Joshua Slive wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Location /dynamic-stuff
SetHandler virtual-dynamic-handler
/Location
Alias /normal/stuff/dyn /dynamic-stuff
How would all this affect this situation? IE, we would still need to
know that /normal/stuff/dyn/1/2/test.html became
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/* this info-handler won't deal with the filename
* so null the filename to ensure no file is served.
*/
r-filename = ;
\
What if you have something like:
Location /dynamic-stuff
SetHandler
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Brian Akins wrote:
Location /dynamic-stuff
SetHandler virtual-dynamic-handler
/Location
Alias /normal/stuff/dyn /dynamic-stuff
How would all this affect this situation? IE, we would still need to
know that /normal/stuff/dyn/1/2/test.html became
You hit the nail on the head - Alias (and mod_rewrite) cause us the greatest
grief in fixing this set of issues. *IF* they all are parsed in the translate name
phase we are fine, since map_to_storage is run after translate_name is done.
If they are not handled up front we have problems (some
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You hit the nail on the head - Alias (and mod_rewrite) cause us the greatest
grief in fixing this set of issues. *IF* they all are parsed in the
translate name phase we are fine, since map_to_storage is run after
translate_name is done.
If
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
And perhaps I'm going way off in left field here, but why should this be
user-configurable at all? Shouldn't the (for example) server-status
handler know itself that it is a virtual handler, and
At 01:37 PM 2/9/2004, André Malo wrote:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You hit the nail on the head - Alias (and mod_rewrite) cause us the greatest
grief in fixing this set of issues. *IF* they all are parsed in the
translate name phase we are fine, since map_to_storage is
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only issue in mod_rewrite could be the Type/Handler forcing which
occurs also in fixup, where is the right place for such things (to force
something).
Don't they result in internal redirects? In that case there is nothing
wrong when the
At 02:11 PM 2/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
And perhaps I'm going way off in left field here, but why should this be
user-configurable at all? Shouldn't the (for example) server-status
handler know
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:11 PM 2/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Modules can do that today with some very trivial code...
I think I see a problem. No doubt it could be made to work with a simple tweak.
SetHandler in the location container sets the handler
At 04:34 PM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated when selecting the resource.
That is why I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:17 PM 2/5/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated when selecting the resource.
That is why I
At 09:47 AM 2/6/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:17 PM 2/5/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated
Greg Marr wrote:
I'm only changing Location ... Directory is unaffected.
Well, that's not entirely true. The Directory is affected indirectly,
because it no longer applies. The behavior currently is: it applies to
everything it matches. This would change it to: it applies to
everything
Let's do this in 2.1 by splitting out the file system,
and if the filesystem module isn't handling a request, it won't be serving
content but also won't be invoking the directory walk or stat-ing files.
this all sounds kinda interesting, and similar to the way auth has been set
up in 2.1 -
Thanks for the feedback, Will.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:39 PM 2/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then if I play devil's advocate, someone could see the new directive and turn it on when it's not appropriate and cause Bad Things to happen. Mainly I'm looking for comments on whether
I just want to add a couple notes here on what I see as user-expectations.
The problem is that you want to add layers of additional directives, which
would change the behavior of Directory or Location ,
only Location , in a way that IMO is consistent with the existing
documentation, but
At 10:22 AM 2/5/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Will.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:39 PM 2/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then if I play devil's advocate, someone could see the new directive
and turn it on when it's not appropriate and cause Bad Things to
I do, however, agree that doing a directory-walk on virtual resources is
not nice. But my opinion is that virtualness is a property of the
resource, and hence should be designated when selecting the resource.
That is why I suggested changing SetHandler rather than Location.
And perhaps I'm
At 10:43 AM 2/5/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
At 10:22 AM 2/5/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Will.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:39 PM 2/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then if I play devil's advocate, someone could see the new directive and turn
it on when it's not
At 09:22 AM 2/5/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Effect/Issue 1:
Bypassing the filesystem canonicalization would be very bad on certain platforms
such as windows, depending on case sensitivity, etc. It would
also bypass *user configured* options such as avoiding symlinks.
only for Location If
At 03:39 PM 2/4/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But then if I play devil's advocate, someone could see the new directive and turn it
on when it's not appropriate and cause Bad Things to happen. Mainly I'm looking for
comments on whether this should be configurable or not.
Yes, I'm one who will
22 matches
Mail list logo
