As i said, i am not advocating breaking up repositories. It would help
modulartiy, but is not worth the price.Submodules refer to versioned code so
changes to the submodule have no impact to the built code until until the
version referenced by the submodule is updated. I think that would allev
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 10:26 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> On 11/19/2022 9:02 AM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote:
> >> From these, the valid argument is that it would be non-standard (not a
> top level name) related to Appache rules, which I think
+1
Em sex., 18 de nov. de 2022 às 14:01, Sebastien Lorquet
escreveu:
>
> nuttx and nuttxapps
>
> Sébastien
>
> Le 18/11/2022 à 17:30, Gregory Nutt a écrit :
> >
> >> why can’t we just have :
> >>
> >> nuttx, apps
> >>
> >> as it has been for a long time (before Apache) …
> >
> > Ultimately, the r
Maybe if we chose simply nuttx + nuttx-apps then it would be easier to
separate step by step nuttx-doc, nuttx-cpu from "just" nuttx? Sooo
manyy chooiiccesss :-) :-)
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:01 AM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 9:01 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote:
> > how about
> > nuttx
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 9:01 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote:
> how about
> nuttx-core
> nuttx-apps
rtos part would clearly say what is NuttX even / especially for people
who do not know it yet, i.e. FreeRTOS is self-explanatory :-)
thus nuttx-rtos + nuttx-apps / nuttx_rtos + nuttx_apps whatever fits
requ
It has to do with the CI configuration, but should not be breaking
anything. I'll put up a PR today to bump the version we use. The build
itself should be running in a 22.04 container already.
Thanks for the reminder!
--Brennan
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 12:17 PM Tim Hardisty wrote:
> The checks o
The checks on the few PRs I've done give an error " The ubuntu-18.04
environment is deprecated, consider switching to ubuntu-20.04(ubuntu-latest),
or ubuntu-22.04 instead."
Is that me (my machine is on 22.04 though) or a script/github problem?
how about
nuttx-core
nuttx-apps
then we locally clone to
nurtx_core
nuttx_apps
Best regards
Alim
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, 16:50 Jukka Laitinen, wrote:
> +1 for
>
> nuttx
> nuttx-apps
>
> Petro Karashchenko kirjoitti lauantai 19. marraskuuta 2022:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My two cents are that I think we sh
+1 for
nuttx
nuttx-apps
Petro Karashchenko kirjoitti lauantai 19. marraskuuta 2022:
> Hi,
>
> My two cents are that I think we should not rock the boat and just remove
> "incubator-" prefix from current repos that results in:
>
> nuttx
> nuttx-apps
>
> Best regards,
> Petro
>
> сб, 19 лист. 2
Hi,
My two cents are that I think we should not rock the boat and just remove
"incubator-" prefix from current repos that results in:
nuttx
nuttx-apps
Best regards,
Petro
сб, 19 лист. 2022 р. о 17:03 Tomek CEDRO пише:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote:
> > From the
On 11/19/2022 9:02 AM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote:
From these, the valid argument is that it would be non-standard (not a top
level name) related to Appache rules, which I think is indeed not acceptable.
It would not imply any source code or
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 3:53 PM Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote:
> From these, the valid argument is that it would be non-standard (not a top
> level name) related to Appache rules, which I think is indeed not acceptable.
> It would not imply any source code organization change nor submodules:
>
> gi
On 11/19/2022 8:31 AM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
As we have this honor and pleasure to talk directly with the NuttX
RTOS author.. maybe really we should listen to Gregory Nutt himself as
the most experienced person in the room? There was a discussion in
this area and the choice is strongly reasoned not
If some toolchain has an issue with hyphen separated name, then it should
be solved in scope of that toolchain.
In particular, instructions for that particular toolchain should suggest
different clone name as a workaround.
One broken toolchain should not lead to violating of URL naming standards.
>From these, the valid argument is that it would be non-standard (not a top
>level name) related to Appache rules, which I think is indeed not acceptable.
>It would not imply any source code organization change nor submodules:
git clone /nuttx/core nuttx
git clone /nuttx/apps apps
Anyway, from
> I am not attached to the name itself, I was just trying to solve the
problem with special characters. Would the following work?
>
> nuttx/core
> nuttx/apps
Again, We need to verify, but I do not think that the Apache github
repository
supports directories like nuttx/ with repositories under the
Short answer: NO :-)
Long answer:
1. This is not how current source code is organized. Implies
additional work and will break compatibility.
2. There will be a problem with git repository. This may not be
accepted by Apache or will require additional non-standard work that
will not align with how
As we have this honor and pleasure to talk directly with the NuttX
RTOS author.. maybe really we should listen to Gregory Nutt himself as
the most experienced person in the room? There was a discussion in
this area and the choice is strongly reasoned not just a matter of
personal preference.. there
I am not attached to the name itself, I was just trying to solve the problem
with special characters. Would the following work?
nuttx/core
nuttx/apps
2022/11/19 08:21:43, Gregory Nutt:
> On 11/19/2022 8:12 AM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
> > We need to verify, but I do not think that the Apache github
On 11/19/2022 8:12 AM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
We need to verify, but I do not think that the Apache github
repository supports directories
Technically, NuttX is NOT a kernel in most build modes. A kernel is a
very specific architectural implementation involving protected
resources: https://en.w
We need to verify, but I do not think that the Apache github repository
supports directories
Technically, NuttX is NOT a kernel in most build modes. A kernel is a
very specific architectural implementation involving protected
resources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(operating_system)
+1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 14:53 Thiago Costa de Paiva wrote:
> How about?
>
> nuttx/kernel
> nuttx/apps
>
>
> 2022/11/19 13:26:53, raiden00pl:
> > +1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps
> >
> > sob., 19 lis 2022 o 12:17 Abdelatif Guettouche <
> > abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> nap
How about?
nuttx/kernel
nuttx/apps
2022/11/19 13:26:53, raiden00pl:
> +1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps
>
> sob., 19 lis 2022 o 12:17 Abdelatif Guettouche <
> abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > nuttx and nuttx-apps for me too. For the hyphen, as it was said before
> > people can clone
+1 for nuttx and nuttx-apps
sob., 19 lis 2022 o 12:17 Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> nuttx and nuttx-apps for me too. For the hyphen, as it was said before
> people can clone the repo under any name they want. We've been doing
> this ever since we joined the
nuttx and nuttx-apps for me too. For the hyphen, as it was said before
people can clone the repo under any name they want. We've been doing
this ever since we joined the incubator and this is how we're
instructing people too:
https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/quickstart/install.html#download-nu
25 matches
Mail list logo
