Re: 8.6.3 Release

The way GitHub works for contributors is that you are expected to fork a repo and then push to your fork. At that point when you go to the PR area, you'll see a convenient yellow dialog to create a PR based on your pushed branch. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http

Re: terms filter in json.facet

> > Can I raise a JIRA and work on the code change to support it? > Of course. Search for an existing JIRA first, just in case someone reported this already. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:35 PM g

Re: Should ChildDocTransformerFactory's limit be local or global for deep-nested documents?

On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 9:13 AM Bar Rotstein wrote: > Hey David, > long time no speak. > > I think I'll start working on SOLR-14869. > > Do you have any tips that might enable me to tackle it a little faster? > > ChildDocTransformer loops over document IDs. They should be in the same segment.

Re: Facing issue while connection with mysql

Please ask for help on the solr-user list. This dev list is for internal development. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:56 AM Harry Singh Makkar wrote: > Hi team, > > I want to make a core instance

Re: terms filter in json.facet

Please ask on the solr-user list. I think the answer is "no" but I'm not sure. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:10 PM gopikannan wrote: > Hi, > In normal facet request below can be used to

Re: BlockMaxConjunctionScorer for Occur.FILTER query clauses

Hi. Block Max WAND is an optimization that can skip docs based on score thresholds with some hints in the index. If there are no MUST/SHOULD clauses in the boolean query, then there is no score. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon

Re: Solr Alpha (EA) release of Reference Branch

cannot be ported because they purterb tests even if the change itself is fine. So those can't be ported unless someone's willing to alo address the test failures that go with it. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:36 AM

Re: restlet dependencies

No strong opinion from me. I think the back-compat concern is minor. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 5:42 PM Noble Paul wrote: > I think we should call that out in the changes.txt and make the changes >

Re: Solr Alpha (EA) release of Reference Branch

y out any software. I'm -0 on doing an official release for alpha software because it's unnecessary to achieve the goals and somewhat confusing. I think the Solr 4 alpha/beta situation was different -- it was not some fork a committer was maintaining; it was the master branch of its time, and it was de

Re: CWiki and IDE instructions

Moreover, with more and more helpful information showing up in the codebase itself lately (as Dawid pointed to), I think we should remove corresponding information in the wiki. Less to maintain, more/different places of information can be more confusing. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search

Re: Should ChildDocTransformerFactory's limit be local or global for deep-nested documents?

Glad to hear from you again Bar! Also, FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14869 is a serious bug relating to child documents. It returns deleted docs! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 3:23 PM Bar

Re: I'd like some discussion about the problem outlined in SOLR-14861

. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:15 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > All: > > The test framework, and perhaps all of Solr has a disorderly shutdown > process. I’ve seen at least one case where this is

Re: Should ChildDocTransformerFactory's limit be local or global for deep-nested documents?

I think that's a bug! Good catch! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 11:38 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > I am indexing a deeply nested structure and am trying to return it > with fl=*,

Re: Backward compatability handling across major versions

you point to is very clear to me, as it's a web service API endpoint. We *can* break back-compat on a major release :-). But such discussion deserves its own issue about breaking that compatibility. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On

Re: restlet dependencies

These resources are fundamentally a part of the configSet and can (in general) affect query results and thus flushing caches (via a reload) is appropriate. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:06 AM Noble Paul

Re: restlet dependencies

gic and potentially premature reload if there are additional edits to be done (e.g. query-elevation or other word lists). ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 5:46 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com&

Re: Filestore, subsume userfiles requirement

The "userfiles" thing is merely a directory. There's no CRUD API on it. Even if the CRUD API of the file store isn't active in standalone -- I think that doesn't matter. You're left with the /filestore/ dir to put there what you want in standalone mode. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/S

Re: restlet dependencies

I think it can simply be a limitation of standalone. If you want something similar to managed-resources, use SolrCloud. I want to get to this for 8.7, maybe this weekend, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12987 which can be used to help inform users of deprecations. ~ David Smiley

Re: Filestore, subsume userfiles requirement

Yes. And I think it's high time that coreRootDirectory default to /something (e.g. "cores") ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:42 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Would that file store also be un

Filestore, subsume userfiles requirement

hat would be another avenue of use separate from the configSet. You can already upload single files to the file store :-) ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: 8.6.3 Release

on the other branches in one go? If not, I think it'd make sense for that to happen. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 6:22 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > I will push the 8.7 release by a week to give Jason enough headr

Re: restlet dependencies

Ishan: can you be more specific please? How is it less secure or harder to secure than, say, a configSet upload (internally multiple files)? ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya

Re: restlet dependencies

does not delete the existing files? ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:28 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > I agree we should deprecate the managed resources feature, it was the > first thing I was asked to build by

Re: 8.6.3 Release

ntance for the regression. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:07 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > Hi all, > > I ran into a query-parsing bug recently in SOLR-14859 that caused > problems for some of my u

Re: Apache Bug Bash

Sounds great! I'll try and be more responsive to any bugs reported through the bash. +1 (PMC) ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:56 AM Tom DuBuisson wrote: > Lucene Developers, > > As part of our sp

Re: Github PR Actions

issue. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 1:00 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > I think this is a good idea. In general, I'm +1 on improving PR > validations as much as possible, and as Houston says, we can

Logging deprecations

static method taking a String loggerName (that is an ID of the feature likewise) and a String warning message. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: Solr configuration options

<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/SIP-11+Uniform+cluster-level+configuration+API> / SOLR-14843 is where this discussion has gone. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:03 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe

Re: Tests that use bin/solr?

run from a Docker image, thus insulating platform issues further. Separately, someday I do want to work on running SolrExampleTests against the docker image, which will be more possible once the projects merge. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com

Tests that use bin/solr?

te a JettySolrRunner but instead use the configured one. This would then be executed by the smoke tester and maybe a future Docker release process. I have test infrastructure I wrote where I work that does this sort of thing for our Solr plugins, and it works great. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr S

Re: Name for the directory above solr.home?

rently in solr.home get some new special name. I don't think we need new special dirs though. And I think it's useful that "solr.home" retain all the stuff in it already. Any thoughts on this thread Jan? I mention you because you tend to comment on such matters. > > Regards,

Re: Checking dependencies in gradle after code is removed

ject members. Maybe it should be beneath "/help" and be named "for-committers" -- thus "/help/for-committers"? ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 5:58 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > What

Re: Name for the directory above solr.home?

gt; time for the Solr in Docker final decisions. > Yeah; I hope you like my suggestions above. > Regards, >Alex. > P.s. To make it more interesting, I am also confused about pid files > going into bin directory. I bet docker image puts them somewhere else. > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020

Re: The "supported" way to run gradle -- was: Re: [jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-9495) Ref Guide gradle buildSite ignores version parameter

Yep; I also use oh-my-zsh with the gradle plugin, and so I simply type "gw" ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:32 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I’m using zsh shell with oh-my-zsh and the gradle plugin. It

Re: SIP-10: Solr 9 examples: Can we use Ref Guide as a dogfood example?

ning at who move beyond some of the very early basics. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:23 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > That Jeopardy set reads very dubious. Content that was collected by >

Re: Checking dependencies in gradle after code is removed

Thanks Dawid for that fantastic explanation! What's the path of the ".lock" file you refer to? gradlew -p solr/solrj dependencies I observe it has many named dependency trees; some quite large. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmile

Re: SIP-10 Improve Getting Started experience

Thank you, thank you, thank you! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:42 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Dear all, > > Based on the discussion in SOLR-14726, Slack, and in many other JIRA >

Re: Request to release packages(Apache Solr Solrj,Apache Solr Core) with latest netty

It was just recently updated: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14606 8.7 will use 4.1.50.Final. I just checked by using a local distribution (cd solr; ant dist) on branch_8x and looking for the netty jar files therein. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http

Re: Name for the directory above solr.home?

The parent directory of Solr home is not special. Where Solr Home is (as you know) configurable. It's default location is different too, since it's in /var/solr for both the Docker & service install script. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin

Re: Atomic updates, copyField and stored=true

Sounds reasonable to me. I suggest that you try to find which people worked specifically on the existing restriction at the time RTG came about and ask them. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:56 PM Erick

Re: [VOTE] Lucene logo contest, third time's a charm

(binding) vote: D, A1 (thanks Ryan for your thorough vote instructions & preparation)

Re: Code Analysis during CI?

Sounds great to me! I'm really glad to hear it works with the PR workflow, and only on the files touched in the PR. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 8:03 PM Tom DuBuisson wrote: > Tomás, > Oof,

Re: Analytics Module; maybe should be 3rd party?

I'd prefer discussion about removal of contribs (or major parts of Solr) occur here first with a vote, and _then_ file a JIRA if the conclusion is to remove it. It's more visible to each other and the community. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com

Analytics Module; maybe should be 3rd party?

ibuted it) (?), then let it be. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: RoadMap?

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:03 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I find it highly depressing that we can't, *in a major release*, manage > to get rid of our deprecations -- particularly for code that has a new home > and is packaged in a form that is trivial to install

Re: 2020-08 Committer virtual meeting

as good/bad as can be expected. But 4 weeks from today is Activate. The week after is ApacheCon. So what about in only 3 weeks -- the 17th? Or say 6 weeks out -- October 8th? I'm up for anything. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue

Re: RoadMap?

age ready at that time (rather than just the promise of one). Also, users generally are cautious on performing a major version upgrade. There's time. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:06 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: &g

Re: Welcome Atri Sharma to the PMC

Welcome! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am pleased to announce that Atri Sharma has accepted the PMC's > invita

Re: timeAllowed NPE and possible patch

Please file a JIRA issue. Also mention which version of JIRA you use for the "Affects version". ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:49 AM Bram Van Dam wrote: > Hey folks, > > I would occasional

2020-08 Committer virtual meeting

I have the ability to do this recording via Salesforce's G-Suite subscription. - Published notes: I (or someone) will take written meeting notes that are ultimately published for anyone to see (not restricted to those invited). They will be transmitted to the dev list. ~ David Smile

[CVE-2020-13941] Apache Solr information disclosure vulnerability

to trusted paths * Prevent remote connection when using Windows UNC Paths ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: BadApple report, but please read the first bit

Thanks Kevin; clearly I missed the link to that which I can now see at fucit. I was worried I may have worked on something that could have perturbed this recent issue but no -- I don't think so. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed

Re: Remove/Replace Nashorn, Remove Eval

plug in GraalVM as a JS impl! This blog explains it well: https://golb.hplar.ch/2020/04/java-javascript-engine.html ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:34 AM Eric Pugh wrote: > Does

Re: Performance testing is necessary now

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:56 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I was glad to read your last mail with a softer tone, Ishan. Respect! I > really appreciate all your hard work and passion for Lucene/Solr, and > thanks for putting time into benchmarking, it really shows that you care > about the project!

Re: BadApple report, but please read the first bit

Do we have any long term (aka "longitudinal") pass/fail rates for tests? SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest in particular is kinda-sorta tied to HDFS, and that's going away to a plug-in for 9.0. The shared file system notion isn't well supported in SolrCloud, I think. ~ David Smiley Apa

Re: hybrid document routing

Cool! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:55 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > SOLR-14728 supports sub-second performance on joins with more than 1 > million values from the from index. Nice for access c

Re: Naming of non-SolrCloud clusters in the Ref Guide

it's not a terrible or confusing name (IMO). I agree with Jan's concern that "self-managed" is ambiguous as to who/what is managing Solr. It reminds me of the debacle of the "implicit router" -- boy was that a bad choice! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer

Re: Performance testing is necessary now

oesn't stop progress. We don't go changing code just for the heck of it; we do it for a variety of matters. If those things are blocked, we'll be trading the opportunity cost of the change for the performance risk. Each issue is different -- has its own risk-reward trade-off. Just keep this in m

Re: SOLR-13412 (Make the Lucene Luke module available from a Solr distribution)

r could run GUI apps or if somehow Luke could run as an Applet or something. Or maybe "java web start" but I thought that technology might be dead. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 8:57 PM Tomoko Uchida w

Re: When zero offsets are not bad - a.k.a. multi-token synonyms yet again

There already is one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8776 ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 1:30 PM Roman Chyla wrote: > I'll have to somehow find a solution for this situation, giving up > o

Re: hybrid document routing

Are you sure you need the docs in the same shard when maybe you could assume a core exists on each node and then do a query-time join? ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:34 PM Joel Bernstein wrote: > I h

Re: SolrClient and making requests asynchronously

Maybe the method could be overloaded with an executor... there's a balance between expert control and simplicity. Shrug. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:56 AM Bram Van Dam wrote: > > public Completable

Re: Migrating to Cloudbees

Sweet! Thanks Uwe! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:52 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Thanks Erick! > > I hope the remaining issues sort out quite soon. > > For the release managers: As I did

Re: When zero offsets are not bad - a.k.a. multi-token synonyms yet again

ut risking breaking position-sensitive queries. So... I'm not a fan of this constraint on offsets. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:49 AM Roman Chyla wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Yes, they are n

Re: Standardize Leading Test or Trailing Test

+1 to standardize on something. This has been brought up before: LUCENE-8626 -- credit to Christine who started the work. I recommend resuming the discussion there. ~ David On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:08 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 > > Thanks

Re: SolrClient and making requests asynchronously

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 10:47 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > I am +1 to this approach. Some thoughts inline. > > How would query timeout be respected in this approach? > The backend would need to "complete exceptionally" with a timeout exception we think is appropriate. It'd call

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.1 RC1

Bravo to Gus for doing a more thorough examination of the release to see there is a serious problem! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:36 AM Gus Heck wrote: > Digging a little further, I not

Re: Deprecate Schemaless Mode?

ically any change though; even a simple change from opt-out to opt-in to "data driven" URPs. I don't like the status quo. BTW I've also seen people try to take "bin/solr -e cloud" to production :-( "Hey look, this is how a tutorial told me to run SolrCloud" (so the logic go

Re: Welcome Gus Heck to the PMC

Welcome Gus! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:21 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am pleased to announce that Gus Heck has accepted the PMC's invitation

Re: Welcome Munendra SN to the PMC

Welcome Munendra! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:20 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am pleased to announce that Munendra SN has accepted the PMC's > invita

Re: Welcome Namgyu Kim to the PMC

Welcome Namgyu! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:20 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am pleased to announce that Namgyu Kim has accepted the PMC's > invita

Re: 8.6.1 Release

FYI I volunteered to do the docker 8.6.1 release already: https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/328#issuecomment-666494362 I recommend other committers interested in docker "Watch" that repo, just as you probably do for lucene-solr. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search

Re: SolrClient and making requests asynchronously

; > We must create a simple small interface for this as will > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 6:25 AM David Smiley wrote: > > > > > > Hello devs, > > > > > > I'd like to have an API design discussion here on the dev li

SolrClient and making requests asynchronously

a user-friendly API, and my hope is that the eventual implementation is reasonable. I hope I haven't bored you all to tears and that you find this public discussion useful. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: 8.6.1 Release

I have a PR up: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1706 reviews welcome; I won't merge to a release branch without one. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:43 AM Houston Putman wrote: > Thanks

Re: 8.6.1 Release

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9443 This regression on the highlighter is trivial; just revert a commit to a file and maybe suppress a warning. I'll get this into 8.6.1 today. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Jul

Re: Feature Request: Smoothing scores for documents without search term

, and another that matches a subset of "similar" docs that don't necessarily match the original query. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:52 PM Cameron M VandenBerg wrote: > Hello, > > >

Re: Approach for a new Autoscaling framework

stractions within Solr that could be used to hide implementation details that are found in some APIs currently in Solr. Good 'ol software engineering practices. Am I missing something? ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Jul 26, 2020

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida to the PMC

Welcome Tomoko! ~ David On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:55 PM Erick Erickson wrote: > Welcome Tomoko! > > > On Jul 24, 2020, at 4:44 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote: > > > > Welcome Tomoko! > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > >> 24. jul. 2020 kl. 19:08 skrev Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < >

Re: Welcome Mike Drob to the PMC

Welcome Mike! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:28 PM Kranti Parisa wrote: > wow, this is great news. Congratulations Mike! > > Best, > Kranti > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 4:04

Re: Gradle cutover timing

+1 ~ David On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > Solr is changing very rapidly, from the reference impl to moving DIH, > ExtractingRequestHandler, et. al. to packages etc. This is going to make > maintaining both the Gradle and Ant builds for trunk increasingly >

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida to the PMC

Welcome Tomoko! ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 2:26 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > I am pleased to announce that Tomoko Uchida has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Tomoko! > > -- > Adrien >

Re: 8.6 release

, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:05 PM David Smiley wrote: > Thanks starting this discussion, Cassandra. > > I reviewed the issues I was involved with and I don't quite see something > worth noting. > > I plan to add a note about a change in defaults within UnifiedHighlighter > that could

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov to the PMC

Welcome Michael! ~ David On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 7:57 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > I am pleased to announce that Michael Sokolov has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > Welcome Michael! > > -- > Adrien >

Re: RoadMap?

ation of the issue because our contributors don't know any better than to put something inappropriate there. But the edit screen works. I think Lucene might release v9 without Solr if Solr is going to drag its feet for too long. Wearing my Lucene hat (er... well shirt), I support that within reason. Agreed

Re: 8.6 release

>>>> > >>>> > On 27 Jun 2020, at 04:59, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >>>> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > I tagged SOLR-14590 for 8.6, The PR is read

Re: SolrCloud upgrade process

ion to continue writing in > the previous format for a while, that would allow switching to writing the > new format once all nodes have been upgraded (or more likely when the > cluster admin decides so). > > Ilan > > Le mar. 30 juin 2020 à 21:34, David Smiley a écrit : > >&

SolrCloud upgrade process

remove the read-only status. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: PGP key to sign the 8.6 branch

I signed and sent the updated key to the ubuntu & sks-keyservers servers. Before signing, via other communication channels, I verified that the hexadecimal key ID was authentic. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Tue, Jun 30, 2020

Re: PGP key to sign the 8.6 branch

out gpg: keyserver receive failed: Keyserver error ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:33 AM Robert Muir wrote: > I have had problems with gpg last few hours too. pgp.mit.edu has been > slow/not working even for

Re: StreamExpressionTest failures

I reverted the change in behavior (not the entire commit which was 99% good stuff) which will also fix the test. Just pushed to master and will do for 8x in a few minutes. ~ David On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:33 AM David Smiley wrote: > This fails due to my refactor of path handling ins

Re: Not able to edit Confluence

Maybe first check that you are using your Apache ID and not some older ID before you became a committer? On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 2:58 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > I am trying to create a SIP but unable to create a page. What am I doing > wrong? > -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > -- Sent

Re: Wiki access to post SIP

Mike, I granted you some permissions. I'm not certain if you can edit the SIP Gus created but try. If not, you should now be able to create and edit pages you create. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:02 PM

Re: StreamExpressionTest failures

This fails due to my refactor of path handling inside the cat stream (oops!). Either Solr is wrong or the test is wrong depending on your point of view as to what sort of paths Solr should expose. See the dev list thread I started on the choice. On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:12 AM Erick Erickson

Should Solr expose OS specific file paths?

I started a conversation in Slack with Jason but think Slack is too narrow of an audience so I'm going to copy-paste it here. We want your opinions! Here's a copy of it; I hope this doesn't look terrible on the mailing list. David Smiley <https://app.slack.com/team/UEATAEXDE> Today at 11

Re: 8.6 release

;> made and that has not already the appropriate "Fix Version"? >> > >> > Currently there 3 unresolved issues flagged as Fix Version = 8.6: >> > Add tests for corruptions caused by byte flips LUCENE-9356 >> > Fix linefiledocs compression or replace in tes

Re: Review your squash-merge message to remove duplicate text

, as the PR title should already have the relevant info (Jira ID + > short description), right? And when the PR title does not contain this > info, we should edit it prior to commit. > Making sure I understand you correctly. > > Ilan > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 6:00 AM David Smil

Re: The moment you've all been waiting for PLEASE READ, Gradle builds will start failing on warnings on 9x!

ors, not us. Not that the items aren't pertinent to us but we don't need to fill it out into the PR to display to everyone what we did/didn't do. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:47 PM Erick Erickson wrote: &

Review your squash-merge message to remove duplicate text

separate individuals: 57a892f896f543913d6b22a81577f69184cd94b6 25428013fb0ed8f8fdbebdef3f1d65dea77129c2 26075fc1dc06766a9d2af8bd5dd14243c0463a6b Thanks, ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley

Re: 8.6 release

Thanks starting this discussion, Cassandra. I reviewed the issues I was involved with and I don't quite see something worth noting. I plan to add a note about a change in defaults within UnifiedHighlighter that could be a significant perf regression. This wasn't introduced in 8.6 but introduced

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >