Hi,
I think we should list the companies with a short outline like, e.g. postgres
does it here: https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/europe/
For codecentric one could write (I see no problem):
PLC4X was initially started as an internal project at codecentric and open
soure to
Hi Julian,
I think having links to commercial support offerings is a pretty important
thing for us to have.
If we have to allow anyone be listed there (even if they don't contribute to
the project) well that will be "the toad we have to swallow" (Don't know how to
translate this German saying t
Ah, yes then full ack. Thus, I suggested the PMC Vote approach, because also I
dislike that (except for there are any other good reasons why the PMC could be
fine like.. they donate us enough money to sell our asses... : ) )
Julian
Am 27.01.20, 08:13 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Maybe I n
Maybe I need to rephrase my last sentence ;-)
"I am not happy to have just any company listed, even if they didn't even have
any of their employees contribute anything to the project."
Chris
Am 27.01.20, 08:10 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hey,
@Christofer Dutz you can also a ge
Hey,
@Christofer Dutz you can also a general discuss about whether or not we should
do that.
I am mostly concerned with clear rules, if we do it.
But, in the end, its not granted, lets discuss it and if we cant get an
agreement decide it.
Julian
Am 27.01.20, 06:55 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi Justin,
So in general it would be OK to have a list of links to companies plc4x support
pages?
I don't care about seeing the ties between persons and companies.
Just not happy to have any company listed.
Chris
Von: Justin Mclean
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Januar
Hi,
See [1] and in particular [2]. Note also how druid is not in line with [3]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#projectthanks
2. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#productsupport
3. https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking#whoweare
Hi,
> as Lukas just opened up a discussion about mentioning commercial support on
> the (new) PLC4X Homepage.
> One Example where this is done is Apache Druid
> (https://druid.apache.org/community/ see Getting Help).
I dislike the Druid example as it shows who the committers are working for,
t
Nice thank you. Just also
Wanted to start the discussing here that we have a resolution before starting
something.
Julian
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Christofer Dutz
Datum: So., 26. Jan. 2020, 18:42
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DIS
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [662]':
Is back to normal.
Hi all,
so I took the question to the trademarks list (Which I sort of think is the
appropriate place to ask)
Chris
Am 26.01.20, 18:35 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
+1 From my side
We however should double check that this is generally allowed.
Just finding a precedence where i
+1 From my side
We however should double check that this is generally allowed.
Just finding a precedence where it is done, doesn't mean it's generally allowed.
It might have just not been found.
Chris
Am 26.01.20, 15:42 schrieb "Lukas Ott" :
Hi,
+1 for PMC Vote - Only companies s
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [661]':
Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/PLC4X/job/PLC4X/job/develop/661/";>PLC4X/PLC4X/develop
[develop] [661]"
chrisdutz merged pull request #2: PLC4X landing page
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x-build-tools/pull/2
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
dominikriemer opened a new pull request #2: PLC4X landing page
URL: https://github.com/apache/plc4x-build-tools/pull/2
This PR adds some improvements to the PLC4X homepage:
- teaser image + teaser text
- improved layout of the feature sections
- carousel to show integrations on the
Hi,
+1 for PMC Vote - Only companies should be listed that have Committers that
can actually develop and run PLC4X development and/ or operation services
without external (other companies of course collaboration is fine but the
main work should be done by the developers of the company itself for
p
Hi,
as Lukas just opened up a discussion about mentioning commercial support on the
(new) PLC4X Homepage.
One Example where this is done is Apache Druid
(https://druid.apache.org/community/ see Getting Help).
One concern of myself is that we should be transparent but strict about what
companie
Hi,
Picture of me? Of course, this should really help us with Click Rates... __
But, yes, I will provide something and also one or two images (and would be
cool to get a link on our page for all the hard effort __ ).
Julian
Am 26.01.20, 15:13 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi Julian,
Hi Julian,
for a carousel, probably a picture and one to two sentences.
Perhaps adding dedicated success-story pages would also be good.
Chris
Am 26.01.20, 14:52 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hi,
we could provide a User Story!
How much content would you need?
Julian
Hi,
we could provide a User Story!
How much content would you need?
Julian
Am 26.01.20, 13:23 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" :
Hi Chris,
I just pushed another update that includes the carousel and also changes
(hopefully improves) the layout of the teaser a bit.
Do you have any tex
Hi Chris,
I just pushed another update that includes the carousel and also changes
(hopefully improves) the layout of the teaser a bit.
Do you have any text on success stories that we could add?
Dominik
On 2020/01/26 09:57:58, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> thanks for that it looks
Hi Dominik,
thanks for that it looks a LOT better than the boring skeleton I added.
I would also enjoy a carousel with different things like you mentioned ... the
bootstrap should have all the stuff needed already on-board, I think.
However I am unsure if we should present the different protocol
22 matches
Mail list logo
