RE: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
ent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 12:06 To: dev ; Dennis Hamilton Subject: Re: AOO -> LO or MS O 2015-09-03 17:48 GMT+02:00 Dennis E. Hamilton : > PS: On the interoperable-use challenge lurking in the article, > > The historical business was too long and not so meaningful to user need

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Rob Weir
On Thursday, September 3, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > > > On 03 Sep 15, at 15:13, Rob Weir > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Rich Bowen > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > >>> > >>> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 03 Sep 15, at 15:13, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >>> >>> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open >>> Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
he free ODF/OOXML-supporting products matter for durable preservation and >> interchange of documents, especially those employed in public services, >> without *requiring* use of commercial software as institutions move to >> delivery of services and coordination with the public by digital

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> >> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open >> Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort >> >>

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Substitutability has been promoted to those organizations as a safeguard > for adoption of these products. > > > -Original Message----- > From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 06:54 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: A

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 03 Sep 15, at 12:33, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > On 09/03/2015 07:22 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >>> On 03 Sep 15, at 09:54, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracl

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Kay Schenk
On 09/03/2015 07:22 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 03 Sep 15, at 09:54, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >>> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of >>> Oracle Open Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth >>>

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Tony Stevenson
> Interesting yet not quite accurate. I never made any claims to it's accuracy. I was hoping someone would do exactly what Rich suggested, but preferably without the prompting that Rich afforded the group. The reason for sending it to this list was to see the reaction it got, and how that reac

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Kay Schenk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2015 04:11 AM, Tony Stevenson wrote: > > This is an interesting read: > > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2015/sep/03/switch-openoffice-libreoffice-or-microsoft-office?CMP=twt_a-technology_b-gdntech > > > > > > Many than

RE: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
] Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 06:54 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: AOO -> LO or MS O On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open > Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
> On 03 Sep 15, at 09:54, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open >> Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort >>

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Rich Bowen
On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 09:33:02 -0300 Fernando Cassia wrote: > "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open > Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort >

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Fernando Cassia
"After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort . It laid off the programmers and gave the code an

AOO -> LO or MS O

2015-09-03 Thread Tony Stevenson
This is an interesting read: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2015/sep/03/switch-openoffice-libreoffice-or-microsoft-office?CMP=twt_a-technology_b-gdntech Many thanks, -- Tony pgp9FGHFgNW9g.pgp Description: PGP signature