GitHub user gabrieldelaparra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/216
Add support for netstandard2.0 for Queries and SandBox
I was trying to use Lucene.Net on a side project with Net Core 2 and Blazor
for front end.
I needed the Queries and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/215
---
GitHub user igor-brylin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/215
remove redundant termAtt initialization in UpperCaseFilter constructor
Constructor of UpperCaseFilter has duplicated initalization code for
termAttr field.
I have modified
GitHub user phillipc opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/214
Update ConcurrentMergeScheduler.cs
Add a comment: Non-treatable exception
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/phillipc/lucenenet
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/34ef2ce56c48beeb36e3a608c5339b84b36a5414#commitcomment-24319196
Just thinking a couple of steps ahead. `IDictionary` doesn't
inherit `IReadOnlyDictionary`.
Github user jeme commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/34ef2ce56c48beeb36e3a608c5339b84b36a5414#commitcomment-24318879
Does this make any sense to change?... The only thing it does is making the
dictionary readonly for the ReplicatorService. If we
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/211
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/209
---
GitHub user hgupta9 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/213
Add Lucene.Net.Contrib
Its impossible to find the nuget package for the user contributed code. I
have therefore added the nuget link into the readme.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user AndyPook opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/212
LUCENENET-469 - enumerables
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LUCENENET/issues/LUCENENET-469
for background.
This is an early stage proposal for implementing IEnumerable on
Github user vvdb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/210
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user vvdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/210
Corrected bug in Lifetime reference count
The addFactory in ConcurrentDictionary's GetOrAdd isn't guaranteed to be
called only once, yielding incorrect reference counts. Switched to a lazily
GitHub user jeme opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/209
RFC: LUCENENET-565: Porting of Lucene.Net.Replicator
Commit is for Review with comments about original Java Source for
assistance.
- [ ] RevisionFile.Size - Please change to `Length` to
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/206#discussion_r125003467
--- Diff: apidocs/docs.ps1 ---
@@ -49,10 +49,17 @@ If ($FileExists -eq $False) {
if ($Clean -eq 1) {
Remove-Item (Join-Path -Path
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/206#discussion_r12420
--- Diff: apidocs/api/index.md ---
@@ -129,6 +128,9 @@ index for all the files contained in a directory.
SearchFiles.java
prompts for
Github user vvdb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/208
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Yes. I don't know why this appeared together with my pull request.
I don't understand this system.
Vincent
-Original Message-
From: synhershko [mailto:g...@git.apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 9:06 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: [GitHub] lucenenet pull request #208
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/208#discussion_r121596530
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net/Document/Document.cs ---
@@ -278,9 +279,17 @@ public string Get(string name)
return null;
}
GitHub user vvdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/208
LUCENE-5644: switch to simpler LIFO thread to ThreadState allocator dâ¦
â¦uring indexingâ. Technically, this is something from
releases/lucene-solr/4.8.1, but profiling indicates it makes a
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/207
API: Added ReferenceManager.AcquireContext()
Opening this as a pull request so the team can discuss this approach vs the
previous `ExecuteSearch` method (that was inadvertently removed from
GitHub user Shazwazza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/206
API Doc site generator using DocFx script
I remember seeing on the mail list that getting API docs generated was
still on the TODO list so here it is. This is a PR to build API documentation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user pvginkel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
Made FSDirectory stale files set synchronized.
`FSDirectory` has a hash set to track stale files. In the original Lucene
source at e.g.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/203
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/191
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/204
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user vvdb reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/204
Adding missing build configurations for highlighter and highlighter test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vvdb/lucenenet
Github user vvdb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/204
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user vvdb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/204
Adding missing build configurations for highlighter and highlighter test
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/vvdb/lucenenet
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/203
API Work - Stabilization
This is a branch of #191 and supersedes that pull request. To build this
branch, see the instructions on #191.
The plan is to work on the API here to keep
Github user konopka closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/202
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user wwb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/201
updating assemblyinfo files for nuget package metadata.
Updating the AssemblyInfo files to provide better myget metadata for now.
This should not conflict w/ #191.
You can merge this pull request
Github user wwb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/200
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user wwb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/200
Adding nunit 3 console package to enable TeamCity to run the tests.
Adding Nunit 3 console package to enable TeamCity to run the nunit 3.5
tests.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user wwb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user wwb closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/199
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user wwb reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/199
Merge pull request #1 from apache/master
resync with upstream
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/wwb/lucenenet master
GitHub user wwb opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/199
Merge pull request #1 from apache/master
resync with upstream
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/wwb/lucenenet master
Alternatively
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/194
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/196
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/197
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user conniey opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/198
Updating minimum Visual Studio version to 2015
There are C# 6 features in use (ie.
GitHub user DevMk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/196
Renamed hyphenation to Hyphenation
Renamed hyphenation to Hyphenation to fix build and run on case sensitive
file systems
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/174
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user laimis closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user laimis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/195
Moving ICU dependent classes into a separate project
Would this help to deal with ICU issues that people are encountering in
using early versions of 4.8 port? Seems like a quick way to get past
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/193#discussion_r87320660
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/Support/HashMap.cs ---
@@ -125,9 +140,87 @@ public TValue AddIfAbsent(TKey key, TValue value)
return
GitHub user ecortese opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/192
Fixed terms boosting in multifield query
Provided fixes for prefix terms, wildcard terms, fuzzy and range terms
boosting when parsing a multifield query.
Specific test cases were added
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/190
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/190#discussion_r82028685
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/Support/DataInputStream.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+using System;
+using System.IO;
+
+namespace
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/190#discussion_r82028284
--- Diff: Lucene.Net.sln ---
@@ -59,14 +60,14 @@ Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") =
"Lucene.Net.Suggest", "src\L
EndProject
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/188
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/187#discussion_r81840724
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.QueryParser/Surround/Parser/QueryParser.cs ---
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ private void Jj_rescan_token()
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/190#discussion_r81838986
--- Diff: Lucene.Net.sln ---
@@ -59,14 +60,14 @@ Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}") =
"Lucene.Net.Suggest", "src\L
EndProject
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/190#discussion_r81839278
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/Support/DataInputStream.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+using System;
+using System.IO;
+
+namespace
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/190
Ported Analysis.Stempel
All 16 tests are passing.
I ended up porting over `DataInputStream` and `DataOutputStream` and their
corresponding interfaces from Java to save time. There
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/189
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/186
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user eladmarg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/188#discussion_r81025984
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Facet/Taxonomy/LRUHashMap.cs ---
@@ -100,19 +120,25 @@ public bool Put(TKey key, TValue value)
Github user eladmarg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/188#discussion_r81009940
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Facet/Taxonomy/LRUHashMap.cs ---
@@ -100,19 +120,25 @@ public bool Put(TKey key, TValue value)
Github user eladmarg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/88
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/188
Fixed 64 Failing Tests and Finished Facet Implementation
Fixed the 64 failing Facet tests, refactored the public API to be more .NET
friendly (changing methods to properties and vice versa,
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/187
Fixed 76 QueryParser Failing Tests
This fixes 76 of the 77 failing tests in QueryParser. The remaining one is
a matter of completing the test implementation (or removing it entirely
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/186
Ported Misc (mostly), Suggest, and Memory
This pull request contains Lucene.Net.Misc, Lucene.Net.Suggest, and
Lucene.Net.Memory. There is also some cleanup of the compiler warnings in
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78303386
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Util/fst/FSTTester.cs ---
@@ -395,6 +407,24 @@ internal virtual FST DoTest(int prune1, int prune2,
bool
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78303194
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Util/fst/FSTTester.cs ---
@@ -395,6 +407,24 @@ internal virtual FST DoTest(int prune1, int prune2,
bool
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78303088
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Util/TestWeakIdentityMap.cs ---
@@ -174,12 +188,15 @@ public virtual void TestSimpleHashMap()
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78302998
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -84,6 +90,6 @@
// (*) Delay Signing is an advanced option - see the Microsoft .NET
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/176
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78302897
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Util/TestWeakIdentityMap.cs ---
@@ -174,12 +188,15 @@ public virtual void TestSimpleHashMap()
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78302841
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -84,6 +90,6 @@
// (*) Delay Signing is an advanced option - see the Microsoft .NET
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78302836
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Util/fst/FSTTester.cs ---
@@ -913,6 +945,73 @@ private void VerifyPruned(int inputMode, FST fst,
int prune1, int
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185#discussion_r78302397
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -84,6 +90,6 @@
// (*) Delay Signing is an advanced option - see the Microsoft .NET
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/184
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/185
Ported Core.Util.Fst tests + Core.Util.Packed.TestPackedInts test
This includes 3 missing test files from Core.Util, several bug fixes to
make the Core.Util.Fst tests pass (all green), and
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/184
Fixed OfflineSorter Test Failures
This resolves the following failing tests:
Core.Util.TestOfflineSorter.TestEmpty
Core.Util.TestOfflineSorter.TestIntermediateMerges
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/173
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/182
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user conniey opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/183
Fix test failures and making SPIClassIterator more performant
### SPIClassIterator
* Filtering out Microsoft/System assemblies to improve loading
* Only adding public classes to the
GitHub user synhershko reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/173
Analysis work
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/lucenenet analysis-work
Alternatively you can review and apply
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/179
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/180
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/180
Misc bugs
This removes 15 failing tests and in some other cases fixes the test
failure message to show the real logic error instead of an exception.
You can merge this pull request into a
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/177
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/178
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user NightOwl888 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/178
Ported Core.Codecs.Perfield.TestPerFieldPostingsFormat2
Ported the Core.Codecs.Perfield.TestPerFieldPostingsFormat2 tests and
removed [Test] attribute from a couple of methods where it
Github user synhershko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/commit/c6f1a19af68a405b428f935118665f65fefad491#commitcomment-18551289
Please mark as LUCENENET specific if that's the case
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user NightOwl888 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/176#discussion_r73793556
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/Util/ToStringUtils.cs ---
@@ -36,12 +37,13 @@ public static string Boost(float boost)
{
if
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/176#discussion_r73792790
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/Util/ToStringUtils.cs ---
@@ -36,12 +37,13 @@ public static string Boost(float boost)
{
if
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/177#discussion_r73790017
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Search/TestPhraseQuery.cs ---
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ public virtual void TestPhraseQueryWithStopAnalyzer()
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/177#discussion_r73789830
--- Diff:
src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Codecs/Lucene3x/TestLucene3xStoredFieldsFormat.cs ---
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ protected override Codec Codec
Github user synhershko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/177#discussion_r73789759
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Index/RandomIndexWriter.cs ---
@@ -85,22 +86,22 @@ public static IndexWriter MockIndexWriter(Directory
dir,
GitHub user conniey opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/177
Limiting uses of static variables and methods in Testcases
This is an improvement from PR #172. The difference is that all the
existing constructors are maintained with some additions.
Github user conniey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/172#discussion_r71187179
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.TestFramework/Index/RandomIndexWriter.cs ---
@@ -85,24 +85,24 @@ public static IndexWriter MockIndexWriter(Directory
dir,
Github user conniey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/172#discussion_r71186208
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Index/TestBinaryDocValuesUpdates.cs ---
@@ -1109,25 +1109,55 @@ public virtual void
Github user conniey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/172#discussion_r71185454
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests.Queries/TestCustomScoreQuery.cs ---
@@ -334,11 +334,11 @@ private void VerifyResults(float boost, IndexSearcher
s,
Github user conniey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/172#discussion_r71185299
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests.Join/Lucene.Net.Tests.Join.csproj ---
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
-
1 - 100 of 556 matches
Mail list logo