Re: Vote on XMLBeans 2.7.0-rc1 release

The xmlbeans build is currently on JDK 1.6 and I'm looking for a justification to keep it on 1.6 or upgrade to 1.8. Pro 1.6: depending libraries aren't forced to upgrade Pro 1.8: mainly JAXP security fixes in JDK 1.7 [1] after such a long time, the JDK upgrade pill might be easier to digest :)

Re: Vote on XMLBeans 2.7.0-rc1 release

On 6/10/18 8:21 PM, pj.fanning wrote: > I do have the RC jars uploaded on Nexus (they are not released yet). > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachexmlbeans-1002/org/apache/xmlbeans/xmlbeans/2.7.0-rc1/ > > Is this enough? > > I'm not sure how to push jars into

Re: Question on Apache POI 4.0 Release Plan

Hi, we currently have a blocker with updating XmlBeans. This involves quite some internal discussions - my optimistic bet is, that we might release by end of July (... hopefully) Out of curiosity, which feature are you depending on? Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[RESULT] [VOTE] Re: Review #62355

The vote has passed with the consensus on applying the patch (3x +1) , which I'll do within the next days. Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Read PPTX file using java and generate Powerpoint

Hi Saranya, > To display title at top and multiple tables to be generated inside single > slide alighed. If you want to generate a certain feature, you might need to reengineer it. So create the sample PPTX in powerpoint and unzip the .pptx file - the slide1.xml is the first page. Look for your

Re: Apache poi-4.0.0 snapshot/beta version

Hi Sonee, thank you for pointing this out - I've fixed the links. The nightly can be found here: https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-DSL-1.8/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/dist/ Please have a look at #62355 [1] - currently it's quite likely that it will be applied with 4.0.0.

[VOTE] Re: Review #62355

Hi, We had a few arguments on #62355, but no decision and I don't want it to peter out. Would you mind, if we have a vote? a) leave it as-is - the classes stay in the java packages b) provide an additional one-big-jar c) apply the patch FYI -  there might be more changes necessary for the

Review #62355

Hi, I'd like to apply the patches in #62355 before 4.0.0, but this contains breaking changes especially for the POIXML* classes, i.e. their package moved. At least for this, I'd like to have a thumbs up/down. Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: 3.18? Or push for 4?

Hi *, my plan was to wait for commons-compress 1.17 and then release poi 4.0.0. I'm currently trying to use jigsaw modules and would like rather push module refactoring for jigsaw than backporting stuff, but if you list the bugzilla issue for a 3.X maintenance release I'm happy to merge those.

Review request #62092

Hi, as I would change again quite a few H/XSLF classes, I would like to have a review: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62092 Even if you don't have time now, but are interested, just drop me a PM - the relevant classes aren't that many ... Thanks. Andi signature.asc

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

There's a workaround for the GPL problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-264 ... but my last experiments with the current ECMA schemas weren't so successful: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46869482/ On 3/9/18 2:05 PM, Murphy, Mark wrote: > Since JAXB is being dropped from Java

Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars

Although I think that in the long-term we should go away from maintaining another apache project, I don't have a better plan for the mid-term ... so +1. I also think, that the svn + history approach is better than keeping it under POI root. Even if we don't bring XmlBeans uptodate with

Re: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.10 #1

this would potentially only work for stream but not for file based access. On 3/4/18 7:54 PM, pj.fanning wrote: > I'm also wondering if maybe we could abandon the reflection approach and just > have ThresholdInputStream wrap the entry's InputStream and count the bytes > that are read, and blow up

Re: XMLBeans in 4.0.0 release

I guess the XMLBeans release will anyway take some time, but I've found an issue with [1], please don't start preparing the POI release without that being resolved. Andi [1] https://github.com/apache/poi/pull/90 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Failing gump tests

+1 for removing/disabling the poi-gump module Andi. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: XMLBeans in 4.0.0 release

Hi, we had this discussion already before [1]. - at 1) ... -1, we should get rid of the known errors - at 2) ... if we get something with apache/poi in its name, I would +1 it. I still don't get it, why we can't have it as a module in our codebase - keeping everything apart the maven group

POI Visualizer

Hi, I'm currently developing a small tool to inspect and edit ooxml / ole files: https://github.com/kiwiwings/poi-visualizer My development is focused towards my usually steps when I re-engineer a file and my goal would be, to have a format sensitive browser. I.e. one where you could drill

Codescene stats

Hi, I've imported our git repo into codescene.io -> https://codescene.io/projects/2038 Currently I don't know yet, how to interpret the various statistics, i.e. to draw interesting conclusions from ..., but maybe you want to give it a try yourself. Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: poi project Exception

There's no POI 1.0.6 version - please try a current version - e.g. 3.17 - first, if that still fails with your document, please provide us your document in bugzilla. Andi. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Test document Tika-792

There's also a third (and probably more ...) option: You could set an option/enum/boolean as a ThreadLocal to decide how to output the data. The default might be not to return deleted text and Tika could change it when calling the extractor. As the library would fill up with ThreadLocals, I

Re: classloading xsbs for pptx

Hi Tim, last time when I've introduced the setClassLoader() method, it was helpful to have a minimal maven project to showcase the error. Can you setup a sample project? When I changed the ClassLoader code last time with #61478, I've also used the same sample project [1] Andi [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting a fixed version of XMLBeans

Hi, I would prefer c) but keeping the package names and only change the artifact groupid, to keep it's proprietary usage for POI. So we don't need to care to build up a xmlbeans community again. I think d) is a longterm goal - to simulate xmlbeans xml infoset preservation plus support various

Re: jaxb problems

lasses, then wouldn't that mean that we'd need to dynamically import > the CT classes and reload the XSSF classes with the correct schema at > runtime? > > This sounds tricky. > > On Oct 22, 2017 02:30, "Andreas Beeker" <kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi *, >&

jaxb problems

Hi *, I'm struggling with jaxb and the ecma v5 schemas for quite a while - maybe you could have a look at [1]. My idea is to have several ecma version available in parallel and decide which to use after some introspection of a given ooxml file - AFAIK the versions are not downward compatible.

Re: 3.17.1?

If you can wait for another week, I'll take care of merging and releasing a 3.17.1 ... which is basically my current $dayjob ... -.- Please decide which issues you want to have in. Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Apache POI 4.0/Java 8

Please use 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT ... I wouldn't use the term beta anymore, so betas become patch versions 4.0.x Andi On 9/16/17 5:40 PM, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > I did most of my changes to switch to Java 8 and adjusted the Jenkins jobs > accordingly. Version is currently at 4.0-beta1, I'll

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC3)

This vote has passed with 5x PMC +1 votes. I release the artifacts now and announce the release on the website, when I see the files on maven central. Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC3)

Hi *, I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.17 (RC3). The most notable changes in this release are: - Various modules: add sanity checks and fix infinite loops / OOMs caused by fuzzed data - OPC: fix linebreak handling on XML signature calculation (#61182) - SS Common: fix

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC2)

I will postpone the release of RC3 until Saturday evening - I think it doesn't hurt to saddle the code 1-2 days. Btw. as the voting for Java8 and POI 4.0 was so smooth, I'll use [1] as a reference for our upcoming change. I.e. I assume we go for POI 4.0 next and use Java8, because Tika will

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC2)

of a 3.18 release. > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 2:38 PM Andreas Beeker <kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi *, >> >> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.17 (RC2). >> >> The most notable changes in this release are: >> >>

Version codenames?

Hi, version code names are all around us [1] ... how about putting a bit of spice in the next releases? Along our project name, we could choose some interesting dishes: :) Casu Marzu San-nakji Balut Boodog Surströmming Tripe Bat Paste (in remembrance to "bad taste") Shirako Huitlacoche Airag

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC2)

Hi *, I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.17 (RC2). The most notable changes in this release are: - Various modules: add sanity checks and fix infinite loops / OOMs caused by fuzzed data - OPC: fix linebreak handling on XML signature calculation (#61182) - SS Common: fix

POI 4.0 and Java 8

Hi Tika devs, at POI, we are about to have a major change in the upcoming version after POI 3.17 is out, which will be probably in the next week or so. Up till now we had a discussion [1], about the next Java SE, i.e. Java 7 or 8, and it looks like Java 8 is the preferred version - with the

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC1)

O'Neal wrote: > Let's leave this vote open until Dominik and/or Tim can run tests against > our corpus and Tika. > > If this is the last Java 6-compatible release, let's make it a good one. > > On Aug 21, 2017 3:43 PM, "Andreas Beeker" <kiwiwi...@apache.org> w

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.17 release (RC1)

Hi, I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.17 (RC1). The most notable changes in this release are: - Various modules: add sanity checks and fix infinite loops / OOMs caused by fuzzed data - OPC: fix linebreak handling on XML signature calculation (#61182) - SS Common: fix

Discussions on POI 4.0 / Java7/8 voting

Hi, I'd like to add a note to the final announcement about the JDK change and link a vote thread to it. We've discussed about Java 7 [4], but as a few projects around us already have switched to Java 8 [1], I want an official vote about Java 7/8. As I anticipate a bit of controversy on this, I

Re: 3.17-beta2 vs. 3.17 final?

Hi Greg, when do you know, if your chances are ok for Vaadin? if that is accepted, I would like to release 3.17 final and then switch to 4.0 (jdk7) - IIRC we discussed to immediately release 4.0-beta1 - is this correct / does it make sense? Regarding the API changes - I haven't checked the

Jenkins on H21 seem to have SVN problems

FYI: I've excluded H21 from the builds as it seems to have SVN problems: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14857 Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: XDDF implementation shared between XSSFChart and XSLFChart

> I would prefer this wait until 3.18, for purely selfish reasons, as we've > already released a beta for 3.17. The postponing is ok for me ... but afterwards you have the breaking changes anyways and the Vaadin guys (or you?) have to do the chart modifications twice ... or Vaadin might be

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-Maven #289

> The two tests in error pass on my local system (Windows 10). > ... > Anyone have a clue what is happening? This is apparently due to some other > recent change, nothing in my commit would touch this. So which files differ from your local installation vs. the trunk? I've done quite some changes

Unsynchronize xmlbean calls

Hi, does anyone mind, if we unsynchronize the xmlbean calls? [1] Andi [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45082014/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: TestFonts failing on my laptop

Although the .ttf-Font is provided, the rendering can be quite different. [1] That's the reason, why I'm trying to also execute the Job on the Windows machines too - currently I'm playing around with Jenkins pipeline syntax. What happens if you change something in GraphicsEnvironment.prefer*() ?

Re: Java 6 support

> Andi just tried to use more generics in some places and this showed a > problem either in Java 9 or Java 6 and thus he reverted this change again. AFAIK this also happened when I've refactored the SL Common interfaces, but I've forgotten about it :S This is a bug in Java 6 ... there are a few

Re: Java 6 support

+1 for switching now or after POI 3.17 ... if we will do a 3.17 final soonish. I'm actually bringing this up, as I was facing again problems with generics bugs in Java 6 and independently had a devops discussion with fluxo yesterday, questioning me/us why we are still on Java 6 level. > If

Windows builds again on Jenkins?

Hi, we had some problems with the windows builds in the past [1]. If no-one objects, I'll activate the builds on Windows again, to see if there are still similar problems with file locks & Co. The reason for this is, that I'd like to test my recent rendering add-ons also on Windows ... In the

Re: corruption in xlsx spreadsheet generated by poi?

This could behave differently in POI 3.17-beta2 (to be released in 2-3 months) or the trunk because of the changes of #61182 https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61182 Andi On 7/6/17 9:08 PM, Carl Buxbaum wrote: > Thank you. I had not realized that it was a zip file. I was able to

[ANNOUNCE] Apache POI 3.17-beta1 released

The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 3.17-beta1. Featured are a handful of new areas of functionality, and numerous bug fixes. See the downloads page for binary and source distributions: https://poi.apache.org/download.html Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an

Jenkins problems

Hi, in case you wonder, why our builds don't start ... there's already a ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14476 Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.6 #367

when Strings are concatenated StringBuilder.append() will be called and the toString() call happens inside the jvm classes. I'm now adding a check for StringBuilder.append(Object) which catches quite a few of those cases ... On 6/29/17 12:37 AM, Andreas Beeker wrote: > I'm trying to reprod

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: POI-DSL-1.6 #367

I'm trying to reproduce it by setting a different Locale, but I can't break it yet ... When I'm using a test project to sign a .xlsx with POI 3.17-beta1, Libre Office doesn't like its signature. It I can't find a solution, I'll probably just comment out that line ... :( On 6/29/17 12:25 AM,

Re: Moving to Git

I'm 0 - although I haven't done much with git/-hub, it seems to be the (new) standard ... > Then we'd be able to have github show merged PR's with credit to the > author rather than closed PR's. I wonder what is our stance at credits? ... I usually remove the author tags when I rework code -

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache POI 3.17-beta1 release (RC1)

ndi. > > Looks like Maven Central has the artifacts now. Other mirrors may not be up > to date, though. > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.poi%22 > > On Jun 27, 2017 16:31, "Andreas Beeker" <kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> This vot

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache POI 3.17-beta1 release (RC1)

26, 2017 9:11 AM >>> To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.17-beta1 release (RC1) >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I compared the contents of the archives to 3.16, things look good there. >>> >>> O

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.17-beta1 release (RC1)

Hi, I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.17-beta1 (RC1). The most notable changes in this release are: - XSSF: improved support for XSSFTables - HSLF: various fixes in table support - HPSF: reworked to cover edge cases and better support non-latin charsets - SL Common: fixed

Re: Is it time for POI 3.17-beta1?

AlternateContent is also used in XSLF and XmlBeans provides either a XPath or a Cursor API, to access those - just have a look at XSLFDrawing - if you need help, I can support. So I'm waiting for your modifications (+EMUUtils merge), before preparing the release candidate. Andi On 6/23/17

Re: Is it time for POI 3.17-beta1?

I know XML signatures aren't a base functionality of POI, but I'm currently working on #61182 and although the [signature] verification looks good, I can't add signatures which will be successful verified in Libre / Office. As this is the case with all versions since 3.11 it might be something

Is it time for POI 3.17-beta1?

Hi *, there are quite some changes since the last final in the changelog - how about pushing out the next beta? I would be available as release manager ... As I made substantial changes to HPSF - I'm curious about the common-crawl & Co. tests, i.e. the integration test have been modified to

Re: Extracting images from pptx using xslf discarding charts.

just a few thoughts about the (render) implementation: 1. check if the current xmlbeans cover the chart schema in the needed areas 2. parse the references and build a chart data model 3. map data model to a existing chart api see alternatives of JFreeChart (which can't be used because of LGPL

Re: Details on new vulnerability against Apache POI usage ?

> We specifically use POI ONLY for extracting data from Microsoft Excel sheets > ... Do you trust and know the people/programs generating those Excel sheets? Yes -> no need to upgrade No -> upgrade! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

New Bugzilla version entry

Hello Nick, please add a new version entry to our bugzilla. Thank you, Andi signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[ANNOUNCE] Apache POI 3.16 released

The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 3.16. Featured are a handful of new areas of functionality, and numerous bug fixes. See the downloads page for binary and source distributions: https://poi.apache.org/download.html Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-final release (RC1)

est wishes, Andi On 17.04.2017 21:31, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Thanks Andi for the smooth release! Hopefully the ongoing work on > stability/tests/corpus-tests pays off and we have another rocksolid version > with a bunch of new features out there now! > > Dominik. > > On Sun, Ap

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-final release (RC1)

17 at 7:08 PM, Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Builds work on Windows (.zip) and Linux (.tar.gz) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> -Original Message- >>

[VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-final release (RC1)

Hi, I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.16-final (RC1). The most notable changes in this release are: - add initial streaming, read-only support for xlsb files - SL Common: various rendering issues resolved - various charset related fixes in SS Common, XSSF and HWPF

RE: POI 3.16 Final?

> For clarification, when you say property sets...do you mean the Document > Properties from the tablestream? No, I meant the HPSF document-/summary information, which codepage looked better than some asian codepage on the 4th font object of one of the failing files. [1] [1] 2nd entry in 

Re: POI 3.16 Final?

Hi Tim, I'm waiting for your go to start with the candidate. Not sure, if this of any help, but the property sets also contain a codepage and this might help in guessing the codepage in HWPFOldDocument.guessCodePage(). Andi On 10.04.2017 22:28, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi Tim, > > I have now

POI 3.16 Final?

Hi, how about pushing the 3.16 final out soon? I have quite a few changes for HPSF, which I don't want to commit to the final. Who will be the release manager? ... I'll be the fallback, if everyone is busy ... Andi - To

Re: GSOC mentee

Hi Piyush, Disclaimer: I haven't been a mentor and only read the FAQ [1] ... and I only would support Javen/Mark. > But I got involved with some other project actually. I will be making GSOC > proposals for that project. I think it's ok, to make two proposals, if that's what you want. [2] >

Re: Missing "Ant (latest)"

We need to downgrade to Ant 1.9.9. ipv6guruGavin added a comment - 3 hours ago So yesterday all nodes/slaves had two new Ant versions installed - 1.9.9 and 1.10.1. 1.10.1 was symlinked to latest. 1.10.1 also has Java 8

Missing "Ant (latest)"

Hi, FYI - I've opened a ticket because of all the failing builds lately: https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-13500 Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional

Re: Evaluating expressions outside a cell value context

Hi Greg, > but I won't make my first commit some behemoth that hasn't received any > feedback Sorry to read that, but I have to admit that I usually immediatly remove emails containing expressions like shift rows, cell style, formula evaluation ... You can try to stimulate a discussion / review,

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16 beta 2 release (RC1)

+1 from me I have only done a shallow check of the - not any more - usual suspects, as I'm quite busy with other stuff ... sorry Thank you Javen for taking care of this. Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Time for another release?

I would go for another beta soon. Who will be the release manager? Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: EMF/WMF files from our regression corpus

ode...the other > parts...well...sorry. :) > There may be some areas where the emf parser could leverage some wmf > objects/constants...to reduce code...perhaps not, though. > > Onward. > > Thank you. > > Best, > > Tim >

Re: EMF/WMF files from our regression corpus

Hi Tim, thank you ... although I'm currently not working on WMF, this is very helpful! There are still a lot of features currently not implemented but I haven't had examples for. Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Using Apache Commons IO

I always wonder why a lot of these oldies stick with POI 3.9 and based on your explanation there wouldn't be much reason not to use 3.10 as there weren't much breaking changes ... if any. So it must be something else ... I start to believe - especially when dealing with a few stackoverflow

Re: [Bug 60519] Extractor for *SSF embeddings

Hi Tim, every now and then I play with the idea to provide an EMF parser like the WMF parser, to render images inside slideshows. This could be of course used to extract other content too. The simplest way would be, to adapt the FreeHep library, but its GPL licensed ... :( So for extracting

SonarQube and JaCoCo

Hi, I'm trying to integrate the JaCoCo results in the SonarQube, but the JaCoCo plugin only runs for the first maven submodule and then exists with: Error: Could not find or load main class @{argLine} My first try would be, to get JaCoCo without SonarQube to work and the next step would be the

Re: Builds changes

Hi Dominik, +1 for using the seeder job. Will you convert the jobs or do you need help? Andi. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Test corpus vs. releases

way >> of pinning test-data so that old releases could be run against these >> documents without breaking. >> 3) Migrate away from asking users to check out the source using a >> Subversion client, using Gradle to perform this checkout instead (solution >> 1). >> &

Test corpus vs. releases

Hi, our test corpus is constantly growing and I think this is good, as this covers the edge-cases in the integration tests. But I wonder if we need to include those files in the releases, e.g. we could make those files downloadable in case a users executes test-integration. Or maybe we find a

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.16-beta1 release (RC1)

+1 I've copy the signatures, checked the archives for clutter and ran a very small XSLF test project. In the release note the "... password ..." line should be replaced by: - Add support for mixed-length cipher/hashes in password protected files typically used by Office for Mac (... I probably

github mirror account federation

Hi, I'm not sure if this might be interesting to you: https://wiki.apache.org/general/GithubMirror I've just set up the federation, but I guess, as it hasn't synced yet again, I'm not listed with my github account at the commits yet. Best wishes, Andi

Re: svn commit: r1766237 - in /poi/site/src/documentation: resources/images/ resources/stylesheets/ skins/poi-site/images/

Not necessarily, i.e if the xml encoding is not specified, it defaults to UTF-8 and a/my XML editor is free to add a BOM -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark Maybe we should encode those xml files in ISO-8859-1? On 23.10.2016 00:19, Javen O'Neal wrote: > Looks like there was a file

Re: Fwd: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project ooxml-schemas (in module poi) failed

Hi Dominik, we actually don't know which step of downloading/generating/compiling takes so long. I thought about echoing timestamps, so we can find the culprit. My wild guess is, that it is a memory limitation and it will simply garbage collect too much while compiling ... Andi

Re: Functionality injection technique for XWPF

> 3. Use XmlBeans to "Weave-in" some additional interfaces into the CT_... > classes to handle this Most of the time, I thought about this, I didn't want constant changes in the schema jar. But now we have a common type loader, and we could put a bit extra magic in: Not sure if this works, but

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

+1 Sigs and docs look ok. As this is a final release, please also add a note pointing to #59170 in the release notes. FYI, I've removed the obsolete nexus repos. Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1761161 - /poi/trunk/build.xml

On 17.09.2016 19:10, Javen O'Neal wrote: > Should the classifier be RC3? > > Looking at build.xml, this seems to only affect the output file name and > not the maven artifact coordinates. If so, then this doesn't matter. > When reworking the release scripts, I've removed a few naming parts (e.g.

Re: How are XSLFParagraphs divided into XSLFTextRuns?

Hi Josh, opposed to HSLF, in XSLF the TextRuns and Paragraphs are returned as-is, i.e. if it's split in the xml file, it will be returned as two TextRuns. A TextRun will be usually split, when the formatting differs. I've looked for a way to insert a field, but to no avail [1] Is it possible

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta3

Hi David, what's the status? should I jump in? Andi On 19.08.2016 10:30, David North wrote: > Should be able to sort it this weekend, yes. > > Thanks, > David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For

Re: 3.15 beta 3 soon?

On 08.08.2016 21:01, David North wrote: > Thanks, some help would be good. The next time I'll be free to make an > attempt is Wednesday evening UK time - say 7.30pm BST if you'd be around > on IRC then? So this is 20:30 CEST here - usually I'm available 21:00-01:30, so should be ok. As my keys

Re: Fwd: Jenkins Ant Matrix - and consolidating of versions.

Thanks for bringing this up ... I've changed it to Ant (latest). On 08.08.2016 02:34, Javen O'Neal wrote: > Looks like POI-with-old-Xerces on the Jenkins build server needs some > attention to upgrade the task to use the latest Ant version. > > Can someone with the appropriate permissions on

Remove old svn branches?

Hi, does anyone mind, if I remove the old svn branches? [1] Andi [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3528464/svn-best-practice-deleting-completed-branches - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For

Re: 3.15 beta 2 soon?

On 17.07.2016 23:03, Javen O'Neal wrote: > Is there any need to push our artifacts to an Apache-hosted repo? > There are a few repos [1] Usually the artifacts are first moved to the staging repo [2] and when the vote is over, the artifacts are copied to [3] and/or [4] when released via Nexus.

SonarQube Jenkins out-of-sync

Hi, FYI - I've create a ticket for the failing SonarQube job - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12234 Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache POI 3.15-beta2 released

The Apache POI project is pleased to announce the release of POI 3.15-beta2. Featured are a handful of new areas of functionality, and numerous bug fixes. See the downloads page for binary and source distributions: https://poi.apache.org/download.html Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta2 release (RC1)

This vote has passed with 3x PMC +1 votes. I release the artifacts now and announce the release on the website, when I see the files on maven central. Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For

Let the trunk be defrosted

; From: Nick Burch [mailto:apa...@gagravarr.org] >> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:33 AM >> To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta2 release (RC1) >> >> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Andreas Beeker wrote: >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta2 release (RC1)

> I think we ought to fix that before the release, no? Actually I'd prefer to push the release and unfreeze the trunk. How about having a beta3 in a month and you skip beta2 for tika? Andi. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta2 release (RC1)

gt; >> Tested on a POI-powered application at my $DAYJOB. No issues, and seems a >> little faster than previous builds. >> >> +1 from me. >> On Jun 25, 2016 4:35 PM, "Andreas Beeker" <kiwiwi...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >