.
Welcome to DrRacket, version 5.3.2.2 [3m].
Language: racket [custom].
. . ..\..\plt\collects\racket\require-transform.rkt:266:2:
syntax-local-module-exports: unknown module
module name: #resolved-module-path:'tmp-module-name
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl
-package tmp-package (f)
(define (f-tmp arg ...) (displayln wrapper) body ...)
(define*-syntaxes (f) (make-rename-transformer #'f-tmp)))
(open-package tmp-package))]))
(def-wrapped (f x) (+ x 1))
(f 100)
On Jan 26, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote
At Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:01:30 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:05:08 +0300, Michael Filonenko wrote:
I have prepared a new version of the patch (attached).
Thanks!
A question on the design
It looks ok to me.
At Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:26:00 -0700, Danny Yoo wrote:
I've run the tests that use the lexer, and it appears to pass. But
since it's parser-tools/lex, I'd like a second opinion on this, just
in case I'm doing something very silly.
I've put this in my branch 'pr13471':
I agree.
More generally, if running a program has the side effect of configuring
DrRacket, then maybe it should not be allowed to run within DrRacket.
That is, maybe DrRacket should install a security guard that prevents
writing to installed collections.
Meanwhile, to install packages from
At Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:04:29 +0400, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
One thing is not quite clear from your message:
if Mikhail now starts to work on unboxing, will not he
be duplicating your own work? You said
Unboxing of locally-bound extflonums is still not implemented, but I
think it's probably
I'm trying a clean build now, and maybe the problem will be obvious.
At Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:36:09 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
I don't know what would help, but one thing that usually does is a stack
trace. You can probably get it from a coredump file or by something like
this:
$ gdb `which
skills are far too limited to
provide a patch.
Tobias
On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:30:15 +0100, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
At Fri, 1 Feb 2013 12:23:59 +0100, Tobias Hammer wrote:
i am getting the following error when i try to compile racket-textual
on a
a version
Merged - thanks!
I'm not certain why the example below didn't work for you, but I think
it had to do with shuffling unboxed arguments to `loop'. Please check
whether the current version works; it now works for me.
There was a mismatch in the order that unboxed arguments are gathered
for the call
Does `collection-file-path' work?
Here's a small example:
#lang scribble/base
@image[(collection-file-path heart.png icons)]
I think this is closer to your example (but untested):
#lang scribble/base
@(define (fig name)
(collection-file-path name book figures))
@image[#:suffixes
At Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:37:22 +0400, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
1. Minor issue: broken contract does not check for some
reason related to the unboxing machinery:
(require racket/extflonum)
(define (a b)
(extfl+ b 1.0))
(a 1.0t0)
Should raise extfl+: contract violation, but silently
I forgot to check 32-bit mode, and I see a problem there. Are you using
a 32-bit or 64-bit build?
At Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:29:57 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2013-02-19 10:48:21 -0500, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
ca95129 Matthew Flatt mfl...@racket-lang.org 2013-02-19 08:02
:
| JIT
At Sun, 24 Feb 2013 09:51:12 -0800, Eric Dobson wrote:
lambda supports optional arguments, and does this by expanding out into a
core form that has flag arguments for if each argument is supplied. This is
tricky to type in TR and so I was investigating why it did it this way. I
did a micro
At Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:16:13 -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Two hours ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
I think that this should be reverted, and instead make the older
docs more available: I'll make another column in the all-versions
page (main page download all versions).
Done, now. See the new
:14 -0500, Ray Racine wrote:
all-phase modules
static modules
static-phase modules
phase-invariant modules
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.eduwrote:
At Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:59:01 -0500,
mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
899a327 Matthew Flatt mfl
:58 AM, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Greetings.
On 2013 Feb 27, at 01:14, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I think part of the problem is distinguishing module declarations
(which don't have a phase) from module instantiations (which are
normally phase-specific
At Mon, 4 Mar 2013 06:30:35 -0700, Jay McCarthy wrote:
2d5884b broke some of my Scribble documents.
Repair pushed.
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
At Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:35:42 -0600, mikel evins wrote:
The reason I ask is that MacScheme made it easy to have most of an app
compiled to bytecode, which was very compact and reasonably efficient, but to
optionally and selectively compile performance-critical procedures to native
code.
At Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:06:32 +0300, Michael Filonenko wrote:
The following pull request provides long double type (extflonum) on
win32: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/265
Merged --- with some changes, as usual...
It seems that RacketCGC is supposed to be built without any
third-party DLLs
Thanks - I've pushed a repair.
At Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:12:04 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
This breaks on Linux 32-bit.
Here's the error I get:
make[7]: Entering directory `/home/stamourv/tmp/tmp-plt/plt/src/build/foreign'
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -pthread-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
Yes, this is clearly a bug.
At Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:21:49 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
I have found what I think may be a bug in Racket's constant propagation:
(unsafe-fx* 0 (error 'foo))
does not throw and error and evaluates to 0. If 0 is replaced with
another value, or if it's
Sorry for the long delay!
At Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:14:46 +0400, Michael Filonenko wrote:
Agreed. But since switching the processor at last minute every time
slows things down a bit, it may be useful to have an option to
switch to the extended mode on Win32 just once. That will be useful
for us
At Fri, 5 Apr 2013 07:31:03 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote:
Most importantly, as far as I can tell, cross-phase persistent modules are
currently an internal silent heuristic for turning modules into persistent
ones. I'd really like a way to explicitly declare that I want a module to
be persistent
At Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:34:18 -0600, Danny Yoo wrote:
I'm running into dynamic evaluation behavior that I don't quite
understand yet. My example is:
https://gist.github.com/dyoo/5314045
It's meant as an experiment to see whether it's possible to avoid 3d
syntax in certain places like
I stand by my recommendation from December:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/2012-December/011218.html
That is, I think this suggestion should be phrased as a patch.
As implied in my quote below, I tried something much like you're
describing, and I was unhappy with the resulting
I've pushed changes to the JIT to add an ARM back-end, which is based
on Paulo César Pereira de Andrade's very nice implementation of GNU
lightning for ARM.
The generated code uses Thumb and VFP instructions when available, and
floating-point arithmetic is unboxed as on x86.
Places should work,
At Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:15:03 -0500, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:
On 04/08/2013 03:58 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I've pushed changes to the JIT to add an ARM back-end, which is based
on Paulo César Pereira de Andrade's very nice implementation of GNU
lightning for ARM.
On what processors
At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:43:46 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:26 PM, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
middle-body ...
- (let ([new-vec (if (eq? i (unsafe-vector-length
vec))
+ (let
At Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:20:54 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
In any case, given that nobody seems sufficiently interested, maybe
it's best to remove the new functions for this release to avoid code
depending on it which will make later changes more difficult?
I don't think we're going to have any
Yes, that should be module name resolver.
At Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:11:03 -0600, Danny Yoo wrote:
I'm reading the documentation for:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Module_Names_and_Loading.html#%28tech._mod
ule._path._resolver%29
and it looks to me like the term here should have been
At Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:57:40 -0400, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
On 2013-04-16 11:50 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
The PPA build has been failing the past 2 days or so for amd64 machines
due to the Racket VM running out of memory, usually during 'raco setup'
but not correlated with any specific
At Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:19:58 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:39:22 +0200, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
wrote:
For module paths, same file involves only syntactic normalizations of
the pathname (e.g., no checking for soft links). Various pieces of the
system
At Mon, 8 Apr 2013 15:22:02 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:15:03 -0500, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:
On 04/08/2013 03:58 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I've pushed changes to the JIT to add an ARM back-end, which is based
on Paulo César Pereira de Andrade's very nice
At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:23:37 -0600, Doug Williams wrote:
I did have DrRacket crash twice on startup. I'm running the 64-bit version
under Windows 8 64-bit.
The stars have aligned this morning!
We've had reports of crashes specific to 64-bit Windows, but I had not
been able to replicate the
? Perhaps some simple property that was being violated
that one could write a checker for (maybe running Racket in some debug
mode)?
Robby
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:23:37 -0600, Doug Williams wrote:
I did have
At Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:16:07 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
mflatt:
- added file-truncate (48e05093)
- mach-o: handle some new load commands (a229f292)
- mach-o: code signing fixes (1744a787)
- scribble/latex-properties: add command-extras (17865bfa)
- ffi/com: improve handling of
At Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:59:42 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2013-04-25 14:55:45 -0400, as...@racket-lang.org wrote:
a15fa5b Asumu Takikawa as...@racket-lang.org 2013-04-20 23:18
:
| Start on a notation section for the Reference
:
This is in response to the How to read procedure
Thanks for tracking this down!
In case you mean a channel in the sense of `make-channel', I recommend
a semaphore, instead, since a semaphore is the lightest-weight
synchronization construct.
At Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:38 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
Sam, Asumu and I found and fixed the bug.
At Fri, 3 May 2013 17:29:52 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
FWIW, this was the bug in redex that prompted me to send this
message (it was there for some time since it wasn't a syntax error
it was similar in spirit to the code I posted; things broke
At Sat, 4 May 2013 09:15:22 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Fri, 3 May 2013 17:29:52 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
A few minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
FWIW, this was the bug in redex that prompted me to send
everywhere
instead of [else ...] ?
Would such an #:else allow for multi-line bodies?
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Sat, 4 May 2013 09:15:22 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
You're right that the comment about keys under 256 is out of date.
The GC implementation should take _scheme_last_type_ into account. My
initial thought is that the array needs to be bigger than that, because
the intent is that new type tags can be created at run time with
scheme_make_type().
At Mon, 6 May 2013 11:58:13 -0400, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
If you're modifying stypes.h, though, public is not relevant. You
should be able to add lots of new types to stypes.h without reaching
512 or otherwise running
I think you're right: line 1851 is useless.
I added line 1851 weeks after writing the surrounding code. At the time
that I added line 1851, the real repair was changing line 1859 to use
`dest' as the destination. I didn't pay enough attention to see that
the slow path is a failure path, so no
The change looks ok to me.
At Fri, 10 May 2013 19:23:35 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
No matter what the input color's alpha is, set-pixel uses 100%
opacity. Similarly, get-pixel ignores the alpha in the image.
I think we should change this with the patch below, but I wonder if
there is some
, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
The last example seems to be the only one that uses `write', while the
others implicitly use `print'.
Does
(write #\c)
crash? How about
(print #\c)
?
At Fri, 10 May 2013 21:19:25 -0400, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
My
Your example made it easy to find the problem (which would have been
difficult to track down otherwise), and I've pushed a repair.
Thanks again!
At Wed, 15 May 2013 06:47:43 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
I didn't get from your earlier message that provoking the crash is as
easy as running
At Mon, 20 May 2013 18:27:34 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
An hour and a half ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
This plan has two prominent implications:
* The current git repo's directory structure will change. [...]
I very strongly object to this. While in theory git will follow
everything
Yes, I think
address ? address : #f
is right, while host not found should change to something like host
lookup failed.
At Tue, 21 May 2013 04:57:25 +0300, Alex Moiseenko wrote:
Hi. I've successfully started Racket 5.3.4.7 with Geiser server through JNI +
SDL2 on Android (and this
At Tue, 21 May 2013 00:09:49 -0700, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
To put it another way and overstate a little: I'm trying to get buy-in
from dev to make the switch to packages wholesale. The little bit of
staging
At Tue, 21 May 2013 10:46:29 -0400, David Van Horn wrote:
On 5/20/13 4:42 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
This plan has two prominent implications:
* The current git repo's directory structure will change.
Will this directory structure change have an impact on how modules are
referenced
At Tue, 21 May 2013 05:29:19 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
If you have the source, then you need all the phase = 1 dependencies,
but if you just have the binary then you only need the phase = 0 deps.
That's the right idea, but not precisely correct. If you `(require (for
syntax ...))' a module,
sooner rather of later. Then, everyone
will be in a good position to script progress in various ways.
At Tue, 21 May 2013 14:20:33 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Yesterday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Concretely, new repositories that are just a subset of the current
repo would be off-by-one
At Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:41 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
That's true, but the downside of changing the structure and having
files and directories move post structure change will completely
destroy the relevant edit history of the files, since it will not be
carried over to the repos once it's
At Thu, 23 May 2013 07:09:17 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Relevant history is vague.
The history I want corresponds to `git log --follow' on each of the
files that end up in a repository.
The thing that you can't do with
filter-branch is keep the complete history if you remove files from
the
At Fri, 24 May 2013 03:26:45 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
If that can be done reliabely, then of course it makes it possible to
do the split reliabley after the first restructure.
Great! Let's do that, because I remain convinced that it's going to be
a lot easier.
* Also, I'd worry about file
Adding an operation to construct the identifier directly makes sense to
me, and I can see how it might be more convenient to construct an
identifier instead of changing the comparisons.
At Thu, 23 May 2013 18:08:09 -0700, Eric Dobson wrote:
Right, but why cannot we forge an identifier easily?
At Fri, 24 May 2013 12:44:35 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
* The script should also take care to deal with files that got
removed in the past.
Ditto.
I don't believe that it's *not* doing this, so I did the double-check
in the form of a test.
You're right --- I misunderstood your
Here's a first experiment at moving collections around into packages:
https://github.com/mflatt/racket/tree/pkg
That repository really is meant as an experiment and a point of
discussion --- not a conclusion!
In particular, this experiment is about what it might look like to
break up the
At Tue, 28 May 2013 17:44:08 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
One question -- a bunch of unstable seems to be in the
typed-racket-lib package. Why is that?
Just a shortcut. Typed Racket seemed to be the only user of the
libraries in the repo, so I put the libraries there for now.
So, how
At Tue, 28 May 2013 19:36:14 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
I don't have a good sense of what level of granularity is the right one,
but I naturally would have gone even finer grained with drracket: the
macro-debugger, pkg/gui, and maybe even the gui-debugger I would have
separated out. (Probably
At Wed, 29 May 2013 11:11:18 -0600, Neil Toronto wrote:
On 05/28/2013 03:44 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I don't know whether the -lib/-docs split is worthwhile, but it's
part of erring on the side of breaking
At Wed, 29 May 2013 14:14:11 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
* Does this split actually work wrt having no circular dependencies?
It's mostly non-circular, but there are some exceptions.
I think there are no circularities among the -lib packages, but I'm
not 100% certain.
The existing -docs
suggest to me that the documentation is
thorough and helpful.
At Wed, 29 May 2013 14:31:08 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
20 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Yes. Package dependencies can be cyclic (unlike module
dependencies), and packages can have cyclic build dependencies
without cyclic run
At Wed, 29 May 2013 15:51:30 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
20 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...package distribution kinds...]
Well, I agree with all these thoughts, but what's the conclusion?
There's no requirement that packages be in multiple repositories,
but different packages
At Thu, 30 May 2013 09:01:16 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
I also really don't want to have Typed Racket's documentation outside
of Typed Racket's code repository, and I think it would be a mistake
to do that for other parts of Racket. An on-point comment on this
from just yesterday in a
At Thu, 30 May 2013 10:02:29 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
One question, though: how does this work with the package manager.
Right now, only repositories can be specified as the source when
creating a package at pkg.racket-lang.org. There must be something
I'm missing about how this will
As I understand things, we should certainly try to align divisions of
responsibility with divisions of code (including tests and docs) among
packages.
My initial experiment probably doesn't align them very well, and I'd
expect a better alignment to emerge from everyone's efforts to improve
some
Does `raco link -l' show any trace of the old package (which would
suggest that the package manager failed between the points of removing
its own registration of the package and removing the link)?
If the package install was not installation-wide, then all state should
be in your add-on directory
At Mon, 3 Jun 2013 08:27:19 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
On Thursday, Matthew Flatt wrote:
You've sketched out the producer side, and I'm not sure of some
about some of those details. The consumer side seems even more
complex to me. It seems like the package system would have to keep
At Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:37:43 +0200, Laurent wrote:
Here is a patch for a proof of concept (file /collects/pkg/lib.rkt).
The modifications are minimal as I had expected, but obviously I only have
a very narrow view of the package system, so probably something does not
work properly.
In
At Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:36:51 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
(BTW, a possible source of confusion: I'm assuming that distribution
must be done via archives and not via repository specs, since there
should be some way to put the compiled files in there.
I don't think that's the right assumption. We
a class=LargeFriendlyLetters href=#end
DON'T PANIC
/a
I've pushed a new version of the package experiment:
https://github.com/mflatt/racket/tree/pkg
You won't see much difference in terms of package splitting. I haven't
even renamed -docs packages to -doc packages, yet.
This new version
At Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:41:53 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote:
and you should deal with the non-proof of concept method of
specifying it in, for instance, the info file, which is now package
info AND collect info.
This shouldn't be a problem
At Tue, 4 Jun 2013
I've updated the package experiment again:
https://github.com/mflatt/racket/tree/pkg
State of the Proposal
-
Based on discussion of the initial proposal,
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/2013-May/012364.html
I'm revising the proposal as follows:
* The details
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:36:38 +0200, Laurent wrote:
Some other the details:
* A package's mode is recorded in the installed-package table.
Otherwise, a linked package could switch modes just because the
package directory's content changes, which would be difficult to
keep in
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:00:56 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
When we have a small core, then there should be
practically no packages without explicit dependencies --- when a
package's dependencies are specified accurately, at least.
Is it possible to enforce, either in the package system
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:17:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
If we go that way, then I'd characterize a single-collection package
without 'single-collection' in info.rkt as a low-quality package, but
a low-quality package is a fine starting point for a high-quality
package.
Would this
At Tue, 4 Jun 2013 18:55:51 -0400, Sean McBeth wrote:
I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of Scribble, but it seems you could
add to the scribble-style.css file:
.tocsub{display:none;}
True, but I think the 'no-sidebar style property is a fine addition.
To me, the table of contents is the
At Thu, 9 May 2013 16:22:54 +0200, Laurent wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Anything is open for discussion, but speaking for myself, I'm not
interested in revisiting keyword syntax or case sensitivity.
I've always wondered why the syntax
At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:35:20 -0600, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Since code in a package can synthesize a module reference dynamically,
any static enforcement would have to be approximate, naturally (e.g.,
checks on all
I've pushed your repair - thanks!
I think I found (and fixed) similar problems with `require' and deleted
files.
At Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:48:42 +0200, Tobias Hammer wrote:
Hi,
i think i found a bug in the handling of external dependencies (via
register-external-file) in compiler/cm.
I think more people need to speak up on this question --- particularly
authors of existing packages, since the current proposal necessitates
an update to each existing package.
The proposal is to make single-package collections the default:
* If a directory used as a package has no info.rkt
At Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:14:58 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
I just want to be clear what I need to do to
keep compatibility with 5.3.4 for existing packages. If that means
adding something to info.rkt to say, yeah, I'm still multi, I may do
that.
Yes, that's exactly what will be required for
At Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:44:17 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
I think we have, roughly, two options:
1. Something like the split Matthew's tree proposes. In fact, I think
we need to split some things further, so that `gui-lib` doesn't depend
on scribble-related things.
2. Something much,
those instructions,
of course.
On Jun 15, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:44:17 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
I think we have, roughly, two options:
1. Something like the split Matthew's tree proposes. In fact, I think
we need to split some things
At Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:56:52 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
* The error message when you look for a missing collection is really
long if you have a lot of packages installed
Yes. I have been thinking about whether there's a better solution than
just not showing the paths, but I can just drop
At Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:33:30 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
On Jun 15, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Can you say more about what is needed in addition to
https://github.com/mflatt/racket/blob/pkg/INSTALL.txt
?
We can continue to simplify the process and refine
Here's the latest (in a pkg2 branch):
https://github.com/mflatt/racket/tree/pkg2
Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
I'd like to feel more confident that enough of us are ready before
merging it to the main Racket repository.
So, vote in favor of the
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
1. Try the branch:
git clone https://github.com/mflatt/racket.git
Sorry --- that should be
git clone git://github.com/mflatt/racket.git
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:16:09 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:13:09 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I ran 'make', after rebasing, and eventually got this error:
pkg: missing dependencies
for package: pkgs/gui-pkgs/gui-lib
missing packages:
gui-x86_64-macosx
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:56:14 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
I'd like to feel more confident that enough of us are ready before
merging it to the main Racket repository
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:23:56 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On 2013-06-18 10:47:01 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Because this change will break all sorts of things in the short run,
I'd like to feel more confident
At Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:40:27 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
I tried it. It works, but DrRacket doesn't find the macro stepper tool.
The racket/lib/info-cache.rktd has an entry for the right location, but
it also has another (lib macro-debugger) entry. Is this caused by
having multiple modules
It sounds like we're ready, so I plan to push the change at 10:00am
Utah time (which is noon in Boston and midnight in Taiwan).
_
Racket Developers list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
At Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:54:00 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Four hours ago, mfl...@racket-lang.org wrote:
D collects/2htdp/image.rkt
D collects/algol60/info.rkt
D collects/browser/info.rkt
D collects/compiler/embed-unit.rkt
D collects/compiler/find-exe.rkt
D
At Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:58:04 -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
Yesterday, Eli Barzilay wrote:
[...] some script that finds the recent rename of all files and make
sure that it produces an expected result.
Suspicious undetected renames (excluding info files, git files, etc):
At Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:31:00 -0600, Neil Toronto wrote:
Should I do the same kind of thing with math/tests and plot/tests?
In general, should everything have a separate tests package?
It probably depends on the package/project. A project with separate
-lib and -doc packages seems more likely
I've pushed repairs.
At Sat, 22 Jun 2013 05:23:01 -0400, Carl Eastlund wrote:
I get the following error when I try to run tests/racket/quiet.rktl:
Section(basic)
Section(unicode)
Section(rx)
Section(reading)
Section(readtable)
Section(printing)
Section(macro)
Section(syntax)
I've restored `path-relative-string/setup'.
My intent was to replace it with the function that is currently called
`path-relative-string/setup/pkg', but I think there was some
dependency issue, or maybe I was worried about new dependencies. I'll
take another look at it.
At Fri, 21 Jun 2013
501 - 600 of 917 matches
Mail list logo
