SPDX, Rats and Configs --- oh my

Greetings, I saw a note from Andy awhile back about exploring SPDX tag usage in Rat. I am currently working on Rat to make it much more configurable. Recent changes include the ability to detect SPDX license statements and an upcoming change that will check licenses found in archives (e.g. jars

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Accept jena-ontapi into the Apache Jena codebase

+1 On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 9:56 PM Arne Bernhardt wrote: > +1 > > Andy Seaborne schrieb am Fr., 3. Mai 2024, 19:17: > > > This is a lazy consensus VOTE to accept a PR for a new module > > jena-ontapi that enhances Apache Jena with OWL2 support. > > > > https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2420 >

Anyone going to Community over Code EU?

I will be attending Community over Code EU (June 3-5) in Bratislava. Is anyone else here planning on going? If so do we have enough people to do a birds of a feather session and perhaps find some more interested parties? Claude

Re: [ANN] New PMC member : Arne Bernhardt

Arne, Welcome to the fold. Claude On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 6:09 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > We are pleased to announce that Arne has accepted an invitation to join > the Apache Jena PMC. > > Please welcome Arne to this role! > > Andy > -- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 5.0.0

+1 checked as per checklist. I also run the 5.0.0 in a Raspberry Pi project and have had no problems there. On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 7:34 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena version 5.0.0. > > Release Vote > > This vote will be open until at least

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

ght be flying in no time. > > Marco > > > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 12:00 PM Claude Warren wrote: > > > Marco, > > > > Is your earlier code available in a repository somewhere? I'd love to > get > > a head start on the functions. > > > &g

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

do the job for your use case. > > Marco > > > > > > > > . > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 11:15 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > Background: I am building an "autonomous chair side table" for my wife. > > The goal is to have the table carry h

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

rql isn't either as it's all about geo data. > > What type of functions (access methods) would you like to perform on the > data? > > > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 8:24 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > Yes just x and y on a flat surface. > > > > On Sat 6 Jan 2024, 00

Re: [geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

Yes just x and y on a flat surface. On Sat 6 Jan 2024, 00:45 Marco Neumann, wrote: > Can you give an example? you just want to use x and y instead of WGS84 > coordinates? > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:28 PM Claude Warren wrote: > > > I want to use the geospatial

[geosparql] How can I specify a planar geometry?

I want to use the geospatial capabilities of Jena but without the global shape. I am looking for a planar geometry (flat, like a small scale map). Is there a way to specify this? Claude -- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

process question.

I haven't been around for awhile so I have a process question. How many reviews are required before code can be merged? Claude -- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Collection of paths?

RDF Collection provides a mechanism to create a list of Nodes. Is there a similar construct to create a list of Paths? I don't see one. Claude -- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Re: dataset union query.

OK. PBKAC. But I would like to know if there is a standard name for the Union of the graphs in the dataset rather than the arq specific one. On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 6:29 PM Claude Warren wrote: > is there a GRAPH name for the union of the models in a dataset? > > I have tried:

dataset union query.

is there a GRAPH name for the union of the models in a dataset? I have tried: ASK FROM { { (){+} }} now assuming that there is a in one of the models of the dataset it should return "true" Am I missing something? If not, I think I have found a bug. -- LinkedIn:

[Update] Reboot noise

At this time there is no way to reduce the noise from the reboot messages short of creating a new mailing list. If there is a strong desire to do that then I will start the process. However, while the noise is a bit higher I think that it is handy to know when the system has been updated. Claude

Mea Culpa

I was not following the dev list and made a change to main while a release vote was underway. I opened JENA-2352 [1] and closed it with a pull request [2] which was reviewed and I merged. The defect is major and the change is minor, but I will leave it to Andy to decide if I should back it out.

Re: Updates for sparql.org

Does anyone know how to ensure that the text "## Licensed under the terms of http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0; in the sparqler.service file will pass the RAT test. On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 5:09 PM Claude Warren wrote: > that can be done by editing > https://github

Re: Updates for sparql.org

tps://sparql.org? > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:03 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > Claude, > > > > Thank you for doing this. https works now as well which is great. > > > > One question: the ASF Infra email mentioned > > > > On 29/03/2023 12:43, Claude

Updates for sparql.org

Greetings, After several attempts the sparql.org site is automated. There was a recent announcement from infrastructure indicating that they would be automating reboots to handle system updates. The changes listed below were undertaken to ensure that the sparql.org site would restart properly.

Re: About JENA-2339 - security related

I am sorry that I am coming to this _VERY_ late. I don't understand why Permissions can not be used. It does address individual graphs. It does handle union graphs properly. It does handle the difference between graph update and model update. It calls back to the Security engine to

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-2242) Include VALUES clause in string when stringifying a WhereBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren resolved JENA-2242. - Fix Version/s: Jena 4.4.0 Resolution: Fixed fixed by pull request 1158 > Include VAL

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2242) Include VALUES clause in string when stringifying a WhereBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17468857#comment-17468857 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-2242: - Proposed fix in https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/1158

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-2092) Adding SELECT * subquery to construct with the query builder causes bad query.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren resolved JENA-2092. - Fix Version/s: Jena 4.2.0 Resolution: Fixed > Adding SELECT * subquery to constr

Weird parsing difference

If I use an ARQParser to parse the string "?x < 10" I get an E_LessThan object with the expected var and and XMLSchema#integer If I use NodeFactory.createLiteral(LiteralLabelFactory.createTypedLiteral( 10 )) I get the XMLSchema#int. This means that the following fails {noformat} E_LessThan lt1 =

Query Pattern question

Is there any effective difference (execution difference) between ElementGroup [ ElementPathBlock[ ], ElementPathBlock[ ] ] and ElementPathBlock[ , ] -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-2109) Migrate Permissions to V4 and implement a soft read error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren resolved JENA-2109. - Resolution: Fixed > Migrate Permissions to V4 and implement a soft read er

Pull merge process?

I created a pull request. Andy reviewed and approved it. Am i responsible for performing the merge or is that required to be done by a 3rd party? Claude -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-2109) Permissions should have a soft read error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren updated JENA-2109: Description: JENA-2055 uncovered a difficult to process issue. When permissions to read an object

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-2109) Migrate Permissions to V4 and implement a soft read error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren updated JENA-2109: Summary: Migrate Permissions to V4 and implement a soft read error (was: Permissions should have

[jira] [Created] (JENA-2109) Permissions should have a soft read error

Claude Warren created JENA-2109: --- Summary: Permissions should have a soft read error Key: JENA-2109 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2109 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type: Bug

SPARQL question

Is there a difference between CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o . } WHERE { { WHERE { ?s ?p ?o} } ?s2 ?p2 ?o2 } and CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o . } WHERE { { SELECT * WHERE { ?s ?p ?o} } ?s2 ?p2 ?o2 } -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place

Jena Permissions 4.0 / changelog?

I have completed the initial coding of the Permissions to add the HardError flag (so that the union code will work without a strange SecurityEvaluator. But I want to note the addition of the flag as it changes the old default operation.I don't find a changelog in our codebase. Are there any

Re: RDF / Linked data track @ ApacheCon

at 9:42 PM Claude Warren wrote: > Sorry for the cross posting. > > I am the chair for the RDF and Linked data track at ApacheCon this year. > I am looking for a few speakers to talk about RDF and or Linked data in > projects, particularly with respect to the use of Apache librari

Re: Towards Jena4

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2075 Might need a resolution before 4.0 (or perhaps it is already resolved there?) On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:46 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > I was just about ready to build 4.0.0. > > Then JENA-2074 came in (c.f. JENA-2061). > > I'm looking at fixing

[jira] [Created] (JENA-2075) Seq "set" and "add" methods yield different results.

Claude Warren created JENA-2075: --- Summary: Seq "set" and "add" methods yield different results. Key: JENA-2075 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2075 Project: Apache

Re: autoclosable iterator

iterators properly. > > 3/ Ensuring app code that uses the Graph or Model interface (and so may > be Secured* but it does not know) closes iterators properly. > > If (3) isn't any change going to impact existing use code? > > What's more, it does not seem to work > > On 10/03

Re: autoclosable iterator

I think that if the solution was any simpler it would have bit me. Change ClosableIterator to extend AutoCloseable as well as Iterator. mark ClosableIterator.close() with an @Override annotation and done. While Autoclosable throws an exception the ClosableIterator does not so the try with

Re: autoclosable iterator

sure lcose was called. We could move (some of) that > to jena-core. > > Is there an interaction with "var"? > > Andy > > On 06/03/2021 17:56, Claude Warren wrote: > > I know that we had discussed adding autoclosable to the iterators but > > decided not to. I fi

Re: Towards Jena4

, 2021 at 6:47 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/03/2021 18:18, Claude Warren wrote: > > I am adding the softReadRestriction processing to the 3.x version > > currently. I think it will directly translate to 4.x, and it gives us > the > > ability to make softReadR

Re: Towards Jena4

I am adding the softReadRestriction processing to the 3.x version currently. I think it will directly translate to 4.x, and it gives us the ability to make softReadRestriction the default setting rather than the way it is set in V3. I am only about 1/2 way through the code -- there are some bits

RDF-* and permissions

Greetings, RDF-* seems like it may cause problems for permissions. >From what I have seen we take a statement and convert that to a node where the label is the statement (or the triple?). But there does not seem to be a way to differentiate the RDF-* edge nodes from other Nodes. My question

RDF / Linked data track @ ApacheCon

Sorry for the cross posting. I am the chair for the RDF and Linked data track at ApacheCon this year. I am looking for a few speakers to talk about RDF and or Linked data in projects, particularly with respect to the use of Apache libraries, tool kits, etc. If you are interested please drop me

autoclosable iterator

I know that we had discussed adding autoclosable to the iterators but decided not to. I find that I am doing a lot of try/finally-close manipulation with extended iterators. Rather than rehashing the previous discussion (I'll assume we made the correct decision before), I would like to suggest

Re: read permissions on data.

undo that work which at the > low level looked expensive and it wasn't the primary requirement for > the > work. > > Having it Fuseki means that application code isn't in the same JVM as > the security mechanisms. > > I agree that soft/view mode is safer.

read permissions on data.

I started looking at the read permissions on graphs issue that was raised today. It seems to me that if we change the functioning of graph.find() then we need to change graph.contains() and graph.size() accordingly. This led me to look at the Model based classes, and there we find a number of

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2055) handle properly the denied access generated by jena-permission security evaluator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17292906#comment-17292906 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-2055: - I have two items to bring up here: *One – The record code

Re: ApacheCon 2021

? Perhaps we should take this discussion to the users list and see if there is interest over there. Thoughts? Claude On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:54 PM Marco Neumann wrote: > I'd like to see a demo session. > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Claude Warren wrote: > > > arrrgg. W

Re: ApacheCon 2021

ght be interested :) When is it and what does it take? > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:52 PM Claude Warren wrote: > > > > arrrgg. What was I thinking?? I don't know either. I meant to ping > this > > topic to see if there was any interest before dropping it. So if yo

Re: ApacheCon 2021

My talk at FOSDEM was ok. Basically just talked about what Jena is and does. Turns out that is a lot to say. It was all off the cuff and more like a radio show than anything else. On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:37 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 17/02/2021 11:43, Claude Warren wrote

Re: ApacheCon 2021

at 6:50 PM Claude Warren wrote: > not hearing any suggestions on this topic. I will drop it. > > Thx > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:41 PM Marco Neumann > wrote: > >> I am in touch with the Apache spatial group about the 2021 slots, and it >> looks like I will

Re: ApacheCon 2021

ial track. > > Marco > > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:43 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > There is a call for tracks for ApacheCon 2021. Do we want to propose a > > track again this year? Perhaps we could get some presentations from > users. > > > >

Re: use of * in import

2/2021 17:37, Claude Warren wrote: > > I noticed that the changes to querybuilder converted a bunch of > java.util.x > > import to java.util.* > > This is what PR review is for. It does help to be in-context. > > I have updated the PR - can you approve it now please?

use of * in import

I noticed that the changes to querybuilder converted a bunch of java.util.x import to java.util.* I have always heard that the asterisk should not be used in the import statement as it can cause conflicts that are very hard to debug when new versions of the specific library are updated and

ApacheCon 2021

There is a call for tracks for ApacheCon 2021. Do we want to propose a track again this year? Perhaps we could get some presentations from users. FYI: I gave an impromptu talk about Jena at the Apache "table" during FOSDEM at the beginning of this month. Claude -- I like: Like Like - The

ApacheCon@home 2020 - Semantic Graph BoF

Greetings, ApacheCon is almost upon us. This year it is online and free. So please make plans to attend. This year Apache Jena is hosting a Semantic Graph "Birds of a Feather" session[1] as part of the Jena track. Please come join us and discuss all things Semantic Graph. [1]

ApacheCon@Home Jena Track

We have a track at ApacheCon in which we can celebrate 20 years of Jena. I would like someone who has been on the project to give a Janus View of Jena. Janus being the Roman god that looks both to the past and the future. If anyone wants to give a talk about: 1) Your favorite

Re: 20 years of Jena @ ApacheCon

I forgot to state that proposals should be submitted in the "General/Other" category On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:10 PM Claude Warren wrote: > Greetings, > > It is 20 years since Jena was introduced to the world and we are trying to > put together a program track at

20 years of Jena @ ApacheCon

Greetings, It is 20 years since Jena was introduced to the world and we are trying to put together a program track at ApacheCon to celebrate! If you have a story to tell, a module to describe, or a project to crow about, please submit a proposal [1] and be sure to use the Jena name in the title

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-1863) ARQ formats query with wrong padding when rdf:type is present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren updated JENA-1863: Summary: ARQ formats query with wrong padding when rdf:type is present (was: Query builder creates

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JENA-1862) Query.cloneQuery is slow

So the objective here is to create another Query cloning method that is fast? Why not just replace the original Query.clone() with the new implementation? On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 10:42 PM Andy Seaborne (Jira) wrote: > > [ >

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17053955#comment-17053955 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - Pull [request 704|https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/704] has

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17052086#comment-17052086 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - I did not intent a full replacement for round-trip object

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17052065#comment-17052065 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - Actually, I wrote that this AM without looking at my test code

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17051866#comment-17051866 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - Upon further reflection it seems to me that the automatic

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17051679#comment-17051679 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - If instead of just calling {{NodeFactory.createLiteral

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050982#comment-17050982 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - [~andy] what would happen if we constructed a typed variable

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050592#comment-17050592 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - Would it make sense that rather than throw an exception just

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17049652#comment-17049652 ] Claude Warren edited comment on JENA-1841 at 3/2/20 10:38 PM: -- When creating

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1841) Side Effect of Datatype Use in Query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17049652#comment-17049652 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1841: - When creating a Node from an Object the QueryBuilder code does

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving Jena site from Apache CMS/SVN to Git

I think this can be the first step in making the entire site deployment process more automated and keeps us moving forward with supported technologies. However, I note that the Hugo documentation states: "Hugo ships with an internal Disqus template". I am concerned that the Discus connection may

Re: Logging (JENA-1005)

All the code is SLF4J isn't it? So this is just about what implementation of logging we will ship with various application packages like fuseki. WARs should probably not include an implementation as many larger servers (e.g. Websphere) manage the logging for the applications that use standard

Re: documentation update

I checked with Infra last night and they found an issue with the server. It should be up and running now. On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:52 PM Claude Warren wrote: > I tried to follow > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JENA/ProcessWebSite but I > could not get to https://cms.a

Re: documentation update

at 11:39 PM Claude Warren wrote: > Will take a look at docs this weekend > > On 18:24, Fri 10 Jan 2020 Andy Seaborne >> Ping? >> >> On 07/01/2020 16:58, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 07/01/2020 15:51, Claude Warren wrote: >> &

Re: documentation update

Will take a look at docs this weekend On 18:24, Fri 10 Jan 2020 Andy Seaborne Ping? > > On 07/01/2020 16:58, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > > > On 07/01/2020 15:51, Claude Warren wrote: > >> I did some documentation updates (SVN) and think I checked it in. B

documentation update

I did some documentation updates (SVN) and think I checked it in. But I must have missed a step. Is there documentation somewhere? Claude -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Re: [VOTE] Split off GH PR email traffic to a new list.

+1 I like this idea On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:02 PM Merlin Bögershausen < merlin.boegershau...@rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > +1 > > Am Di, Jan 7, 2020 at 14:44 schrieb Andy Seaborne : > > +1 > > > > On 07/01/2020 13:58, Aaron Coburn wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Aaron > >> > >> On Tue, 7 Jan

A "new" approach to query optimization

Background: I have been preparing to give a talk on DataSketches at FOSDEM 2020. I am doing this for an acquaintance and don't have much background in them but I am learning. Idea: This is a sketch called the Frequent Distinct Tuples (FTD)[1] sketch. What it can do is estimate the number of

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1806) Move all code examples to jena-examples package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17003576#comment-17003576 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1806: - I think that the package naming should

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JENA-1806) Move all code examples to jena-examples package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17001926#comment-17001926 ] Claude Warren edited comment on JENA-1806 at 12/22/19 12:53 PM

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1806) Move all code examples to jena-examples package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17001926#comment-17001926 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1806: - In addition to the RDFConnection examples the following should

Re: Examples?

and examples as a sort of very high-level test. If examples are > not working we might want to disable some of them instead of investing a > bunch of time fixing the specific problems, but wouldn't we want to know? > > ajs6f > > > On Dec 20, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Claude Warren wrote: &

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1806) Move all code examples to jena-examples package

Claude Warren created JENA-1806: --- Summary: Move all code examples to jena-examples package Key: JENA-1806 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1806 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1805) Add example of StreamRDF to RDFConnection.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren resolved JENA-1805. - Resolution: Fixed > Add example of StreamRDF to RDFConnect

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1805) Add example of StreamRDF to RDFConnection.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17001695#comment-17001695 ] Claude Warren commented on JENA-1805: - Added as part of https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/659 >

Examples?

I just finished an example of how to write a StreamRDF to an RDFConnection. I placed this in the jena-examples project and update the pom so that it tracks the jena version. I then noticed that the RDFConnections examples are in the jena-connections main source tree. I think that all examples

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1805) Add example of StreamRDF to RDFConnection.

Claude Warren created JENA-1805: --- Summary: Add example of StreamRDF to RDFConnection. Key: JENA-1805 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1805 Project: Apache Jena Issue Type

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1803) Query builder has no method to merge a where clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claude Warren resolved JENA-1803. - Fix Version/s: Jena 3.14.0 Resolution: Fixed > Query builder has no method to me

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1803) Query builder has no method to merge a where clause

Claude Warren created JENA-1803: --- Summary: Query builder has no method to merge a where clause Key: JENA-1803 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1803 Project: Apache Jena Issue

Re: [Discuss] Split the dev@ mailing list?

+1 This change seems like it will make my life easier so I am in favor ;) On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:48 AM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 05/12/2019 14:12, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > Now would be a good time to get this done so we can have dev@ for > > discussions. > > > > Please yes/no/etc and

Re: FOSDEM 2020

aude On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Marco Neumann wrote: > indeed looks like it's catering well for Neo4j and property graphs as it > is... > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:37 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > A bit late for that now. However there is a Graph Systems

Re: FOSDEM 2020

oom for jena > at FOSDEM? > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 9:51 AM Claude Warren wrote: > > > Is anyone else planning on going? If so I think we should volunteer at > the > > ASF table to talk to people about the Jena project. We will have > stickers. > > >

[NXT] -Permissions

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 9:57 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > What would be the requirements for permissions-extensions? If not in > use, I'd like it to be invisible - security can also be in application > via request processing (the usual ACL stuff). > All the permissions are implemented via a

FOSDEM 2020

Is anyone else planning on going? If so I think we should volunteer at the ASF table to talk to people about the Jena project. We will have stickers. Claude -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren

Re: Jena next (AFS)

I am a bit concerned about Streams. I am working with some large scale streams from stored objects in another project and keep coming up against stack overflow issues when attempting to convert merge them or convert from iterators. Perhaps I have not done it correctly but the iterator approach

Re: Jena next

afterthought you refer to shiro? to define permissions > functionality in a TTL configuration for high granularity would indeed be > nice. why not do it somewhat similar to how it's done in mainstream RDBMS > with SQL system tables? > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:07 AM Claude Wa

Re: Jena next

I would like to see the permissions functionality baked into the standard implementations rather than wrapped around as an afterthought. However, if that can't be done or is just more overhead than we want when permissions are not in use then I would hope that we will continue to use interfaces

Re: old tags

They can be deleted. On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 8:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote: > There are 3 tags from September 2013: > (Claude?) > > new-test-branch-point > new-test-core-graph-mem > tests%20for%20core%20-%20graph%20%20and%20%20mem > > Do they serve any purpose nowadays? > > Because tags get used

Re: OWL2 support in Jena.

n free-time. > I'm still working continuously on ONT-API, and so far I am not going to > abandon it. > Again, it is not an urgent question, > some things can be done first in bounds of ONT-API, and migration can be > done later (or not). > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:05 PM Claude W

Re: OWL2 support in Jena.

OK. I finally had a few minutes to look at this code. I agree that supporting OWL2 would be nice. There seems to be a lot here. (I have not read through it all and therefore do not have a full understanding of the contribution) I too am concerned about having enough developers that understand

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JENA-909) Create Docker launcher for Fuseki

My take on this. 1) We can use a profile that will activate if docker is installed 2) If we want to control what get released to the Docker repository under the Apache Jena name then I think we need to have Maven build the docker images. We need to restrict access to the repository so that only

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >