[dev] Re: fixing postgresql sdbc connector

2011-07-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:40:30PM +0430, Jan wrote: The build instructions on http://dba.openoffice.org/drivers/postgresql/index.html seem totally outdated since they use cvs, not hg. Yeah, because that driver *is* in cvs, not in hg. Separate project etc, never merged into the official code.

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:56:35AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name unoinfo* /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo in Debian, is that what you mean? Good that this script isn't documented

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:00AM +0200, rony wrote: unoinfo java and interestingly unoil.jar is missing! Did a locate unoil.jar after an updatedb, but it is not installed. So this is Obviously totally untrue. I don't think Ubuntu removed unoil.jar, that would break everything Java-ish. Did

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, rony wrote: This is the story for the current Ubuntu 11.04, plain-vanilla installation, after having gone further: * Ubuntu 11.04 does *not* install any of the Java classes in /usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link/program/classes,

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:45:09PM +0200, rony wrote: Thank you very much for the link! In the meantime further information has become available, thanks to Renés comments, so the installation seems to be (very unfortunate!) intentional (to cripple LO)! :( There IS NOTHING CRIPPELD. Just

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 01:52:41PM +0200, rony wrote: If packages deviate from the reference packages (OOo or LO), they get crippled, like it or not. Nonsense. They just ha a bit other structure, the functionality is supposed to be there. Just install the one package you miss.

[dev] Re: Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:28:53PM +0200, rony wrote: On 07.06.2011 14:07, Rene Engelhard wrote: Insulting people does not change facts and reality either, but is quite You don't? Aha. I see insults from you too. You cripple XYZ. When we don't. (And you say we do

Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

2011-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 08:41:43AM +0100, eric b wrote: Hi, For your information : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=117017 EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port makes it sound you did the port. Wrong. Stop your propaganda, please. Now to the technical points: ARM_TARGET=7

[dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

2011-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: ARM_TARGET=7 Oh, and this: +# Default is armv7 mini. If you build +# for an older version (could be slow), +# please adapt to your needs + +.IF $(ARM_TARGET) == ARMV6 +ARCH_FLAGS+=-march=armv6 -mfloat-abi=softfp -D__SOFTFP__

[dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

2011-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: +.IF $(ARM_TARGET) == ARMV6 This is broken, too, afaics. In configure you set ARM_TARGET to e.g. 6 (WITHOUT ARMV) but there you use it WITH ARMV... Grüße/Regards, René

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

2011-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 02:37:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: +.IF $(ARM_TARGET) == ARMV6 This is broken, too, afaics. In configure you set ARM_TARGET to e.g. 6 (WITHOUT ARMV) but there you use it WITH ARMV... I fixed some

Re: [dev] EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port

2011-02-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 06:02:44AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: EducOOo donated code for ARM Linux port makes it sound you did the port. Me, I didn't understand if EducOOo is the subject or object here... (And with issuezilla being down, I couldn't check the link either.) Was it donated to

Re: [dev] ARM port

2011-02-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:38:15AM +0100, eric b wrote: OpenOffice.org is already ported to Linux ARM, oabi and eabi, le and be. Sure. But the current port is generic and needs some improvements at several places anyway, plus, the current OpenOffice.org is unusable on such machines.

Re: [dev] ARM port

2011-02-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:08:47PM +0100, eric b wrote: Sorry, but I tend to disagree : can you please tell me the arm version choosen by default in OOo source code ? I'm just working at Whatever default your compiler does. $ file /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3

Re: [dev] Segmentatiefout in OOo -3.2.1 (Dutch version)

2010-10-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 06:47:42PM +0200, Ben Engbers wrote: I have used the insturcions from http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wik ... to install van LibreOffice 3.3. beta. Great! This is not a libreoffice discussion list (unfortunately) The relavan part of the output from 'strace

Re: [dev] macro run error

2010-09-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:11:53AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Strange. Which platform are you on, and where did you get OOo from? (The lr in deploymnetlr.uno.so indicates a platform, but it is none of the standard ones.) What might give a clue is to call Linux/ARM. Grüße/Regards,

Re: [dev] Classpath management in Java UNO extensions

2010-09-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:56:50AM -0400, Benson Margulies wrote: If our UNO extension depends on some additional JAR files, do we need to manifest them somehow, or just pack them into the OXT? You can do either of them. Class-Path: works, too if you for whatever reason don't want to embed

Re: [dev] Missing vcl resource

2010-09-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 08:58:17AM +0200, Malte Timmermann wrote: 3.2.1.4 sounds like ooo-build, not vanilla OOo, so please use the ooo-build mailing list for such questions... He already got told, but as we already notice for other questions, he can't read and does not follow advice. That

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

2010-09-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:19:01PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: First time, I've built Openoffice without --with-system-python, but the result is same. You obviously didn't read completely. I said that ooo-build defaults to using sytstem-python so you *of course* get no internal python.

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

2010-09-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:59:36AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 09/06/10 01:01, Rene Engelhard wrote: But a vanilla OpenOffice.org install doesn't do that. And the only way (unless you put all the .pys and the needed .so files into pythons site-packages) way to do that is to include

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

2010-09-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: I tried to do it --with-system-python. But it is not included python in program directory. Of course. --with-system-python is the switch to NOT include it. So I tried to build python separately and I got this message. Building

Re: [dev] no module named uno error

2010-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:44:00PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: import uno, unohelper Import Error: No module named uno. Jup. After install package for Openoffice 3.2.1.4 on Ubuntu, I tried these scripts on Ubuntru, I run it successfully. Because Ubuntus OOo puts uno.py etc. in the system

Re: [dev] Porting addon from Linux to Windows

2010-09-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thto) u, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:47:13AM +0430, Jan private wrote: Microsoft Visual C. Does this mean that I must use MSVC to compile my addon? That would be a BIG problem since I am using the GiNaC library wh ich does not exist in a MSVC version and does not willingly compile with it. I

Re: [dev] Print format changes for Linux

2010-09-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Philipp Lohmann wrote: the CUPS print system that is used on Linux and other Unix operating systems is switching its file format from PostScript to PDF. As part of this OpenOffice.org should switch its print output file format to PDF, too. This

Re: [dev] patch error

2010-08-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:16:53AM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: Thanks, I tried to do again, but I still have some patch error as follows: [snip] How can I fix this problem? Please let me know. No. Not unless you start reading and following the hints/solutions we give you. (No, you don't

Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem

2010-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:53:48PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: But, I wonder what is difference between /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/libavmediali.so and above file. The one is the system-version of it (of OOo 3.1!) and for Intel, and what you compiled is 3.2.1 and arm. Obvious, no?

Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem

2010-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 02:43:22PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: Because this directory, /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/, has same file name compared to There is some error. My directory is /usr/oo-311/basis3.1/program/ includes (*lr) files So you already built 3.1.1 for ARM? BTW, I

Re: [dev] Re: building openoffice problem

2010-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 03:19:32PM -0700, Soohong Min wrote: BTW, I wonder after bin/ooinstall, I see the files (li) is searched in That is weird, yes. Is there way to search *lr instead of lr while processing bin/ooinstall ? You just do a correct build. The OOo install does not have

Re: [dev] external module stax and java baseline

2010-08-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: I'm just wondering wether the external module stax is still needed at all anymore, it seems only needed if using JDK 1.5 and lower and not needed if using gcj. My suggestion is to raise Java baseline to 1.6 and

Re: [dev] change log of jpeg library 8b

2010-08-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:31:54PM +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: we're still using version 6b, this is the change log since that version, maybe some expert want to recommend an update ? Actually I'd recommend *against* it. I don't see versioned symbols there, and thus mixing 8b and 6b will

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: The static NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), jpipe); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConnection within jurt.jar effectively depends on finding a jpipe dynamic library

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: This works in standard OOo installations, where the jpipe dynamic library is found relative to jurt.jar within the URE installation either in ../../lib (Unix) or ../bin (Windows). This fails if you either use a

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: The static NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), jpipe); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConnection

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup somewhere. As we already found out in this thread. It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu because we move the Java libs to a standardized path with symlinks and OOo cannot

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:02:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup somewhere. As we already found out in this thread. It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:57:26PM +0200, rony wrote: [...] Uninstalling the Ubuntu OOo and instead installing the genuine OOo, downloaed from http://OpenOffice.org/download, installing it and running the very same program works without an error! We (at least Debian, can't speak of

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. Then that is a bug in the bridge or the extension

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Michael Stahl wrote. so try adding /usr/lib/ure/lib/ to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. Or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (no idea whether that helps for JNI Linkage but it can be tried, too) Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [dev] Instance of OOo running after unopkg ?

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:01:45PM +0200, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: for installing an extension (under Ubuntu in this particular case) in an installation script the command-line tool unopkg is used. When starting OOo thereafter a warning comes up that an instance of OOo would be running,

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:29:47PM +0200, rony wrote: (Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of Eww, synaptic. modules (with the risk that I am overlooking an important one, given that the OOo related modules seem to be quite dispersed.) apt-get install

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote: (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my packages and breaks them at times, but what you experience could

Re: [dev] Build order

2010-07-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:29:50PM -0700, Gregoire Gentil wrote: Which script are you talking about? I can't find any script that answers my question. Thanks in advance for any tip, whateverEnvSet.sh Grüße/Regards, René

Re: [dev] Re: Building ooo

2010-07-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: On 29/07/2010 17:46, Rick Kautick wrote: Hi all, I'm not sure if I have come to the right place, but here goes nothing. I recently decided that I wanted to get involved with open source development, and thought that fixing

Re: [dev] Build error in helpcontent2 (Lucene)

2010-06-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:54:53PM +0200, Pavel Laštovička wrote: citing from issue #103354: During the massive parallel build of helpcontent2 the lucene indexer generates index files which are renamed. This behavior breaks the MSP pack process, were no files have to be removed. So

Re: [dev] Re: FASTBOOL macro vs bool - decrease memory usage

2010-06-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 02:15:29PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: isn't bool ususally (or at least sometimes) 4 bytes in size? $ cat test.cxx #include stdio.h int main() { printf(%d\n, sizeof(bool)); } $ g++ -o lala ./test.cxx $ ./lala 1 Grüße/Regards, René

Re: [dev] Re: Build Open office 3.20 on window XP

2010-06-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: On 20/06/2010 14:25, Lê Việt Quang wrote: Dear sir , I try to build OOO320_m12 on window XP , but it fail , and take this error , what is it ? any reason why you want to build such an outdated milestone? Because he wants

Re: [dev] Build error in helpcontent2 (Lucene)

2010-06-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 06:13:15PM +0200, Pavel Lastovicka wrote: when doing a parallel build of 3.2.1 on Cygwin I hit the following error: Checking cfs file _0.cfs: Not found cfs file check failed, terminating... See http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112339 for a similar

Re: [dev] Password protect extension

2010-06-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:01:57PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: Le 08.06.2010 11:47, Kai Sommerfeld a écrit : Hi, On 08.06.10 10:37, Christian Heise wrote: Hi everybody, Is it possible to protect an extension in a way that disabling or uninstallation have to be confirmed

Re: [dev] Re: ant error while compiling on win7

2010-06-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: ant -version Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/tools.jar Apache Ant version 1.7.1 compiled on March 5 2010 JAVA_HOME='/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun' ant -version Apache Ant

Re: [dev] Re: ant error while compiling on win7

2010-06-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:14:32PM +0800, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: Are you replying to my question? No, I replied to Michael. It seems that what you quoted isn't from mine. Please read: On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:

Re: [dev] subsequenttests

2010-05-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 05/31/10 11:55, Bernd Eilers wrote: what X Server do the subsequenttests use by the way xvfbd or xvnc or something else? subsequenttests and below sets up nothing. The started soffice instances simply use whatever

Re: [dev] ant error while compiling on win7

2010-05-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:17:24PM +0800, xiaofen...@iscas.ac.cn wrote: The error is: ... checking for jakarta-ant... no checking for ant... /cygdrive/c/ant/bin/ant checking whether ant is = 1.6.0... ./configure: line 28460: test: tools: integer expression expected Are you

Re: [dev] subsequenttests

2010-05-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:47:00PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: svp not possible? The smoketest at least works with it. No idea what you mean. SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=svp aka. headless. As said, works for me for the smoketest in 3.2.x. Grüße/Regards, René

Re: [dev] CMake module for finding OpenOffice.org SDK installation

2010-05-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:59:56PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: File is attached. License is BSD. Any fixes/addition are welcomed. No. ;) (And you better file an issue with the patch anyway) Grüße/Regards, René - To

Re: Re: [dev] CMake module for finding OpenOffice.org SDK installation

2010-05-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ please follow Netiquette and wrote proper lines with proper linebreaks ] Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:20:49PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: Actually, no, I disagree. As it's just a data file, we can just include it in the SDK. Actually, this script is not OOo side integration.

Re: [dev] New build system

2010-05-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:07:04PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: Also, with autotools you'll depend on their version. With CMake, you'll set version number, and newer CMake versions will run in compatibility mode with that version. You're off-topic, noone here said anything about full

Re: [dev] New build system

2010-05-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:54:24AM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: * much faster installation - up-to-date binaries are not updated As we (unfortunately) don't have proper make install (but run make_installer anyway, which has already some sort of caching of the installset created) this point

Re: [dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

2010-04-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:43:28AM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 19:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: We can only improve things here when we eventually drop the STLport-requirement (and become URE-incompatible on the affected platforms). (Note that I didn't say

[dev] Re: [releases] recommended stlport settings?

2010-04-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ releases is not the correct list for that, X-posting to dev@ ] Hi, On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote: So far i686 needed --with-stlport to be able to use 3rd party extensions. DEV300_m77 introduced cppunit requirement and now i686 configure fails: Not really.

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:36:16AM +0200, Juergen Schmidt wrote: mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org community and against derivated work. And in consequence of this i see a

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:32:56PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: mmh, i have still one problem. One motivation for me to go into the CC was and still is that i will try to work for a stronger OpenOffice.org community and against derivated work. And in consequence of this i see a

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:30:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@openoffice.org wrote: a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the community. which you don't. there's

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:30:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:52:18 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@openoffice.org wrote: a stronger community means actively involving hughe parts of the community. which you don't. there's still

Re: [dev] Re: Re: OpenOffice.org Product Development

2010-03-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:25:12PM +0200, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:52:11 +0200 Rene Engelhard r...@openoffice.org wrote: How is patch -pX lack of resources? How is telling people how they need to change stuff to get a patch

Re: [dev] problem with compiling ooo-build

2010-03-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Heiko L. wrote: |diff --git a/sc/inc/sc.hrc b/sc/inc/sc.hrc - pwd != patchdir - use -p1 Nonsense. If you looked at the actual patch: --- sc/inc/sc.hrc +++ sc/inc/sc.hrc Go figure. (The sbuild tree of theones who tries building is just fucked

Re: [dev] new dependency to ant version 1.7.1

2010-02-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:29:15AM +0100, Juergen Schmidt wrote: i would like to increase the ant dependency to version 1.7.1. The reason is that newer NetBeans versions create build.xml scripts that make use of features from ant 1.7.1 Then they should be fixed not to use them. It should

Re: [dev] Using JUnit 4 in OOo build environment

2010-02-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:57:24PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: 1 Include JUnit 4 as an external module in the OOo code base, allowing some configure --with-system-junit switch to override it. We could include either Good. 1.1

Re: [dev] OO SDK GLIBCXX_3.4.9 not found in Linux Ubuntu

2010-01-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:33:08AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: r...@catullus:~# /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker:

Re: [dev] Re: Build error

2009-12-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Björn Michaelsen wrote: so simple now with mercurial), but there is a also testautomation tarball, maybe you need to add that one? If that is the case, we should indeed update the docs to reflect that. No, we should fix the build to *NOT* require

Re: [dev] Re: Build error

2009-12-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 03:08:09PM +0100, Björn Michaelsen wrote: Am Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:39:51 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard r...@openoffice.org: No, we should fix the build to *NOT* require it if you don't need it. Actually, there is a lot of work going on in that area. see: http

Re: [dev] disabling module xmlsecurity when not building module nss

2009-11-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:17:05PM +0100, Joachim Lingner - Sun Germany Software Engineer - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: As a consequence I will disable building of xmlsecurity when building of the nss module is disabled. Please do not forget system-nss (aka system-mozilla) and that this of course

Re: [dev] Library requirements (freetype2 = 2.0 ) not met . . .

2009-11-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Albretch Mueller wrote: Thank you and I think error messages should be a bit more explicit. They are explicit enough. It's common that you need -dev for the libs. r...@knoppix:/media/hdb2/inst/sw/OO/source/ooxpkgs# dpkg -l | grep curl ii curl

Re: [dev] Build with Ubuntu 9.10

2009-11-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:55AM +0800, Zhu Lihua wrote: In file mkdepend/def.h:157 char *getline(); But in file /usr/include/stdio.h:651 extern _IO_ssize_t getline (char **__restrict __lineptr, size_t *__restrict __n, FILE

Re: [dev] Recompiling OOo 3.1.1 Ubuntu (karmic) package source

2009-11-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:42:45PM +0800, Spider Larkin wrote: If I try to skip the cleaning and unpacking: $ rm debian/stampdir/build That just removes the debian stampfile. ooo-build has one, too. $ debuild -uc -us -b -Tbuild ...debuild sets up its environment... ...cds into

Re: [dev] Planned outage: EIS not available on 2009-10-23 07:30h - 08:00h MEST

2009-10-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:18:29PM +0200, Frank Mau wrote: we scheduled an outage for half an hour for the external EIS Friday, 23th October, 07:30 a.m. - 08:00 a.m. MEST (means UTC +2) No updates will be recognized during the outage so please stay tuned for further updates, thank

Re: [dev] Where to download libagg source code package?

2009-10-09 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:23:14AM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thursday 08 October 2009, 23:30:22, Peng Yu wrote: Hi, I know that openoffice website provide the source of agg. But where I can download its official source code release. Anti-grain geometry has its own

Re: [dev] Dropping tcsh support for Mac (all?) / changing configure's default

2009-09-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:42:25PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: because of 105003, own bad experience with tcsh (random build freezes, slow performance), encouraged by the kick4nt cws I'd like to go on and drop tcsh support at least for Mac OS X. dropping tcsh support means:

Re: [dev] Dropping tcsh support for Mac (all?) / changing configure's default

2009-09-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:01:34PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 09/25/09 13:49, Rene Engelhard wrote: But what about defaulting to the current login shell? People who might want tcsh already might use it as login shell I would vote for getting rid of tcsh-support in the build

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:36:37PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: command - where's the no net access from here onwards-line drawn? After the download of the sources. When the actual build begins, there is no net access allowed. And what it downloads is just the source package (tar.gz

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:30:39AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: [ Seems so, do you now strictly need 1.39? No, I think 1.34 would do, too. As said, a previous incarnation of the CWS compiles fine with 1.34, but again, I didn't do extensive runtime

Re: [dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Regina Henschel wrote: The new Math libraries 'Special Functions' and 'Statistical Distribution' are not included in Boost 1.34, but first in Boost 1.35. The accuracy of those functions is ongoing work in Calc and doing it ourself has been a

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:31:59AM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Rene, The code as-is now will fail to build/work with system-boost 1.39, I assume? Most probably. Didn't explicitly try that, though. OK, just tried, it fails e.g. in connectivity because

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: So we either need something like this (when did they change that?): [configure patch] I'd prefer that. Making the source code dependent on different boost versions (even if it's only about

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Or invent a nice solution that does auto-downloads, and switch a few other huge external libs to that (like icu). ;) That would be a problem for some builders unless you don't download it when the file is there... For

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:18:28PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: For example, for Debian requiring any form of net access on a build is a no-go (and for some libs we have to use the internal versions, and be it sometime, in emergency) What's the definition

Re: [dev] Re: [tools-tinderbox] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:11:53PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: After the download of the sources. Then let's define download the pre-requisites as a sub task of download the sources :) Doesn't work. I need to upload a self-contained thing. THAT gets

Re: [dev] Re: [porting-dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:50PM +0200, Frank Schoenheit, Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: BTW, if the problem only is that header (build still running), no, there are much more of those. No. (At least on Linux) cws boost134 build with system-boost *1.34* only needs that header

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] Moving to bost 1.3?

2009-08-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ dropping tinder...@tools, as they don't use system-boost anyway ] Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: We invite everybody porting OOo to another platform to give feedback to this project. As rumor has it, boost 1.39 creates

Re: [dev] libxml2 dependency on zlib

2009-08-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:26:44PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 07/20/09 12:46, Rene Engelhard wrote: The easiest fix is just to use system-zlib. At least for UNX. Any (UNIX) system will jave it No, the easiest fix still appears to just drop zlib support from our libxml2

Re: [dev] Mercurial Pilot Feedback, Results

2009-08-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Not difficult if you ignore problems ;-( I don't think, that Heiner ignore problem reports. He was very open for comments for this pilot and did a lot to evaluate problems. As you can read he has listed positive and also negative feedback. Also your feedback is listed

Re: [dev] Mercurial Pilot Feedback, Results

2009-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: Scalability: - overall perceived good performance, some were even quite enthusiastic about it (SVN users are easy to please ...). - there were three mentions of sub-par performance which all have been investigated shortly: - unexpected slow

Re: [dev] Mercurial Pilot Feedback, Results

2009-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ forgot something ] Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: intensive due to the implementation in python. Also there was a misunderstanding about when hg uses hard links as an optimization. There wasn't actually, I just followed your pilot documentation 1:1. If that sucked you can't

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: Ivo and others are working on it to realize it in the near future ;-) http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fl10nframework01 How is that helpful? #build the l10n tools cd transex3 build --all deliver cd xmlhelp build --all deliver cd

Re: [dev] Re: [l10n-dev] Localisation moved into own module

2009-06-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: the goal to to build and deliver language packs without any dependencies. This CWS is the first step. There are still some steps open. But as I heard by Ivo, when this CWs is ready you can you can build the localization without any obj's / libs / whatever. But the

Re: [dev] finding binaries et al from OO3.0.1 build

2009-04-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, lux-integ wrote: No EPM: do no packaging at this stage ^^^ Reading helps... ;) rmdir /tmp/7113 ## However I am unable to find the binaries  etc to install them. Of course, you disabled the packaging alltogether. (You used

Re: [dev] help with openofice-3.0.1-64-bitCLFS-linux

2009-04-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, lux-integ wrote: Test Complete ^^^ No environment file will be generated ^^^ There were no warnings however there appears to be no Makefile  nor bootstrap.sh Of course not. Re-check your configure

Re: [dev] help with openofice-3.0.1-64-bitCLFS-linux

2009-04-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, T. J. Frazier wrote: We thought it useful to say something like: **--enable-check-only=yes** No environment file will be generated Is it not. It is redundant. People who used --enable-check-only should have read the description it at which time it would have been clear. Regards,

Re: [dev] Please fix these security flaws that could be considered bugs ...

2009-04-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Nathanael Kennedy wrote: There are serious problems, even at a security level, with OpenOffice... There is no EASY OR STRAIGHTFORWARD WAY to DELETE the entire list of Recent Documents. Documents I no longer care about, I of course delete. DOCUMENTS REMAIN ON THE RECENT DOCUMENTS LIST

Re: [dev] Please fix these security flaws that could be considered bugs ...

2009-04-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Regina Henschel wrote: I do not share your view. In my school we have got PCs for pupils, where not each pupil has got an account, and therefore only one OOo user exists. Same in our teacher library, one PC user for all teachers. There And you don't know what teachers are there so

Re: [dev] buildbot builds vs standard builds

2009-02-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Thorsten Ziehm wrote: I do not see the need to bring the build bots near to the build environment here in Hamburg. The request for build bots was (as I know) to have builds in different environments to find build issues in these different environment. When these environment will be nearly

  1   2   >