Re: new website, docs code freeze

/google_analytics.js On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:23 PM Mu Li wrote: > I think the reason is that the google tracker is not included in the new > website. > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:17 PM Marco de Abreu > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I checked the Google Analytics

Re: new website, docs code freeze

I think the reason is that the google tracker is not included in the new website. On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:17 PM Marco de Abreu wrote: > Hello, > > I checked the Google Analytics statistics and the launch of the new > website reduced the traffic by over 80%: > > [image: image.png] > > (Please l

Re: Disabling, circumventing and altering CI checks

Hi Marco, Thank you for helping CI all the time. You did an incredible job on it. Please let me explain why it’s urgent we need to update our CI to allow fast developing. In this summer, we managed to hire a large amount of interns to help, they did great to contribute to MXNet. But CI is on

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

> > I am disappointed when I see articles that use Gluon, but don't mention > MXNet [1]. The only sentence contains Gluon is "Our model implementations and training scripts are publicly available in GluonCV ", not referring Gluon as a framework. But I agree that this paper should mention MXNet.

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

-aws-and-microsoft/ On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:04 PM Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > > > Am 28. März 2019 21:53:16 MEZ schrieb Mu Li : > > > >The reason why we call it GluonCV instead of MXNetCV is because MXNet > >is a > >trademark owned by Apache, while Gluon doesn

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

Hi Lieven, The reason why we call it GluonCV instead of MXNetCV is because MXNet is a trademark owned by Apache, while Gluon doesn't have this issue. Best Mu On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 1:52 AM Lieven Govaerts wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 at 00:02, Pedro Larroy > wrote: > > > Hi dev@ > >

Re: Gluon fit API- Design proposal

It's great to see the proposal has a list of models that this API should cover. But note that the D2L book has a very simplified train function (I wrote it). It's oversimplified compared to what we are using in real life. Kaggle competition solutions and popular github projects are closer to what p

Re: MXNet Community Monthly Updates

had thought about a Weekly > > > Digest > > > > > for MXNet (weekly newsletter) - which is on similar lines (can be > > made > > > > into > > > > > Monthly if it sounds good). > > > > > > > > > > Here

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

r example, stands for MXNet-Modified (military > connotation). If naming is the only thing we need to figure out - that is a > good place to be in __ > > -- > Thanks, > Denis > > On 3/22/19, 4:48 PM, "Mu Li" wrote: > > Gluon is about imperative neural ne

Re: [DISCUSS] Rebrand Gluon to MXNet imperative or something MXNet.

Gluon is about imperative neural network training and data loading. ndarray is another large imperative module. Besides, Gluon also supports symbolic execution after hybridizing. mxnet imperative might not be a good name for it. Another choice is high-level API, that's how TF talks about Keras. O

Re: CI unstable

I saw CI is downloading from data.dmlc.ml. Changing it data.mxnet.io should fix this issue. Say http://data.dmlc.ml/models/imagenet/inception-bn/Inception-BN-0126.params -> http://data.mxnet.io/models/imagenet/inception-bn/Inception-BN-0126.params On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:57 AM Anton Chernov w

MXNet Community Monthly Updates

Dear Community, I propose to send a monthly summary to users to broadcast the recent progresses in the community. It will not only include new features added into MXNet, but also various community activities. Here is an example: Tutorials - 10 new lectures teaching at UC Berkeley - Video record f

Re: direction for documentation across various APIs that share common doc source

The original design is putting psudo-code in cc files (e.g. ndarray.cc ) that are languange indepent, then having python codes in .py files (e.g. ndarray_doc.py

change the forwarding of gluon-crash-course.mxnet.io

Dear community, I'm changing the forwarding address of gluon-crash-course.mxnet.io to https://beta.mxnet.io/guide/crash-course/index.html. The http version should be effective in a few minutes, while the https version may take up to 24 hours. It means https://gluon-crash-course.mxnet.io/ might be

Redesign of the MXNet document site

Dear Community, I have been working with several Amazon folks in the past few weeks for a major update of the document website. Now we have a minimal demo at https://beta.mxnet.io/ and would like to ask for feedback. What's new: 1. A new theme based on the material design that looks modern 2. Re

Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Thanks for your contribution, Carl. I remember I left a comment on the proposal, but today I found it was disappeared. My suggestion is trying best to not change the existing API. The reason is that we need to change all trainers on the frontend that uses the existing kvstore APIs, which may cause

Re: Propose to discontinue supporting Apache MXNet on Windows 7

According to google analytics, ~12% users who visited mxnet's website are using Windows 7. It's a significant number. Even though we cannot conclude that all of these users will run MXNet on Windows 7, I suggest we still support win7. BTW, anyone who can access mxnet's google analytics report can

Re: Help with understanding docs

On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > > > Am 8. August 2018 21:34:47 MESZ schrieb Tianqi Chen < > tqc...@cs.washington.edu>: > >As far as I understand, these are packages that are build on top of > >gluon > >and runs on MXNet, > > Going through the hosted subdomains that see

Re: Help with understanding docs

MXNet's website is http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/. I own mxnet.io, which was mxnet's main site before, but now we are using its subdomains to host various packages in the mxnet ecosystem. On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > Hi, > > I had a bit of time recently to wa

Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

xnet-cumkl are not > actively maintained. > > > > - > > Anirudh > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:09 PM Mu Li wrote: > > > Surprisingly only the python binding is actively maintained. I remember > we > > can easily push all bindings into docker h

Re: Publish MXNet images to DockerHub

Surprisingly only the python binding is actively maintained. I remember we can easily push all bindings into docker hub through the script in https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/docker. On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Anirudh Acharya wrote: > Hi, > > Docker Hub( https://hub.do

Re: Remove Caffe functionality

Sina > > > On 7/19/18, 1:27 PM, "Steffen Rochel" wrote: > > Hi Mu - do we have any indication how many users we do have on the > functionality? I see only two github issues from 2017 open. > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:54 PM Mu Li wrote: > >

Re: Remove Caffe functionality

Hi Anton, It's understandable that Caffe is old and its community is shrinking. For this very reasons, existing caffe users are looking for alternatives. The current converter is important for such users to transit to MXNet. It addresses an important issue that: how I can reuse my previous caffe m

Re: Request for feedback: proposal for MXNet SDK Office hours

A minor suggestion: rename MXNet SDK to AWS MXNet SDK or Amazon MXNet SDK. On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Davydenko, Denis < dzianis.davydze...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, MXNet community, > > Following up on recent announcement of office hours introduction from > MXNet Berlin team, we are tryi

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

>> Would people who used 1.2.0 to save models be able to load parameters in > >> 1.2.1 using the reverted load_params? (i.e. is it backward compatible) > >> > >> -sz > >> > >> > >>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Anirudh

Re: [VOTE] Release MXNet version 1.2.1.RC0 (Patch Release)

v1.2.1 will print a deprecating warning message when calling save_params. We should tell users clearly to replace "save_params" with "save_parameters" or something else. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Anirudh wrote: > Hi, > > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.2.1.

Re: users@mxnet

I like the idea to have a user mail list, it should be able to cover the user segment who prefer to use mail lists. Though my concern is how many of us will be volunteered to maintain this list. We have several contributors actively maintain the forum, including Sina, Thom, and Thomas. We need more

Re: Reverting pull request

e strict and enforcing > > them. > > > > > > I could've also made a script that prevents any PR from being > > self-merged, > > > but I thought our committers are responsible enough to follow our own > > rules > > > without systems actu

Re: Reverting pull request

's a fix? > > If we keep going backwards like this, no progress can be made. > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Mu Li wrote: > > > > > Agree that major changes need more extensive reviews. But we cannot > > ignore > > > that both reviews and CI

Re: Reverting pull request

> without systems actually enforcing them. I won't waste my time working on > that script, but from now on I will revert every single PR (except > emergency cases) that has been self-merged without approval. > > -Marco > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM Mu Li wrote:

Re: Reverting pull request

Why reverting instead of fixing the bugs? Static memory aims to reduce memory allocation, it's a key feature to bridge the perf gap between gluon and symbol. On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Marco de Abreu < marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm reverting https://github.co

Re: landing pages for the website

Thanks for the proposal, Aaron. The landing page idea is great. I feel we should group MXNet topics into landing pages, such as Gluon you mentioned, also performance, and deployment. But I'm less sure if we want to add too many contents from 3rd party projects into MXNet, otherwise, it may make the

Re: [GitHub] szha closed pull request #11154: Revert "[MXNET-503] Website landing page for MMS (#11037)"

Hi Sheng, I suggest to put down a reason for such actions later. It may confuse other contributors, e.g., Steffen raised his concern in a private thread. Best Mu > On Jun 10, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Sheng Zha wrote: > > Thanks, Henri. I was reverting the commit on a PR that another committer > didn

Re: Accidental commits to 1.2.0 branch using Maven apache-release profile

ull requests for the 1.2 branch which are not from key > contributors. I'm also aware of a few Amazon internal customers who are > currently actively working off the 1.2 branch to prepare for 1.2.1 release, > so I'd rather err on the side of caution here. > > -marco > > M

Re: Accidental commits to 1.2.0 branch using Maven apache-release profile

g than the benefits >>>>> >>>>> -Marco >>>>> >>>>> Naveen Swamy schrieb am Sa., 9. Juni 2018, >> 21:39: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mu, >>>>>> >>>>>> No, it isn't necessary to hav

Re: Accidental commits to 1.2.0 branch using Maven apache-release profile

Hi Naveen, Thanks for the clarification. Is there necessary to keep these commits submitted by the maveen plugin in the repo? Otherwise, can we squash these commits and force push it to a single commit? It's good to have a stable release only patched with meaningful commits. Best, Mu > On Ju

Re: Vote to stop using JIRA

Hi Naveen, Can we clarify that how JIRA improved the project? One key Apache spirit is about transparent, but I didn't see the current way we are using JIRA improves it. Comparing to Spark, one major problem is that we have 10x less active contributors. Even PyTorch is 3x more active (#commits, #

Re: data.mxnet.io is gone (correction)

Up now. (The EBS volume was unmounted.) I'll move all data into S3 On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Aaron Markham wrote: > So anyone know what happened? It's a critical resource for datasets > and examples and more... and all the files seem gone. > > http://data.mxnet.io/ > That's show forbidde

Re: MXNet Name Change?

Agree that MXNet, the combination of Minerva and CXXNet, which can be interpreted as mixed-net, is hard to be pronounced. But rebranding a name is a very big decision. We need a very carefully designed marketing plan for it. A choice is that we can gradually refer MXNet as a backend, and talk more

Re: fyi: deep learning framework mentions on arXiv over the past 3 months

arXiv mentioning is a good metric for academic adoption. We should improve it. But I failed to reproduce the twitter results. Can someone help it? On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Sebastian wrote: > https://twitter.com/fchollet/status/971863128341323776 >

Re: Display the master branch website in default for a period

Not sure why the screenshot of the page view is not there, attach it again: Best, Mu > On Feb 25, 2018, at 8:32 PM, Li, Mu wrote: > > Hi Team, > > We are in trouble attracting new users. According to Google analytics, there > is almost no increase in the number of paper views for the documen

Re: Unit tests removed

ot;A code-modification proposal may be stopped dead in its tracks by a -1 > vote by a qualified voter. This constitutes a veto, and it cannot be > overruled nor overridden by anyone. Vetos stand until and unless withdrawn > by their casters." > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1

Re: Unit tests removed

back later, that’s > just a good intention. > > Hen > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:11 Mu Li wrote: > > > I think simply reverting the MKL PR that Da has been working for a half > > year and immediately enabling the cpp tests in the CI without reaching an > > a

Re: Unit tests removed

> service we're optimizing). > > -Kellen > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Mu Li wrote: > > > I think simply reverting the MKL PR that Da has been working for a half > > year and immediately enabling the cpp tests in the CI without reaching an > >

Re: Unit tests removed

I think simply reverting the MKL PR that Da has been working for a half year and immediately enabling the cpp tests in the CI without reaching an agreement with Da seriously hurts his feelings. I put the details at the end of https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/9661 On Thu, Feb 1, 201

Re: Module maintainers proposal

lso don't aware any other contributor use the direct email way. So I didn't clarify it on the proposal. On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > > > Am 9. Januar 2018 18:25:50 MEZ schrieb Mu Li : > >We should encourage to contract a specific contri

Re: Module maintainers proposal

intainer instead of owner. > > > >Best, > >Sebastian > > > >On 09.01.2018 08:24, YiZhi Liu wrote: > >> +1 for adding @CodingCat (Nan Zhu) as owner of Scala package. > >> > >> 2018-01-08 21:58 GMT-08:00 Mu Li : > >> > >>> It

Re: Handling secrets in Jenkins

I suggest to use 2) for simplicity, especially given Jenkins is not very secure in some aspects. I remember about a half year ago I forgot to upgrade the jenkins server in time, someone then installed a coin miner on all slaves.. On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Marco de Abreu wrote: > Hello, > >

Module maintainers proposal

It has been a while for discussing having maintainers for individual modules. A maintainer for a module will be the main person who reviews and approves PRs contributed to that module. Currently, some maintainers are listed in the file CODEOWNERS

Re: Increase indentation limit from 100 to 120 characters

I read more google codes instead of amazon codes. That's why I used Google for example, not because Google is "our competitor", which term is actually disallowed to say by amazon employees. I think the question is not "there's a good reason *not to* increase", but "why we want to make such a chang

Re: Increase indentation limit from 100 to 120 characters

I think this code should be refactored instead of increasing the indent. Puting the test codes within 7 nested for loops is hard to read. Maybe we can split it into multiple functions, or create some templates, or try "using mxnet::op::BatchNormV1Prop" In general, I feel 80-column is not a big pro

Re: request for reviewing PR in ps-lite

@yizhi, please go ahead. I'm on NIPS this week, probably don't have enough time to dive deep into the codes On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:51 PM, YiZhi Liu wrote: > to my understanding, this is not about fault-tolerance, i.e., restart when > worker/server fail, right? > > I can help to review. ping @M

Re: Protected master needs to be turned off

s. If the > fix merged causes problem, you still get CI to report it maybe a few hours > later. > > The bottom line is that comitter get these information as feedbacks and > they use their best judgement when do so. Most of the time when unsure, I > simply wait for CI to finish

Re: Protected master needs to be turned off

Totally agree that CI is useful. Actually, I wrote the jenkinsfile and setup the jenkins server before moving to apache server. I just mention that we cannot rely on the CI test. It currently covers operator unittests and regression test on several cnns. But the code coverage isn't great. If a PR t

Re: Protected master needs to be turned off

I barely remember CI caught bugs except for lint, but it definitely slows down the code merge. I understand the general concerns for removing master protection. So I propose to use the dev branch to merge changes until the CI is stable. And make the nightly build build the dev branch instead o

Re: AWS contributing ONNX-MXNet

Thanks for pointing it out, Hagay. I actually missed the "Special thanks to dmlc/nnvm team" sentence. I was looking for Zhi and Tianqi's names, because the onnx converter was mainly done by both of them. However I do not entirely agree that I "had no comments". I actually pointed out the initial dr

Re: AWS contributing ONNX-MXNet

Thanks for letting the mxnet community know it. Given this new converter is derived from the nnvm-onnx converted developed by Zhi and Tianqi, see this link and that link

Re: [Proposal] Stabilizing Apache MXNet CI build system

I didn't see the clear advantage of CodePipline over pure jenkins, because we don't need to deploy here. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Chris Olivier wrote: > CodePipeline, then. You can point it to Jenkins instances. > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 4:49 PM Mu Li wrote:

Re: [Proposal] Stabilizing Apache MXNet CI build system

ble with Jenkins. > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Tianqi Chen > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Tianqi > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:39 PM Mu Li wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > It seems that the Apache CI is quite ove

Re: New Apache MXNet logo idea

Clearly better than the previous logos we had. One concern is that the logo color is inconsistent with the current doc theme: https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/versions/master/index.html. We need to change either the logo or the doc theme. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:02 PM, sandeep krishnamurthy <

Re: [Proposal] Stabilizing Apache MXNet CI build system

+1 It seems that the Apache CI is quite overloaded these days, and MXNet's CI pipeline is too complex to run there. In addition, we may need to add more devices, e.g. macpro and rasbperry pi, into the server, and more tasks such as pip build. It means a lot of requests to the Infra team. We can

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

or > > > > > caffe2 > > > > > > > sitting on a separate repo. My suggestion would be put code > > under > > > > > > nnvm/top > > > > > > > and migrate into mxnet eventually when the top components get > >

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

model exchange format). > > > > > > > > > > I am glad to see the discussion happening and surely there is > doubt, > > as > > > > > with every big step of changes. But with the rapidly changing pace > > of > > > > deep > >

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

f changes. But with the rapidly changing pace > of > > > deep > > > > learning systems, this is the direction that we thought is most > > > promising. > > > > We can call for a vote if necessary among the committers for the > design > > >

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

Net users. > > Hagay > > On 10/19/17, 10:01, "Mu Li" muli@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm speaking under my "MXNet contributor" hat. > > It will be sad that our new model format and compiler is not supported > by > our own contrib

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

I'm speaking under my "MXNet contributor" hat. It will be sad that our new model format and compiler is not supported by our own contributors. It puts us in a bad position to reach out to outside to ask for support. If you really what to do it with the onnx <-> mxnet way, I suggest putting the co

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

Hi Hagay, As mentioned on my previous thread, " MXNet has lots of users already using the Symbolic API which hopefully mean that is a mature API that is not likely to have breaking changes or major issues." actually indicate NNVM is stable. Because MXNet uses NNVM's symbolic.h directly, see https:/

Re: Request for suggestions- Supporting onnx in mxnet

I cannot get the point. MXNet relies on NNVM. In fact, the Symbol object in MXNet is defined on NNVM. On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Chris Olivier wrote: > My $0.02: > > NNVM is not currently an Apache module. It’s under dmlc umbrella, whose > direction and governance is unclear. For this rea

Re: proposal to shut down apache-mxnet.slack.com

the-asf? > Steffen > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:34 PM Mu Li wrote: > > > there are several private channels on apache-mxnet.slack.com, how we are > > going to deal with it? > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Hen wrote: > > > > > +

Re: proposal to shut down apache-mxnet.slack.com

there are several private channels on apache-mxnet.slack.com, how we are going to deal with it? On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Hen wrote: > +1. > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Chris Olivier > wrote: > > > +1. Nuke it. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:23 AM Steffen Rochel > > wrot

Re: NNVM status?

NNVM defines the graph structure, and how to write a pass function. What you referred includes a concrete definition of the operator interface, e.g. the lapack/blas interface. A similar project is DLPack (https://github.com/dmlc/dlpack), it currently defines the tensor interface, but not the opera

Re: run Jenkins in a newer version of OS

We can (should) upgrade the docker image used in CI from ubuntu 14.04 to ubuntu 16.04 On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Nan Zhu wrote: > Hi, all > > I just noticed that our Jenkins is running on Ubuntu 14.04, which does not > even contain JDK8 in its default repo > > I am trying to do https://git

Re: MXNet project web page

I suggest using the current logo on http://mxnet.io We on the way to transfer the website to http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently in the process of creating a slide deck and wanted to use the > mxnet logo as part of

Fwd: Formalize Committer Proposal and Application Procedure

It seems that this thread didn't show in the dev list. Totally agree that we should make the committer nomination more formal. -- Forwarded message -- From: Tianqi Chen Date: Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:20 PM Subject: Formalize Committer Proposal and Application Procedure To: priv...@m

Re: IMPORTANT: Link accounts to Apache today 7/12

Done, my apache id is muli On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Ly Nguyen wrote: > As mentioned in the migration FAQ, if you currently have any kind of write > access to MXNet repo, once migration happens, YOU WILL LOSE IT unless you > do the following. > > If you haven't already, please link your A

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

hat the ASF > > > provides, we ship a number of messaging systems that may be better > from a > > > licensing stand point - ActiveMQ, RocketMQ, Pulsar. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:27 PM Mu Li wrote: > > > >

Re: Licensing update per code move

Created a PR to resolve this issue. https://github.com/dmlc/mxnet/pull/6944 Please have a review if it is ok. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > it clearly says that's for mini javascripts, images or PDFs - not for > source code. > > "Sometimes the situation of a file is s

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

MXNet's backend is written in C++, which is not able to use the java interface. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Are you guys able to use this (which is what we use in Apache Toree)? > > https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq > > Which has been successfully relicensed? > https

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

It's optional for MXNet to use ZeroMQ. Even if it is enabled, the source codes of MXNet will not contain any codes from ZeroMQ except for "include" and calling zeromq's APIs. But if we want to ship the binary, it will link against libzeromq.a On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM, John D. Ament wrote:

Re: [gitlab] credentials

Thanks Dom. Agree that we should use a credential to increase the request limit to 5k. I think anonymous access shouldn't work because it cannot set the build state of each PR. On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > Hi > > while setting up the builds of log4net to fetch branch

Re: NNVM status?

+1 for Apache deep learning stack There are a few exciting projects such as NNVM, DLPack and TVM going on. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Markus Weimer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Tianqi Chen > wrote: > > Have a separate repo gives possibility of non-mxnet project to use it, >

Re: Blog

Currently, we have one at http://dmlc.ml/. We can transfer it to a new place if necessary On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > It was recommended that we set up a blog: > > * Request a blog: https://www.apache.org/dev/project-blogs > > That will give us a place to start com

Re: building mxnet.io from release tag

Let’s start with 0.10 to host docs for each release and the latest. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Madan Jampani wrote: > That sounds good. We can have the "latest" (not yet released) version. But > having a view that is tied to a particular release will ensure what is > documented is what th

Podling Report - May 2017

* Your project name: Apache MXNet * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project or necessarily of its field MXNet is an open-source deep learning framework that allows you to define, train, and deploy deep neural networks on a wide array of devices, from cl