On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Ali Abbassi
wrote:
> Hi my name is Ali looking to participate in open office project
>
Welcome Ali. We suggest that new volunteers go through our Orientation
modules:
http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/index.html
They will give you an overview of how the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
> Hi people
>
> I am returning slow.
>
> We have preview for new changes and versions ? Because ~one year old
> (2014-08-21) we were still AOO 4.0.1 [0].
>
> 0 -
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Release+Notes
>
On 07/26/2015 03:28 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 24/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 06/23/2015 11:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Before we do anything with it, can we decide on the name?
>>> oooextras.mirror is clearly confusing since it is not a mirror ...
>
On 07/26/2015 12:48 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 25/07/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> I just committed the new consultants listing for "infolearn" to
>> /openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/bizdev/consultants.html
>> and much to my surprise, The buldbot has erre
I just committed the new consultants listing for "infolearn" to
/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/bizdev/consultants.html
and much to my surprise, The buldbot has erred out.
See info at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/ooo-site-site-staging/builds/6/steps/compile/logs/stdio
I've done updates to
On 07/23/2015 03:53 AM, | Stelios Lambropoulos | wrote:
> Hello Marcus,
>
>
> This is the XML file
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> infolearn - TEST4U.eu
> Global
> Certification
> Training
> Development
>
> Infolearn offers a comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2015 11:03 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Apologies for the initial build failures, but we now have a
> successful RAT build on the AOO410 branch in addition to the normal
> RAT build on trunk.
>
> See:
> https://ci.apache.org/p
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 16/07/2015 bugzilla wrote:
>
>> Kay has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
>> Issue 126401: Add ASF license headers to files
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126401
>>
>
> Unless I'm really mistaken this does not apply to AOO4
On 07/15/2015 01:07 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 07/15/2015 07:29 PM, schrieb jan i:
>> On 15 July 2015 at 02:35, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> I can't expect people to read all lists, so a short update to say
>>> that the
>>> first small batch of release blockers for 4.1.2 was integrated.
>>>
>>
>> T
On 07/15/2015 05:28 AM, Aptitude Testing Team wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 Aptitude Testing Team wrote
>> Back in May 2014, I submitted a patch fixing this issue. I understand
>> that we have to be careful implementing it, due to the location of the
>> bug.
>>
>> We have had no responses from the 13 us
Thanks to Pedro and Don for hanging in there with these changes!
It's great that we finally have a freebsd build! YAY!
On 07/15/2015 02:23 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> This is great work, thanks!
>
> I’m going to try this on our Buildbot tomorrow.
>
> Gav…
>
>> On 15 Jul 2015, at 6
On 07/14/2015 03:36 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> In answer to my original question regarding commits to the AOO410
>> branch. It seems my initial suggestion might have been wrong, and
>> probably mini-check outs of areas that need to be updated are t
On 07/14/2015 02:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> The following references for some of the AOO lists no longer work in
>> Markmail --
>> org.apache.incubator.ooo-commits
>> org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev
>
> Where do you see
branch, followed by a commit.
Additionally, for our further education on svn, I came across this
article on why TAGS should not be used for future commits -- you must
use branches.
http://www.sethcardoza.com/2009/04/svn-copy-creating-a-branch-or-tag/
On 07/10/2015 03:37 PM, Kay Schenk wrote
Does anyone have any contacts at Markmail?
The following references for some of the AOO lists no longer work in
Markmail --
org.apache.incubator.ooo-commits
org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev
org.apache.incubator.ooo-issues
org.apache.incubator.ooo-marketing
org.apache.incuba
On 07/09/2015 12:49 PM, Mark Officer wrote:
> Hello,
> My name is Mark Officer and my background is in software product
> management/marketing and as such I would like to get involved in
> OpenOffice in these areas. I live in New Hampshire, US.
>
> Thank you,
> Mark
>
Thanks for your interest i
On 07/10/2015 12:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 09/07/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release.
>
> Yes we are. It's not the 410 branch, it's the "AOO410" branch and even
> though the naming is unfortun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2015 02:57 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>> On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel
>> mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> JZA schrieb:
>>> Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO?
>>>
>>
>> Yes there are problems. You
It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There
have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release
that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2.
How do we get the changes from trunk into the 410 branch easily?
It seems we could use --
svn copy
On 07/09/2015 01:34 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I use the thread to ask if there any links to the actual development
> builds.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-fullsets
>
>
> still refers to AOO 4.1.1 bui
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Malte Timmermann
wrote:
> This approach would mean that you mostly don't use Qt at all.
>
> VCL uses SAL to get a top level window from the os, and then renders all
> widgets on it's own. Using Qt simply as yet an other SAL implementation
> would mean that you stil
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Kay;
>
> It's somewhat interesting for FreeBSD since we carry compatibility
> libraries
> (currently 32 bit but 64 bit will be available) from CentOS 6 .
>
> If you want to play a bit more try building it with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> [1].
>
F
On 07/05/2015 11:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> I seem to recall that we should no longer put these kinds of
>> pre-developmets on people.apache.org. Is this the case
>
> It is fine to use people.apache.org for custom builds and test builds.
> It i
On 07/05/2015 03:16 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/2015 02:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Anyway, for now I did update the build instructions according to
>>> my experience. But, it can of couse be changed
>>
>> Well
I now have a proof of concept package using CentOS 6 and my somewhat
limited configuration options -- no category-b.
So, just this one package in en-US if someone wants to try it out.
I seem to recall that we should no longer put these kinds of
pre-developmets on people.apache.org. Is this the ca
On 07/05/2015 02:28 PM, Jason Marshall wrote:
> Hello
>
> With reference to the query below and having examined the 'bootstrap'
> script, I realised that the script was expecting to be able to 'cd'
> to a directory named 'DMAKE_4_12', using the comment below:
>
> cd "$dmake_directory_name" || e
On 07/05/2015 02:46 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Anyway, for now I did update the build instructions according to my
>> experience. But, it can of couse be changed
>
> Well, so far it is a bug that you experienced but that no-one else
> confirmed
On 07/05/2015 03:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> As near as I can tell, once you specify --package-format=
>> installed any other package format specifications are ignored. I
>> was trying to generate BOTH an installed AND rpm packaging with
>>
As near as I can tell, once you specify --package-format= installed
any other package format specifications are ignored.
I was trying to generate BOTH an installed AND rpm packaging with
--package-format="installed rpm"
when I noticed the rpm packages were not there even though I received no
er
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> > wrote:
>
> > THE TL;DR:
> >
> > I agree. The extensive lag to availability of 4.1.2 is far more
> pertinent
> > at the level of the Board Report. The existe
[top posting]
Well no responses but no need for a response. No, I did not get this
solved -- yet!
Autoconf on my new setup is, as we say here in the US, "weirding" things
out quite a bit, and, an autotools guru I am not, so LOTS of research. :(
later...
On 06/22/2015 03:56 PM, Kay Sc
On 06/26/2015 11:27 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 06/26/2015 12:40 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
>> Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
>> long time.
>
> I remember that Rob has taken care about updating these numbers.
> Unfortunately, I don't know where it is decribed h
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Gina Likins wrote:
> As you mention at the top of the page (which, admittedly, it took me a
> while to see), almost all the info on the page is now wrong. I wonder if
> it would make more sense to grey out all the old text and just do a
> redirect to the new Lic
On 06/24/2015 12:01 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> It seems that on one hand we all agree that we should release 4.1.2
> reasonably soon, but on the other hand nobody volunteered to be a
> Release Manager so far.
>
> After several months of traveling, I expect to have more free time that
> I can al
On 06/23/2015 11:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/06/2015 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>> oooextras is back from few hours now.
>
> Thank you for this. I believe nothing was lost, since this was supposed
> to be a "proof of concept" for Apache Extras and I don't think we had
> uploaded new libra
On 06/23/2015 01:48 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> 2015-06-23 22:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk :
>
>>
>> On 06/23/2015 08:00 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>>> 2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk :
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/21/20
On 06/23/2015 08:00 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> 2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk :
>
>>
>>
>> On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alo
I am up on a new CentOS 6 OS (32 bit). Mostly OK except I can NOT get
PKG_CHECK_MODULES used in configure.in to work. It fails on the first
occurrence looking for cppunit. It's been so long since I first started
building AOO that I don't remember if I had to do something special to
my autoconf setu
On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the SF
>> mirror must have been deactivated just a day or so ago.
>
> Could it be that this is an unintended consequence
ere is one relevant to our current situation:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.community.devel/2983/match=apache+extras
Let's take a wider view and hope the mirror gets restarted soon!
>
>
> Kay Schenk schrieb:
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Regina Henschel >
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to make a new build from current trunk. I have got a lot of
> download failures in ./bootstrap.
>
> I have attached a log file and in addition I copy the relevant parts of
> the file below (for the case the attachment is
On 06/17/2015 04:03 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Kay;
>
> You want to check this email in the archives:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201408.mbox/%3C540130E6.3060709%40apache.org%3E
Ok, yes, this is where I ended up downloading from. OK, I *thought* I
had download
On Jun 8, 2015 8:46 AM, "Dennis E. Hamilton"
wrote:
>
> I've never understood this business of having multiple releases as
progressions on the same code branch.
>
> It seems far more confusing than having a branch or tag that corresponds
to the release identifier.
Actually before 4.1.1, we did us
Hello all--
I'm in the process of redoing my OS, and wanted to reinstall dmake
locally which I had done before.
OK, here's out url ref:
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
This actually still downloads dmake 4.12 but the main url:
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.c
don't think we ran out last year. Melissa would know.
>
> - Dennis
>
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Kay Schenk
> [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 13:23 To:
> dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache@ OSCON 2015 - Booth
> Goo
> Kay, 1.4" diameter for the AOO seagull buttons would be superb!
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2015 14:54
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache@ OSCON 2015 - Bo
a_home-variable-in-mac-os-x-maverick/
It seems finding and setting correct JAVA_HOME is a bit more challenging
than what I'm used to.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> 2015-06-08 6:22 GMT+09:00 Kay Schenk :
>
>>
>>
>> On 06/05/2015 03:41 PM, aronsoyol wrote:
>>
On 06/05/2015 03:41 PM, aronsoyol wrote:
> Thanks Kay Schenk.
> But I've certianly specified ant's home
> --with-ant-home=/usr/local/Cellar/ant/1.9.4 but the error still there
> Is there any miss in my configure
> Or environment settings?
What is the information in your
On Jun 5, 2015 11:06 PM, "jan i" wrote:
>
> On Saturday, June 6, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>
> > OSCON 2015 is near upon us.
> >
> > I am offering to do booth duty again this year. I had a great time and
am
> > happy to do it again.
> >
> > I have one request.
> >
> > Can we have bigger
On 06/04/2015 08:02 PM, aronsoyol wrote:
> The Source code is cloned from github and the head is on
>
> commit ea4c3e19069b2746928af62788be6a65e07c03e9
>
> Author: Kay Schenk
>
> Date: Wed Jun 3 22:53:11 2015 +
>
>
> #i126281# Remove HWP as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2015 08:28 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> After going through all the builds we are now in a much healthier
> position.
>
> See: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>
> Only ONE failing build as of writing (fbsd-nighty) a
On 06/01/2015 12:09 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 31 May 2015 at 18:43, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>>>> As
On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 30/05/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>> Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there any reason to insist
>>> on CentOS 5?
>> There was a dissension. I did as
On 05/30/2015 01:57 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I started the discussion on dropping CentOS 5 and moving on
> to CentOS 6. There was no comment against moving to the
> newer version, which AFAICT is the last version to support
> 32 bits.
>
> Assuming AOO builds on CentOS 6, is there a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/15/2014 03:47 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:31:54PM +0100, jan i wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> FYI, in case you have not noticed. INFRA-8768 (centOS buildbot
>> for AOO) took a huge jump today, and are very near
o just graphic images
(but overall size ) so I didn't find it.
>
> On 26.05.2015 00:28, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> On 05/25/2015 11:03 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>> There are constant reports of images going missing in OO Writer. The
>>> problem is not c
On 05/25/2015 11:03 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> There are constant reports of images going missing in OO Writer. The
> problem is not consistently reproducible, but is there nevertheless.
> A recent report suggests it might be memory related:
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Jason Marshall
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> My name is Jason Marshall. I am writing in order to introduce myself to
> the project in the first instance. I am aiming to contribute to the
> project from a development point of view, but would be interested in
> helping with t
Quite a number of changes have been suggested in Help and UI (beginning
with comment #35), see:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125985
It would be helpful if we could get additional feedback on these
suggestions. To do this, please us Bugzilla and directly reply to the
individual commen
On 05/03/2015 11:49 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 Marcus wrote:
>> that's great to see. :-) Didn't know that you had such deep knowledge of
>> the code.
>
> Honestly, as someone (I think it was Pedro) once put it, to remove stuff
> you just need an axe (sometimes a well-sharpened ax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2015 01:56 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Subsequent build passed so we are all good here:-
>
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/20
>
> Gav…
Thanks!
>
>> On 6 May 2015, at 2:51 pm, Gavin McDon
On 05/06/2015 10:29 PM, jan i wrote:
> On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 06:51 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Last build for this was way back in October last year:
>>>&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/06/2015 06:51 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Last build for this was way back in October last year:
>
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/19
>
> and failed due to disconnecting with the master, the s
On 05/01/2015 03:05 AM, Kim Pedersen (KMP) wrote:
> Hello "Open Office"
>
> I´m using your Super Program, and am happy about it.
> Would say; Worlds best Office Program, and for free... Just super.
>
> Se You have Danish Translation/Version and it´s made god.
> If i in any way can contribute with
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote:
> On 2015-04-29 00:07, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> I normally set --disable-odk in my builds. When I enabled it today for
>> some testing, I get an configuration error that says --
>>
>> checking for external/unowin
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 29/04/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> put it into external/unowinreg using your browser or a command
>> equivalent to:
>> wget -O external/unowinreg/unowinreg.dll
>> http://www.openoffic
I normally set --disable-odk in my builds. When I enabled it today for
some testing, I get an configuration error that says --
checking for external/unowinreg/unowinreg.dll... configure: WARNING: not
found, will be cross-built using mingw32
configure: error: for rebuilding unowinreg.dll you need t
As we plan for the 4.1.2 release, should we give some thought to the
importance of the HWP filter, Hangul Word Processor, that was recently
involved in the latest security breach? Is this a filter we think should
be maintained? Does anyone have any information on how much it is
currently used, etc
On 04/27/2015 03:58 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Board report for Q1 is behind us now and the negative articles (which we
> knew would be the
> consequence of being honest) are probably also behind us.
>
> Time to think on the near future. Our next report is due in a little more
> than 2 Month
On 04/23/2015 08:43 PM, Nancy K wrote:
> Hi everyone, I just wanted to suggest that negative points made in
> these articles can be turned around and made into good public
> relations by addressing these points as separate blog posts. Several
> positive blog posts linking back to OpenOffice would
On 04/18/2015 03:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On 04/18/2015 09:01 AM, jan i wrote:
>>> I thought 4.1.2 would be used to release non-released languages
>> My assumption was this just meant "next release" and not necessarily
>> 4.
On 04/18/2015 09:01 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On 17 April 2015 at 08:38, FR web forum wrote:
>
>>> Here is the link to the issue in Bugzilla:
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126243
>>
>> Other report for Thai translation:
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125934
>>
On 04/17/2015 12:43 PM, Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> 2015-04-17 11:45 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
>
>> Guy Waterval wrote:
>>
>>> EuroOffice for Android is a possibility
>>>
>>> http://www.multiracio.com/index.php?lang=en&style=eurooffice&page=eo_android
>>>
>>
>> Is this based on the O
On 04/15/2015 03:50 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The plugin for NetBeans 8.x and Apache OpenOffice 4.1.x is now available
> for download from NetBeans.org [1] and also through the IDE.
>
> I have also updated our wiki [2].
>
> [1] http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/57917/apache-openoffi
On 04/12/2015 10:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> currently I do not find a "Register" link on any OpenOffice Wiki
>>>> (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page)
>>>> pages. Was this removed and I didn't notic
On 04/12/2015 11:09 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Hello all --
>>
>> I know we're basically "whitelisting" both CWiki and MWiki accounts, but
>> currently I do not find a "Register" link on any OpenOffice Wiki
>>
Hello all --
I know we're basically "whitelisting" both CWiki and MWiki accounts, but
currently I do not find a "Register" link on any OpenOffice Wiki
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page)
pages. Was this removed and I didn't notice?
If some alternate means of account registration is used,
On 04/12/2015 08:24 AM, 郄宁 wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer. I am using win7，there is a CMS in the
> background and use network， If I want to edit oo documentation which
> interfaces need to call?
Hi. When you say you want to edit the documentation, do you mean some
information on:
* the w
On 04/06/2015 10:20 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for top posting.
>
> I have just been made aware, that my understanding of chair role was wrong.
> The Chair has the responsibility to make the board report:
>
> "The report is mainly about the status of the project, together with any
> commu
On 04/05/2015 11:35 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Wow, it sounds so depressive, I would really want to sound it more
> optimistic as more matter of fact. I think for a report is way too
> emotional.
>
> Just list what is being done (or not), is it still on planning stage, and
> what it's being
On 04/01/2015 11:15 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 04/01/2015 10:42 AM, schrieb jan i:
>> On 1 April 2015 at 09:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we could resume some work here. At least, bring to the trunk the
>>> small list of fixes we have already available (and which I listed
>>> here on
>>
On 03/31/2015 04:22 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Congratulations Marcus !
>
> Marcus is now member of Apache Software Foundation.
>
> Marcus was invited after the yearly membership meeting and accepted.
>
> Marcus might not (yet) be so active in the Foundation itself, but Marcus is,
> to me and
On 03/30/2015 10:14 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just took some time looking at the content of the cwiki, and have a few
> suggestions:
>
> I suggest we remove:
> Project planning, page states "*Warning: this page refers to the Incubation
> phase, ended in October 2012". *Either we should have a
On 03/30/2015 02:52 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/30/2015 11:41 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>>
>> On 03/30/2015 09:36 AM, jan i wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Time for my first AOO Board report.
>>>
>>> I have prepared the board report see
>&
On 03/30/2015 09:36 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Time for my first AOO Board report.
>
> I have prepared the board report see
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+Mar
>
> You might notice that I prefer to use a much more direct tone, than Andrea
> did. That is NOT to say
On 03/27/2015 08:56 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/27/2015 04:21 PM, schrieb jan i:
>> On Friday, March 27, 2015, Marcus wrote:
>>
>>> Am 03/26/2015 08:09 AM, schrieb jan i:
>>>
In the ongoing discussion (apache wide) Infra has now made a FAQ,
which is
worth reading.
[...]
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2015 11:42 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:36:51PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> Hello;
>>
>> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
>> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2015 11:37 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:59:03AM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Dear all --
>>
>> If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance wi
th
>> tr
On 03/27/2015 02:38 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I the 2nd install command under
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_14.04
> is not up to date.
> should the actual command looks like the following:
>
> sudo dpkg -i
> unxlngx
YAY! :) Good work.
On 03/27/2015 02:56 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> fianlly I have a successful build :)
> :)
>
--
-
MzK
“What is the point of being alive if you don't
at least try to do something remarka
Hi Regina --
On 03/26/2015 11:46 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Kay,
>
> Kay Schenk schrieb:
>> Dear all --
>>
>> If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance with
>> tracking down our Windows buildbot problem. See our buildbot r
On 03/26/2015 01:35 PM, Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> is the step by step building guide for AOO under Ubuntu the same as under
> Debian?
> Or is it better to have Ubuntu to contribute to the open office
> development?
> the guide is under the following
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/
On 03/26/2015 12:03 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 26 March 2015 at 03:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
>> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
>> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely
Dear all --
If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance with
tracking down our Windows buildbot problem. See our buildbot results
page -- http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
Since rev. 1667884 (a possible result of making one thing right but
breaking something else),
On 03/24/2015 09:25 AM, Chengyang Lin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I dont know how to add my name to the Directory of Volunteers page.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Chengyang Lin
> Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
> QA
Hello and thank you for volunteering --
Please go to the Directory of Volunteers page --
h
We are still in the planning phase for our next release, tentatively
4.1.2. One of the first and most important items we need to have is a
Release Manager. Our former release manager, Juergen, retired from this
role a few months ago.
(See original post on how Juergen was chosen/volunteered --
http
GTK is enabled by default for our builds.
I don't see this listed as a build requirement for either Windows or
Mac, however. So, should this build flag be changed to non-enabled
generally and only enabled for Linux?
--
-
MzK
On 03/19/2015 01:24 PM, Audrey MOLIES wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> We would like to know if there is a copyright on images from openoffice
> draw gallery?
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
> Audrey
These images are licensed with Apache License v 2 as far as I know --
details http://openoffice.apache.org/licen
On 03/18/2015 04:35 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2015-03-18, 4:46 PM Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 03/18/2015 09:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>> >Larry, that's great. I saw that in a screen shot that showed both of
>>> >them installed.
>>> >
On 03/18/2015 09:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Larry, that's great. I saw that in a screen shot that showed both of
> them installed.
>
> Please add that link to Bugzilla issue 126130. If you don't have an
> account there, let me know and I will do it.
OK, I see Larry has done this.
I t
501 - 600 of 2022 matches
Mail list logo
