Hello to all Tomcat project members,
since we unfortunately had to withdraw version 1.2.24 shortly after
release, there is now a new, fixed version 1.2.25 available. We already
made it available for testing for some days as a svn snapshot. There has
only been feedback from 2 people, both
You are missing nothing. Feel free to scratch :)
Regards,
Rainer
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 2, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
And in fact it doesn't matter. I found it more logical, to have
JK_STATUS_ERROR and JK_STATUS_FATAL_ERROR closer together (for those
reading the code
That would be nice (and just in time, because it's likely we'll have a
JK release tomorrow, which refers to the TC 6 bugzilla URL for new bug
reports).
Maybe we should also add Comet?
Regards,
Rainer
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, you
Looks good, thanks!
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 8/9/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, you are right. We certainly can drop some of them. Maybe the
following list is better?
Catalina
Cluster
Connectors
Documentation
Jasper
Yes, I would test and vote this time.
Concerning the timing: we could allow some pending changes for a week or
so, before proceeding to tag.
Filip, thanks for RM :)
Rainer
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 8/10/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there enough interest to
We received five stable votes (Mladen, Jim, Peter, Günter and me) and no
other votes.
I'm now starting to publish the release.
Thanks for supporting this release.
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
Rainer
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
ok, I will schedule the 5.5.25 tag next Friday, 1pm (13.00) Mountain
Time (GMT-7).
Filip
Rainer Jung wrote:
Yes, I would test and vote this time.
Concerning the timing: we could allow some pending changes for a week
or so, before proceeding to tag.
Filip
Looks like an active weekend then ;)
I think that will suffice.
Regards,
Rainer
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
sounds good, lets shoot for Tue or Wed next week then
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
OK, great. Weekend is no problem, but having a few days between
committing and tagging is even better.
Rainer
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Looks like an active weekend then ;)
I'm sorry, I just reread friday. Friday next week is totally fine. No
one should have to work
Hi Henri,
so now i5/OS should use send_bodyct like the other platforms. What I
don't understand is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -375,7 +369,7 @@
static void JK_METHOD ws_flush(jk_ws_service_t *s)
{
-#ifndef AS400
+#if ! (defined(AS400) !defined(AS400_UTF8))
if (s s-ws_private) {
Henri Gomez wrote:
The define told us that we shouldn't use flush on AS400 V5R2 and previous.
On V5R4 (UTF8 mode), we could use it.
This code (no flush) is pretty old and was provided by i5/OS IBM Labs,
so better stick with it. On V5R3 and previous release, we didn't see
the send_bodyct was
My trusted information sources concerning i5/OS (yes, such exist :) )
tell me, that it's quite common out there to not support R3 any more.
On the other hand: if we really get enough benefit from dropping support
during 1.2 now and not for the next major version, is unclear to me.
This mainly
A note shouldn't hurt. Did there is a date for 1.2.25 release ?
It's released. So a note would be part of future releases, and of course
we can add important stuff to the web site docs in between. Since 1.2.25
had been released only 2 weeks ago, I think we don't plan a regular
release in the
No problem, better safe than sorry.
In fact there are a couple of memcmp in the same file (decoding http
method), that are OK, because we already know that the string length is
OK. For the headers the parsing strategy is slightly different and there
is now prevention for matching longer
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
No problem, better safe than sorry.
Right. It seems I always forget the ingenuity of the users
that wish to extent the http spec :)
However, I think that we can still use the memcmp
with xxx\0. That would still be faster then figuring out the EOL
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But the header could be shorter than the constant string. So there was
a second problem with the old code, we eventually compared potentially
uninitialized memory to string constants. Strictly speaking the result
was not defined.
Sorry, but you get
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Yes Mladen, I know. But we never really use len :) I know, that we can
do it with memcmp, but then you, me or someone else has to add a
couple of if(len=...) before each memcmp(). Go ahead if you like to.
Look, we have a local header[16] on which we
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 30, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
+/* Always do memcmp including the final \0-termination character.
+ */
switch (header[0]) {
case 'A':
-if (memcmp(p, CCEPT, 5) == 0) {
+if (memcmp(p, CCEPT
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.25/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 5.5.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Tested with two apps under Java 5. Also took a
Looks good w.r.t. the contents in those dirs.
Mladen should also comment though.
Regards,
Rainer
Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
Following on from my previous over eager attempt to clean up the
duplicate code in connectors I would like to propose the following
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/CHANGES
-
Hi Mladen,
I'm fine with rolling back and committing in steps.
Will do later today. Usually I do it like that (see jk_map comits
yesterday), but it got a little late yesterday :(
This was motivated by BZ43229. We partially lost track of the many
return codes of the service() methods of all
Hello Daniel,
Daniel Schwartz wrote:
Hello Mark,
Thanks for the quick reply.
When I try to execute apache-tomcat-5.5.17.exe on WinXP or Win 2003 Server,
I get
the message:
NSIS Error:
The installer you are trying to use is corrupted or incomplete.
This could be the result of a
me that error message (on two different
machines). It just seems like that particular file has some kind of
problem.
I don't understand
Maybe a proxy between you and archive.apache.org has a bad file in its
cache?
How would I deal with this?
--Dan Schwartz
Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Henri,
1.2.25 is still pretty young :)
There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of:
- BZ 43287 (already fixed)
- BZ 43229 (still needs to be fixed, should be fixed in next release)
Version 1.2.25 is now 1 month old. So a reasonable target release date
would be in about 10 weeks?
Henri Gomez wrote:
2007/9/11, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Henri,
1.2.25 is still pretty young :)
Yes
There are 2 new bugs for 1.2.25 that I'm aware of:
- BZ 43287 (already fixed)
- BZ 43229 (still needs to be fixed, should be fixed in next release)
Version 1.2.25 is now 1 month old
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
as well as the problems which started this whole
thing.
[ ] 0. Whatever.
[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
Hi Filip,
I guess that also fixes the misleading html manager display (request
times going up and up). That would be very nice.
Just a quick shot:
- maybe you can fix Procssing - Processing everywhere
- will this change the behaviour of the requestProcessingTime as one can
retrieve from
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Filip,
I guess that also fixes the misleading html manager display (request
times going up and up). That would be very nice.
Just a quick shot:
- maybe you can fix Procssing - Processing everywhere
not sure what you mean?
Simply
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
my suggestion, open a BZ item, attach the patch there, and have the
STATUS file refer to that item
I would agree with Filip, that the patches should not be inlined in the
STATUS file. The file is for status, so should be good for an overview
(which patches are
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
As far as I know, the accumulated request processing times retrieved
via the MBeans for Servlets or the GlobalRequestProcessor are correct.
I simply don't want to break them.
I had a quick look, and our confusion might come from the fact, that
RequestInfo
Hi,
since the main project agreed on trying a new policy for commits against
stable branches, I think we should clarify our policy concerning the
native parts of Tomcat connectors (JK and tcnative).
Both have only one active branch, which at the moment is the stable
branch as well as the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+* Fix explicit flush before response commit in the org.apache.jk AJP connector.
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=580815
+
+ +1: remm
I admit, that I don't have a better solution, but nevertheless a
question: In case the flush comes to early, i.e.
Mark Thomas wrote:
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_14
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk
RTC on tc6.0.x/trunk
RTC on
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
So my question is: is there a reliable way to detect, if it would be
safer to just drop a flush request?
I think flush should still send a flush packet. One scenario would be
(in the servlet): write 10 bytes and flush (in this case, the response
has
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:28 -0400, Tim Funk wrote:
There was a request in bugzilla to pass in a new env variable called
JAVA_EXE (or similar).
Could that be an acceptable alternative? Then it would make the bug
submitter happy since he can
Hi Peter,
did you read pages from inside the download files, or only follow the
link on the automatically generated download page?
The latter link points to the public Tomcat docs, so always will show
the latest released docs.
Inside the downloads, the changelog looks OK (apart from the missing
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
be careful:
OK :)
I also added an option JkMountCopyAll,
OK, but clone is called when there is no JkMountCopy All defined
if (sconf sconf-was_initialized == JK_TRUE jk_mount_copy_all ==
JK_FALSE) {
clone_jk_config
So
Please see my comment in BZ 42003.
Most of the changes should not be necessary, because JK and Tomcat in
recent releases have a config parameter, so only the iis patch is left.
It would be nice, if you could test the combination of your iis patch
with the config params.
Regards,
Rainer
Dan
Hi Larry,
your analysis is correct, but the results nevertheless a little obscure.
Yes, mod_jk has no internal timing of management threads. We will move
mod_jk to the APR libraries when starting JK3, but at the moment we rely
completely on the web server plugin API. Apache has no timing API, so
Mladen Turk schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Nov 11 11:22:23 2007
New Revision: 593943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593943view=rev
Log:
Undo revision 593927.
This produced a mem leak for vhosts with private JkMounts.
No idea why.
Because uw_map is
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:29:26 2007
New Revision: 596747
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596747view=rev
Log:
Add comments to explain timestamp formatting for sub seconds resolution.
Furthermore increased the accepted format length a
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for
the log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the
line number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like
wrong
Hi Konstantin,
On 07.11.2011 02:46, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Nov 7 10:46:14 2011
New Revision: 1198696
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1198696view=rev
Log:
Introduce new request attribute to be used to mark request if there was a
failure during
Hi Mladen,
On 08.11.2011 03:15, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Nov 8 11:15:38 2011
New Revision: 1199192
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1199192view=rev
Log:
Guard data shm data access with lock. We can have sync problems when multiple
processes try to update the
On 10.11.2011 13:46, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2492
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build:
On 10.11.2011 14:52, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/11/11 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
On 10.11.2011 13:46, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
On 10.11.2011 15:08, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/11/11rj...@apache.org:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Nov 10 21:46:32 2011
New Revision: 1200582
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1200582view=rev
Log:
Add proposal.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
+* Fix setting of some standard
I get crashes when testing APR/TCnative 1.1.22 on trunk and on TC 7.
APR version was 1.4.5.
Does anybody else see this? The failures seem intermittent and I would
expect they are *not* always happening in the same tests.
A) trunk
Failing test: org.apache.catalina.core.TestAsyncContextImpl
On 23.11.2011 08:14, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/11/23 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
I have done a little bit of digging on this as the current 7.0.x trunk
fails frequently enough on my windows box that I can repeat the failure
often enough.
I have got as far as discovering that the
On 23.11.2011 22:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/11/2011 09:52, Chatree Srichart wrote:
Hi community.
I got a problem when I start my own embedded Tomcat server with a lot of
JAR files in classpath.
Really in classpath used by the system loader? Or do you simply mean
using many JAR files (in
On 28.11.2011 12:30, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.35/
According to the release process, the 6.0.35 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_35 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
- MD5 OK
-
On 09.12.2011 22:37, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/12/8 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
Since 7.0.23 was rather later than the expected 1 Nov 2011 date
originally planned, I intend to aim for 7.0.24 early in the New Year. If
anything pressing comes along before then (the Realm issue is easily
On 19.12.2011 22:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
(for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
coming weekend ;)
All: If we can get some
On 20.12.2011 15:25, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Dec 20 14:25:24 2011
New Revision: 1221276
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221276view=rev
Log:
* Make configuration issue for RemoteAddrValve, RemoteHostValve result
in the failure of the valve rather than just a
No luck downloading: all files except for the *.asc are 403. They have
permission 700 on people.apache.org.
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 07.01.2012 10:10, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/01/2012 03:57, Bill Barker wrote:
Gump Run 1107012012, vmgump.apache.org:vmgump:1107012012
Gump E-mail Identifier (unique within run) #27.
--
Apache Gump
http://gump.apache.org/ [Instance: vmgump]
This is odd.
Here is an extract from the
The signature files for all bin tarballs are missing. Can you please add
them?
src and zip/exe are OK.
Thanks!
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Now finally my vote :)
On 06.01.2012 21:19, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.35 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.35 build corresponding to the
tag
On 10.01.2012 05:27, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/1/10 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
2012/1/9 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
2012/1/7 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
Maybe enable the accesslog during testing with test.accesslog=true, so one
can check after the
I analyzed a fun problem a few weeks ago. Someone was using the shared
loader extensively (TC 5.5). They observed performance problems and
thread dumps showed, that often the class loader locking was the culprit.
Code was inside loadClass(). Now it turned out, it wasn't about really
loading
On 10.01.2012 11:57, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/1/10 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
On 10.01.2012 05:27, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/1/10 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
2012/1/9 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
2012/1/7 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
Hi Chris,
On 10.01.2012 22:03, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 1/10/12 5:43 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Now loadClass() in the WebappClasLoader does:
- check own class cache
- check super class cache
- try loading from system loader
- call Class.forName with parent loader (which calls
On 11.01.2012 02:14, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 1/10/12 5:37 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
It would matter if they take the reedom to return something new if
loadClass() is called for a class that was already loaded - and
something changed for the CL. For example a custom CL could check
On 10.01.2012 16:28, Rainer Jung wrote:
The below observation seems to be fixed now, after Mark's enhancements
to Realms and the unit tests.
Regards,
Rainer
One observation, unrelated to the failure we were discussion above: if I
dump all MBeans out of curiousity in the middle
On 15.01.2012 10:44, Brian Burch wrote:
When using netbeans as an ide, it will always create a subdirectory
called nbproject inside the project root directory. That means svn
status will show this local directory as ? (not under version control).
There are no circumstances where someone should
On 16.01.2012 00:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_24/
The proposed 7.0.24
On 16.01.2012 00:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_24/
The proposed 7.0.24
On 11.01.2012 03:16, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/1/10 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
Note that when looking for a class most time is wasted when looking up
a *.class resource. That code is in findResourceInternal() and I
think that that method should be considered as well, to speed up
On 16.01.2012 16:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/01/2012 13:19, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 16.01.2012 00:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.24 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.24/
The svn tag is:
http
On 17.01.2012 02:15, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/1/17 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
On 16/01/2012 19:04, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
On 16 janv. 2012, at 10:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
1) Unit test failure due to missing target directory in src dist
On 17.01.2012 09:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
In that case, I agree with your plan below and will do that shortly.
Sorry Mark, didn't see your response earlier, I hope there was no energy
wasted by doing duplicate work.
Regards,
Rainer
On 17.01.2012 11:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.25/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-082/
The
On 17.01.2012 11:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.25 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.25/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-082/
The
On 24.01.2012 22:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have made some further headway with this and the latest patch is on
people.a.o [1].
Looks nice, especially I like that the integration into the existing
code base isn't very complex. Good work!
Thanks also for all the additional explanations.
On 03.02.2012 13:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/02/2012 12:19, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/3ma...@apache.org:
+@Override
+public String getMBeanKeyProperties() {
+Container c = this;
+StringBuilder keyProperties = new StringBuilder();
+int containerCount = 0;
On 03.02.2012 13:44, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/3 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
On 03/02/2012 12:19, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/3ma...@apache.org:
+@Override
+public String getMBeanKeyProperties() {
+Container c = this;
+StringBuilder keyProperties = new
Hi Mark,
On 08.02.2012 14:26, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:26:26 2012
New Revision: 1241891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241891view=rev
Log:
Restore method required for JSR 77.
Modified:
Hi Mark,
On 08.02.2012 14:26, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Feb 8 13:26:26 2012
New Revision: 1241891
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241891view=rev
Log:
Restore method required for JSR 77.
Modified:
On 13.02.2012 22:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
There are 15 or so custom rule classes in the Tomcat sources for
handling various commons-digester events.
I've only taken a brief glance at their content, but I'm wondering if we
can't replace these classes with an XML-based configuration
On 17.02.2012 17:06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/17/2012 8:55 AM, Francis Galiegue wrote:
While AccessLogValve is the subject...
Any chance we can do away with the default, unparseable timestamp
format? With Apache, it is allowed to specify the timestamp using
strftime(3)-like format,
On 17.02.2012 21:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.26 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.26/
The Maven staging repo is:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c ) included
?
Mladen is aiming for 1.1.23, so he will be releasing from the 1.1.x branch.
Regards,
Rainer
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
On
On 21.02.2012 21:56, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
included
?
AFAIR 1.1.x is CTR. So you just add it and try
Looking at the server status on www.apache.org running 2.3.15 one can
see, that about 50% of the async connections are in closing state.
We created AsyncRequestWorkerFactor to control the amount of
overcommitment in terms of connections relative to idle workers we allow
for each process. The
Sorry, wrong list.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 25.02.2012 14:51, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2012-02-25, Bill Barker wrote:
Yes, the version of HTTPD that Gump builds mod_jk against is
trunk. Similarly for the version of APR and APR-UTIL. So what the
errors are telling the Tomcat community is that there will need to be
changes to mod_jk
On 24.02.2012 20:33, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/24/2012 07:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I have made available soon to be 1.1.23 release at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293352/
Please use:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293383/
Inside binaries there is now win32-bin.zip
Hi Mladen,
On 24.02.2012 20:33, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/24/2012 07:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I have made available soon to be 1.1.23 release at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293352/
Please use:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293383/
The xdocs folder and the jni
On 24.02.2012 13:09, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Feb 24 12:09:43 2012
New Revision: 1293202
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293202view=rev
Log:
Simpplify release script. Get url from svn info
Modified:
tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/jnirelease.sh
Modified:
On 03.03.2012 18:47, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/03/2012 03:41 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Mar 3 14:41:12 2012
New Revision: 1296630
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1296630view=rev
Log:
BZ 52793: Fix default value of forwarded worker
activation state.
Think we've
On 02.03.2012 17:21, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Mar 2 16:21:18 2012
New Revision: 1296284
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1296284view=rev
Log:
Use simpler tomcat-native distribution which comes with 1.1.23+
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/build.properties.default
On 06.03.2012 18:40, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Converted html files (no mater which tool used)
just look ugly. I see no point of having trash-like content
distributed, so can we just axe those conversion?
The content is already present in src as generated html file(s)
so converting them to .txt
Hi Konstantin,
On 06.03.2012 23:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/3/6mt...@apache.org:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 6 16:54:34 2012
New Revision: 1297571
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297571view=rev
Log:
Add support for lynx html to txt converter
Modified:
On 07.03.2012 13:12, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Mar 7 12:12:13 2012
New Revision: 1297948
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297948view=rev
Log:
/bin/ksh? Whats ksh? Use something each system should have.
Bah, what's bash?
Rainer
On 07.03.2012 21:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/07/2012 08:55 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 07.03.2012 13:12, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Mar 7 12:12:13 2012
New Revision: 1297948
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297948view=rev
Log:
/bin/ksh? Whats ksh? Use something each
Talking about scripts: we hace --force in the buildconf.sh. AFAIR I
threw it out from buildconf in APR and httpd, because --force will
overwrite local config.guess and config.sub by copying in the system
installed (old) ones. If we now want instead to use our local up to date
versions, there's
On 08.03.2012 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/08/2012 09:02 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:02:45 2012
New Revision: 1298288
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1298288view=rev
Log:
Remove --force from libtoolize in buildconf
to prevent overwrite of our
On 08.03.2012 12:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/08/2012 09:21 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 08.03.2012 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/08/2012 09:02 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:02:45 2012
New Revision: 1298288
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1298288view=rev
On 09.03.2012 13:00, Mladen Turk wrote:
Release candidate artefacts [1] based on tag [2] are ready for vote.
The vote will stay open for at least 72 hours.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.33 release candidate is
[+1] Stable, release
[-1] Do not release because of ...
+1 as stable.
The only
On 17.03.2012 21:00, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Mar 17 20:00:54 2012
New Revision: 1301987
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1301987view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ52921
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
1001 - 1100 of 2003 matches
Mail list logo
