a bit late, but +1 of course
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors
+1
but it seems that actual Continuum server is compiling with jdk 1.5 instead of
1.4
The following build should have failed since the commit makes use of
String.contains(String) API in CheckDependencySnapshotsPhase class
see
+1.
--
Olivier
-Message d'origine-
De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 21 août 2007 04:38
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project
infrastructure
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while.
Sounds good.
+1,
Stéphane
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing
Definetely +1. I wouldn't have thought that we need a vote for this...
As a sidenote: Arnaud once had a continuum instance set up for maven1,
which I don't see anymore. Not that I expect much development anymore
but just in case, could that be added to the project groups on zones?
Thanks,
Hi,
2007/8/20, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
As long as we're free to evaluate other tools. Since we've never
actually done any comparison I don't want this to be cast in stone or
be the only tool we use. In other words I don't want this mandated.
I'm happy that it is setup, provided I can use Hudons or something
else. Continuum has
+1 of course
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
caught
+1, definitely.
-john
On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing
+1
and it'd be great if it deploys snapshots too :D
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are
+1, deploying to snapshot repo would be good too.
Andy
On 21 Aug 2007, at 03:38, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
There
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
caught (and it's picking up a lot more
+1
Brett, you didn't vote.
Arnaud
On 21/08/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are
heh, +1 for the record :)
On 21/08/2007, at 3:02 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
+1
Brett, you didn't vote.
Arnaud
On 21/08/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have
14 matches
Mail list logo
