HI Michael,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, mdue...@apache.org wrote:
+* upgrade : Upgrade from Jackrabbit 2
upgrade mode is only supported in oak-run-jr2 jar (as that only
packages JR2 classes) and is documented there [1]
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak
Hi Thomas,
Command line tool options are documented at the readme in oak-run
folder. See [1]. Or you are looking for something else?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/trunk/oak-run#oak-runnable-jar
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Thomas Mueller muel
for
storage of index nodes and then remove only those nodes
Chetan Mehrotra
forward in OAK-2005.
Note that initial plan was to
1. Have current LuceneIndex moved to AdvanceQueryIndex
2. Then branch off the impl and make a new copy which has changes done
for Property index support
Chetan Mehrotra
queries which involve property restrictions.
With this existing logic would not be modified and we can move ahead
with Lucene based property index. Later once we unify them we can
tackle this issue
Chetan Mehrotra
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 22.9.14 6:13 , Amit Jain wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.6
Michael
where a new checkpoint gets created (Line
229) then that checkpoint would not be released and also would not be
recorded in index metadata. Such a checkpoint would prevent GC for a
long time.
Is that understanding correct?
Chetan Mehrotra
properly.
Yes thats the case I was referring to
Let's continue the investigation on OAK-2087.
This issue is different from OAK-2087 as that is only meant for
informational purpose. Opened OAK-2088 for this issue and would
followup there
Chetan Mehrotra
)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:27 AM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds
I have updated OAK-2082 with test run results. Looking at the result I
think FDS does provide a benefit in terms of lesser storage space.
Putting Lucene index on file system provides best storage efficiency
but then it would not work once we have TarMK failover implemented.
Chetan Mehrotra
CopyOnReadDirectory support in OAK-1724
Further we also get the benefit of sharing the BlobStore between
multiple instances if required!!
Thoughts?
Chetan Mehrotra
would need to add one for '{}' in log message to log the 'updates' argument.
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi,
Do we have any build bot running for 1.0 branch
Chetan Mehrotra
This was discussed earlier [1] and Jukka mentioned that there were
some restriction of deployment size. I tried pushing a snapshot
version sometime back and that got deploy fine. So I think we should
try to deploy artifacts again
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/ofvy3z5lyu5cw2i7
Welcome Amit!!
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
welcome Amit!
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-08-26 22:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org:
Hi,
Please welcome Amit Jain as a new committer and PMC member of
the Apache
to expose the faceted data
bound to a system path. Otherwise we would need to expose the Lucene
API and OakDirectory
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-25 19:02 GMT+02:00 Lukas Smith sm...@pooteeweet.org:
Aloha,
Aloha
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org wrote:
IMO, this should work, even if the value is not a ValueImpl. In this
case, it should fall back to the API methods to read the binary.
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
/classifier
scopetest/scope
/dependency
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org wrote:
On 20/08/2014 10:11, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
oops, you are right, that would be a bad idea. I thought this is about
a production class and not a test utility.
I
are exclusive.
So at minimum if you can provide a patch which allows the admin to
choose between the two it would allow us to experiment and later see
how we can put a max cap on cache size.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Vikas Saurabh vikas.saur...@gmail.com wrote:
we can
Lucene index defintions multiple
LuceneIndex instances would be returned by LucenIndexProvider and each
impl would return a single plan
Chetan Mehrotra
if we can have a cache policy which can put up a max cap on memory
taken and also allow limit of number of entries then that would give a
more deterministic control on tuning the cache
Chetan Mehrotra
that this refactoring should be delayed (if that is to be
done) for some time till we get more stability in the two NodeStore
implementations.
Chetan Mehrotra
(ContentRepositoryImpl.java:161)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.repository.RepositoryImpl.login(RepositoryImpl.java:253)
... 43 more
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:00 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full
be fine
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org wrote:
Currently we use junit 4.10. By looking at the release notes of 4.11[0]
there's a nice improvement on the Assume that we use, being able to
provide a custom message.
(0)
https://github.com/junit
Hi Davide,
Recently Ian pointed to Metrics [1] project which is related to such
timing measurements. It might be helpful to use this (via a wrapper)
to measure timings in critical areas in Oak. So have a look at that
also
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://metrics.codahale.com/
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014
+1
All checks ok
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-08-01 11:45 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.4 release is available at:
https
with the suggestion of returning one plan per
index.
btw any plans to add hint support to force usage of specific index?
Chetan Mehrotra
it
would be implementation specific
Chetan Mehrotra
. The Boolean query created would maintain the order and might be
faster if the result from first clause is small.
Would it make sense to retain the order of property restrictions?
Chetan Mehrotra
This is being tracked via OAK-1708. Julian do we still require it or
these can be removed now?
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that even if the h2 dependency is now included with a 'test'
scope [0], we still
was 23ms, measured granularity was 10.0ms)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:34 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/384
a few calls to Item.save in vault codebase for the path
taken by package installation. It might be possible to use a sub
session to perform internal bookkeeping task by vault and use ther
other session to save the package content and thus avoid intermediate
save.
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Raquel Neves
raquel.ne...@alert-online.com wrote:
Timed out while waiting for a server that matches AnyServerSelector
Are you able to connect to Mongo via Mongo shell? Also can you try
connecting with host set 127.0.0.1
Chetan Mehrotra
internal implementation details and you
would have to refer to code for that.
btw whats the higher level objective here. That might help us to clarify better
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Abhijit Mazumder
abhijit.mazum...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is my first mail to Oak mailing
: Failed with seed -255091622
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.segment.CompactionMapTest.testCompactionMap(CompactionMapTest.java:89)
And on running the testcase it indeed fails with that seed
Chetan
();
+}
+}
+}
+}
+
+}
Interesting test approach Marcel!!
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
OAK-1645: Route find queries to Mongo secondary in MongoDocumentStore
This part still needs to be tested completely so I have set the fix
version now to 1.0.2
Chetan Mehrotra
Closeable
2. Have the actual implementations (i.e. SegmentNodeStore and
DocumentNodeStore) implement
Closeable and the close logic does an instanceof check to determine
if the NodeStore has to be
closed or not
Which approach to take?
Chetan Mehrotra
. OR refer to the jars (pre defined names) as part of Class-Path
attribute of oak-run manifest and place the required jars in same
directory. In that can you can just run the jar with java -jar
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3788:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.7.5)
2.9
S3DataStore require to set endpoint
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3788:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available
And then access the token value from the passed credential attribute
in session login call.
Wanted to check if this approach is ok or it should be done in a different way?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/security/authentication/preauthentication.html
[2]
http://svn.apache.org
Welcome Davide !!
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Please welcome Davide Giannella as a new committer and PMC member of
the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to
offer Davide committership based
benchmarking (possibly by
including the oak-run classes only
Various sub features in oak-run together do not still add much
complexity and are neatly seperated via various main methods. So
should be ok for now
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote
them in OSGi would again be tricky
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
On 27.5.14 4:48 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org
wrote:
We can turn the jar in to an OSGi container
a new module.
Chetan Mehrotra
and then it should work fine
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm upgrading the OakSlingRepositoryManager used for Sling tests to
Oak 1.0, and it's not indexing PDFs anymore - it used to with oak 0.8.
After uploading a text file
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Galo Gimenez galo.gime...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running an old version of Felix, maybe that is the problem?
Looks like you are using an old version of SCR. Try to run with more
recent version of SCR.
Chetan Mehrotra
For the record I have implemented a DataSource provider bundle [2]
(based on above flow) as part of SLING-3574. That bundle can be used
to configure a DataSource in OSGi env
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-3574
[2] https://github.com/chetanmeh/sling-datasource
Service Registry. If multiple BlobStore services
are registered then you can possibly specify a specific one by
configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter
(DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium)
Chetan Mehrotra
specify a specific one by
configuring the 'blobStore.target' to the required OSGi service filter
(DS 112.6 of OSGi Compedium)
Assuming same is true for NodeStore services.
Did not get the query?
btw I have update the docs at [1] (update should reflect on github in
couple of hours)
Chetan Mehrotra
SecurityProvider should get registered. Do you have the Felix running
with WebConsole. Whats the status of the
'org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security.SecurityProviderImpl'
Chetan Mehrotra
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Galo Gimenez galo.gime...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up Oak
in 1.0 would cause upgrade issue.
So should the change be reverted in trunk?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1587430
[2]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jackrabbit/oak/branches/1.0/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene
)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:10 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk-win7 while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7/builds/67
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
All tests passed and All checks ok.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Davide Giannella
giannella.dav...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Davide
'
Chetan Mehrotra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3772:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available
into the list and set the right type
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/osgi/design/raw/master/rfcs/rfc0197/rfc-0197-OSGiPackageTypeAnnotations.pdf
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1741?focusedCommentId=13979465#comment-13979465
Hi,
I was checking the CI status for Oak trunk and it seems build are not
getting built at [1] and [2].
Do we have to enable it somehow?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds
[2] http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/
DocumentNodeStore against NodeStore interface
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/osgi_config.html#DocumentNodeStore
[2]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/document/DocumentNodeStoreService.java
On Tue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra resolved JCR-3771.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
Applied the patch in http://svn.apache.org
and ensure
they are consistent from there on.
Also would helpful to review the list once i.e. if the package export
is required for e.g in oak-solr-osgi exports quite abit but are
probably not required.
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1741
be
acceptable. This would enable scenarios where traversal would be too
costly and Lucene can still be used to provide required results in a
lot lesser time.
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
In theory, the Lucene index could be used
of
META-INF/services/java.sql.Driver [1]. For such cases fragment bundles
can be avoided by having #1 monitor for such drivers and register them
programatically
3. DocumentNodeStoreService should only have a reference to DataSource
and use that
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7
he wants to use depending on the
usecase.
Chetan Mehrotra
I'm sorry but your test run exceeded 50.0 minutes.
Build failure is due to TimeOut
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Travis CI ju...@apache.org wrote:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #4073
Status: Errored
Duration
much understanding of Lucene internal can someone review the
approach taken and see if there are some major issues with it
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12639366/OAK-1702-shared-indexer.patch
[2]
https://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene
not sure if this a problem with the usecase taken. Or the
Lucene Index cursor management should be improved as in many case the
results would be multiple but the client code only makes use of
initial few results
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main
1 5 5 6 7
68 10038
Profiling the result shows that quite a bit of time goes in
org.apache.lucene.codecs.compressing.LZ4.decompress() (40%). This I
think is part of Lucene 4.x and not present in 3.x. Any idea if I can
disable compression?
Chetan
Would look further
Chetan Mehrotra
[1]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/plugins/index/lucene/FieldFactory.java#L44
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
Aside from the compression
can be
accomodated on each node I think it would be better if the index is
access from file system
Are the above concerns valid and should we relook into how we are
using Lucene in Oak?
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702
[2]
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3754:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Applied the patch in
# http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3760:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.7.6
FileDataStore: reduce synchronization
Chetan Mehrotra created JCR-3764:
Summary: Provide an option to disable use of inUseMap in
FileDataStore
Key: JCR-3764
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3764
Project: Jackrabbit Content
from node data. Yes it adds to
the complexity of backup but then such a feature is required then that
cost has to be paid.
Default setups currently do not use FileDataStore or BlobStore with
SegmentNodeStore. So as per defaults original design is still honored.
Chetan Mehrotra
to add
a separate method for that. But note that not all Blob implementations
have a blobId like in BlobStoreBlob.
For now there is no strong requirement for that. If need arises would
follow up this way
Chetan Mehrotra
to check the head revision
- cluster lease time = 1 min - This is the time after a cluster lease
would be renewed.
So we need to decide the time interval for Job for detecting recovery condition
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Amit Jain am...@ieee.org wrote:
Hi,
1) a cluster node
currently is not read from
NodeStore and in OSGi env is being provided by OSGi ConfigAdmin.
And more other settings like Index are currently stored as content
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Michael Marth mma...@adobe.com wrote:
On 02 Apr 2014, at 08:06, Jukka Zitting
jukka.zitt
Test case failure on oak-solr
Failed tests:
testOffsetAndLimit(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:1 but was:0
testOffsetAndLimitWithGetSize(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:2 but was:0
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:04 PM
to distinguish between active
used blobs
regards
Chetan
Chetan Mehrotra
Might be simpler to define the version in oak-parent
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:57 PM, resc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: reschke
Date: Mon Mar 31 13:27:46 2014
New Revision: 1583325
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1583325
Log:
use the latest H2 DB throughout
Modified
You can define the version in dependencyManagement section and that
would be inherited by child projects. For e.g. there are entries for
junit, easymock etc. In child project you just define the groupId and
artifactId
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc
+1. I also missed getting a clean way to get blobId from Blob. So
adding this method would be useful in other cases also
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote
I think the intention of the method is to return a value in
seconds with a five second resolution.
Makes sense. Change the logic to use seconds and also fixed method
names/constant to reflect that
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi
Travis says
I'm sorry but your test run exceeded 50.0 minutes.
One possible solution is to split up your test run.
-
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Travis CI ju...@apache.org wrote:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
they be removed.
Further can we implement other wrapper via proxies as it increases
work if new methods are to be added to DocumentStore
Chetan Mehrotra
);
}
}
}
}
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
We can kill the one in rdb (I didn't see the other one when I added it).
Would do
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote:
if there's a reason not to
It might effect test related to GC as GC logic would clean more than
expected set of blobs
Chetan Mehrotra
Hi,
Currently Commit.getModified has following impl
-
public static long getModified(long timestamp) {
// 5 second resolution
return timestamp / 1000 / 5;
}
-
The result when treated as timestamp cause the time to set to 0 i.e. 1970
I intend to fix this with (looking
in target folder
Chetan Mehrotra
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
CacheInvalidationIT
Looking into it
Chetan Mehrotra
Fixed the RDBDocumentStore to create file in target folder. However
current approach would cause issue in test env. Would start a separate
thread on that
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
I fixed that issue yesterday but build
Oak instance, right?
For OSGi case yes
Chetan Mehrotra
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make some query settings (limits on the number of nodes read)
configurable via OSGi. So far, I have a patch of about 100 KB, and this is
just
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
CacheInvalidationIT
Looking into it
Chetan Mehrotra
My fault. Looking into it
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Travis CI ju...@apache.org wrote:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #3809
Status: Broken
Duration: 444 seconds
Commit: afb6c5335b46067a3ea43ce69c987a46d9a3fd38
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13941445#comment-13941445
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on JCR-3754:
--
Couple of comments wrt patch
{code:java
Roger that!
For Java file IDE takes care of them. Probably we can just exclude
test/resources from rat plugin? Most of the missing headers are
reported in that probably
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Alex Parvulescu
alex.parvule...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes boys and girls, files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra reassigned JCR-3754:
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
[jackrabbit-aws-ext] Add retry logic to S3 asynchronous failed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3755:
-
Affects Version/s: 2.7.5
Export S3DataStore package to enable osgi resolution
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chetan Mehrotra updated JCR-3755:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.7.6
Export S3DataStore package to enable osgi resolution
501 - 600 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
