Hi all,
so I took the question to the trademarks list (Which I sort of think is the
appropriate place to ask)
Chris
Am 26.01.20, 18:35 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
+1 From my side
We however should double check that this is generally allowed.
Just finding a precedence where it is done, doesn't mean it's generally
allowed.
It might have just not been found.
Chris
Am 26.01.20, 15:42 schrieb "Lukas Ott" <ott.lukas...@gmail.com>:
Hi,
+1 for PMC Vote - Only companies should be listed that have Committers
that
can actually develop and run PLC4X development and/ or operation
services
without external (other companies of course collaboration is fine but
the
main work should be done by the developers of the company itself for
professional support on PLC4X) help.
I like the druid example because there is a list of committers and then
3
companies (which in my understanding really build services with and
around
druid) thats it.
Lukas
Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 15:35 Uhr schrieb Julian Feinauer <
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
> Hi,
>
> as Lukas just opened up a discussion about mentioning commercial
support
> on the (new) PLC4X Homepage.
> One Example where this is done is Apache Druid (
> https://druid.apache.org/community/ see Getting Help).
>
> One concern of myself is that we should be transparent but strict
about
> what companies we allow to mention there. One one hand, everybody who
> contributes and is reasonable qualified should be noted. On the other
hand
> we do not want dozens of companies to be listed there that have few
or no
> knowledge about the project.
>
> Thus, I suggest, as process, that whoever wants to be mentioned there
just
> applies in a formless manner (on dev@...) and the PMC decides by
regular
> vote if this is accepted or not.
> This should be reasonably fair and transparent. What do others think?
>
> Julian
>
