Thanks for that reminder Isabel. As a recently added mentor, I have been
struggling to understand all the interactions on MXNet. Besides the user,
dev and private mailing lists, I am trying to watch
- Two forums at https://discuss.mxnet.io/ and https://discuss.gluon.ai/
(although I can't read Ch
Am 19. Januar 2019 16:35:58 MEZ schrieb Pedro Larroy
:
> We talked with Timur about graphcore accelerators, and
>seems other people also missed the meeting
Meetings like this always should be optional, what's more important: It must be
possible to follow the project from subscribing to its ma
Hi Pedro:
Can you give a summary of takeaways, and possible decision proposal that
might affect the technical directions?
Thanks!
Tianqi
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:36 AM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Hi Isabel. We talked with Timur about graphcore accelerators, and
> seems other people also missed the
Hi Isabel. We talked with Timur about graphcore accelerators, and
seems other people also missed the meeting.
For next meeting I will send an agenda of topics to discuss in advance.
Thanks.
Pedro.
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:43 PM Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 08:03:42PM
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 08:03:42PM +0100, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> If you wish to join the monthly architecture meeting today, please
> join the hangout below:
>
> https://hangouts.google.com/call/ZXXqJ0ZL5m_dcHOVIeTcAEEE
Likely I've missed the mail - can you point me to the summary of the above
mee
I joined it now. But I can't unmute myself. I see Pedro (I believe it's
him).
My question is: what do we think about Graphcore?
https://www.graphcore.ai/technology
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 7:03 PM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you wish to join the monthly architecture meeting today, please
> jo
Hi
If you wish to join the monthly architecture meeting today, please
join the hangout below:
https://hangouts.google.com/call/ZXXqJ0ZL5m_dcHOVIeTcAEEE
Regards. Pedro.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:18 AM Pedro Larroy
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I think you make good points. We can address your concerns by s
Hi
I think you make good points. We can address your concerns by sending
notes to the mailing list and use the wiki / RFCs appropriately so the
community can follow and participate asynchronously so asynchronous
participation is still possible.
I would say let's try and see if they bring value, w
I feel that online meeting may not address most of the issues get raised in
a short amount of time(1h) and still suffers the problem of not being
publically archivable.
Maybe we can not try more asynchronous way? (RFC discussion in issues.
and/or discuss @dev). Just my two cents and I am not block
Nice!!! 👍🏾
Perfect!
"I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd." -Jules Winnfield
> On Dec 14, 2018, at 3:04 PM, Marco de Abreu wrote:
>
> That's a great idea, Pedro!
>
> -Marco
>
> Am Fr., 14. Dez. 2018, 14:34 hat Pedro Larroy
> geschrieben:
>
>> Hi MXNetters
>>
>> To address the project
That's a great idea, Pedro!
-Marco
Am Fr., 14. Dez. 2018, 14:34 hat Pedro Larroy
geschrieben:
> Hi MXNetters
>
> To address the project growth and increased contributions I'm
> proposing a monthly meeting / hangout to have community discussions
> about MXNet architecture and mid / longer term t
Hi MXNetters
To address the project growth and increased contributions I'm
proposing a monthly meeting / hangout to have community discussions
about MXNet architecture and mid / longer term technical directions
that require coordination beyond single PRs.
TOPICS:
The goal of this series is to ad
12 matches
Mail list logo
