Hi Marcus,
Am 07.02.23 um 18:06 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 07.02.23 um 12:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Does anyone have the karma to disable the review section here?
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/reviews/
>>
>> It is full of SPAM. Alternatively we need someone to clean up.
>
>
Am 07.02.23 um 12:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Does anyone have the karma to disable the review section here?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/reviews/
It is full of SPAM. Alternatively we need someone to clean up.
I've asked SF.net for request, got it and cleaned up the reviews
Hi All,
Does anyone have the karma to disable the review section here?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/reviews/
It is full of SPAM. Alternatively we need someone to clean up.
Regards,
Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Am 19.01.23 um 17:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
It looks like they are up again...
that is great. Luckily just a short hiccup.
Marcus
Am 19.01.23 um 16:09 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
In fact it must have happened in the last couple of hours... ;-)
Am 19.01.23 um 16:05 schrieb Aivaras Stepuko
It looks like they are up again...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 19.01.23 um 16:09 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi,
>
> In fact it must have happened in the last couple of hours... ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 19.01.23 um 16:05 schrieb Aivaras Stepukonis:
>> I can confirm that the versions pa
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:29:16 +0100
Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> SourceForge seems to have big trouble!
>
> All recent download files are gone. Not only for OpenOffice:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/
>
> Can anyone confir
Hi,
In fact it must have happened in the last couple of hours... ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
Am 19.01.23 um 16:05 schrieb Aivaras Stepukonis:
> I can confirm that the versions past 4.1.10 are not available. This
> must be a relatively recent mishap as I was checking Source Forge a
> couple weeks a
Czesław
>
> Am Do., 19. Jan. 2023 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> SourceForge seems to have big trouble!
>>
>> All recent download files are gone. Not only for OpenOffice:
>>
>> ht
16:58, Czesław Wolański rašė:
Hi Matthias,
Same problem at my place.
Regards,
Czesław
Am Do., 19. Jan. 2023 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Matthias Seidel <
matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
Hi all,
SourceForge seems to have big trouble!
All recent download files are gone. Not only for OpenOf
Hi Matthias,
Same problem at my place.
Regards,
Czesław
Am Do., 19. Jan. 2023 um 15:29 Uhr schrieb Matthias Seidel <
matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
> Hi all,
>
> SourceForge seems to have big trouble!
>
> All recent download files are gone. Not only for
Hi all,
SourceForge seems to have big trouble!
All recent download files are gone. Not only for OpenOffice:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/
Can anyone confirm or is this just my (local) problem?
Regards,
Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
Hi Marcus, Carl
> On 07/25/2022 5:06 PM WEST Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 25.07.22 um 16:04 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> > It seems to be fixed now.
>
> I can see the listed item for 4.1.13 and it has already over 81,000
> downloads.
Yes, all is back to normal, even the mirror options.
Regards,
Pedro
-
Am 25.07.22 um 16:04 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Pedro and all,
On 7/25/22 9:41 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
It worries me that 4.1.13 does not show up on
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/
Should I report that?
Sourceforge must be changing the pages (again) because when you
Hi Pedro and all,
On 7/25/22 9:41 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
It worries me that 4.1.13 does not show up on
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/
Should I report that?
Sourceforge must be changing the pages (again) because when you press the "Problems
Downloading?&qu
It worries me that 4.1.13 does not show up on
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/
Should I report that?
Sourceforge must be changing the pages (again) because when you press the
"Problems Downloading?" button, you no longer have the option to choose the
Hi Dave and all,
On 7/25/22 9:14 AM, Dave wrote:
On 25/07/2022 13:52, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
I tried going through https://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html to
download Linux x86-64 rpm binaries and follow the binary link to SF and
the download download doesn't start and it redirects m
On 25/07/2022 13:52, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I tried going through https://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html to
> download Linux x86-64 rpm binaries and follow the binary link to SF and
> the download download doesn't start and it redirects me to the files
> page and 4.1.13 isn't li
Hi All,
I tried going through https://openoffice.apache.org/downloads.html to
download Linux x86-64 rpm binaries and follow the binary link to SF and
the download download doesn't start and it redirects me to the files
page and 4.1.13 isn't listed but there is another download button that
doe
Hi Pedro,
Am 04.05.21 um 16:51 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi all
>
> The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;)
> Small victories on May the Fourth!
Yes!
And thank you for using the 4th...
Matthias
>
> All the best,
> Pedro
>
>
>> On
Hi all
The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;)
Small victories on May the Fourth!
All the best,
Pedro
> On 03/30/2021 5:19 PM Marcus wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> &g
Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino:
Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
(that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago)
the answer from the Sourceforge staff was
Hi Pedro,
Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi all
>
> Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
> (that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago)
>
> the answer from the Sourceforge staff wa
Hi all
Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
(that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago)
the answer from the Sourceforge staff was
> On 03/24/2021 4:15 PM SourceForge.net Support & Ops
> wrote:
>
Hello Joseph,
SourceForge is a long time trusted partner. We have a simple Download
page that helps to select the Version you need.
https://www.openoffice.org/download/
Do you have issues with this page?
What Platform do you use?
All the Best
Peter
Am 26.04.20 um 19:35 schrieb Joseph
Hello,
Please, never put your downloads on sourceforge site. The display is
complete mess. Impossible to download from there.
Where can I download openoffice from ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Popups on Sourceforge are not Apache OpenOffice responsibility ;)
You can always download directly from the Apache archives if you know which
files to get
http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/
> On October 10, 2019 at 3:13 PM Matic Smerdu
> wrote:
>
>
> I tried to down
I tried to download OpenOffice 4.1.7 from SourceForge. But you a tooo evil with
your Advertising.
I closed totaly AdBlockPlus for all pages, but no difference.
Will I never be able to get openoffice again without these violent popups
As discussed in https://s.apache.org/sHGE we can't do a clean build
while SourceForge is down, to to the fact that oooextras.mirror (where
we keep some libraries) is unreachable.
I've created a temporary mirror with the files I had locally and with
some more files (especially extens
Am 21.01.2018 um 17:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Can one of the admins provide me access to our SourceForge page?
My SourceForge name is seidelm:
https://sourceforge.net/u/seidelm/profile/
done. Due to your usual work I've added you to the Admin group.
M
Hi,
Can one of the admins provide me access to our SourceForge page?
My SourceForge name is seidelm:
https://sourceforge.net/u/seidelm/profile/
Regards, Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi Dave,
Am 16.01.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Dave Brondsema:
> On 1/13/18 10:21 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema:
>>> On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>> Since yesterday (?) Sourc
On 1/13/18 10:21 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema:
>> On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look:
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeor
Hi Dave,
Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema:
> On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look:
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>
>> While I have to get used to the colors, it f
Am 11.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Dave Brondsema:
On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
While I have to get used to the colors, it feels like the AOO downloads
are much more
On 1/10/18 6:30 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>
> While I have to get used to the colors, it feels like the AOO downloads
> are much more responsive now.
>
Glad you
Since yesterday (?) SourceForge has a complete new look:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
While I have to get used to the colors, it feels like the AOO downloads
are much more responsive now.
Regards, Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 12/22/2017 07:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Carl Marcum wrote:
Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me
permissions so I can upload the release?
Done. Thank you and enjoy!
We now have 6 PMC members as administrators of that area, so we should
be well covered
Carl Marcum wrote:
Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me
permissions so I can upload the release?
Done. Thank you and enjoy!
We now have 6 PMC members as administrators of that area, so we should
be well covered.
Regards,
Andrea
Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me
permissions so I can upload the release?
My SF username is cmarcum.
Thanks,
Carl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Am 24.11.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> It seems that "openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz" is missing on Sourceforge (OOO
>> Extras):
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/
>
> Added earlier today, should be vis
Matthias Seidel wrote:
It seems that "openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz" is missing on Sourceforge (OOO
Extras):
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/
Added earlier today, should be visible now.
More admins can always be added to our SourceForge area, just provide
the S
It seems that "openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz" is missing on Sourceforge (OOO
Extras):
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/
The fallback URL defined in "external_deps.lst" points to:
http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-0.9.8zg.tar.gz
At the moment our Linux bui
On 13/10/2017 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Our SourceForge area is now updated with files from revision 22458 from
the dev area (this revision includes the rebuilt Linux-64 binaries).
Now updated again to revision 22553 (this one includes the rebuilt OS X
binaries).
As expected, the only modified
; update the download pages any moment after the vote passes.
>
> Our SourceForge area is now updated with files from revision 22458 from the
> dev area (this revision includes the rebuilt Linux-64 binaries).
>
> Everything is still staged (unavailable to the public), but we
r the vote passes.
Our SourceForge area is now updated with files from revision 22458 from
the dev area (this revision includes the rebuilt Linux-64 binaries).
Everything is still staged (unavailable to the public), but we can count
on propagation to mirrors to be completed well in advance of when
On 11/10/2017 Don Lewis wrote:
That's a good way to reduce the time to the official release, but if we
had done this for RC4, then the release would have been happened before
the latest regression was reported.
Yes, the idea is not to give people another opportunity to block the
release! Just
Sounds like a great plan!
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not
> public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the
> place where our off
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
> (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
> This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
>
> Instead of wa
Am 11.10.2017 um 23:29 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
(not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
Instead of waiting for a
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
(not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I will gradually upload
4.1.4-R
Dave Brondsema is our contact. May I ask you what is the problem you're
trying to solve?
Roberto
2017-02-15 22:52 GMT+01:00 Raphael Bircher :
> Hi all
>
> I search our contact to SourceForge. Has anyone the information?
>
> Regards Raphael
>
> --
> Mein Blog: https
Hi all
I search our contact to SourceForge. Has anyone the information?
Regards Raphael
--
Mein Blog: https://raphaelbircher.blogspot.ch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
to 4.1.2.
I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge...
regards
Matthias
Clear your browser cache and 4.1.3 will show up.
I took the liberty of changing this just a few minutes ago.
It would be good to include this in the release instructions. After making the
folder unstaged, just
On 10/13/16 1:11 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200
> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> The "latest version" on
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still
>> pointing to 4.1.2.
>>
>&
quot; on
>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still
>>> pointing to 4.1.2.
>>>
>>> I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge...
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>> Clear
openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still
>> pointing to 4.1.2.
>>
>> I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge...
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Matthias
>>
> Clear your browser cache and 4.1.3 will show up.
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200
Matthias Seidel wrote:
> The "latest version" on
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still
> pointing to 4.1.2.
>
> I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge...
>
> regards
>
> Matt
The "latest version" on
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/ is still
pointing to 4.1.2.
I think this had to be set manually on sourceforge...
regards
Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2016 20:54, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> Thanks for your patience, what follows it's the result of a joint meet
ing
> with our AdOps team and our Managing Director.
Is "our AdOps team" a SourceForge team, or an Apach
to improve the timeliness of removing ad violations, but it
needs end-users' input.
With regard to our direct sales and partner advertisers, they remain active
and in full compliance with SourceForge ad quality specifications and
policies, and we never had similar issues with them.
Stay tuned, I will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2016 08:02, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Something has been puzzling me lately. What if this is deliberate?. I
> mean, people setting up these "fake AOO" sites and then joining the SF
.net
> advertisers network only to hurt AOO?.
Pretty much sin
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Patience! Let's see what Roberto has to say
Something has been puzzling me lately. What if this is delliberate?. I
mean, people setting up these "fake AOO" sites and then joining the SF.net
advertisers network only to hurt AOO?.
Can an indiv
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad
> that has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content?
It's not as simple as that, some evildoers create ad buttons that show
The choice to go with sourceforge was not about stats. OpenOffice binaries are
quite substantial. There was concern about if all the Apache mirrors could
handle the load.
Patience! Let's see what Roberto has to say. SourceForge has been generous.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Apache’s mirrors already have the binaries, and should handle the load.
It has been argued repeatedly that they wouldn't.
FC
Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad that
> has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content?
>
> I understand there are technical challenges. If that is difficult is it
> possible to simply block all ads?
>
> Regards,
Hi Roberto,
Is it possible for SourceForge to implement an active blocking if any ad that
has "Office" or "OpenOffice" anywhere in the content?
I understand there are technical challenges. If that is difficult is it
possible to simply block all ads?
Regards,
Dave
Sent
+1 for a divorce :)
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for heads up, both the account and its creatives have been blocked.
>
> Roberto
>
> 2016-01-07 15:38 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
>
> >
> > Today, we have 2 users that have pay for a f
Thanks for heads up, both the account and its creatives have been blocked.
Roberto
2016-01-07 15:38 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
>
> Today, we have 2 users that have pay for a fake OpenOffice2015
>
>
> https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=l&ai=Cqhy-1neOVt6KL-WpiQackZzAAYfp7MoH34WD-LgC1MrWdxAB
e.
As for other projets, I think Apache must not accept such situation:
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2931575/open-source-tools/sourceforge-fail-itbwcw.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
-pub-4006818487458500&nm=11&nx=197&ny=210&mb=2&adurl=http://opf2.fisseef.com/fr%3Futm_campaign%3Dopenoffice2%26utm_source%3Dgoogle
>
> - Mail original -
> De: "Roberto Galoppini" >
> À: "dev" >, "Cyril Beaussier" <
&
l -
De: "Roberto Galoppini"
À: "dev" , "Cyril Beaussier"
Envoyé: Mardi 10 Novembre 2015 10:35:16
Objet: Re: Sourceforge and commercial ads
Thanks for heads up, could you kindly pass me the exact link? Send me also
a direct message if you prefer.
Roberto
2015-11-10 1
2015-11-22 18:29 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton :
> Roberto, thanks for this. Comments in-line
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 14:23
> > To: dev
>
Roberto, thanks for this. Comments in-line
> -Original Message-
> From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:roberto.galopp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 14:23
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: SOURCEFORGE [Was: téléchargement version 4.1.2]
>
> 2015-11-21 19:
2015-11-21 19:28 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton :
> [not cross-posting]
>
> SourceForge is valuable to the project for providing the mirror capacity
> that AOO requires. The penalty is in regard to user distrust and these
> awful situations that the list and Forum folks have to co
[not cross-posting]
SourceForge is valuable to the project for providing the mirror capacity that
AOO requires. The penalty is in regard to user distrust and these awful
situations that the list and Forum folks have to contend with. As far as our
users are concerned, it is the AOO project
Dave Barton wrote:
I do not understand, or
find any reasonable explanation, why our download page does not redirect
to the ASF's own mirror network:
https://www.apache.org/mirrors/
where our binaries are already being served by 200+ mirrors around the
world.
Leaving all the Source
==
Is it not time to _*SERIOUSLY*_ review the distribution of our binaries
via SourceForge?
Rory O'Farrell and others dutifully expend their valuable time advising
"unaware" users NOT to click on download links and buttons after they
are redirected to the
Thanks for heads up, could you kindly pass me the exact link? Send me also
a direct message if you prefer.
Roberto
2015-11-10 10:23 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
> Hello list,
>
> New ad to have a fake AOO:
> http://www.cjoint.com/c/EKkjxfqjgbA
> Jump to a para-site:
> h**p:/opf.goltus.com
>
> --
Hello list,
New ad to have a fake AOO:
http://www.cjoint.com/c/EKkjxfqjgbA
Jump to a para-site:
h**p:/opf.goltus.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openof
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:01:58 +0200
Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> AOO Extensions is ok since yesterday, AOO Templates is finally back too.
Just checked on two computers. Working correctly - thanks, Roberto. If you
get the SourceForge holding page you should delete your Browser cache (I had
I've just checked on the webpage. It's working for both.
Thanks to everybody at Sourceforge for bring it back online. :-)
Marcus
Am 07/24/2015 10:01 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
AOO Extensions is ok since yesterday, AOO Templates is finally back too.
2015-07-22 16:37 GMT+
ery path, with dedicated backups.
> >
> > We are really sorry for the inconvenience, are we're doing our best to
> take
> > it back asap.
> >
> > Roberto
>
> Thanks for the update, Roberto.
>
> >
> > 2015-07-22 10:48 GMT+02:00 Rory O'Farrell :
>
ate, Roberto.
>
> 2015-07-22 10:48 GMT+02:00 Rory O'Farrell :
>
> > This is not a complaint, just a comment for information:
> >
> > After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the AOO
> > download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates
dedicated
delivery path, with dedicated backups.
We are really sorry for the inconvenience, are we're doing our best to take
it back asap.
Roberto
2015-07-22 10:48 GMT+02:00 Rory O'Farrell :
> This is not a complaint, just a comment for information:
>
> After the recent Source
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 13:35:15 +0200
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> > After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the
> > AOO download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the
> > detailed pages previously link
Rory O'Farrell wrote:
After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the
AOO download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the
detailed pages previously linked.
Links on the http://www.openoffice.org/download page are unchanged. So
the redirection is wit
This is not a complaint, just a comment for information:
After the recent SourceForge outage, the pages being linked off the AOO
download page for AOO extensions and AOO templates are not the detailed pages
previously linked. Of course, restoration may still be in process; if so,
please
O'Farrell
>
> As far as I read, the GIMP team had never opt-in distributing
> adwares/malwares. They did agree to share SF.net's ad profit, but not
> bundling adwares/malwares with their installers. And SF.net did
> hijacked GIMP for Windows without authors' con
t did
hijacked GIMP for Windows without authors' consent.
Goodbye, SourceForge.
https://helb.github.io/goodbye-sourceforge/
Anatomy of SourceForge/GIMP controversy (from GIMP team)
http://libregraphicsworld.org/blog/entry/anatomy-of-sourceforge-gimp-controversy
What happened to Sourceforge?
It has been removed, thanks for heads up.
2015-05-27 11:10 GMT+02:00 Roberto Galoppini :
> Hi,
>
> I need the original link, and possibly a screenshot, thanks.
>
> Roberto
>
> 2015-05-27 10:51 GMT+02:00 FR web forum :
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> New ad to have a fake AOO.
>> Jump to a para-site:
>>
Hi,
I need the original link, and possibly a screenshot, thanks.
Roberto
2015-05-27 10:51 GMT+02:00 FR web forum :
> Hello list,
>
> New ad to have a fake AOO.
> Jump to a para-site:
> h**p://www.sutuul.com
>
> -
> To unsubsc
Hello list,
New ad to have a fake AOO.
Jump to a para-site:
h**p://www.sutuul.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Just confirming it has been blocked 5 mins ago.
Thanks again,
Roberto
2015-02-13 17:29 GMT+01:00 Roberto Galoppini :
> Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be
> removed shortly.
>
> roberto
>
> 2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> N
Thanks for heads up, I've just passed this onto our AdOps team, it will be
removed shortly.
roberto
2015-02-13 17:09 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
> Hello list,
>
> New ad to have a fake AOO.
> See: http://hpics.li/73a635e
>
> This ad jump to a para-site:
> h**p://www.maribiz.net
>
>
>
>
Hello list,
New ad to have a fake AOO.
See: http://hpics.li/73a635e
This ad jump to a para-site:
h**p://www.maribiz.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@
Just realised I forgot to mention we have removed that in the very same
day. Thanks for heads up.
Roberto
2014-12-09 15:44 GMT+01:00 FR web forum :
> See today: http://hpics.li/5e52083
> This ad go to h**p://maribiz.net
>
> -
>
See today: http://hpics.li/5e52083
This ad go to h**p://maribiz.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
; Unfortunately advertising networks like Google allow that to happen, and
> > that's where the problem comes from.
> >
>
> Thanks for the info. At least we know who to blame.
> I wrote the above under the assumption that Sourceforge ran its own online
> adverts network.
; that's where the problem comes from.
>
Thanks for the info. At least we know who to blame.
I wrote the above under the assumption that Sourceforge ran its own online
adverts network.
FC
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
