Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-11 Thread John D. Ament
Yep, thats all necessary. Once thats in, cdi spec jar should be buildable. John On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:54 PM Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > cool guys! > > +1 daniel, the patch looks good > > 2016-07-11 21:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > > >

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-11 Thread Thomas Andraschko
cool guys! +1 daniel, the patch looks good 2016-07-11 21:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha : > Cool! > > I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin. > I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with > java8. > > It's

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-11 Thread Daniel Cunha
Cool! I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin. I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with java8. It's necessary update this plugins to have build working fine, so I'll be possible to use java8 features on the code. :) Let me see

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-11 Thread Mark Struberg
txs will apply. LieGrue, strub > On Monday, 11 July 2016, 2:43, John D. Ament wrote: > > I've raised a JIRA with the API changes that I noticed. There might be a > few more pending. I tested it against Weld, apparently they're behind a > little bit as well. > >

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-10 Thread John D. Ament
I've raised a JIRA with the API changes that I noticed. There might be a few more pending. I tested it against Weld, apparently they're behind a little bit as well. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 - John On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM Mark Struberg

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-06 Thread Mark Struberg
> Only constraint we > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK. Except we wrote that stuff ourselves for the spec. In that case the original author is of course free to also contribute it to the ASF under ALv2. LieGrue, strub > Am 03.07.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-03 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 3 juil. 2016 22:56, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > > geronimo@ who? Dev list > > I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR, there's just > considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes confusing. > Well you can also see geronimo community

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-03 Thread John D. Ament
geronimo@ who? I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR, there's just considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes confusing. What about my comments about the javadocs? John On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-03 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi John, -> geronimo@ ;) Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up to date version Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Wordpress Blog | Github

CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

2016-07-03 Thread John D. Ament
Hey guys I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2 spec jar. I'm wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently? In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based on the changes in CDI 2. I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its pretty heavy on javadocs. I