Maybe I need to rephrase my last sentence ;-) "I am not happy to have just any company listed, even if they didn't even have any of their employees contribute anything to the project."
Chris Am 27.01.20, 08:10 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]>: Hey, @Christofer Dutz you can also a general discuss about whether or not we should do that. I am mostly concerned with clear rules, if we do it. But, in the end, its not granted, lets discuss it and if we cant get an agreement decide it. Julian Am 27.01.20, 06:55 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: Hi Justin, So in general it would be OK to have a list of links to companies plc4x support pages? I don't care about seeing the ties between persons and companies. Just not happy to have any company listed. Chris ________________________________ Von: Justin Mclean <[email protected]> Gesendet: Montag, 27. Januar 2020 01:45 An: [email protected] <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Guideline for "professional support" Mentioning on Homepage Hi, > as Lukas just opened up a discussion about mentioning commercial support on the (new) PLC4X Homepage. > One Example where this is done is Apache Druid (https://druid.apache.org/community/ see Getting Help). I dislike the Druid example as it shows who the committers are working for, that should not matter. Individuals contribute to Apache projects not companies. Having links to those companies (next to the committer name) when they may or may not be ASF sponsors is even worse. Re commercial supped listing them is OK as long as all that ask are listed and it not being seen as promoting or suggesting one over another. It must be vendor neutral. Thanks, Justin
