Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1667
Closing this since SupervisorV2 was merged
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1605#discussion_r79570505
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpoutRetryExponentialBackoff.java
---
@@ -144,7 +145,12 @@ public String
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1605#discussion_r79571602
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -330,11 +328,9 @@ public void ack(Object messageId) {
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1605#discussion_r79572783
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpoutRetryService.java
---
@@ -29,14 +29,18 @@
*/
public
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79576762
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -479,16 +487,17 @@ public OffsetAndMetadata
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79575563
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -277,7 +277,10 @@ private void emit() {
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79574175
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -266,26 +266,32 @@ private void
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79575910
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -451,11 +454,11 @@ public int
Github user hmcl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79576337
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -479,16 +482,17 @@ public OffsetAndMetadata
Github user srdo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79669257
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -266,26 +266,32 @@ private void
Github user srdo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1667
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jfenc91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79659246
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -266,26 +266,32 @@ private void
Github user jfenc91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79662312
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -479,16 +487,17 @@ public OffsetAndMetadata
Github user jfenc91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679#discussion_r79657089
--- Diff:
external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/KafkaSpout.java
---
@@ -451,11 +454,11 @@ public int
Github user jfenc91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679
Thats fine @srdo . Thanks again for the reviews. I also created STORM-2106
to keep track of the consequences of this change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
GitHub user revans2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1697
STORM-2018: Supervisor V2
Still need to do some more manual testing but the unit tests passed for me.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1697#discussion_r79723534
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -1067,8 +1067,8 @@
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-compiler-plugin
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1337
@dossett
ES2 doesn't shade their Guava dependency? I guess ES1 is doing that.
I'm not sure we're OK to upgrade Guava version only for this, but there's
another PR which gets rid of Guava
Now might be a time to consider making version-sensitive modules ((kafk, ES)
maven multi-modules.
I've never really liked "storm-Kafka" and "storm-kafka-client" as
differentiators of Kafka 0.9..X and 0.10.x. I'd tend toward something like:
storm-Kafka/
/0.9.x
/0.10.x
I would think the
Thanks everyone. Could one or more committers +1 the PR that would support
both versions?
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1337
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:52 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Agree with Bobby, +1 for supporting both versions till EOL and findout how
>
I like the idea, especially if it can be implemented as generically as
possible. Ideally we could "dead letter" both the original tuple and the
tuple that itself failed. Intervening transformations could have changed
the original tuple. I realize that's adds a lot of complexity to your idea
and
+1 on arranging module names on storm-kafka and storm-kafka-client (with
versions).
Actually there's another trick behind storm-kafka-client.
storm-kafka-client 1.0.x supports Kafka 0.9.x and storm-kafka-client 1.1.0
(SNAPSHOT) supports Kafka 0.10.x, which can make a confusion. There was
also a
Github user harshach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1691#discussion_r79754113
--- Diff: integration-test/src/test/resources/storm-conf/storm.yaml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+
+storm.zookeeper.servers:
+- "node1"
+
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1690
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user satishd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1690
Thanks @HeartSaVioR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user harshach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1691#discussion_r79754021
--- Diff:
integration-test/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/st/topology/window/TumblingTimeCorrectness.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
GitHub user abellina opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1695
STORM-2101: fixes npe in compute-executors in nimbus
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/abellina/storm
GitHub user abellina opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1694
STORM-2101: fixes npe in compute-executors in nimbus
We observed compute-executors can throw NPE while shutting down a topology
sporadically.
joinMaps (join-maps) will NPE if one of the
GitHub user srdo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1696
STORM-2104: More graceful handling of acked/failed tuples after partiâ¦
â¦tion reassignment in new Kafka spout
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2104
In order to test
Github user srdo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1679
@jfenc91 I borrowed a few classes from this PR for another change to the
spout here https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1696. I hope you don't mind :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
30 matches
Mail list logo