Chris,
Sorry, if you took my comments about pain of porting personally. That
wasn't my intension.
+1 for all your changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been doing this for a
lot longer than I have, but I didn't understand you pain until I had to go
through it personally. :P
Have you looked at Contrib in a while? There's a lot of projects that are
in Java's Contrib that are not in
My english isn't enough to understand this answer. I hope it is not related
with
employee-employer relationship as in the past.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 1:08 AM
To:
Chris,
Now that you have spent some time dealing with the porting what is your view
on creating a fully automated porting tool?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:23 PM
To:
Next to impossible/really, really hard. There are just some things that
don't map quite right. Sharpen is great, but it seems you need to code
written in a way that makes it easily convertible, and I don't see the
folks at Lucene changing their coding style to do that.
An example: 3.0.3 changes
Lucene locks directory with index after network related problems
Key: LUCENENET-457
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-457
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1014/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.LargeVolumeJettyTest.testMultiThreaded
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
fpientka updated LUCENE-3585:
-
Attachment: org.apache.lucene.store.jdbc.JdbcDirectory.zip
from COMPASS VERSION 2.2.0 GA (6 April,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3448:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3448-fix-optimization.patch
This patch fixes the optimized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154131#comment-13154131
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-2904:
-
Committed revision 1204453 on
Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
https://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.5.0-RC1-rev1204425/
as Lucene 3.5.0 and Solr 3.5.0.
Simon Willnauer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154161#comment-13154161
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2438:
---
3.5 is branched. But just my opinion: we should
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
https://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.5.0-RC1-rev1204425/
as Lucene 3.5.0 and Solr 3.5.0.
Simon Willnauer
Thanks for building this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154173#comment-13154173
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2438:
---
bq. 3.5 is branched. But just my opinion: we
+1, smoke tester is happy for me too.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154210#comment-13154210
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2438:
--
bq: I guess at the end of the day I think the
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/307/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 13437 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154257#comment-13154257
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-2382:
--
Noble,
I can't speak for every use case, but these
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/303/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.facet.taxonomy.directory.TestIndexClose.testLeaks
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
+1, search results clustering works, both on Java 5 and 6.
Staszek
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 13:47, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
https://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.5.0-RC1-rev1204425/
as Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154268#comment-13154268
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2667:
---
bq. I think the files admin-extra.html and
Perhaps it's a build error (i.e. not cleaning after the test)? This is the
exception that appears in the log:
The following exceptions were thrown by threads:
*** Thread: Lucene Merge Thread #0 ***
org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: sub-readers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: TestLFUCache.java
LFUCache.java
ConcurrentLFUCache.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154344#comment-13154344
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2906:
I've re-added lastAccessed to the class, as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154368#comment-13154368
]
Ben Roubicek commented on SOLR-2894:
Based on SOLR-792, it looked like there was some
Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lot of late
nights and gotten far more done in a week and a half than I expected. The
list of changes is very large, and fortunately, I've documented it in some
files that are in the branches root of certain projects. I'll list what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154394#comment-13154394
]
Yury Kats commented on SOLR-2724:
-
FWIW, PingRequest fails if there is no
Under Windows 7, this test fails 100% of the time for me - no other Lucene/Solr
test does this:
cd modules/benchmark
ant clean test -Dtestcase=LineDocSourceTest
Test output follows:
junit-sequential:
[junit] Testsuite:
org.apache.lucene.benchmark.byTask.feeds.LineDocSourceTest
I wasn’t able to reproduce using Ant.
But I can consistently reproduce the failure with both of these Maven cmdlines
under modules/facet/:
mvn
-Dtests.seed=78e524cead5893e3:4edf9eedd4ed0a36:1912c3654ff9f2e1
-Dtest=TestIndexClose clean test
mvn -Dtests.codec=Lucene3x
PingRequest fails if there is no defaultSearchField in the schema.xml
-
Key: SOLR-2910
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2910
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-3464:
---
I am reopening this issue as there is some API problem which makes
openIfChanged not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154430#comment-13154430
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3464 at 11/21/11 8:03 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154434#comment-13154434
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
{quote}
The problem: This cannot be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154437#comment-13154437
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
bq. I don't understand this statement,
+1 on the suggestion to move Close - IDisposable; not being able to use
using is such a pain, and an eyesore on the code.
Although it will have to be done properly, and not just have Dispose call
Close (you should have proper protected virtual Dispose methods to take
inheritance into account,
Hi,
the Lucene-Core package works for PANGAEA as drop-in replacement, so this is
all fine.
I found a problem (an inconsistency in the new openIfChanged API) when porting
the code to not use deprecated stuff:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464 (reopened). The deprecated
stuff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3464:
Attachment: LUCENE-3464_see_its_just_fine.patch
Thats no problem, it just calls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154440#comment-13154440
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
This code does not compile (fails by
Some of the Lucene classes have Dispose methods, well, ones that call Close
(and that Close method may or may not call base.Close(), if needed or not).
Virtual dispose methods can be dangerous only in that they're easy to
implement wrong. However, it shouldn't be too bad, at least with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154442#comment-13154442
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
bq. Thats no problem, it just calls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154441#comment-13154441
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
Uwe, see my patch, it uses its own
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1315#comment-1315
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
In my patch FIR returns whatever the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154445#comment-13154445
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
Robert read my comment about the reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154448#comment-13154448
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
Robert: If you wrap a standard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154449#comment-13154449
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
As I said before, this is simple, FIR's impl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154456#comment-13154456
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3464:
---
bq. As I said before, this is simple,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: TestLFUCache.java
LFUCache.java
ConcurrentLFUCache.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: ConcurrentLFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: TestLFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: LFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: ConcurrentLFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: ConcurrentLFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: FastLFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: (was: FastLFUCache.java)
Implement LFU Cache
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154465#comment-13154465
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2906:
All known bugs found and fixed, unit test looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154463#comment-13154463
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
{quote}
Not in your proof of concept. And this
Christopher,
I'd say there not that hard to get wrong, the pattern for correctly
implementing the IDisposable interface is well-established and has been
common practice since .NET 1.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b1yfkh5e(v=VS.100).aspx
Additionally, I said protected virtual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154468#comment-13154468
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3464:
-
And just again: I want to point out this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154478#comment-13154478
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2772:
1) The _original_ code was more broken then what we have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154482#comment-13154482
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2906:
---
bq. IMHO, ready for review and possible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154484#comment-13154484
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2772:
---
I don't know if that will help but maybe we
I tried this, and the test fails under Maven; codec's class is
o.a.l.index.codecs.lucene3x.Lucene3xCodec instead of
o.a.l.index.codecs.preflexrw.PreFlexRWCodec.
So, it's a classpath ordering issue. I'll see if I can do some re-ordering.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154505#comment-13154505
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2772:
Simon: see parent issue with link to JodaTime thread where
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154509#comment-13154509
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2772:
bq. 1) The original code was more broken then what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154514#comment-13154514
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-2906:
bq. shawn, is it possible to upload a diff file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-2906:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2906.patch
I figured out what I did wrong. You have to 'svn add' the files before
Hi Chris,
First of all, thank you for your great work on 3.0.3 branch.
I suppose you took 2.9.4 as a code base to make 3.0.3 port since some of
your problems are the same with those I faced in 2.9.4g branch.
(e.g,
Support/MemoryMappedDirectory.cs (but never used in core),
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154551#comment-13154551
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2772:
I guess i don't understand what exactly you mean by
I committed a fix for all modules' POMs in r1204732. All tests pass for me
locally (except for benchmark module's LineDocSourceTest: LUCENE-3583).
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:47 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154691#comment-13154691
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2910:
This sounds like a user configuration error.
the ping
So, if we're getting back to the line by line port discussion... I
think either side of this discussion is too extreme. For the case in
point Chris just mentioned (which I'm not really sure what part was so
difficult, as I ported that library in about 30 minutes from
scratch)... anything is a pain
Troy,
I am not againt it if you can continue to understand and port so easyly.
No one here -I think- wants a java-tastes code.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:42 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154710#comment-13154710
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-1972:
Based on filenames, I couldn't find an existing
To clarify, it wasn't as much *difficult* as it was more *painful*. Above,
I was inferring that it was more difficult that the rest of the code, which
by comparison was easier. It wasn't painless to try and map where code
changes were from the java classes into the .Net version. I prefer that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-2438:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2438.patch
OK, this patch does a better job with the matchVersion as per Muir.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/304/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 25151 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
Hi all, I have need of the functionality proposed in SOLR-1351, and I
would like the chance to dip my toes in the water to implement this
what would be needed to resurrect this patch ?
-- Greg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I posted a patch in LUCENE-3583 - simple fix. I will commit it shortly.
Shai
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but thats not my fault: the test has been broken for a long
time... I just exposed its brokenness.
I'd rather it fail than see confusing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3583:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3583.patch
Patch fixes the problem in LineDocSourceTest - add tasks.close()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3583.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Assignee: Shai Erera
I fixed LUCENE-3583. It was a test issue, so I'm not sure if it's worth a
respin. But if you do, then we should mark the issue as Fix Version: 3.5
(not 3.6) and merge the changes to the 3.5 branch.
Shai
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13154930#comment-13154930
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3583:
---
I still think we should also commit
82 matches
Mail list logo
