Re: Next release...

2015-11-13 Thread Adrien Grand
Le jeu. 12 nov. 2015 à 18:21, Erick Erickson a écrit : > Are there any tentative (not firm commitments) time frames for 6.0? > I don't think we talked about it before. Maybe we could aim for something like February 2016. This would be one year after 5.0, which I think

Re: Next release...

2015-11-13 Thread david.w.smi...@gmail.com
+1 to not sooner than February 2016 (one year later) On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:25 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Le jeu. 12 nov. 2015 à 18:21, Erick Erickson a > écrit : > >> Are there any tentative (not firm commitments) time frames for 6.0? >> > > I

Re: Next release...

2015-11-12 Thread Erick Erickson
e data loss problems in CDCR so I don't >>>> think we should put CDCR in 5.4 unless that issue is fixed first. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Erick Erickson <ericke

Re: Next release...

2015-11-10 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar
SOLR-6273) > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to > push it into 5x just before we cut the next release. So if 5.4 is > imminent I'd like to know for my planning. > > Thanks! > Erick > >

Re: Next release...

2015-11-10 Thread Mark Miller
the CCR (SOLR-6273) > > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to > > push it into 5x just before we cut the next release. So if 5.4 is > > imminent I'd like to know for my planning. > > > > Thanks! > > Erick > > > > -

Re: Next release...

2015-11-10 Thread Jan Høydahl
Created a blocker https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8269 so we don’t forget… There could be other workarounds than waiting for their release, feel free to degrade priority if necessary. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect

Re: Next release...

2015-11-10 Thread Erick Erickson
Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) >> > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to >> > push it into

Re: Next release...

2015-11-10 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
2 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) >>> > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to >>> > push it into 5x just before we

Re: Next release...

2015-11-10 Thread Adrien Grand
Le lun. 9 nov. 2015 à 19:16, Upayavira a écrit : > I would love to see a 5.4 release. All the tasks I had planned for the > admin UI are done, so, barring any unforseen and as yet unreported bugs, > it is ready to go. > > How much time commitment does it typically take to make

Re: Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Upayavira
Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le lun. 9 nov. 2015 à 16:32, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > >> > >> What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) > >> is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot

Re: Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Adrien Grand
Le lun. 9 nov. 2015 à 16:32, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> a écrit : > What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to > push it into 5x just before we cut the next rel

Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Erick Erickson
What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to push it into 5x just before we cut the next release. So if 5.4 is imminent I'd like to know for my planning. Thanks! Erick

Re: Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Erick Erickson
>> What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) >> is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to >> push it into 5x just before we cut the next release. So if 5.4 is >> imminent I'd like to know for my planning. > > > I t

Re: Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Jack Krupansky
erick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) > > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to > > push it into 5x just before we cut the next release. So if 5.4 is > > imminent I'd like to

Re: Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Erick Erickson
Make that CDCR On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-6273) > is about ready to rock-n-roll. It's a lot of code, and I don't want to > push it into 5x just before

Re: Next release...

2015-11-09 Thread Susheel Kumar
on, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le lun. 9 nov. 2015 à 16:32, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > a > > > écrit : > > >> > > >> What is the thinking on cutting 5.4? It looks like the CCR (SOLR-62

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-831) revist jar packaging prior to next release

2009-05-22 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
-900. Now solr-core does not contain solrj and there is no solr-commons jar anymore. Hoss's comment on moving the source folders remains valid. But I think we can mark this one as resolved/invalid. revist jar packaging prior to next release

[jira] Assigned: (SOLR-831) revist jar packaging prior to next release

2009-05-21 Thread Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar reassigned SOLR-831: -- Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar revist jar packaging prior to next release

[jira] Created: (SOLR-831) revist jar packaging prior to next release

2008-10-29 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
revist jar packaging prior to next release -- Key: SOLR-831 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-831 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components: clients - java Affects Versions

Re: Next release?

2008-02-20 Thread Doğacan Güney
Hi, On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Andrzej Bialecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I propose to start planning for the next release, and tentatively I propose to schedule it for the beginning of April. I'm going to close a lot of old and outdated issues in JIRA - other committers

Re: Next release?

2008-02-20 Thread Dennis Kubes
Andrzej Bialecki wrote: Hi all, I propose to start planning for the next release, and tentatively I propose to schedule it for the beginning of April. Sounds good. I'm going to close a lot of old and outdated issues in JIRA - other committers, please do the same if you know

Re: Next release?

2008-02-20 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Doğacan Güney wrote: There are some issues I want to put in before a release. Most are trivial but I would like to draw attention to NUTCH-442, as it is an issue that I (and looking at its votes, others) want to see resolved before another release. I really could use some review and

Next release?

2008-02-19 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Hi all, I propose to start planning for the next release, and tentatively I propose to schedule it for the beginning of April. I'm going to close a lot of old and outdated issues in JIRA - other committers, please do the same if you know that a given issue no longer applies. Out

Next release - 0.10.0 or 1.0.0 ?

2007-03-28 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Hi all, I know it's a trivial issue, but still ... When this release is out, I propose that we should name the next release 1.0.0, and not 0.10.0. The effect is purely psychological, but it also reflects our confidence in the platform. Many Open Source projects are afraid of going to 1.0.0

RE: Next release - 0.10.0 or 1.0.0 ?

2007-03-28 Thread Steve Severance
: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:38 PM To: nutch-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Next release - 0.10.0 or 1.0.0 ? Hi all, I know it's a trivial issue, but still ... When this release is out, I propose that we should name the next release 1.0.0

Re: Next release - 0.10.0 or 1.0.0 ?

2007-03-28 Thread Dennis Kubes
+1 Andrzej Bialecki wrote: Hi all, I know it's a trivial issue, but still ... When this release is out, I propose that we should name the next release 1.0.0, and not 0.10.0. The effect is purely psychological, but it also reflects our confidence in the platform. I think that a 1.0

Re: Next release - 0.10.0 or 1.0.0 ?

2007-03-28 Thread Chris Mattmann
that we should name the next release 1.0.0, and not 0.10.0. The effect is purely psychological, but it also reflects our confidence in the platform. Many Open Source projects are afraid of going to 1.0.0 and seem to be unable to ever reach this level, as if it were a magic step beyond which