;>> 2013/11/16 Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> updated my test suite - works fine
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg
>>>> wrote:
>>>>&
;>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
gt; > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > From: David Blevins
> > >
39 AM, Mark Struberg
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > From: David Blevins
> > > >To: "dev@tome
tthias
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > From: David Blevins
> &g
;
> >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
> >
> >
> >Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> >
> >I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2
M, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >____________
> > > From: David Blevins
> > >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org"
> > >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013,
Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > From: David Blevins
> >To: "dev@tomee.apache.org"
> >Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
> >Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 /
+1
LieGrue,
strub
>
> From: David Blevins
>To: "dev@tomee.apache.org"
>Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 2:47
>Subject: [VOTE] TomEE 1.6.0 / OpenEJB 4.6.0 (staging-120)
>
>
>Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes
+1
I've tested a couple of our apps running on these binaries. I've also
successfully tested the datasource failover functionality (TOMEE-912).
Jim
> David Blevins wrote:
>> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>>
>> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's propos
+1
--
Bjorn Danielsson
Cuspy Code AB
David Blevins wrote:
> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries.
> I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go.
>
> Mave
+1
No regressions found with this final TomEE+ 1.6.0 with our products, tested
on Windowses, Linuxes, AIX & Solarises (Sparc & x64).
Alex
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, David Blevi
+1
Jon
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:47 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're
> good to go.
>
> M
Here is my +1
Only ran a full build locally.
JLouis
2013/11/12 David Blevins
> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0
> binaries. I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're
>
It does work for me. Only compiled on my Mac.
+1
JLouis
2013/11/12 AndyG
> OK, I have a single test failing:
>
> testWithTransaction(org.superbiz.injection.tx.MoviesTest) Time elapsed:
> 0.285 sec <<< ERROR!
> javax.ejb.EJBException: The bean encountered a non-application exception;
> neste
OK, I have a single test failing:
testWithTransaction(org.superbiz.injection.tx.MoviesTest) Time elapsed:
0.285 sec <<< ERROR!
javax.ejb.EJBException: The bean encountered a non-application exception;
nested exception is:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: List.size() expected:<3> bu
+1 On windows 32bit and 64bit (with corresponding JVMs)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-TomEE-1-6-0-OpenEJB-4-6-0-staging-120-tp4666097p4666103.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> +1
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2013/11/12 Thiago Veronezi :
> > +1... It w
+1
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/12 Thiago Veronezi :
> +1... It works like a charm!
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jeff
+1... It works like a charm!
[]s,
Thiago.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
> +1 ;-)
>
> Jeff
>
> On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins
> wrote:
>
> > Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
> >
> > I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's
+1 ;-)
Jeff
On Nov 11, 2013, at 6:47 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
>
> I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries.
> I ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go.
>
>
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I
ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go.
Maven Repo:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachet
Ok! All dependent projects are up for votes or completed voting.
I rolled a new set of binaries with Mark's proposed OpenJPA 2.3.0 binaries. I
ran these through the TCK and all is green. Looks like we're good to go.
Maven Repo:
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheto
23 matches
Mail list logo
