me:
module userid fullnametypeowner
Mail::SpamAssassin DOS Daryl C. W. O'Shea co-maint
JMASON
Mail::SpamAssassin FELICITYTheo Van Dinter co-maint
JMASON
Mail::SpamAssassin JMASON Justin Masonmodulelist JMASON
Mail::SpamAssassin
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:03 PM, bugzilla-dae...@issues.apache.org wrote:
The way I viewed it is if the committer is still consider active, the sandbox
is off-limits without asking them first.
However, perhaps this is time to consider moving some committers to non-active
status.
Hey folks!
Typically you'd post the messages (user/paths) in question on dev, or
mail the people directly, and they can either get you copies of the
mails or otherwise try to help debug a little (if the mails are
sensitive, etc.)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, John Hardinjhar...@impsec.org wrote:
Justin
fwiw, the decision to drop support for older perls isn't really about
those folks don't get support for their OS or it's old so let's
drop it. In the let's drop 5.0 support and require 5.6 decision
process, it was about we are having a hard time supporting the 5.0
series with numerous regexp
fwiw, the process used to be:
- beta releases to get things stabilized
- use a beta release to do mass-check runs
- generate scores with mass-check data and submit to svn
- rc releases to get wider testing w/ scores
- release after rc appear to work
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Quanah
Plugins can't directly add headers to the message rewrite process.
However, the plugin can create a tag which you can setup to be added
w/ add_header.
ie:
$permsgstatus-{tag_data}-{FOO} = foo;
then
add_header all Foo _FOO_
will add X-Spam-Foo to all mails.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM,
I had forgotten about some mirrored file bits, but then discovered
them again the other day, and even found some new things this morning,
so fyi here ... :)
If sa-update has not been run for a given channel before, it looks up
mirrors.[channel] in DNS
I'd have to go look at the mail archives, assuming we discussed it
in email and not just irc ... but I seem to recall it had to do with
mails coming in w/ the same message-id and sa-learn seeing them as the
same message, thereby bypassing our ability to learn tokens. Since we
already generated
fwiw, I'm pretty +1 on the idea. I was a bit skeptical of these rules at the
start (concerns about the automated nature more than anything else), but
things seem to be going pretty well.
I'd like to see several people w/ large corpus publish their own similar
channels. The build it and they
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:35:20PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I updated the updatesd cert, but not the release cert, so things still
weren't
running correctly. Third time's the charm?
If it works, can you send a mail about where you updated it (or if
you're ambitious document it
I haven't touched the zones stuff in a while. sigh
I updated the updatesd cert, but not the release cert, so things still weren't
running correctly. Third time's the charm?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
I wonder if they'd use a cow as a heat shield for a space rocket... Make it
kind of like
Apparently attempt #1 didn't take. :(
I kicked it again, so hopefully ... tomorrow, woot.
Looks like a problem with the rsync area, found rev 724102 but expected rev
722809
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 06:26:52PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
The nightly runs weren't properly getting setup, so
The nightly runs weren't properly getting setup, so I went and updated the svn
certificate on updatesd. It ought to be functional tomorrow. :)
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 05:20:07AM -0500, Cron Daemon wrote:
Looks like a problem with the rsync area, found rev 723957 but expected rev
721652
--
. :(
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:06:35PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
This week I noticed that my usual run took around 23h to complete, which
is much (2x?) longer than usual. Poking around, it seems that my second
machine starts running through it's message queue and then stops at some
point, leaving
.
Fixed, I think, in r721962... :)
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 05:22:21PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
Now I need to go through and find out why the server has so many errors
accessing a non-changing corpus. :(
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
1) Your kid mistakenly gets sent to the principal's office
Just in case there's a question about where my results went...
This week I noticed that my usual run took around 23h to complete, which
is much (2x?) longer than usual. Poking around, it seems that my second
machine starts running through it's message queue and then stops at some
point, leaving
I started seeing these the other day:
status: starting scan stage now: 2008-09-22
05:12:36
Out of memory!
mass-check: no messages to process
It could just be that I need to allocate more memory to mass-check now, but
the 256M limit that I've given it has run fine
I got tired of this stuff, so I removed the fallbacksmarthost option in
sendmail.cf and restarted sendmail. Hopefully it'll stop mailing constantly
now:
- Transcript of session follows -
550 5.1.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Host unknown (Name server:
mailhost.zones.apache.org: host not found)
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:02:13PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
ns1.kluge.net isn't serving an up-to-date zone for spamassassin.org
ns.hyperreal.org.
681717
ns1.kluge.net.
668092
Hrm.
Aug 4 15:11:13 eclectic named[9975]: zone spamassassin.org/IN: Transfer
started.
Aug 4 15:11:13 eclectic
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:54:04PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
I'm guessing that started failing around the time I upgraded to bind 9.5.0.
I'll look into it when I get some time.
Aha:
Aug 4 19:28:28 eclectic named[9975]: dumping master file:
slave/tmp-mVQ0HgIztJ: open: permission denied
+1 looks good here. ran tests, built rpm, installed and ran a bunch of mails
through. :)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:50:00AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
- bug 5775: newer gpg versions require keys to be cross-certified (backsig).
Did a cross-verify on our sa-update public key and re-exported
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 05:35:03PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
theo:
. 1 /home/corpus/SpamAssassin/corpus/ham/personal/2008/03/05/71efdf24c3
sigh misfiled spam. removed.
. 2 /home/corpus/SpamAssassin/corpus/ham/hamtrap/2008/01/29/286160f9fd
Valid, I'll send you a copy via other channel.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:15:43AM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
I'm guessing that a bunch of people need to install the newly required
NetAddr::IP.
Yeah, of the two mass-check machines I have, only one had it installed
already.
Whenever we make a required module change, we should alert the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:22:02PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
+1, agreed on all points there. That really is the problem with
Apachecon for us.
I'm +1 at this point too. At least before I could goto httpd talks
and have it be work related, but (relative) $newjob isn't dealing with
websites or
[updates]
comment = SpamAssassin updates (updates.spamassassin.org)
path = /var/www/buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage
read only = true
$ ls /var/www/buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage
/var/www/buildbot.spamassassin.org/updatestage: No such file or directory
It's related to:
lrwxrwxrwx
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:47:11AM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
Are the rulesrc/sandbox/* directories shared across SVN branches?
Yes.
Having added my sandbox under spamassassin-trunk, it is now
also seen under a spamassassin-3.2 branch. Which is fine,
as my rules (e.g. in 20_rpvalid.cf) are
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:28:28AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
yep, a spam; a phish, specifically, coming via:
[...]
Received hdrs look like that's a botnet-infected machine.
Ditto.
* -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
* medium trust
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:38:50PM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
We've noticed that SpamAssassin still uses the rather inefficient V1 BDB
databases for Bayes via DB_File. Is there any move to re-work this to use
the more efficient V4 database types, or is all BDB support essentially
We should also finally get around to doing 3.1.10.
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:36:52AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
ok, I'll do that today or tomorrow, depending on holiday workload ;)
On Jan 1, 2008 9:20 AM, Sidney Markowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It look like we are now all ready to defer
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:20:58PM -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392851
Is this already solved in the upcoming 3.2.4?
Unless it was reported to us, I don't think it would have been looked at.
It sounds like if the local state dir had to be created, and
Wow. This has sat around for ages! :(
It doesn't look like anything got committed to fix these issues, but we should
get that done and get 3.1.10 out. Sidney, do you still have the code you were
working on for this? I didn't see any open bugs w/ milestone of 3.1.10, and
3.1.11 only has a
Yeah, it looks like it got dealt with in the last day or so. :)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:36:15PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
this is now fixed, right?
Theo Van Dinter writes:
My nightly/weekly runs have been failing because of mismatched versions
(*-versions.txt says version X
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:37:02PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Really? Wouldn't the rsync code have been updated the same time apart
from the version file being updated as before?
It depends. :)
There are different cronjobs to update the versions and the rsync area, so
there's a race
My nightly/weekly runs have been failing because of mismatched versions
(*-versions.txt says version X, but the rsync code is version Y). I thought
it may be related to the clocks, so I went to check and found this:
my machine:
$ TZ=GMT date
Sun Dec 9 18:30:08 GMT 2007
zone machine:
$ date
Sun
Hey folks,
A few weeks ago, I noticed my nightly runs were not finishing in a timely
manner. I didn't have time to debug the issue before going on vacation,
so I shut them off while I was gone. Now that I'm back I took a look
at it, and it appears the problem is that both bayes and awl are
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:08:39PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Unfortunately the only offer has been a non-committer -- and I'd
prefer to keep it committer-only due to confidentiality. Anyone?
Yeah, I still have the machine I offered a while ago available. :)
I can add a new run after my
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:29:24AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
I don't think the intent was to allow the_world, merely the_committers.
If the idea is to help people doing the weekly/net runs, then it's not
the_committers, it's anyone_who_does_the_weekly/net_runs.
And that list is an open-ended
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:16:21PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the
chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as
Spamhaus.
Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once a week
.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Windows 98 -- Go for the bloat! - Theo Van Dinter
pgphoUiIV2HbK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
status: starting scan stage now: 2007-08-25
05:12:15
status: completed scan stage, 202620 messagesnow: 2007-08-25
05:13:06
status: starting run stage now: 2007-08-25
05:13:06
status: server ready for connections
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:33:04AM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
I wanted to revisit unloadplugin. Its been awhile since I messed with the
config code but I think we load plugins right away on loadplugin. What
if during .pre parsing we didn't load right away, but waited until all
the .pre
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 06:09:34PM +0200, Nicolas Fertig wrote:
Is there a way to access RAW email (Full email with all headers and mime
content) from a plugin in the method check_end ?
Sure.
sub check_end {
my ($self, $params, $fulltext) = @_;
# the $fulltext does not exists in this
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 08:56:24PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
I think so.. Sydney made a call for Theo to make a new release candidate
a week ago (8/11), but nothing happened.
Yeah, I got the mails, just been so busy I haven't been able to do anything
with them. We should do a 3.1.10 if it's
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 02:30:11AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
First, I'm wondering if there is an easy way that already exists to re-run
spamassassin on all the mails in an mbox format file?
Sure, spamassassin --mbox. :)
But for rule testing, you'll want to use mass-check/hit-frequencies,
fyi.
- Forwarded message -
[Using '-90 days' for --after setting]
status: starting scan stage now: 2007-08-03
05:12:28
print() on closed filehandle CACHE at
/home/corpus/SA/spamassassin-corpora/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/AICache.pm
line 162.
Can't
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
as far as I know, if they're rules in the rulesrc tree, it's
C-T-R; but rules in the rules dir are still R-T-C.
I'd be happy to loosen this up, though.
I'm fine with that too. The rules dir (imo) is essentially a snapshot of the
I was going to go through the AICache patches and make some comments, but I
haven't had a chance yet. However, here's a definite comment: it's broken in
my environment.
I run mass-checks as both felicity and corpus. corpus only has write
access to the cache file, and read-only access to the
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:11:28PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
you could use --cachedir?
Sure, if I wanted to spend time re-rigging my entire corpus/mass-check
setup/migrating cache information/etc.
I'd be ok with reverting that part of the change back to what it was
before, but note that it's
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 07:08:32PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I would vote +1 if it's the last version we *test* with 5.6.1 as a
requirement for release. But I would prefer nothing actively be done to
stop working w/5.6.1. Is there some major feature or anything that is
causing the
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:41:38PM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.10 is now available! This is a maintenance and
security release of the 3.1.x branch.
Is the reference to security release a copy and paste error?
Hrm. Yes indeedy. It'll be just maintenance in the
Hi --
3.1.10 tarballs are available for testing:
http://people.apache.org/~felicity/3110/
By the way: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for
a release, but we encourage everyone to download, test, and report
any issues!
my vote: +1.
BTW: my proposed release announcement is as
Please tell me that I'm not seeing new full rules... ;)
/me thinks we need to have a new plugin rule type. Perhaps like:
rawmatch PDF_1 eval:rawmatch('^application/',
'\AJVBERi0xLjMgCjEgMCBvYmoKPDwKPj4KZW5kb2JqCj')
and then rawmatch() would simply find_parts(qr/$1/i,1) and return
Hrm. So where do updates go in the 3.2 branch? In 3.1 it's a very
(imo) obviously named 80_additional.cf ... 72_active.cf ?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:42:52PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: felicity
Date: Tue Jul 10 12:55:50 2007
New Revision: 555062
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:24:02AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
no ahas here unfortunately :( -- is this in your own local freqs,
or the freqs on the server (with everyone else's logs too)?
This is from hit-frequencies off of my net-theo weekly logs.
It's very reproducable too:
, and apparently only for weekly runs, and apparently only for this
rule (pcregrep '([A-Z0-9_]+),\1(,|$)', shows only this rule duplicating)?
sigh
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:02:12PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:24:02AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
no ahas here unfortunately
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:40:51AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
A month's worth of requests (~535k) right now is ~15G, which breaks
down to ~18000 requests/day and ~6KB/sec.
Do you really mean 18K requests / day? That seems like a lot.
Yeah, that's the current count. I actually expected
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:26:43AM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Target Milestone|3.2.2 |3.2.3
Are we in a hurry to get 3.2.2 out?
As I mentioned in bug 5510, I want to put an end to the problems
installing via CPAN really soon since there's been a lot of noise
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:36:24AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
So I'm thinking we should get some more mirrors for the channel setup to
distribute the load. Coral sucked, so let's not use them. I also don't want
to add in the zones machine since we already use a large amount of resources
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 12:27:44AM +0200, arni wrote:
I've looked into sa's SPF plugin but to me (i'm not a perl person) it
looks like it doesnt even see the raw record which would allow
modification but leaves it all up to a Mail::SPF object.
Any suggestions on how i could archieve this?
Hey folks,
I was having a chat with duncf about sa-update via irc this weekend, and it
got me to thinking ... Right now, my machine is the only one serving up the
updates channel. I originally did this so that I could see all of the
downloads in the logs, and thereby generate statistics about
Hi,
It sounds like you'd want to talk to the Amavis folks since you're using their
tools to call SA. We can't help you with that.
Also, for general SA questions, please use the users@ list. dev@ is meant for
discussions about SA development and not support. fyi.
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:35:25AM -0700, hubby2debbie wrote:
the etc/spamassassin/Plugin/ directory, and enabled the TextCat plugin in
the user_prefs file. I've also added a directive stating what languages I
You can't enable plugins in a user_prefs file. You need to enable them in a
*.pre
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:34:30PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
There's another issue, too -- now SVN uses $HOME instead of the home
field from getpwuid() when looking for the user's auth info. This
means that 'sudo -u automc svn up' no longer works :(
sudo -H -u ... :)
--
Randomly
Hrm. So apparently on spamassassin.zones.apache.org::
$ which svn
/opt/subversion-1.1.4/bin/svn
but
$ svn --version
svn, version 1.4.3 (r23084)
compiled Feb 25 2007, 04:34:40
[...]
which is interesting because:
$ svnversion --version
svnversion, version 1.1.4 (r13838)
compiled May 2
fyi:
Use of uninitialized value in bitwise and () at
/home/corpus/SA/spamassassin-corpora/masses/../lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/ImageInfo.pm
line 100, $tmpfile line 1.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Awkward moment?!? I'll give you an awkward moment: One time during
sex I called Lois Frank.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:17:32PM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Looks like less of an error perhaps and maybe just an invalid graphic? In
the get_details hash procedure, it looks like unpacking the header and
sometimes return a $packed that isn't initialized.
Does this fail every time
This is a new one on me... JM, I assume this is related to the score
generation changes?
Can't use string (0) as a HASH ref while strict refs in use at
/home/corpus/SA/spamassassin-corpora/masses/../build/parse-rules-for-masses
line 161.
parse-rules-for-masses failed! at
/branches/3.1/Changes
-
---
-Randomly Selected Tagline:
-You will soon learn the secrets of butterflies.
- Their stark, unrelenting malice will drive you gibberingly insane.
- (from The Onion's weekly horoscope for Gemini)
-
-From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 14 15:38:18 2007
-From: Theo Van
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.8 is now available! This is a maintenance and
security release of the 3.1.x branch. It is highly recommended that
people upgrade to this version.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200702131100
The release file will also
Hi --
3.1.8 tarballs are available for testing:
http://people.apache.org/~felicity/318/
by the way: per ASF policies, only PMC member votes are binding for a release,
but we encourage everyone to download, test, and report any issues!
my vote: +1.
BTW: my proposed release announcement is as
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last year that we could use again.
Anything else that
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:53:40PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
Any chance we can turn off the nagios notifications? Or at least turn
them down in frequency?
How about fixing the issues? ;) I haven't had time to figure out what it's
monitoring for, so I haven't prodded the box to figure out
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:25:37AM -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
Is it possible to modify sa-update to output a meaningful error message
if it fails due to missing dependencies?
(A different non-zero return code would be nice too.)
ie: instead of the standard perl can't load module X error,
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 07:31:41PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
actually, it may have been a mistake on my part... let's see how
it goes now. ;)
Did you forget to send input to STDIN? ;)
Does anyone have a well-connected machine with
[...]
Anyway, yes, I still have systems available we could
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:57:15AM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
Plus the list of contributors thus far is surprisingly short! Maybe in
general we should just send out another announcement and get other folks
who have requested rsync access a chance to respond.
I'm not surprised. It's
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 03:14:07PM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
Are we going to need to do another rescoring masscheck for 3.2.0?
We should only have to do a single run unless we're going to change code
that would have an effect on the outcome. I'm tempted to check in the
URL deobfuscation
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:45:55AM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
With this release will you be running the scoring analysis before it
goes out?
No, 3.1.8 has no new scores. That'd be a separate process anyway, going out
through the update channel.
If so, is the utility provided self
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:42:31AM -0800, mofturos wrote:
should be ok if i just put this test in the local.cf ?
First, I'd send this type of question to the users list since it's not a
development-related question.
Second, yes, your local site configs go in /etc/mail/spamassassin, typically
in
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:14:08AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
This test (below) looks to me to be designed to catch all spam .gif
through .gif? If so I would say the false positives are going to be
pretty high even without running it through a corpus. Certainly it has a
high
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 01:28:18AM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
All are Chapters/Indigo order acknowledgment/confirmation/shipping
emails. It looks like it's generated by the horrid MS AspMail 3.0
(which is also triggering MISSING_MIMEOLE).
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:06:22 GMT
Date:
I cleaned out a few bugs from the 3.1.8 queue, and put up some patches for the
simple ones that didn't have them.
Please vote on them so we can get them committed and get 3.1.8 out the door.
I'd really like to get it released this week.
Thanks! :)
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Sen. Strom
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:30:09AM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
I didn't know it was possible to use MySQL for the
scoregen runs. I would have used it instead. I also should have used a
smaller corpus.
Yeah, you can do whatever you want for the scoregen run, as long as it doesn't
change the
DoS and Zmi: Can you check on these messages? If they're ham, can you send me
the Date header(s)?
ham-dos.log:.
/home/dos/Maildir/._Inbox_2007/cur/1169531451.M60074P23070V0302I001C062A_47.cyan.dostech.net,S=4293:2,S
ham-dos.log:.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:32:43PM +0100, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Why do the instructions have bayes auto learning and AWL turned off?
I guess because mass-check logs must be based on an absolute basis: two
copies of the very same e-mail checked at beginning and at end of the list
I'm mostly just venting, but I have 2 machines trying to do the
scoregen run, so I need to share the Bayes DB, and chose SQL. In total
across those machines, I'm currently only seeing ~25 msgs/min or 0.5
messages/sec. So for my ~215k messages, that's 430k seconds, or 5 days
of processing. Set 1
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:21:20PM -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
MySQL isn't hitting swap perhaps? That's the only way I've seen it go
that slow (with spamd) and I've done zero tuning of MySQL.
Nope, no swap usage on the machine.
Is the load on the machine running the DB actually high,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:29:02AM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
I read through the masses README's and it looked to me like one account
was all that was needed. But, of course, I could be mistaken.
In the past there's been 2, though most people wouldn't know the difference.
Generally if people
Had to do a svn cleanup . rulesrc on ~release/versions/cvshead, then accept
the cert during update. fyi.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:27:53AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your cron job on spamassassin.zones.apache.org
$HOME/versions/cvshead/build/nightlymc/corpora_runs
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:37:23AM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
I get an error trying to update the trunk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sadev]$ svn up
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/ .
Skipped 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk'
svn: REPORT request failed on
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:14:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the list appropriate for a discussion on how to use
Mail::SpamAssassin in a perl application?
It's more of a users@ question IMO, but...
my $st = new Mail::SpamAssassin()
$st-init(1);
I found something like
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:19:46PM -0500, Fred Tarasevicius wrote:
Y 6 /spamassassin/masses/corpus.ham/HAM.2007.mbox.258825
I'm guessing that .258825 in the string above is the starting byte
position inside the mbox?
Yes, mbx and mbox file specifications are path.byteoffset. Everything
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:00:07PM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
Can you put it somewhere where we all could get it? Say check it into
svn under your rules space? I also use mbox format and am always needing
to find some ham mixed in with the spam.
Sure. For now I put it in contrib
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:26:22PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
doesn't masses/mboxget do that?
I mentioned that to folks, but they still requested my script, so I threw it
in. In hindsight, I could just have put up an URL to get it from my machine.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
But you have to
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:45:10PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
OK, that didn't go too well. *Still* not enough votes...
I've pushed out a not-a-prerelease announcement, instead, since we need
to get going on that to avoid having to push out the release schedule
before we've even completed
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:46:57PM -0600, Doc Schneider wrote:
I just noticed something the pre1 tarball release has no masses
directory. Ugh. Sort of hard to masscheck without that isn't it?
There is one in svn, though.
Yes and no. There's nothing that says we have to provide a tarball to
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:16:51PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
Razor/DCC/Pyzor are all use rules. So there is no need to install those
for a mass-check, unless you have lots of msgs that were not checked
initially. We should only be using the historical data for these rules
anyway, so
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:56:15PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
ok. so something like this?
- T + 0 days: issue prerelease. announce a heads-up mail. clean up our
corpora, get ready for mass-checking, try out mass-check to spot any
big memory leaks or whatnot, fix remaining bugs
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:49:36AM -0800, Karl Chen wrote:
Hi all, I believe SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE can be improved. The rule
currently is:
Ok.
header SUBJECT_ENCODED_TWICE Subject:raw =~
/=\?\S+\?[BQ]\?.*=\?\S+\?[BQ]\?/i
As I understand it, this rule is intended to match subject lines
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:42:44PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
First step, I think, is to define a schedule. How does this sound?
(based approximately on what we did for 3.1.0:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Release310Schedule )
- T + 0 days: announce a heads-up mail. clean up our
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 03:33:54PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ - Compress::Zlib (from CPAN)
+
+If you wish to use the optional zlib compression for communication
+between spamc and spamd (the -z option to spamc), useful for
+long-distance use of spamc over the internet, you
1 - 100 of 590 matches
Mail list logo
