Ah, yes then full ack. Thus, I suggested the PMC Vote approach, because also I
dislike that (except for there are any other good reasons why the PMC could be
fine like.. they donate us enough money to sell our asses... : ) )
Julian
Am 27.01.20, 08:13 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
Maybe I need to rephrase my last sentence ;-)
"I am not happy to have just any company listed, even if they didn't even
have any of their employees contribute anything to the project."
Chris
Am 27.01.20, 08:10 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hey,
@Christofer Dutz you can also a general discuss about whether or not we
should do that.
I am mostly concerned with clear rules, if we do it.
But, in the end, its not granted, lets discuss it and if we cant get an
agreement decide it.
Julian
Am 27.01.20, 06:55 schrieb "Christofer Dutz"
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
Hi Justin,
So in general it would be OK to have a list of links to companies
plc4x support pages?
I don't care about seeing the ties between persons and companies.
Just not happy to have any company listed.
Chris
________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Januar 2020 01:45
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Guideline for "professional support"
Mentioning on Homepage
Hi,
> as Lukas just opened up a discussion about mentioning commercial
support on the (new) PLC4X Homepage.
> One Example where this is done is Apache Druid
(https://druid.apache.org/community/ see Getting Help).
I dislike the Druid example as it shows who the committers are
working for, that should not matter. Individuals contribute to Apache projects
not companies. Having links to those companies (next to the committer name)
when they may or may not be ASF sponsors is even worse.
Re commercial supped listing them is OK as long as all that ask are
listed and it not being seen as promoting or suggesting one over another. It
must be vendor neutral.
Thanks,
Justin
