Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

Hi, On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Antonio wrote: > The "About Dialog" of a NB RCP Application... ... > b) Shows a text stating that the NetBeans Platform is released under the > CDDL/GPL+CPE I don't think it's required to change that before the first release, I'd say

NetBeans Logo (SVG)

Hi, I'm attaching a SVG version of the most voted Apache NetBeans Logo at [1] I uploaded the SVG image there, but does not render properly (you have to click on it). I'll try to add 256/128/64/32/16 pngs in a few days. Cheers, Antonio

[GitHub] vieiro commented on issue #152: Case insensitive SHA-1 comparisons for downloaded binaries.

vieiro commented on issue #152: Case insensitive SHA-1 comparisons for downloaded binaries. URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/152#issuecomment-344741806 Ok. Closing then. This is an automated message

[GitHub] vieiro closed pull request #152: Case insensitive SHA-1 comparisons for downloaded binaries.

vieiro closed pull request #152: Case insensitive SHA-1 comparisons for downloaded binaries. URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/152 This is a PR merged from a forked repository. As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for the sake of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

The "About Dialog" of a NB RCP Application... a) Shows an image where the CCDL/GPL + CPE is still there. b) Shows a text stating that the NetBeans Platform is released under the CDDL/GPL+CPE. I think the image is also on the splash screen. Should that be changed before release? Cheers,

Re: nb-javac

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hi, > > I agree there's a need for a short- and long- term solutions. Here, I was > more aiming for the short-term ones, as we are getting into the stage where > I think we need a particular plan and action items to fulfil

[GitHub] matthiasblaesing commented on issue #152: Case insensitive SHA-1 comparisons for downloaded binaries.

matthiasblaesing commented on issue #152: Case insensitive SHA-1 comparisons for downloaded binaries. URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/152#issuecomment-344691047 I agree Antonio, feel free to just close this.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > ...the file name will need to > be changed in the hash file as well/the hash files will need to be > regenerated, although the hash itself should remain the same... That's fine - we vote on hashes, not filenames, though

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

For the IPMC vote, I'd suppose it might be good to actually stage the release (signed and with hashes): http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#stage IMO if the only thing we need to change is the filename, it should be enough to rename before committing to the SVN (the file name will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

That means we need to make a new artifact with that name and start a new vote thread here for that artifact? Or do we start a vote thread at the IPMC with the newly named artifact? Thanks, Gj On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Nov

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ..."Shouldn't the name of the ZIP start with "incubating" ? As per http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html - "Release artifacts must include incubating in the final file name"

Re: Status of 2nd vote thread for 9.0 Alpha

Would be great if you could do it before we go to the IPMC, or at least to have had one mentor do it. Gj On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

Before we go to the IPMC vote, there's another question that needs an answer by Jaroslav Tulach above: "Shouldn't the name of the ZIP start with "incubating" ? I think that is a requirement somewhere in the release documents." Gj On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

OK, I think we have all the info we need -- I'm going to put the IPMC vote thread together. Gj On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > Isn't the solution to write to the README.md (maybe just next time) that > one has to: > > ./platform/lib/nbexec

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

Isn't the solution to write to the README.md (maybe just next time) that one has to: ./platform/lib/nbexec --userdir /tmp/testuserdir (if that works on all platforms)? -jt 2017-11-15 15:23 GMT+01:00 Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > My personal opinion: seems the main issue here is that the nbexec expects > to get userdir (and cache dir) from the product/application launcher. If > that's good or bad, that I guess is a question to NetBeans Platform >

Re: JDK 9 & NB build

That is correct, but the build itself tells you to do set nbjdk.home, which is wrong, so the description or better the message from ant should be updated. Am 15.11.17, 15:12 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" : How I do it on mac is: 1. I have JDK 9

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

My personal opinion: seems the main issue here is that the nbexec expects to get userdir (and cache dir) from the product/application launcher. If that's good or bad, that I guess is a question to NetBeans Platform architects, but this (as far as I can tell) is not really anything new in this

Re: JDK 9 & NB build

How I do it on mac is: 1. I have JDK 9 installed. 2. In the terminal, I do export JAVA_HOME=`/usr/libexec/java_home -v 1.8` 3. Then in the same terminal I run 'ant' to build the NetBeans sources. Gj On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Anton Epple wrote: > Hi, > > > >

Re: NetBeans talk at DevFest Istanbul

Excellent. Great -- thanks for letting everyone know. We should always drop a quick note here when we're speaking somewhere about NetBeans. Gj On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:37 AM, mark stephens < marksteph...@idrsolutions.com> wrote: > My colleague Georgia Ingham and me are reprising our JavaOne

Re: Status of 2nd vote thread for 9.0 Alpha

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...Would be great if a mentor would also take a look prior to us moving the > vote to the IPMC... I shall be able to do that in the next 24 hours but if not I'll vote on the IPMC thread later.

JDK 9 & NB build

Hi, the description on git incubator-netbeans suggests to have both JDK 9 and JDK 8 installed when building NB from sources. On mac this can cause problems, so the description should maybe be updated with instructions to make it work: When you start the build with JDK 9 installed, you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

FWIW, ./platform/lib/nbexec runs just fine on macOS: Product Version: NetBeans Platform Dev (Build incubator-netbeans-release-79-on-20171113) Java: 1.8.0_66; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 25.66-b17 Runtime: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 1.8.0_66-b17 System: Mac OS X version 10.12.6 running

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

OK, makes sense. Still, we need to figure out what the problem is that Chris describes in this thread. Gj On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 at 13:17, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > > On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga < > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

> On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Well, the question would be why it is useful. > > > > And what does it prove -- and is it a requirement for release. > What does it show if the launcher isn't working? That you cannot start

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

Hi Gj ! No sorry, I'm not able to reproduce on Windows Server 2012 R2. - Ralph D:\netbeans Platform\platform\lib>nbexec --help Usage: launcher {options} arguments General options: --helpshow this help --jdkhome path to JDK -Jpass to JVM --cp:p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating) -- 2nd attempt

Also, can someone on Windows reproduce the problem Chris describes in this thread? Gj On Wednesday, November 15, 2017, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Well, the question would be why it is useful. > > And what does it prove -- and is it a requirement for release.

Status of 2nd vote thread for 9.0 Alpha

Hi all, The 2nd vote thread looks good, everyone with a +1: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a2ee0c199a4f742b22249d7993233465e18bc8252a665af37f75728e@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E Would be great if a mentor would also take a look prior to us moving the vote to the IPMC. Also, should we

Re: nb-javac

Hi. One option that hasn't been discussed yet is to merge work done in the [jdk-javac branch]( https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/tree/jdk-javac). When this branch is merged, the Apache-NetBeans.zip download will be able to work out of the box with the latest JDK9 javac. I believe it is

Re: nb-javac

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Lars Bruun-Hansen wrote: > Ahh. I see. I'm sure there's solution to the module dependency problem. I > like best your idea of a dummy. Why do you need checks on entry points? > Because you want it to fail gracefully in the absence of the