I have completed buying a new home, moving into it, and selling the old
one, followed by Christmas in England and recovery from the cold I
caught there. That means I'm ready to get much more active in River.
Last year, we got some feedback suggesting that better support for new
users might rem
May 2, 2013.
COMMUNITY
In June, Patricia Shanahan returned from emeritus to active status as a
committer and PMC member. She was appointed as the River PMC Chair at
the June board meeting.
A new user has brought to the attention of the PMC some issues in the
"Getting Started" web page
Technology Starter Kit originally
donated by Sun Microsystems.
ISSUES FOR THE BOARD
There are no board-level issues at this time
RELEASES
Apache River 2.2.2 was released on November 18, 2013
Apache River 2.2.1 was released on May 2, 2013.
COMMUNITY
Patricia Shanahan has returned from emeritus to
to cache
using timed, weak or soft references with any java collection
implementation.
Peter.
On 28/07/2014 8:28 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Several programs in qa_refactor import classes from
au.net.zeus.collection. For example,
com/sun/jini/start/AggregatePolicyProvider.ja
Several programs in qa_refactor import classes from
au.net.zeus.collection. For example,
com/sun/jini/start/AggregatePolicyProvider.java contains:
import au.net.zeus.collection.RC;
import au.net.zeus.collection.Ref;
import au.net.zeus.collection.Referrer;
Does this represent a jar I need to co
I've forgotten the recipe for building River :-(
I would like to use Eclipse.
Patricia
On 7/6/2014 8:11 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 7/6/2014 7:10 PM, Peter wrote:
I could use some help with qa-refactor,:) esp checking new code in
org.apache.river, making sure new public api makes
On 7/6/2014 7:10 PM, Peter wrote:
I could use some help with qa-refactor,:) esp checking new code in
org.apache.river, making sure new public api makes sense. Some might
need delaying till a later release (such as new stream based
registrar interfaces).
I'll get started on that.
I've been wo
I'm now in a position to return to active development. What sub-project
most needs some extra programming effort? What version should I check
out, compile etc.?
Patricia
Thanks - I think.
Patricia
On 6/18/2014 8:08 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
It would appear that the resolution was accepted by the board, so I’d like to
take this opportunity to congratulate Patricia and wish her the best of luck in
her new role as PMC Char, Apache River.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk.
Embarrassingly, after I dropped out of the River PMC, I forgot my Apache
LDAP password. Does anyone know how to get it reset? I may have the same
problem for SVN, but once I have LDAP access I'll have PMC Chair powers
Thanks,
Patricia
On 5/22/2014 5:08 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
...
You could say I took some time out, to do something easy, at least
compared to the hair pulling concurrency bugs and race conditions I've
been focused on.
...
When you are ready to return to the concurrency bugs and race
conditions, send me info
Remember that you also need to reinstate me as a committer and PMC
member, to make me eligible. I don't know if that requires a separate
vote, or is implied by the PMC Chair vote.
On 5/19/2014 10:31 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
I had originally intended to start a vote thread on private@, but it see
ByteBuffer is a subclass of Buffer, whose documentation says, under
"Thread Safety", "Buffers are not safe for use by multiple concurrent
threads. If a buffer is to be used by more than one thread then access
to the buffer should be controlled by appropriate synchronization."
Is access control
Back when the issue of picking a chair first came up, I said I would
take a turn if needed. Of course, I've since dropped out and am no
longer eligible. My main reason for dropping out was that I felt there
was insufficient user community input and support for a viable project.
In particular, I
I don't think it is just a matter of latency. When I last looked closely
at TaskManager, it appeared to me that it kept each task in the runAfter
checking list until the task returned from its run method. That way, a
dependent task was prevented from running until completion of the task
on whic
Just before Christmas, you were discussing whether to fix concurrency
problems based on theoretical analysis, or to only fix those problems
for which there is experimental evidence.
I believe the PMC will be at cross-purposes until you resolve that
issue, and strongly advise discussing and vot
I'll try. I really think there are three strategies that should be
considered separately:
1. Fix concurrency bugs in River code, even if the bug can only be
identified in theory, without causing any known external symptoms.
2. Externalize some or all of any facilities that are added to implement
I have not seen any evidence of lack of understanding. I believe there
is a genuine lack of consensus on how to deal with some of these
ordering issues.
In particular, to what extent should River live with code that will
almost always work?
The damage from export-from-constructor with final fiel
On 12/20/2013 1:25 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
...
And "serious flaw" - really? How might you judge that as the case? Have we
got a serious service-startup problem? Jini 2.x doesn't seem to have such
an issue even with the "serious flaw" you claim? Perhaps this "serious
flaw" has come into being beca
On 12/19/2013 10:47 PM, Peter wrote:
- Original message -
On 12/19/2013 12:16 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
And, using, for example, the strategy you describe of constructing
another object, code can be perfectly valid without using Startable. I
see value in offering the interface, and a rul
On 12/19/2013 6:18 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
...
I guess that’s one of my frustrations with all this “refactoring” of
the existing codebase - if it doesn’t make it easier for people to
use Jini/River to create their own service-oriented architectures,
then it just seems like a lot of navel-gazing.
On 12/19/2013 12:16 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
+0. Let me explain…
Having a separate interface to say start() is all very well and harmless in
itself, but:
(a) It doesn’t really address the issue of how service instances
should be started. We don’t actually have solid recommendations on this
is
I think from this point of view an immutable object is just an extreme
case of an object with final fields, for which the final field export
issue is the only thread safety issue.
In thinking about all this, we must not assume that the way we do things
is the only way. I base my own multi-threade
As far as I can tell, the special properties of completing a constructor
in the JLS memory model are:
1. A happens-before edge from the end of the constructor to the start of
a finalizer. (17.4.5)
2. The guarantee that any thread that only sees a reference to an object
after the end of the c
We might be able to get some benefit more portably by writing a Java
program that spawns a specified number of threads, all of which
continuously increment the same AtomicLong. That will cause both CPU
load and, with multiple processor chips, bus activity. Run it, along
with River tests, specif
I don't think you need to assume increased JVM optimization to explain
the phenomenon. It is typical of what happens when increasing thread
safety in a system that has been subject to testing, but not full thread
safety design and code review.
Testing, and fixing test failures, tends to eliminate
On 12/17/2013 7:42 AM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
...
As I’ve discussed here before, one of the most destructive
activities
that has happened in the JDK, has been the “enforcement” of “volatile”
vs “non-volatile” correctness in the activities of the JIT. The standing
example, is this:
class foo imp
On 5/27/2013 4:45 PM, Peter wrote:
...
For example the last test failure on arm was caused by it. I couldn't
reproduce it on other architectures, but arm had a high frequency of
failure.
...
Could this be related to ARM's relaxed memory model which reorders some
memory accesses?
Patricia
On 4/27/2013 4:19 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
...
But we are starting to encroach into territory where angels fear to
tread, requiring genius reasoning powers. For 99% of cases I'd like to
stick to simple rules that avoid reasoning about consequences of data
races. This will make it easier for d
013 5:55 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'll read the paper. However, C and C++ tend to have nastier semantics
for data races than Java, which lacks anything quite as drastic as the C
definition of "undefined behavior".
My reasoning for the relative safety of this particular race is
in to carpet bombing; fix every concurrency problem
and that appears to have paid off.
It's very difficult to determine if toString() may be called on
ThreadPool threads. I reasoned it could be and that was sufficient
justification to not use setName().
Cheers,
Peter.
On 27/04/2013 1:20
I've looked at the source code. The field "name" that is shared between
threads doing getName or setName on a given Thread is a reference.
Writes and reads of references are always atomic.
The worst that could happen is that the change to the name does not
propagate to all threads that might d
On 4/11/2013 4:15 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
...
I know some would prefer me to prove something is broken before fixing
it, providing tests that prove the failure, but this isn't an enterprise
project and I lack the resources for such things, there's always the
option of running a 2.2 maintenance
On 4/8/2013 6:52 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
...
Therefore I spent some time in analyzing the 4 tasks
(ServiceDiscoveryManager and JoinManager) that didn't return 'false',
but I concluded it wouldn't be easy to rewrite those, it requires an
intimate knowledge of these implementations and I didn't wan
On 4/8/2013 6:11 AM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
On 4/7/2013 7:03 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
I'm honestly and truly not passing judgement on the quality of the
code. I honestly don't know if it's good or bad. I have to confess
that, given that Jini was written as a top-level project at Sun,
sponsored by B
On 4/7/2013 5:03 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
...
I'm honestly and truly not passing judgement on the quality of the
code. I honestly don't know if it's good or bad. I have to confess
that, given that Jini was written as a top-level project at Sun,
sponsored by Bill Joy, when Sun was at the top of it
On 4/7/2013 1:04 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
On 7 April 2013 05:24, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 4/6/2013 7:26 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
...
Once we have a stable set of regression tests, then OK, we could
think about improving performance or using Maven repositories as the
codebase server
On 4/6/2013 7:26 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
...
Once we have a stable set of regression tests, then OK, we could
think about improving performance or using Maven repositories as the
codebase server.
...
I think there is something else you need before it would be a good idea
to release any changes
On 4/6/2013 2:04 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
On 6 April 2013 04:43, Dennis Reedy wrote:
On Apr 5, 2013, at 956PM, Peter wrote:
We can't afford to hold up 2.3.0 much longer, the 2.2.0 release has
numerous synchronization bugs, these will become more apparent on multicore
hardware. The longer w
rote:
I'm with you. My first step was going to be reviewing where runAfter is
used, how often etc. I'd first like to be convinced that all the ordering
constraints are actually required and can't be circumvented/dropped.
On 3 April 2013 22:01, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I agree
I agree with the idea of understanding the use cases before designing
the solution, and with using standard API classes as much as possible.
The table I sent you was intended as a first step towards that.
I'm not convinced that the right solution is a single TaskManager
successor. Different Ta
runAfter is a method in the TaskManager.Task interface, implemented by
each of its tasks:
/**
* Return true if this task must be run after at least one task
* in the given task list with an index less than size (size may be
* less then tasks.size()). Using List.get will be more efficient
* than
;s notes in html so we don't lose the table
formatting, hopefully it will be accepted by the mailer.
On 2/04/2013 1:38 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I've sent Peter some notes that I hope he can make available - I
don't think I can send attachments to the list.
Rereading my notes ha
M, Dan Creswell wrote:
It's certainly still being used in Outrigger for notifies and Mahalo for
transaction settling amongst other things so yep, any notes you've got
would be worthwhile.
Ta,
Dan.
On 1 April 2013 18:01, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Are you still using River's TaskMana
Are you still using River's TaskManager? When I was looking at its
performance I noticed some things that seemed dubious to me from the
point of view of concurrency. I may still have some notes that would be
useful for a concurrency bug hunt.
Patricia
On 4/1/2013 4:51 AM, Bryan Thompson wrote
I agree with Gregs's reasoning here. Using a domain name one controls
for package naming is an important Java convention.
Patricia
On 3/11/2013 6:39 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
I'm confused - wasn't that domain transferred to the Apache Software
Foundation? And if so, shouldn't the foundation be
On 2/26/2013 3:05 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
...
Final of course meaning nothing other than "value won't change" - a
compile/language level guarantee.
It doesn't interact in any meaningful way with the JVM concurrency
mechanics. i.e. it doesn't have any relationship to a synchronization
action (or
I hope you don't mind me throwing in some random comments on this. I
think there are two types of testing that need to be distinguished,
system and unit.
A system test looks that the external behavior of the whole system, so
what it is testing changes only when the API changes, and tests shoul
+1
Patricia
On 1/26/2012 1:30 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
+1
On 25 January 2012 22:51, Peter wrote:
+1 Peter.
- Original message -
+1
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
On 1/18/2012 7:28 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 18-01-12 12:02, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Do you mean to say that we will stay on jdk5 when a user says no?
Personally, I would vote "+
In any case, I suggest posting the proposal to the user list and getting
reactions before voting.
Patricia
On 1/18/2012 1:50 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Probably a vote.
Sorry for not mentioning this before, I'm snowed under...again.
I remember last time this came up we elected to keep support for
On 1/3/2012 3:18 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 31-12-11 14:33, Peter wrote:
Any thoughts or experience replacing java classes using the
-Xbootclasspath option?
This means creating a new java.net.SocketPermission, completely
replacing it and SocketPermissionCollection in the jvm libraries.
M
When I was looking at TaskManager, I had some concerns with how it was
being used, especially in connection with RetryTask.
Tasks get asked whether they need to wait for another task that in the
TaskManager queue. A RetryTask that has timed out and is waiting to
reschedule itself is completed
Did you see the message on the users group about a new River user trying
to get started?
Patricia
On 8/16/2011 1:52 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
What are the challenges writing secure java policy files?
1. Determining a set of minimal permissions that code requires to
execute, not only for lo
art a new round, release the lock, and go back to
sleep.
Patricia
On 8/11/2011 3:58 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
I like this approach, it sounds elegant.
Cheers,
Peter.
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I've thought of a significant simplification, based on the idea that I
only need samples of the task
r the manager to consider, though I may also want a way
to further limit the number of messages. However, that can be done more
simply, and with better information, inside code controlled by the lock.
Patricia
On 8/9/2011 12:36 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'm investigating extended ThreadPoolE
On 8/9/2011 1:44 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 15:36, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
3. Use a dedicated thread that sleeps until it is time to reconsider the
number of tasks, processes the queue of log messages, does any
adjustment, and then goes back to sleep. This is the most
I'm investigating extended ThreadPoolExecutor to get an Executor that
bases the number of threads on the mean number of tasks over an
interval. If successful, that would flatten out sudden peaks in the task
load, using the queue as a buffer, but would make the number of threads
match a sustaine
On 7/31/2011 1:43 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
...
* TaskManager - improve concurrency and remove the dependency on
Task.runAfter() in River code.
...
I'm playing with implementing a subclass of ThreadPoolExecutor that
modifies the number of threads based on the mean number of tasks over
some r
I've read the document, and am thinking about its implications.
I am not a trademark enforcer. I have no training as a trademark
enforcer, and no interest in learning to be one. I did not understand
that joining the PMC meant becoming a trademark enforcer.
Patricia
On 7/19/2011 1:28 PM, Tom
On 7/7/2011 2:26 PM, Mike Sobolewski wrote:
I'm curious about why the load factor option is desirable. Suppose
you have 30 tasks waiting, and you have could afford 30 threads for
the function, then why not allow 30 threads? The load factor has
the effect of limiting the throughput even when you
Generally, tasks in the same TaskManager instance were all created by
the same object, and their class is, or could be, an inner class in that
object, and therefore they *could* talk to each through methods in that
object.
I'm not sure the current runAfter mechanism is right for all the uses to
w
f not implementation) but allow users to swap in their own
task execution implementations that may or may not throttle in some way.
Just a thought.
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
On 1 Jul 2011 21:29, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote:
On 7
On 7/1/2011 1:14 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
...
If the system throughput is not meeting my needs, I'll apply admission
controls, or "add hardware" to manage the issue. Anything else done by
river only serves as a "limit" that can be very frustrating to debug and
deal with.
I would like to make a
I've seen some discussion of using a separate JVM for security. Does it
also provide a solution to the problem of JVM migration in a
continuously operating River-based system?
Suppose the objective is to migrate from 1.5 to 1.6.
The first step would be to get each client and server into a stat
ries and having a top
level release, and then produce 2.2.1 ASAP to clean up the loose ends.
Patricia
On 6/30/2011 6:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The build is clean if the classes are removed. At least one QA test
fails. That is why I suggested as an alternative fix removing the two
classes an
On 6/30/2011 11:38 PM, Dan Creswell wrote:
On 1 July 2011 03:22, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
On 6/30/2011 9:02 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
...
loadLevel permits specification of a ratio between threads and tasks, so
that threads are only created up to e.g. one third of the number of
tasks. I&#
I'm having trouble squaring this with the description of
ThreadPoolExecutor. If I'm reading it right, it *can* be initialized to
set a low limit on the maximum number of threads, but can equally well
be set to have up to Integer.MAX_VALUE threads, effectively unlimited.
There are two forms of Tas
In what sense does the qa suite require jdk1.6?
With the modification to change NameServiceImpl back to the 1.5
NameService interface, I just did a successful JDK1.5 "ant all.build".
Patricia
On 6/30/2011 12:25 AM, Peter wrote:
The qa suite needs to be considered separately from the main bui
ends.
Patricia
On 6/30/2011 6:54 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The build is clean if the classes are removed. At least one QA test
fails. That is why I suggested as an alternative fix removing the two
classes and skipping the failing test.
Patricia
On 6/30/2011 6:32 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
0 Jun 2011 14:12, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote:
On 6/30/2011 1:42 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 30-06-11 10:12, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Actually, lets have a proper vote thread.
Release the artifacts 2.2.0 which can be found in
http://river.apache.org/~thobbs/river?
+1 Peter Firmstone
+1 Tom H
On 6/30/2011 1:42 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 30-06-11 10:12, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Actually, lets have a proper vote thread.
Release the artifacts 2.2.0 which can be found in
http://river.apache.org/~thobbs/river?
+1 Peter Firmstone
+1 Tom Hobbs
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on t
ge -
I'm signing off for the night. Sill one failure.
Patricia
On 6/29/2011 8:56 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I got a QA test failure,
com/sun/jini/test/impl/reggie/MultihomedClientTest.td. The failure is
due to the missing
com.sun.jini.test.impl.reggie.NameServiceDescriptorImpl cla
I'm signing off for the night. Sill one failure.
Patricia
On 6/29/2011 8:56 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I got a QA test failure,
com/sun/jini/test/impl/reggie/MultihomedClientTest.td. The failure is
due to the missing
com.sun.jini.test.impl.reggie.NameServiceDescriptorImpl class.
something! Fingers cross on the QA
tests. I'm just about to sign off now, but please check the deletions
into the trunk if/when you're happy with them and I'll create some new
RCs.
If only all fixes were as simple.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I&#
been around since the original Sun contribution, and the
log entries since then seem to be about the various reorganizations, so
I still don't know the purpose.
If this reminds anyone of any clues as to the purpose, please comment.
Patricia
On 6/29/2011 1:56 PM, Patricia Shanahan wr
I've done a clean build with the classes in question deleted. It got a
"BUILD SUCCESSFUL". I'll start the QA tests that way, but I suggest
making that change. (I'm not checking in anything to the trunk right
now, to avoid risk of tripping up your efforts).
Patricia
On 6/29/2011 1:07 PM, Tom H
I think the problem may go deeper. sun.net.spi.nameservice.NameService
is a sun.net interface that can change from version to version. Is it
essential that we have our own implementation?
Patricia
On 6/28/2011 12:18 AM, Peter wrote:
Oops, I fixed that but didn't commit, sorry Not near my de
machines in my house!
Cheers,
Tom
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
On 28 Jun 2011 04:42, "Patricia Shanahan" wrote:
I downloaded the source, and tried a naive build on Windows XP, Cygwin.
I put a JDK 1.5 bin directory at the
I downloaded the source, and tried a naive build on Windows XP, Cygwin.
I put a JDK 1.5 bin directory at the start of my path, and ran "ant
all.build". It failed with the following errors:
compile:
[javac] Compiling 1993 source files to C:\Documents and
Settings\Administrator\My
Documents
On 6/26/2011 3:18 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
I think the way to look at this is to examine the non-trivial runAfter
implementations. If they have common elements that can be helped by some
utility classes, write those classes. If not, deal with each
individually.
We are now committed to 1.5, s
On 6/26/2011 1:58 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 6/26/2011 1:23 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
There's an interesting thread of discussion in the Porter mail archive
that Mark has uploaded for us (see River-311), relating to the
TaskManager.
Here's a very i
On 6/26/2011 1:23 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
There's an interesting thread of discussion in the Porter mail archive
that Mark has uploaded for us (see River-311), relating to the TaskManager.
Here's a very interesting comment from Bob Scheifler:
Over the years we've been slowly eliminating use
On 6/19/2011 9:21 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
...
We even have a link with title "starterkit-examples.jini.org (link
dead)". Unless someone can supply a working version of the link, I'm
going to delete the complete sentence.
The examples are now includ
I'm working on the "Apache River Release Getting Started & More" page,
src-doc/static/info-index.html
I has several broken links. Some are easy to deal with - for example,
replacing incubator links with river.apache.org links.
How do you think we should handle references to jini.org and jini.
ine, but it's always good to get others to check.
having said that, you might want to hold off some because Peter is going to
add some more things in and then I'll have to cut a new release.
Grammar and spelling have been sacrificed on the altar of messaging via
mobile device.
O
The early days of UNIX definitely suffered from developers acting as
though they had to pay for every character they typed. See command names
such as "ls" and "rm".
It may have been a reflection of use of paper-based terminals, such as
thermal printers, or of slow communication speeds. At 110 bau
I'm available to work on River again. Is there something I can do to
contribute to getting the release out, given zero experience with Apache
release process?
Patricia
It would have been helpful if the Apache web site had said *why* the
preferred names are preferred.
The command line user argument seems implausible to me.
I am a frequent command line user, but I would like "ls *.txt" to show
any license and similar files. I find it hard to imagine being both a
Yes, it can be marked as fixed. I'm not satisfied with the state of
stress testing, but that should really be a separate issue.
Patricia
On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:40, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Can you give me a quick yes/no on if your Jira issue is fixed? It's
"RIVER-391 -Outrigger failure under stress"
Did people see that we are on the list of projects that need to clean up
incubator dist areas?
I'm afraid I won't be able to work on River this week. One of my former
adviser's students is finishing writing a paper based on my research,
and I need to spend all my computer science time this wee
On 6/2/2011 6:11 AM, James Grahn wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Peter Firmstone
wrote:
Are you suggesting type safety is NOT a necessary language feature
in distributed code?
Not at all.
One of the big questions in O-O language design is the extent and timing
of type checking. At
On 6/1/2011 6:19 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
The argument for generics in remote interfaces is to reduce boilerplate
code, the argument against is, it introduces unchecked type casts. (See
earlier discussion)
Is there another way to reduce the boilerplate code, using annotations
perhaps?
...
Co
On 6/1/2011 10:31 AM, James Grahn wrote:
...
I am now wondering: is the Gigaspaces code available? Under what
license? And is anyone there interested in contributing?
...
My understanding is that GigaSpaces is a commercial product, although a
limited version is available for free use. See
On 5/21/2011 4:21 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
...
4. Have all committers add their signatures to the Keys file.
...
Do I need to get into the Apache web of trust? If so, any suggestions
for how to do it? I live in San Diego, but will be in London for a
couple of weeks later in the year.
Patr
Attachments don't come through the mailing list. Could you upload it
somewhere, and post the link?
Patricia
On 5/22/2011 11:35 AM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
...
I've attached the report, does anyone have any idea what I'm supposed
to do with them?
...
On 5/19/2011 6:29 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 5/19/2011 3:31 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Is this a vote to have a vote on a release? ;-)
I interpreted it as a vote on a release, specifically "Release River from
current trunk&
On 5/19/2011 3:31 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Is this a vote to have a vote on a release? ;-)
I interpreted it as a vote on a release, specifically "Release River
from current trunk".
Patricia
On 5/19/2011 12:29 PM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
...
Thoughts anyone?
...
I have a question. Should I start studying gradle at this time? There
are arguments both ways:
Pro: After learning about it, I might be able to contribute to
discussions of how to set up to use it.
Con: I have other stuff I
On 5/19/2011 12:32 PM, Tom Hobbs wrote:
Me again. I've decided to start a vote (you can always vote against!)
that we should do a release. I think that there's enough good stuff
already in the code base that our users aren't seeing specifically
because we've not released it.
I can't, off hand,
201 - 300 of 356 matches
Mail list logo
