On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Looks promising.
But it turned out I had a bug in my benchmark. New numbers coming up
later today.
Want to merge into trunk use the new one?
Working on it, but it's a messy merge :-)
One additional
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just wanted to start collecting thoughts from everyone what we need to
do before moving Vysper out of sandbox?
I think we're ready to just move it.
/niklas
Sir,
Thank you for your great support(giving advices and made me aware) upto now.
As the second step i started to read the referecences and examine the vysper
codebase.
This is the things what i understood upto now.Please give me a feedback.If
It seems that i
have understood the concept wrong,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Niklas Gustavsson
nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Looks promising.
But it turned out I had a bug in my benchmark. New numbers coming up
later today.
As long as it works,
On 3/29/10 2:43 AM, Mark wrote:
I've been away for a while (yeah yeah) working on many things not java
nor networking-based. I want to get started back up with some MINA
work. Has there been a 3.0 branch started? Or should we work on some
improvements from JIRA in a sandbox copy?
Thanks,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:30, G.W.G.K.N. Udayanga
gwgknudaya...@gmail.com wrote:
Sir,
Thank you for your great support(giving advices and made me aware) upto now.
As the second step i started to read the referecences and examine the vysper
codebase.
This is the things what i understood upto
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 3/29/10 6:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi everone,
Just wanted to start collecting thoughts from everyone what we need
to do before moving Vysper out of sandbox?
I think a proper website would be
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 3/29/10 6:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi everone,
Just wanted to start collecting thoughts from everyone what we need
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:40:19 +0200,
Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 3/29/10 6:57 AM, Bernd
On 3/29/10 9:40 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36, Julien Vermillardjvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On 3/29/10 6:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi everone,
Just
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:52, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/29/10 9:40 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36, Julien Vermillardjvermill...@archean.fr
wrote:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200,
Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
On
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:43, Julien Vermillard jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:40:19 +0200,
Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200,
On 3/29/10 10:25 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
This is not exactly the kind of response we should expect here...
Who is we? I don't want to step on anyones toes but cannot help that
I sometimes do not feel obliged to bind myself to other's
expectations.
We, as in Apache is all about
On 3/29/10 10:30 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Remember, you was collecting thoughts ;)
ok, sure. Thank you.
So I would suggest to open JIRAs to record those classes missing
javadocs - this thread was intended, as you say, to collect thoughts.
perfect ! Let's do that.
--
Regards,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
IMO some class miss javadoc, there is room for improvement.
Randomly pciked examples :
I perfectly agree that Vysper needs a lot more documentation in
general. However, I do not think this is a blocker for moving
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:36, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 3/29/10 10:25 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
This is not exactly the kind of response we should expect here...
Who is we? I don't want to step on anyones toes but cannot help that
I sometimes do not feel obliged to
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:37:13 +0100,
Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
IMO some class miss javadoc, there is room for improvement.
Randomly pciked examples :
I perfectly agree that Vysper needs
roster javadoc
--
Key: VYSPER-191
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-191
Project: VYSPER
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: roster and subscription
Reporter: Julien Vermillard
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
No but I hope it's not going to be a usage here to being rude when we
talk about lack of code documentation nor expecting others to do the
peon work.
I fully agree, and I don't think there was ever any intention
javadoc on exception classes
Key: VYSPER-193
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-193
Project: VYSPER
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Julien Vermillard
Priority: Minor
On
On 3/29/10 10:37 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
IMO some class miss javadoc, there is room for improvement.
Randomly pciked examples :
I perfectly agree that Vysper needs a lot more documentation in
On 3/29/10 10:53 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
No but I hope it's not going to be a usage here to being rude when we
talk about lack of code documentation nor expecting others to do the
peon work.
I
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Sadly, we can't come back to a time where french was the Lingua Franca, or
even Latin
Uhm, yeah sure ;-)
/niklas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Fondermann reassigned VYSPER-191:
---
Assignee: Bernd Fondermann
roster javadoc
--
Key:
Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:53:24 +0100,
Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
No but I hope it's not going to be a usage here to being rude when
we talk about lack of code documentation nor expecting
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
But it turned out I had a bug in my benchmark. New numbers coming up
later today.
Bugs fixed, here's the new numbers:
Tests performed (1 rounds):
Single level XML (child att='foo' att2='bar' /)
Existing parser
Provide more information on command execution to Ftplets - especially file
created in STOU
--
Key: FTPSERVER-361
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-361
I think this should have been taken care of with the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-222. You might want to
try building from the trunk and see if this works out better.
Regards,
Sai Pullabhotla
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Richard Evans (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850867#action_12850867
]
Niklas Gustavsson commented on FTPSERVER-361:
-
I think we have solved this
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi
VYSPER-190 (typo in NOTICE.txt) lead me to look further into the
dependency on the Bouncy castle provider. Do we actually still need
it? I removed the dependency and the unit tests and the server runs
just fine. Now, this is on JDK 1.6 so there might be issue on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850872#action_12850872
]
Richard Evans commented on FTPSERVER-361:
-
I see - the reply would indicate the
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 3/29/10 10:37 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
IMO some class miss javadoc, there is room for improvement.
Randomly pciked examples :
I perfectly agree that Vysper needs a lot
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just wanted to start collecting thoughts from everyone what we need to
do before moving Vysper out of sandbox?
I think we're ready to just move it.
I guess we would want to
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just wanted to start collecting thoughts from everyone what we need to
do before moving Vysper out of sandbox?
I think we're ready to just move it.
I
That's awesome news.
I think that expanded examples and an active wiki which included architectural
discussion, usage tips, examples, etc. would be valuable/essential
post-sandbox.
--Original Message--
From: Bernd Fondermann
To: dev@mina.apache.org
ReplyTo: dev@mina.apache.org
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bf_...@brainlounge.de wrote:
We collected that the following stuff has to be done *before* moving out
of sandbox, right?
I do not think we need to do anything before moving out of the
sandbox. All those things that needs fixing might just as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850909#action_12850909
]
Sai Pullabhotla commented on FTPSERVER-323:
---
Looks like this feature is not
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ftpserver-trunk-jdk1.5-solaris/org.apache.ftpserver$ftpserver-core/343/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/ftpserver-trunk-jdk1.5-solaris/343/changes
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
Hi
VYSPER-190 (typo in NOTICE.txt) lead me to look further into the
dependency on the Bouncy castle provider. Do we actually still need
it? I removed the dependency and the unit tests and the server runs
just fine. Now, this is on JDK 1.6 so
On 3/29/10 2:50 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bf_...@brainlounge.de wrote:
We collected that the following stuff has to be done *before* moving out
of sandbox, right?
I do not think we need to do anything before moving out of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Fondermann resolved VYSPER-191.
-
Resolution: Fixed
javadoc added, please feel free to re-open for anything still missing
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sai
Date: Mon Mar 29 13:31:55 2010
New Revision: 928769
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=928769view=rev
Log:
Implemented FTPSERVER-357
Seems like there was a ton of whitespace changes included in this
commit. Keeping the
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
Bernd has updated the out-of-date text files and I've uploaded a new build.
This vote passes with 5 binding +1 votes and one non-binding +1 vote.
I'll release the artifacts and update the site.
Thanks for voting!
On 3/29/10 9:34 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM,s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sai
Date: Mon Mar 29 13:31:55 2010
New Revision: 928769
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=928769view=rev
Log:
Implemented FTPSERVER-357
Seems like there was a ton of
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 22:11, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Niklas Gustavsson
nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
Bernd has updated the out-of-date text files and I've uploaded a new build.
This vote passes with 5 binding +1 votes and one non-binding
Remove dependency on bouncy castle
--
Key: VYSPER-194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-194
Project: VYSPER
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 0.5
Reporter: Niklas Gustavsson
Remove dependency on nekopull
-
Key: VYSPER-195
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-195
Project: VYSPER
Issue Type: Task
Affects Versions: 0.5
Reporter: Niklas Gustavsson
Merge nbxml-sax branch into trunk
-
Key: VYSPER-196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VYSPER-196
Project: VYSPER
Issue Type: Task
Components: core protocol
Affects Versions: 0.5
I apologize for the mess up. However, I do want you to know that I
tried all the possible things I could, but still was not able to
figure out how Eclipse manages to screw it up. I did not format any
existing sources. I even tried creating a brand new workspace, set the
new lines to UNIX style,
BTW, do you know why Hudson is complaining about the test failure on
trunk? I did not get that error locally.
Regards,
Sai Pullabhotla
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
Hello Bernard Sir,
Thank you very much for your support.I know that the time to discuss about
the project is now over.But if you can please consider about following
things.
You question:What would you want to remove? What would be unwanted stanzas?
What do you think is a stanza at all?
*Stanza
52 matches
Mail list logo
