Andrea, I have already fixed it on build 68.
It now displays combined prefixes at the bottom of the derivates panel.
I have compiled a build 70 to fix some little bugs, which will be
available when I update my site on the 1st of January.
I have also written a guide about how to install the
Hi.
It seems (as usual) that the discussion has died out, and nobody does
anything (my apologies in advance I am wrong, I would very much like to be
wrong).
Digital signing was and is a major theme for AOO. In fact AOO and Tomcat
was to be the 2 start/test applications for Apache. Infra has
On 23 December 2014 at 15:29, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 08:29:54PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
What build settings are neede fpr an release build?
These are my (old) configure options for a non-pro build (for a release
build, remove the last
On 25 December 2014 at 00:42, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I finished checking on the Java-specific messages and the six messages
only have a single place where each is produced.
It appears that a single (default en) page could provide the necessary
information for
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 04:57:25PM +0100, jan i wrote:
I thought we decided to remove wiki-publisher when we released 4.0,
for 2 reasons it is a plugin and the licensetext does not seem updated.
It is an extension; as such, it has never been part of a release, not
even on Sun/Oracle era. Anyway
-- replying to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 07:51
To: dev
Subject: Digital signing release for windows.
[ ... ]
My suggestion is simple, lets rerun AOO 4.1 for windows, sign it digitally,
and then release it as a patch version.
I am happy to
It occurs to me that nagging the list about things is not moving the ball
forward. I suggest that is not useful and it would be valuable to stay
constructive or even request assistance.
Your offer is interesting. Andrea has the key for AOO.
Don't forget that all of the languages need to be
I screwed up big time.
My carelessness in not correcting the To: address is inexcusable.
Jan, I am very sorry.
In the future, I will not use any Reply buttons to move off-list. That way
I'll have to get the address correct.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I screwed up big time.
My carelessness in not correcting the To: address is inexcusable.
not a problem for me, especially because it gives me a chance to write
something I have wanted to in a long time.
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
-- replying to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org javascript:;]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 07:51
To: dev
Subject: Digital signing release for windows.
[ ... ]
My suggestion is simple, lets
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
It occurs to me that nagging the list about things is not moving the ball
forward. I suggest that is not useful and it would be valuable to stay
constructive or even request assistance.
I agree with you, but
-- in reply below --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:13
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Digital signing release for windows.
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
[ ... ]
Hi,
Where can I find these DTDs:
libraries.dtd
library.dtd
module.dtd
scripting.dtd
These are used in ODF packages for the script-lb.xml, script-lc.xml, and
parcel-description.xml files. Besides the DTDs, are there any specs that
describe the format of these 3 XML files?
I haven't
Hi Ariel,
merry xmas to you too, and have fun building :)
i worked :-)
./configure \
--with-build-version=$(date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)) \
--with-vendor=My AOO Debug Build \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2;
\
The files listed below are not conventional files used in ODF packages. The
basic ODF files do not use DTDs and files by those names are not part of the
standard ODF document structure. While there might be other files in an ODF
package, usually XML files are expected to conform to
Hi Oliver,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 08:51:03PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Ariel,
merry xmas to you too, and have fun building :)
i worked :-)
./configure \
--with-build-version=$(date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)) \
--with-vendor=My AOO Debug Build \
I got a dump of 250MB of ODF files from the AOO bug database, via Rob,
the ODF subset used for his recent Peach fuzzing.
There are very few examples of scripts. All of the examples I've found
to date use these XML files, which refer to these DTD files.
I have not see any other script files which
Hello Lee,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:40:59AM -0800, Lee Fisher wrote:
Hi,
Where can I find these DTDs:
libraries.dtd
library.dtd
module.dtd
scripting.dtd
You can use http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/
Select aoo-trunk In Projec(s) and put the filename in File Path,
this will
Hi Lee,
Lee Fisher schrieb:
Hi,
Where can I find these DTDs:
libraries.dtd
library.dtd
module.dtd
scripting.dtd
You can search the code with http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/ and
look into the files.
In this case you will find, that the first three are in
On 25 December 2014 at 21:18, Lee Fisher l.office.fis...@gmail.com wrote:
I got a dump of 250MB of ODF files from the AOO bug database, via Rob,
the ODF subset used for his recent Peach fuzzing.
There are very few examples of scripts. All of the examples I've found
to date use these XML
It is correct that you will find many XML based documents that refer
to DTD
documents, actually it is a part of XML standard to do so.
But that does not mean that scripts or programs use these files. They are
often (and in case of AOO it is so) included just as a reference for
defining which
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
[Not cross-posting to private@.]
-- replying to --
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:20
To: OOo Apache
Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; privateAOO
Subject:
On 25 December 2014 at 20:17, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
-- in reply below --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:13
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Digital signing release for windows.
On
Thanks Jan,
It would be a great help to have links to the posts that document your findings
so that someone else could follow in your footsteps and especially figure out
what the problem is with Windows 8.1 rejecting unsigned files.
May I impose on you for that, please?
I see your 2014-12-09
On 13/12/2014 jan i wrote:
8.1 and above, it complains when you start the exe after installation.
To people who were waiting for developments in this discussion: a new
one (Digital signing release for windows) has been started, so please
follow it and I'll post my replies there too. See also
jan i wrote:
It seems (as usual) that the discussion has died out, and nobody does
anything (my apologies in advance I am wrong, I would very much like to be
wrong).
You are wrong (so it's good news!), but not so much. I started looking
at it only 2 days ago and I didn't get far enough yet.
26 matches
Mail list logo
