Re: GSoC - 2016

[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Rajesh, >> >> I have done some initial set ups. If I find any problems, I will update >> this mail thread with the issues. >> >> >> Thanks >> On Mar 27, 2016 11:19 PM, "[email protected]" < &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Phoenix committer - Josh Elser

Congratulations Josh!! On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:17 AM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > Congrats Josh!! > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Marek Wiewiorka < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Congrats! > > 8 kwi 2016 6:57 PM "Josh Mahonin" napisał(a): > > > > > Welcome aboard and congrats (fe

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ankit Singhal joins Phoenix PMC

Congratulations Ankit!!! Nice work. On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Jesse Yates wrote: > Congrats Ankit! > > On Tue, May 3, 2016, 8:01 PM Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > Nice work Ankit, congrats! > > > > On Tuesday, May 3, 2016, James Taylor wrote: > > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm

Re: PHOENIX-2179

Hi Pranavan, Have you tried limiting tracing to particular queries by trace on/off queries. This gives the trace id of particular queries only so that you can query tracing table matching the trace id. You can refer[1

Please share the status of GSoC project

Hi Pranavan, Hope you are doing well? How's the GSoC project work going on? Can you please share the status of it and and also let's know if any help needed. Happy to help you. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

Regarding PHOENIX-1734

Hi Team, As you know prior to PHOENIX-1734 we are storing all local index data in separate table and colocate data and index regions. To ensure proper colocation we need customer balancer, custom split and merge logic still these will not ensure 100% colocation. That's why we started working PHOE

Re: RC on Monday

I can commit both PHOENIX-3002 and PHOENIX-2209 by today. It would be better to make RC tomorrow. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:24 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Fixes for both PHOENIX-3001 and PHOENIX-2940 have been checked in (thanks - > nice work!). Looks like the only two outsta

Re: where are we at with the RC?

I think PHOENIX-3045 is blocker for the release. Working on it. On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:21 AM, wrote: > I think I have a fix for PHOENIX-2724, that seems important to get it. > -- Lars > > From: Ankit Singhal > To: James Taylor > Cc: "[email protected]" ; Samarth Jain < > samarth

Re: where are we at with the RC?

; > > somehow (PQS still expecting to find Guava in the o.a.phoenix.shaded > > > package). Might just be something to fix at build time (hopefully, > > anyways) > > > -- I'm looking at it now. > > > > > > > > > rajeshb.

Re: Issue in Bulkload when Table name contains '-' (hyphen)

Hi Dharmesh, Are you able to write to table through normal upsert query? Seems like a bug. You can raise a JIRA for this. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Dharmesh Guna wrote: > Dear All, > > I am facing issue in bulk loading from csv files into Phoenix when my > Phoenix

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.2 RC0

+1 - Verified the signatures. - Downloaded source and ran the test and all are passed. - Downloaded tar ball and ran basic tests - Loaded data through bulkload job and some local index tests everything fine. - Ran some query server related tests and everything cool. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, J

Re: Select * with empty result

You can use CsvBulkLoadTool provided by Phoenix than ImportTsv to load data into the table. https://phoenix.apache.org/bulk_dataload.html Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Pandolfino Giuseppe wrote: > Hi, > > i use Phoenix and HBASE for bulk load my dump data tables. > > > >

Re: new 4.8.0 RC?

Thanks Ankit, Here is the JIRA raised PHOENIX-3111. It's not just local index issue it can happen with upsert select, delete rows at server as well. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > I was holding up the RC because Sergey and Rajesh was working on fixin

Re: Planning to cut RC by tomorrow morning IST

It's happening frequently in our tests which include parallel create index, bulkload, deletes operations and automatic splits by HBase. Some times the dead lock happen with create index and some times with deletes. We already have a patch going under same tests. Mostly I can make final patch in 1

Re: New RC?

Hi James, There is a special case in PHOENIX-3111 that if writes happen outside of the inde building there is a chance of RTBE still. Just checking it. Will commit the addendum in couple of hours and ping here. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:29 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Are we re

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0 RC2

+1 - Downloaded source code and ran the IT tests all passed. - Installed Phoenix and ran some smoke tests everything good. - Ingested millions of rows and ran some local index related tests all logs are fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 5:59 AM, wrote: > +1 > - Built from source-

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Josh Elser joins Phoenix PMC

Congratulations Josh!!! On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Thank you all! I look forward to working more closely with everyone :D > > > James Taylor wrote: > >> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Josh >> Elser has accepted our invitation to become

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer: Vincent Poon

Congratulations Vincent!! Great Job. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:21 AM, James Taylor wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm delighted to announce that Vincent > Poon has accepted our invitation to become a committer. He's had a big > impact in helping to stabilize o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer: Ethan Wang

Congratulations Ethan!! Great Job. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:15 AM, James Taylor wrote: > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Ethan Wang > has accepted our invitation to become a committer. He's behind some of the > great new 4.12 features of tab

Re: [VOTE] Apache Phoenix 5.0.0-alpha rc1

+1 - Tested basic, index related queries with and without stats on large data. All queries working fine. - Verified cluster restart, region server restart and compaction related cases they are ok. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > +1 > - All the test

Re: [VOTE] Include python-phoenixdb into Phoenix

+1 On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:36 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 > > > On 3/8/18 7:02 AM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > >> Lukas Lalinsky has graciously agreed to contribute his work on python >> library for accessing Phoenix to Apache Phoenix project. >> >> >> The details of the project can be viewed at:- >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.14.0 RC3

+1 Downloaded the source and ran all the tests they are fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote: > +1 > > Successfully built from source and was able run all UTs/ITs. > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Ankit Singhal > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > * Upgrade

Would like to make 5.0.0 RC this weekend

Hi Team, We are almost ready with 4.14 release would like to make 5.0.0 rc this weekend. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0

Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the 2.0 branch of Apache HBase(2.0.0+). The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. This release has feature parity with HBase 2.

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0

o: [email protected] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4785 seems to be a blocker for the release. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:37 AM [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC0. Thi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix PMC member: Pedro Boado

Congratulations, Pedro!! On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Congratulations, Pedro! > > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:15 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Pedro > > Boado has accepted our invitation to join the P

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix committer: Ohad Shacham

Congratulations Ohad!! On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Ohad! > > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:09 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Ohad > > Shacham has accepted our invitation to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Phoenix PMC member: Vincent Poon

Congratulations Vincent!! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > Congratulations Vincent! > > Well deserved. > > > > On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:20 PM, James Taylor > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please to announce that Vincent > > Po

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1

Hello Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1. This is the next major release of Phoenix compatible with the 2.0 branch of Apache HBase(2.0.0+). The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. The prior RC was sunk due to PHOENIX-4785 whic

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1

7, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Noticed that the pom.xml.versionsBackup are still present, but that's not > > the end of the world. > > > > > > On 6/26/18 1:59 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 RC1

The vote is now closed and passes with 4 binding +1s and no 0 or -1 votes. Thanks to those who voted. We'll work on pushing out the bits next. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:12 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Successful

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 5.0.0 released

The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce release of it's next major version 5.0.0 compatible with HBase 2.0+. Apache Phoenix enables SQL-based OLTP and operational analytics for Apache Hadoop using Apache HBase as its backing store and providing integration with other projects in the Apache e

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.9.0 RC0

James, Found PHOENIX-3433. It's a blocker. I think we need to make other RC. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:08 AM, 김영우 (YoungWoo Kim) wrote: > Hi James, > > I have a problem while upgrading 4.8.0 to 4.9.0 rc0. Filed PHOENIX-3432. > > Thanks, > Youngwoo > > 2016. 11. 1. 오전 9:22에 "

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Phoenix committer - Kevin Liew

Congratulations Kevin!! Good work. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Ankit Singhal wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Kevin!! > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Congrats, Kevin! > > > > > > James Taylor wrote: > > > >> On behalf of the Apache Phoenix PMC, I'm please

Re: Query with index failed when data table's PK column is in DESC order

Good catch William, Please raise JIRA and upload patch there. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:59 PM, William wrote: > Hi all >This is a very simple case, easy to repro, see the following SQLs: > > >create table tt (pk integer

Re: Dropping local index on large table caused crash of region servers

Dropping local index index issues scan and in the coprocessors we prepare index data and write back to same table. To avoid the timeout you can increase scanner timeout/rpc timeout and phoenix client timeout values as well. If you have many guideposts then we might issue many parallel scans to th

Thinking of RC on Thursday

I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on Thursday. We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already: - 60 bug fixed(which includes fixes from 4.3.1) - Spart integration - Query server - Union All support - Pherf - load tester measures throughput - Many math and date/time buit-in functions - MR

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

posted. > > Thanks > > Eli > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:42 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd like to propose we can have 4.4.0 RC on Thursday. > > We have got a lot of great stuff in 4.4.0 already: > > - 60

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

ueries > (PHOENIX-1779). > > Thanks, > James > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:02 PM, [email protected] > wrote: > > That's good to have Eli. I have marked 4.4.0 as fix version for the JIRA. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > On Tue,

It's time to create branch for 1.0.x and/or 1.1.x

Hi Team, I think this is better time to create 4.4 branch to work with 1.0.x. Also HBase 1.1 also very close to release we can have 4.4 branch to work with it. I expect very minimal/no changes required for it. So that we can release 4.4 with all three major versions of HBase. What do you think?

Re: It's time to create branch for 1.0.x and/or 1.1.x

mportant to complete > the work to be on supported HBase APIs (PHOENIX-1681, PHOENIX-1717). > > Thanks, > James > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:31 AM, [email protected] > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I think this is better time to create 4.4 branch to wo

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

; On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, James Taylor > > > > wrote: > > > > You're welcome (and Samarth did the work). Thanks, > > > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:19 AM, [email protected] &g

org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.DropIndexDuringUpsertIT frequently failing

The test case failing because some Hudson problem. Anyone has idea how to solve this? Failed to read test report file /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Phoenix-master/phoenix-core/target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.DropIndexDuringUpsertIT.xml org.dom4j.DocumentExcep

Re: Phoenix branch integrations

4.x-HBase-1.0 branch has deleted by Enis/James. I have created branches 4.4-HBase-1.0 and 4.4-HBase-1.1 from master. You should be able to commit the branches. On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Cody Marcel wrote: > I am a little confused about the where to commit changes. Yesterday I > committe

Re: The BuildBot is live!

Great work Nick. Just one thing now it's running only unit tests it seems. What about integration tests? It would be better to make the scripts run integration tests as well. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:19 PM, James Taylo

Re: The BuildBot is live!

o? Let me know if you have any troubles. > > [0]: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/blob/master/dev/test-patch.sh#L833 > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:53 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Great work Nick. > > Just one thing now

Re: [DISCUSS] branch names

> >- delete the 4.4-HBase-1.1 branch and do this work in master. >- rename the 4.4-HBase-1.0 branch to 4.x-HBase-1.0. >- create the 4.4-HBase-1.0 branch off of 4.x-HBase-1.0 a bit later > I agree with this Enis and but I too feel create 4.4-HBase-1.0 before RC is better than before RC vote is going

Re: [DISCUSS] branch names

nd the 4.4-HBase-1.0 > > branch. This is wasted effort until the branches diverge (which I > > suspect they won't until after the 4.4 release). > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:13 PM, [email protected] > > wrote: > &g

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

are improvements I think we can move them to next version. - PHOENIX-1673 - PHOENIX-1727 - PHOENIX-1819 Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:57 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Devs, > > I have created branches 4.4-HBase-1.0 and 4.4-HBase-

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

y one that's a must fix is PHOENIX-1930. Thomas is looking > at it now and should be able to give you a time estimate tomorrow for it. > Thanks, > James > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Devs, &g

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

I wil make RC once PHOENIX-1773 verified. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:25 PM, James Taylor wrote: > PHOENIX-1930 was resolved, but PHOENIX-1773 may be another b/w compat > issue. Need to sync with Mujtaba to figure out how to repro. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Stack

Re: Thinking of RC on Thursday

Mujtaba confirmed that PHOENIX-1773 is not a problem. The tests are very stable now. I ran multiple times and not even single failure. So I am going to create a RC today. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:11 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > I

No commits to 4.x-HBase-0.98 & 4.x-HBase-1.0

Please hold on commits to 4.x-HBase-0.98 & 4.x-HBase-1.0 while I prepare for RC.

Re: No commits to 4.x-HBase-0.98 & 4.x-HBase-1.0

RC is tagged and posted. You may resume in 4.x-HBase-0.98 & 4.x-HBase-1.0 - only bug fixes please. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:55 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Please hold on commits to 4.x-HBase-0.98 & 4.x-HBase-1.0 while I prepare > for RC. >

Fwd: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

-- Forwarded message -- From: [email protected] Date: Sat, May 2, 2015 at 7:45 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0 To: "[email protected]" This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0. This is the next minor

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 7:27 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0. This is > the > next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the 0.98 branch of > Apache HBase. The release includes

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0. This is the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the 1.0(branch of Apache HBase(1.0.1+) . The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. The 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 release has feature parity wi

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0

This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0. This is the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the 0.98 branch of Apache HBase. The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. Highlights of the release include: - spark integration[1

Re: 4.4.0 RCs?

It's fine James. I am pushing the RCs. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 5:22 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Hi Rajeshbabu, > Anything we can do to help get the RCs out? > Thanks, > James >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0

e passed? > > > > In HBase, at the time of the release candidate, we push the artifacts > > (using maven deploy) so that we can make sure that the artifacts at the > > maven repo is created from the same bits. > > > > See https://hbase.apache.org/book.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

Hi Team, Gentle reminder for voting. Already 3 days over. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 7:45 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0. This is > the > next minor release of Phoeni

Re: Issue with running sqlline (phoenix 4.4 RC0)

if scripts are not working as expected then let's sink the RC. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > This tgz layout looks consistent with previous. The trouble is > bin/queryserver.py assumes the assembly tgz layout, not the make_rc.sh > layout. Hence Sergey

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

> +1 from me. > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Samarth Jain > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:15 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0

> +1 > > Have done the necessary validations of spark feature also. > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Samarth Jain > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:57 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]> wrote

Re: Issue with running sqlline (phoenix 4.4 RC0)

ublic static final int PHOENIX_MAJOR_VERSION = 4; > public static final int PHOENIX_MINOR_VERSION = 3; > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Sergey Belousov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> thank you Nick >> will check first thing in the mornin

Going to make RC for 4.4-HBase-0.98, 4.4-HBase-1.0

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC0

Found couple of issues that sunk this RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1948 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1949 Fix for the two issue are checked in. Will roll out a new RC soon.

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

Found couple of issues that sunk this RC: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1948 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1949 Fix for the two issue are checked in. Will roll out a new RC soon.

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC1

Hi Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC1. This is the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the 0.98 branch of Apache HBase. The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. Highlights of the release include: - spark

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC1

Hi Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC1. This is the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the 1.0(branch of Apache HBase(1.0.1+) . The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. The 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 release has fea

Re: Going to make RC for 4.4-HBase-0.98, 4.4-HBase-1.0

have RC01 for a > test-drive? > > Thank you > > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:52 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC1

he tag > > (v4.4.0-HBase-0.98-rc1) are identical to the contents of the source > > distribution, and noticed that they aren't -- the make_rc.sh script is > > different between these two (it includes among other things the > > changed checksum calculation). This isn't eno

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC1

-rat:check, and verified no .class, .jar, > > .orig, ~ files present > > - build src tgz, UT all pass (with PHOENIX-1963 applied, thanks Gabriel. > > Missing a close() in test is not bad enough to sink the RC.) > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:10 PM, rajeshb...@ap

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC1

ments there; everything > > works as expected and log levels look good > > - checked src tgzl with apache-rat:check, and verified no .class, .jar, > > .orig, ~ files present > > - build src tgz, UT all pass (no need for PHOENIX-1963 this round). > > > > On Mon, May

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 RC1

The vote has passed with 5 binding +1 votes and no 0's. I will publish the release artifacts shortly. Thanks everyone for helping with the release! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:36 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Here is my +1.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 RC1

The vote has passed with 5 binding +1 votes and no 0's. I will publish the release artifacts shortly. Thanks everyone for helping with the release! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. -- Forwarded message -- From: [email protected] Date: Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:41 AM Subject: Re:

I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well

Hi, Already HBase-1.1.0 released and we already have patch to support with it(PHOENIX-1763). I feel we can release 4.4.0 with HBase-1.1.0 as well. What do you guys say? Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1976) Improve PhoenixDriver registration when addShutdownHook fails

If it's committed to 4.x branches it should be fine as of now. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Nick Dimiduk (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14549598#comment-145495

Re: I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well

n. Has Andy's patch already been applied for using > the new RS interfaces? > > Thanks, > James > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:30 AM, [email protected] > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Already HBase-1.1.0 released and we already have patch to support with > &

Re: I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well

we can release with HBase-1.1.0. Running test suite and seems fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > James, > > bq. Will older Phoenix 4.x clients work with the new Phoenix 4.4 clients > against an

Re: I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well

with a release, though. > Thanks, > James > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 6:09 AM, [email protected] > wrote: > > James, > > > > I have installed HBase 1.1.0 with phoenix-4.4.0-HBase-1.0 rc1 + > > PHOENIX-1763 patch at server side. Created tables,indexes,uploaded

All clear

I have created branches 4.4-HBase-0.98 branch off of the 4.x-HBase-0.98 branch that matches the point at which the release was cut. Similarly created 4.4-HBase-1.0 off of the 4.x-HBase-1.0. Only bug fixes need to be committed for 4.4-HBase-0.98 and 4.4-HBase-1.0 branches. Please let me know befor

Re: I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well

ses. Then we'll need to go back over what's landed on 4.x-HBase-1.0 > since 4.4.0 was released and bring forward any patches, so that all 3 > branches are aligned for 4.4.1. > > Make sense? > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, [email protected] < > chrajeshbab...@g

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.4-0-HBase-0.98 released

The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 release compatible with HBase 0.98.x. Highlights include: - spark integration[1] - query server[2] - support for user defined functions[3] - pherf - load tester measures throughput[4] - support union

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.4-0-HBase-1.0 released

The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 release compatible with HBase 1.0.x(1.0.1+). The 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 release has feature parity with our 4.4.0-HBase-0.98 release. Extra features include: - support HBase HA Query(timeline-consistent regi

I will make rc tonight IST(I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well)

ter of overhead of keeping one extra branch > and > > release vs whether we would want to support Hbase-1.0 users for 4.5+. > Just > > my 2 cents. > > > > Enis > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:39 PM, [email protected] < > > [email protected]

Re: I will make rc tonight IST(I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well)

Hi Ted, Tests are failing for both the branches and master branch as well. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On May 24, 2015 7:21 PM, "Ted Yu" wrote: > Did the test fail on branch 4.4-HBase-1.1, branch 4.x-HBase-1.1 or both ? > > Cheers > > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:38

[VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 RC0

Hi Everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 RC0. This is the next minor release of Phoenix 4, compatible with the Apache HBase 1.1.x branch. The release includes both a source-only release and a convenience binary release. The 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 release has feature parit

Re: I will make rc tonight IST(I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well)

adoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.seek(StoreFileScanner.java:161) > > at > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.backwardSeek(StoreFileScanner.java:478) > > > > > > NoTagsKeyValue was introduced by: > > > > HBASE-13579 - A

Re: I will make rc tonight IST(I feel It's correct time to release 4.4.0 with HBase 1.1.0 as well)

e.org/view/All/job/Phoenix-4.4-HBase-1.1/4/console > > Not directly related, but you should also update the version strings in > 4.4-HBase-1.1 and 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches. Right now they do not have the > -HBase-1.1 suffix. > > Enis > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 2:10 AM, rajesh

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 RC0

queries from sqlline-thin command line. They are fine. - enabled tracing and ran some queries and checked the trace information for the queries. It's fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:23 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Everyone,

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 RC0

nd perform similar experiments there; everything works as expected and log levels look good - checked src tgzl with apache-rat:check, and verified no .class, .jar, .orig, ~ files present - build src tgz, UT all pass (with PHOENIX-1963 applied, as before) On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 7:53 PM, rajeshb...@

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.4-0-HBase-1.1 released

The Apache Phoenix team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 release compatible with HBase 1.1.x. The 4.4.0-HBase-1.1 release has feature parity with our 4.4.0-HBase-1.0 release. The release is available through maven or may be downloaded here[1]. Thanks to al

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.4-0-HBase-0.98 released

e. > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.phoenix/phoenix > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/phoenix/phoenix-core/ > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:15 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 4.4-0-HBase-0.98 released

Here you can find the jars in maven repo. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/phoenix/ Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:53 AM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote: > @Josh > I am pushing the jars to maven. Will p

Re: [DISCUSS] drop 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch

+1 to drop. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:08 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Until master would diverge from 4.x-HBase-1.1 branch, I don't think we > need it, so I propose we drop it. It's just added overhead at this > point and is missing commits from master as well. > > Please let me know if you think w

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Josh Mahonin added as Apache Phoenix committer

Congratulations and Welcome, Josh! Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Eli Levine wrote: > Welcome, Josh! > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Thomas D'Silva > wrote: > > > Welcome Josh! > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Samarth Jain > wrote: > > > Congratulations and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.5.0-HBase-1.1 RC0

+1 - verified signatures, - ran full integration test suite, all tests passed. - installed HBase 1.1 cluster with the RC and ran examples queries, performance script with 1 million records. Everything fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote: > +1 to release

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.5.0-HBase-1.0 RC0

I am also seeing the same failures with Join related tests. I often the see the failures, But they are passing when I run individually. testJoinWithSubquery[2](org.apache.phoenix.end2end.SpooledSortMergeJoinIT) Time elapsed: 0.134 sec <<< ERROR! org.apache.phoenix.exception.PhoenixIOException:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.5.0-HBase-0.98 RC0

+1 - Verified signatures - Ran full integration tests and all are passed. - Installed 0.98 cluster with the RC and ran the examples. Everything fine. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jan Fernando wrote: > +1 Ran various internal regression test suites and no issues found. >

  1   2   >