+1
No issues/regressions reported by the AL Windows Community.
- Steffen
On Friday 09/08/2019 at 15:41, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next
> Am 09.08.2019 um 15:40 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri :
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball a
the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.41:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise
On 8/9/19 5:25 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/08/09 13:40:38, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a
On 2019/08/09 13:40:38, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.
Le 09/08/2019 à 15:40, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.41:
[X] +1: It's not just good
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 14:40, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.41:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk
> Can the backport I tested and suggested on May 13th 2019, about
> mod_session_crypto be considered for this release? Or if it's too late
> for me to ask again, for the next one?
>
I proposed it just now
Le Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:51:07 -0500,
Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate
On 8/5/19 8:00 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, All;
> As discussed on this list, a minor regression has been detected with a
> fix in flight. I'll go ahead and terminate this release vote and will
> plan to T again in the near future with the fix in place.
>
> Thanks
Daniel Ruggeri in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:54:18
-0500):
>Thanks, Jan;
> I'm afraid I have no way to verify or dig into Windows-specific
> issues. Can you share more information or errors that can help, or is
> this related to the things already discussed on the list?
There
Hi, All;
As discussed on this list, a minor regression has been detected with a fix
in flight. I'll go ahead and terminate this release vote and will plan to T
again in the near future with the fix in place.
Thanks to all who prepped for testing. Keep those testing rigs warm - we'll be
back
ng a lot of Visual Studio builds: mod_md.so is
>broken. At least on Windows, but probably on any other OS as well. Do
>not release this version.
>--
>Jan
.
>>
>> Yes, it's not a regression, but the fix is easy and version numbers are
>> cheap. We should release the best possible version each time.
>
> The fix for the APLOGNO warnings is probably easy. But a fix for 'my'
> issue with running it in combination with a SSLCertificat
Jim Jagielski in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 09:15:22
-0400):
>I vote -1 due to the known issue w/ building and running mod_md.
>
>Yes, it's not a regression, but the fix is easy and version numbers are
>cheap. We should release the best possible version each ti
On 8/5/19 4:04 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:45PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Quick reply here to let you know that the build fails instantly
>> within server/config.c at func process_resource_config_cb() with
>> a strange error uttered by Oracle Studio 12.6 thus :
> ...
I vote -1 due to the known issue w/ building and running mod_md.
Yes, it's not a regression, but the fix is easy and version numbers are cheap.
We should release the best possible version each time.
Let's mark 2.4.40 DOA and release 2.4.41 w/ the patch.
> On Aug 3, 2019, at 9:51 AM, Dan
Runs all fine, no issues seen sofar.
+1
On Saturday 03/08/2019 at 15:51, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:01:32
+0200):
>I suspect it is the change in mod_ssl interface to the other modules. I
>have to write a test for it.
>
>It used to be that this chain file was ignored in mod_ssl 2.4.39 when it
>retrieved certificates from mod_md. Now
I suspect it is the change in mod_ssl interface to the other modules. I have to
write a test for it.
It used to be that this chain file was ignored in mod_ssl 2.4.39 when it
retrieved certificates from mod_md. Now mod_md adds its certificate via a hook
and the chain file seems to remain in
Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 5 Aug 2019 10:23:27
+0200):
>Trying to sum up what you are saying: mod_md 2.4.40 does not introduce a
>new problem, but testing with it exposed an issue that affects both.
>There is no regression in 2.4.40.
It was not an noticable issue in 2.4.39
2019 um 10:12 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt :
>
> Jan Ehrhardt in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 04 Aug 2019 01:26:27
> +0200):
>> Maybe some config changes are needed, but then they should be clearly
>> documented in the change log. The trouble with this release is that the
>> pr
Jan Ehrhardt in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sun, 04 Aug 2019 01:26:27
+0200):
>Maybe some config changes are needed, but then they should be clearly
>documented in the change log. The trouble with this release is that the
>problem with mod_md will only show up when the first certif
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 04:51:45PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Quick reply here to let you know that the build fails instantly
> within server/config.c at func process_resource_config_cb() with
> a strange error uttered by Oracle Studio 12.6 thus :
...
> "config.c", line 1907: error: undefined
What fails and how? What is in the log?
> Am 03.08.2019 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Ehrhardt :
>
> Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>> On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>> Hi, all;
>>> Please find below the propos
On 8/4/19 4:51 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 8/3/19 9:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few
On 8/3/19 9:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.40:
>
n Windows, but probably on any other OS as well. Do
not release this version.
--
Jan
Jan Ehrhardt in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 03 Aug 2019 21:22:58
+0200):
>Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>>On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>> Hi, all;
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarbal
Gregg Smith in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 3 Aug 2019 08:43:21 -0700):
>On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
>[X] +1: It's go
On 8/3/2019 6:51 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
[X] +1: It's good enough!
VC14 & 15 x86 & x64 w/ makefiles
Opps, looks like the APLOGNO's didn't get filled in. I'm
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.40:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1
> Is this release likely to be ready before August 10? I am guessing "no" at
> this point, but wanted to get an idea early.
Not likely
Hi,
Is this release likely to be ready before August 10? I am guessing "no" at this
point, but wanted to get an idea early.
Cheers,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
Sent: 20 July 2019 10:44
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: r
heck in BalancerMember) and two other
ones ("Mute frequent debug message in mod_proxy_hcheck" and "bytraffic
needs byrequests") to STATUS right now.
Regards,
Rainer
Le 18/07/2019 à 16:06, Stefan Eissing a écrit :
It would be great if we could make a release this month.
Hi,
PR60757 and corresponding r1853560 could be a good candidate for backport.
I don't have a configuration for testing so I won't propose it myself
for backport, but the patch looks simple.
CJ
Le 18/07/2019 à 16:06, Stefan Eissing a écrit :
It would be great if we could make a release
esn't have the time, I can.
>
> On Jul 18, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
> It would be great if we could make a release this month. There are several
> fixes and improvements already backported and a few outstanding issues that
> need a vote or two.
&
+1. If Daniel doesn't have the time, I can.
> On Jul 18, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>
> It would be great if we could make a release this month. There are several
> fixes and improvements already backported and a few outstanding issues that
> need a vote or
It would be great if we could make a release this month. There are several
fixes and improvements already backported and a few outstanding issues that
need a vote or two.
Please have a look if you find the time. I think Daniel expressed willingness
to RM this? That'd be great!
Cheers, Stefan
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 22:07, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>
> Tested on Fedora 30 with Apache/2.4.39, looking good to me
>
> That's my +1
>
Thanks to all for testing. With the +1 from Adam Prime (sent
privately) that's enough :-)
Tested on Fedora 30 with Apache/2.4.39, looking good to me
That's my +1
On 2019-07-03 3:45 a.m., Steve Hay wrote:
> Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41
> release candidate.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.ta
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:45:36AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
> Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41
> release candidate.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.tar.gz
>
> MD5 = 7933d3a6a762f087bf788
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 08:45, Steve Hay wrote:
>
> Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41
> release candidate.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.tar.gz
>
+1 from me using the following setups:
VC++ 2013 32-bit, P
Fantastic! Thanks Steve! Will be giving this a spin today
Sent from the depths of my mind on an iPhone
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 03:45, Steve Hay wrote:
>
> Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41
> release candidate.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/di
Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.41
release candidate.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.41-rc1.tar.gz
MD5 = 7933d3a6a762f087bf7883a1ac2086eb
SHA1 = 17aa9a8669023aa2f485aa83f8f389969b8e5f0c
Major changes in this release are as follows:
Set
)
Thanks to everyone who took the time to test and vote as well as the
work that went into the release itself!
I shall forthwith begin the distribution of the release tarball to the
mirrors.
Thanks for RM:ing.
A nitpick for a future release: Review the CHANGES files (I'm looking
at http
as well as the
work that went into the release itself!
I shall forthwith begin the distribution of the release tarball to the
mirrors.
Thanks for RM:ing.
A nitpick for a future release: Review the CHANGES files (I'm looking
at http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.4.39), the comments
so feel free to fix it in
>the meantime.
>
>
>
>CJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Message du 02/04/19 03:04
>> De : drugg...@apache.org
>> A : c...@httpd.apache.org
>> Copie à :
>> Objet : svn commit: r33393 - /release/httpd/CHANGES_2.4
>>
On 04/02/2019 08:14 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 04/02/2019 02:54 AM, drugg...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: druggeri
>> Date: Tue Apr 2 00:54:25 2019
>> New Revision: 33392
>>
>> Log:
>> Updates for announcement of 2.4.39
>>
>>
On 04/02/2019 02:54 AM, drugg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Tue Apr 2 00:54:25 2019
> New Revision: 33392
>
> Log:
> Updates for announcement of 2.4.39
>
> Added:
> release/httpd/CURRENT-IS-2.4.39
> Removed:
> release/h
.
CJ
> Message du 02/04/19 03:04
> De : drugg...@apache.org
> A : c...@httpd.apache.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : svn commit: r33393 - /release/httpd/CHANGES_2.4
>
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Tue Apr 2 01:04:50 2019
> New Revision: 33393
>
> Log:
> C
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 07:17:59AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> =
> t/ssl/varlookup.t .. 73/83 [ error] oh dangnabit, server dumped core
>
> Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50
> 50
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote has PASSED with the following
recorded votes:
+1: jorton, icing, jim, ylavic, covener, rjung, druggeri
+0: cjaillet (apparent test system issue)
Thanks to everyone who took the time to test and vote as well as the
work that went into the release
On 3/27/2019 10:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.
Am 27.03.2019 um 16:09 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[X] +1: It's not just good
Le 29/03/2019 à 23:57, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 PM Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
Could others confirm that they have tested with 'prefork' and that they
don't have any issue?
No issue here with the somewhat similar Debian 10 / gcc-8.3 /
libssl-1.1.1b. I don't
Le 29/03/2019 à 23:57, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 PM Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
Could others confirm that they have tested with 'prefork' and that they
don't have any issue?
No issue here with the somewhat similar Debian 10 / gcc-8.3 /
libssl-1.1.1b. I don't
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 PM Marion & Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> Could others confirm that they have tested with 'prefork' and that they
> don't have any issue?
No issue here with the somewhat similar Debian 10 / gcc-8.3 /
libssl-1.1.1b. I don't have my older Debian(s) at hand as of now
Le 27/03/2019 à 16:09, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[ ] +1: It's not just good
> Am 29.03.2019 um 13:55 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:10 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all;
>>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:10 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball
On 3/28/19 11:48 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
>> candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
>
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
>
> All te
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All tests pass on Debian(s) 8, 9 and 10 w/ openssl(s) 1.0.2, 1.1.0 and 1.
sendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:52
> An: httpd
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>
> Yep, CentOS5. Mostly due to the fact that regressions would likely show up
> more readily on older OSs rather than newer ones.
>
> Plus, there's still a crap-ton of systems us
What pcre lib did you use on CentOS5? The one provided by CentOS or your own?
Regards
Rüdiger
C2 General
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:52
An: httpd
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
Yep, CentOS5. Mostly due to the fact that regressions would likely show
>
> C2 General
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Jim Jagielski
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39
>> An: httpd
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri
>
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Dennis Clarke
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:23
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>
> On 3/28/19 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
> >
> >
On 3/28/19 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Tested and passed on the following systems (no regressions):
>>
>> o macOS 10.14.4, Xcode 10.2
>> o CentOS 5, 64bit
>
> Really CentOS 5? Just asking because it does not receive further OS updates
> and I wouldn't
C2 General
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jim Jagielski
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39
> An: httpd
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tar
> Am 27.03.2019 um 16:09 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri :
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tar
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:28 PM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> > Hi, all;
> >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> Since there is now a rele
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:09:52AM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarba
On 3/27/19 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
Since there is now a release tarball can we have a week to test?
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.39:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk
Hi,
it has beens a while since there was the last release of mod_fcgid.
There are some important fixes in trunk, but never made it to a
release since 2013.
Is anyone willing to file a release?
Cheers
Mario
On 1/22/19 8:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 2019-01-22 11:39, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 1/22/19 6:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, Cristophe;
Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior.
Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is
fixed up later in
On 2019-01-22 11:39, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 1/22/19 6:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, Cristophe;
Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior.
Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is fixed
up later in the announce.sh script.
Daniel, could
On 1/22/19 6:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, Cristophe;
Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior.
Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is fixed
up later in the announce.sh script.
Daniel, could you please make sure to add a Date: header
pe I did it right.
CJ
Le 21/01/2019 à 17:48, Marion et Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
s/September/January/
in the announcement (html and txt)
CJ
Message du 21/01/19 16:03
De : drugg...@apache.org
A : c...@httpd.apache.org
Copie à :
Objet : svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /rel
votes:
PMC
jorton, jim, druggeri, rjung, ylavic
Community
Noel Butler, Dennis Clark
I thank everyone for their time in testing and verifying this latest
release. I will begin the process of promoting to the mirrors for sync.
Dennis Clarke .. with an 'e'. At your service.
Read that with a Sean
> Objet : svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/
>
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Mon Jan 21 15:03:33 2019
> New Revision: 32075
>
> Log:
> Push 2.4.38 up to the release directory
>
> Added:
> release/httpd/CHANGES_2.4
s/September/January/
in the announcement (html and txt)
CJ
> Message du 21/01/19 16:03
> De : drugg...@apache.org
> A : c...@httpd.apache.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/
>
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Mon Jan 21 15:0
- libxml2 2.9.9
- lua 5.2.4 with LUA_COMPAT_ALL
- expat 2.2.6
Not seen new warnings over I reported here before.
Cheers,
Steffen
On Thursday 17/01/2019 at 19:49, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org
Community
Noel Butler, Dennis Clark
I thank everyone for their time in testing and verifying this latest
release. I will begin the process of promoting to the mirrors for sync.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/20/2019 4:25 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>
>>
>> It's not just good, it's good enough!
>>
>
> tongue in cheek here, but...
> shouldn't that be the other way around, "It's not just good enough,
> it's good!" :)
>
haha - tounge in cheek indeed. The line, "It's not just good, it's good
On 1/20/19 6:50 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Am 21.01.2019 um 00:34 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
On 1/20/19 2:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 17.01.2019 um 19:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
Hi Dennis,
Am 21.01.2019 um 00:34 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
On 1/20/19 2:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 17.01.2019 um 19:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE
On 1/20/19 2:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 17.01.2019 um 19:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball
> It's not just good, it's good enough!
tongue in cheek here, but...
shouldn't that be the other way around, "It's not just good enough,
it's good!" :)
--
Kind Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally
privileged
information,
Am 17.01.2019 um 19:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.38:
[X] +1: It's not just good
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:49 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
> candidate tarball as 2.4.38:
+1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
Tested on Debian(s) 8, 9 and 10 w/ openssl(s) 1.0.2, 1.1.0 and 1.1.1.
Thanks Daniel for RMing!
On 1/17/19 1:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.38:
On Solaris 10 SPARC with OpenSSL 1.1.1a and Oracle Studio 12.6 tools :
[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
Up and running ( testing ) now
On 18/01/2019 04:49, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.38:
>
On 2019-01-17 12:49, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.38:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's
+1: Tested on:
o macOS 10.14.2, Xcode 10.1
o CentOS7
Will do more testing today but so far, so good.
Thx for RMing!
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:49:18PM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarba
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:49 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.38:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk
601 - 700 of 4444 matches
Mail list logo
