Effectively we kill values like 2.5 and the new comment > it is a number between 1 and 100 (or 0.01 and 1.0). is wrong since 0.01 is not an allowed value (it will fail the check

AW: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?)

2017-10-24 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Oktober 2017 15:12 > An: httpd > Betreff: Pruning working branches (Was: Re: Why?) > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Steffen

AW: Simplify download distribution directory by dropping sha1 hashes?

2017-10-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Sounds reasonable to me. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] > Gesendet: Montag, 23. Oktober 2017 20:37 > An: httpd > Betreff: Simplify download distribution directory by dropping sha1 > hashes? > >

AW: mod_rewrite, vary headers and internal redirects

2017-10-23 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I would tend to say that the code is correct and the RewriteCond code is wrong, because it doesn’t matter if the condition becomes true or false. The headers value has an influence on the result. Tricky question is what to do regarding Vary if the non-presence of a header has an influence.

AW: svn commit: r1812393 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ STATUS modules/http2/ modules/http2/config2.m4

2017-10-17 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Good point. The original desire was to have lib64 as fallback in order to keep the default as is with lib. But probably the reverse order (64 over 32) makes more sense these days. Keen to hear what others say. Regards Rüdiger Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Gesendet:

AW: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:24 > An: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: backport patches > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Pl

AW: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: backport patches > > > FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. > > I hope it's

AW: svn commit: r1811192 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/.gdbinit

2017-10-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Does r1811570 fix your issue? Regards Rüdiger Von: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 9. Oktober 2017 15:34 An: Apache HTTP Server Development List Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1811192 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/.gdbinit Hi Ruediger, 2017-10-05 14:01

AW: httpd memory consumption

2017-10-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Gesendet: Samstag, 7. Oktober 2017 15:52 An: httpd Betreff: Re: httpd memory consumption Have you tried bisecting the config directives to see which is triggering the memory abuse? Sounds like the module might not be

.gdbinit changes backports. CTR or RTC?

2017-10-05 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Is backporting .gdbinit changes to a stable branch CTR or RTC? Regards Rüdiger

AW: C-L filter buffering snafu

2017-09-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Just put a reply in bugzilla (https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61222#c4), plus a patch proposal. Reilly weird that we have not been hit by this for such a long time. I think we should not buffer. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton

AW: CVE-2017-9788: Uninitialized memory reflection in mod_auth_digest

2017-07-17 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
http://svn.apache.org/r1800955 Regards Rüdiger Von: Rashmi Srinivasan [mailto:rashmisrinivasan2...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 17. Juli 2017 07:50 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Cc: us...@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: CVE-2017-9788: Uninitialized memory reflection in mod_auth_digest Hi, Please can

AW: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush

2017-07-14 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juli 2017 11:30 An: Apache HTTP Server Development List Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush Hi Yann, 2017-07-13 22:15 GMT+02:00 Yann Ylavic >: On

AW: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

2017-07-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 10. Juli 2017 15:33 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127 > > Personally, I think we simply document that balancer names > must start w/ a character. +1

AW: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush

2017-07-10 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Von: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 09:52 An: Apache HTTP Server Development List Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush Hi Jacob, Helmut! 2017-07-06 20:54 GMT+02:00 Jacob Champion

AW: svn commit: r1800181 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-06-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
FWIW: I am fine with Yann’s proposal as well. Regards Rüdiger Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2017 19:28 An: httpd Cc: c...@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1800181 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Actually,

AW: Timeouts and other time-related granularity

2017-06-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Juni 2017 15:13 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Timeouts and other time-related granularity > > > > Am 20.06.2017 um 14:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski

AW: ocsp stapling improvements

2017-06-20 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Juni 2017 13:40 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: ocsp stapling improvements > > > > Am 12.06.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Ruediger Pluem : > > > > I

AW: The drive for 2.4.26

2017-06-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Juni 2017 10:40 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: The drive for 2.4.26 > > Proposed the patch as fix, since we did not see the behaviour pop up > again over the last

AW: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

2017-04-27 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
svn commit: r1707087 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Stefan Eissing > <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > > > >> Am 26.04.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > <ruediger.

AW: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

2017-04-26 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2017 10:55 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1707087 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c > > Eh, not really into

AW: AW: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

2017-04-26 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jacob Champion [mailto:champio...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. April 2017 00:23 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org; Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> > Betreff: Re: AW: svn commit: r1707087 - >

AW: svn commit: r1674661 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

2017-04-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
I guess the patch is fine with one exception: Please do not "recycle" a configuration option setup explicitly for another module (flusher for mod_proxy_fdpass) for your patch. This only creates confusion. Please create a new one and document it. Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche

AW: [RFC] ?

2017-03-08 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 11:30 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [RFC] ? > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:52:17AM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On 02/28/2017 04:32 PM, Jacob

AW: httpd 2.4.25, mpm_event, ssl: segfaults

2017-02-16 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 11:35 > An: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: httpd 2.4.25, mpm_event, ssl: segfaults > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Pl

AW: httpd 2.4.25, mpm_event, ssl: segfaults

2017-02-16 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 10:49 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: httpd 2.4.25, mpm_event, ssl: segfaults > > Here are some SSL/core_write outputs (sizes) for me, with 2.4.x.

AW: svn commit: r1707087 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c

2017-02-15 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2017 14:08 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1707087 - > /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debugging/mod_bucketeer.c > > [with the patch] > > On Wed,

AW: ssl_io_filter_output vs EOC

2017-02-06 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Februar 2017 18:06 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: ssl_io_filter_output vs EOC > > Besides metadata buckets, should the EOC semantic really apply to the > ssl output

  1   2   3   4   >