Re: [DISCUSS] uima sdk release - some changes to the src distribution?

+1

Adding a multi-modal application to the sandbox

Application skeleton for multi-modal NLP analysis There has been renewed interest in the typesystem and annotators developed as part of the Darpa GALE project to demonstrate how to combine analytics from multiple sources and modalities. The GALE Interoperabilty Demonstration system (IOD) uses

Re: Adding a multi-modal application to the sandbox

Thanks for the open-source suggestions ... will certainly make for a better example. I have just added GaleMultiModalExample to the sandbox ... only the GALE typesystem for now ... more to follow next year. Burn.

Re: UIMA AS Client

Weeird ... I added much the same to runRemoteAsyncAE Iterator it = cas.getTypeSystem().getTypeIterator(); while(it.hasNext()) { System.out.println( Type: + ((Type)it.next()).getName()); } and as well as the uima types got types from my service, e.g.: Type:

Re: Configuration parameters (was Working on a new API to enable creation of UIMA AS deployment descriptors programmatically)

definitiontermoxymoron/termexamplereadable xml/example/definition

Re: CAS Id

How does UIMA-AS currently do the linking of the network-ID to the CAS? Do you use the CAS instance as the key in a hashmap or something like that? When the CollectionReader fills a CAS the UIMA-AS client assigns it an ID generated by java.rmi.server.URI.URI() before sending it to the service

Re: [VOTE] Release uima-build-resources version 3

+1

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA top parent-pom version 3

+1

Re: Configuration parameters (was Working on a new API to enable creation of UIMA AS deployment descriptors programmatically)

I'd like to revive our discussion of August 2011. The basic goal is to improve the existing envVarRef way of parameterizing descriptor configuration parameters which currently allows the values of system properties to be imbedded as part of the value of a parameter, e.g. nameValuePair

Re: I'd like to release the latest uima-build-helper maven plugin

+1 ~Burn

Re: [VOTE] Release uima-build-helper-maven-plugin version 3

+1 ~Burn

Re: [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (UIMA-2378) Support external override setting of configuration parameters

Fixed now (I guess it's not enough to set the compliance level to 1.5) ~Burn

Unexpected default value for UIMA_DATAPATH

I recently created a Jira for what I believe is an inappropriate default setting for UIMA_DATAPATH of user.dir -- the working directory. Since when importing by name the datapath is always searched before the classpath this default setting can unexpectedly prevent the correct file from being

Re: [VOTE] Release build tooling: parent-pom, uima-build-resources, uima-build-helper-maven-plugin

+1 ~Burn

Re: Building

Answered in uima-user thread.

Re: UIMAC++ and ICU

Nice work. I see you have also discovered the need for APR-iconv on Windows. I've just submitted some changes to the build script to fix this but I'm rather back-level on MSVC 8 so they won't tell you anything you don't already know. Thanks, Burn.

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0 RC 7

I found a problem with APR-iconv missing from the Windows build ... needed indirectly by ActiveMQ and hence by deployCppService. I have checked in a fix and a few updates to the documentation. I also dropped all the debug libraries for the dependencies. All my tests worked except the one

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0 RC 7

My problem on Windows with deployment of a service via the -d option on runRemoteAsyncAE appears to be a PATH inheritance problem. Section 3.8 of the UIMA-AS Scaleout doc says: *Components written in C++ can be run as a top level service. These components are launched in a separate process, and

Re: xml files written by eclipse plugin

That was fixed in June with UIMA-2418 (which I see I forgot to close) but is not in a release yet. I used LinkedHashMaps to preserve the order so that users also have some control over initialization order. I added JUnit tests that also verify Marshall's updates to preserve white-space and

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA C++ SDK 2.4.0 RC 8

I found a couple of small problems in the readme's example code (fixed in UIMA-2476) but there are more changes on the UIMA-AS side necessary for the deployment of C++ services as a separate process (UIMA-2474) ~Burn

Re: [VOTE] DUCC contribution to the UIMA sandbox

+1 ~Burn

Re: Failed tests: testLogWrapperCreation(org.apache.uima.util.impl.JSR47Logger_implTest) - Oracle Java 7

The log should also indicate elsewhere if a compile or test failure ... you could look in the uimaj-core/target/surefire-reports to see which test failed. ~Burn

Re: [VOTE] UIMA parent-pom version 6 (try 2)

Built parent-pom uimaj-parent one uimaj project +1 On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: Hi, Link to issues fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20parent-pom-6%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA The artifacts are staged to

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.4.1 rc4

+1 I downloaded the source zip to Windows, verified the md5 signature, built it, installed the build, inspected it and ran the adjustExamplePaths. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: [X] +1 OK to release I downloaded 2.4.1 bin zip - and verified the

Re: Proposal to extend the UimaContext for convenient configuration parameter access

UIMA already checks that the definition of a parameter matches that of its setting, so this would be an analogous check that the use of the parameter in the annotator also matches. It would make for safer cleaner code if the mandatory, multivalued. and type attributes could be checked by these

Re: A proposal for a slight augmentation of aggregate component descriptors

In the GALE project we relied on descriptor editing, removing unwanted delegates and their flow element, but in the Watson project we have many nested aggregates and removing a delegate that has a parameter overridden by its parent aggregate may require many edits. Hence the advantage of a

Re: [jira] [Commented] (UIMA-3312) Add new CLI option to enable or disable console logging

--- Key: UIMA-3312 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3312 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Improvement Components: DUCC Reporter: Burn Lewis Assignee

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.4.2 rc6

Download source on Windows Linux - md5 checksum OK (but had to convert the .md5 file from DOS to Unix lineends on both platforms to make md5sum work) Built on both platforms and installed the binary Performed the Quick Test of aync service on Windows Tested the Linux jars by using them in

Re: [jira] [Created] (UIMA-3430) Memory size units should be consistent - always a number of GB

in letting users specify KB MB. We hope to revisit units after R1 ~Burn On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: Can you expand on why this restriction is preferable to allowing some alternative units? -Marshall On 11/14/2013 8:29 AM, Burn Lewis (JIRA) wrote

Re: Revision 1544714 checked in 11/22 broke the latex build

I did change that file to fix an unbalanced begin/end that you'd found but it was rev 1544712. I ran the build using maven and saw no errors and the alignment of the text was fixed. I have since invoked the explicit pdflatex htlatex commands and found no errors, only warnings. I used version:

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC1

The Jira listing looks fine ... must be a special feature to prevent Marshall from finding multiple problems! On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote: I see all of the issues in the left panel. Not sure why this shows differently for you As far as the

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC1

re uima-ducc-cli.jar This manifest-only jar is a unversioned for the convenience of applications, while its classpath names all the required versioned jars. Also it provides a way to avoid a problem with ant4eclipse where it seems to ignore the manifest classpath in a jar that contains classes,

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC8

Download binary, verified md5sum, followed INSTALL instructions to create a multi-user installation on our small test cluster, verified 1.job worked. Now running more complex set of real jobs (try3). On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: downloaded sources and

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.0.0 RC10

Downloaded binary tarball verified md5sum installed on our small test cluster ran a try3 consisting of 30 jobs APs [X] +1 OK to release On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Lou DeGenaro lou.degen...@gmail.comwrote: Download and unzipped binary tarball Installed on uima-ducc-vm.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC1

Checked source binary signatures Built from source Built DUCC against that build Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA jobs using an http application broker [ ] +1 Approve the release On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote: - Built from source - OK - Spot

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5

Checked source binary signatures Built from source Built DUCC against that build Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application broker [ ] +1 Approve the release On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote: Built from source - OK Spot

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5

Also checked LICENSE NOTICE in binary distribution and after the build from source. [ ] +1 Still approve the release On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Burn Lewis burnle...@gmail.com wrote: Checked source binary signatures Built from source Built DUCC against that build Installed DUCC

Re: [jira] [Created] (UIMA-3967) DUCC SM cannot undo manual modification to default ping parameters.

How about default? On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Jim Challenger (JIRA) dev@uima.apache.org wrote: Jim Challenger created UIMA-3967: Summary: DUCC SM cannot undo manual modification to default ping parameters. Key:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.1 RC1

+ Downloaded source zip verified md5 checksum + Built from source on Windows + Verified md5 checksum on the binary build produced + Started new Eclipse 3.7.2 (Indigo) on Windows + Added the rc1 Ruta update site the public Apache UIMA update site - Selected just the Ruta one ( checked contact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.1 RC1

. But this problem should be solvable. Does anyone remember why the imports have been specified this way? Best, Peter Am 18.09.2014 10:26, schrieb Peter Klügl: Am 17.09.2014 23:31, schrieb Burn Lewis: + Downloaded source zip verified md5 checksum + Built from source on Windows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.1 RC1

-checked the license notice files [X] +1 OK to release ~Burn On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Peter Klügl pklu...@uni-wuerzburg.de wrote: Am 18.09.2014 13:56, schrieb Burn Lewis: Marshall told me 3.4.2 but I should have realized that he's not that old! Ah ok, I thought you meant the version he

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 1.1.0 RC4

with DUCC-Mon using Firefox + spot checked LICENSE NOTICE files + spot checked RELEASE_NOTES README [ ] +1 OK to release Burn Lewis On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: The JIRAs for DUCC in this release are all categorized as bug. I first thought the DUCC team

Re: name and style for new UIMA iterators

With_underscores may be easier to read but all the other methods use camelCase ... which admittedly has the lower-case I / uppercase i confusion. Another alternative is to change the safeness of the index. e.g. myIndex.setSafeIteration(true/false); ~Burn On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:13 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA SDK 2.7.0 - rc2

re the documentation of some of the new flags: 2.4.1.5 in References - typo equlivance 5.6.4 in References says you must addToIndexes after setting the keys, but then goes on to show how to use protectIndices without clearly stating that this is one of three approaches. The block about

UIMA-AS doesn't allow dd2spring to use a custom parser

If an application uses -Duima.framework_impl to insert a custom XML parser that modifies descriptors by, for example, substituting values for some entity references, then the Saxon parser used by dd2spring may fail when reading the unmodified descriptors. So we must also provide a hook to allow

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA Java SDK 2.7.0 rc8

* Checked signatures - OK * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK * Installed the binary distn. and ran an experiment with ~60 UIMA deployments. Using -Duima.report_fs_update_corrupts_index exposed some problems that were fixed by recoding and using the new withSnapshotIterators method. - OK * Built

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA SDK 2.7.0 rc7

* Checked signatures - OK * Checked LICENSE and NOTICE - ? Should the LICENSE file have a copy of the Jackson license - or say that it is licensed under Apache ? * Installed the binary distn. and ran an experiment with ~60 UIMA deployments. Using -Duima.report_fs_update_corrupts_index exposed

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA SDK 2.8.0 rc4

. -- Richard On 07.07.2015, at 15:36, Burn Lewis burnle...@gmail.com wrote: The release notes say no API changes, but the return type of org.apache.uima.jcas.getAllIndexedFS has changed from FSIteratorTOP to FSIteratorFeatureStructure which has produced a compile error in our code

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA SDK 2.8.1 - rc1

Checked signatures on source-release and binary artifacts. Built from source and check signatures Loaded into Eclipse and ran some Junit tests Installed in our cluster and verified that all our code compiles Ran a number of DUCC UIMA jobs using both the binary and source builds Spot checked

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC7

- Downloaded binary and source and checked signatures - Installed binary on a 25-node cluster and ran some jobs - Built from source and installed on a single-user 12-node cluster with a non-privileged ducc_ling and ran some jobs - Imported source into Eclipse and ran some CLI tests - Spot check

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA SDK 2.8.1 rc2

Checked signatures on source-release and binary artifacts. Built from source and checked signatures Loaded into Eclipse and ran some Junit tests Installed in our cluster and verified that all our code compiles Ran a number of DUCC UIMA jobs using both the binary and source builds Spot checked

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC6

- Downloaded binary and source and checked signatures - Installed binary on a 25-node cluster and ran some jobs - Built from source and installed on a single-user 12-node cluster with a non-privileged ducc_ling and ran some jobs - Imported source into Eclipse and ran some CLI tests - Spot check

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC5

- Downloaded binary and source and checked signatures - Installed binary on a 25-node cluster and ran some jobs - Built from source and installed on a single-user 12-node cluster with a non-privileged ducc_ling and ran some jobs - Imported source into Eclipse and ran some CLI tests - Spot check

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC3

FWIW when I build from the RC3 source I get the expected uima-ducc-2.0.0-bin.tar.gz On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, cancelling DUCC RC3 due to a problem found by Lou. -Jerry On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik uim...@gmail.com

Re: {VOTE] Release UIMA SDK 2.8.0 rc5

Checked sha1 md5 signatures on source-release and binary artifacts. Built from source checked those signatures. Installed binary release in DUCC and ran a large test with many UIMA jobs. Repeated with the source build. Spot check licenses notices [X] +1 OK to release On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4

4519 was my mistake ... shouldn't have checked in the code ... and then probably made things worse by changing the fixVersion. I could change the Jira back as I gather it is OK to have code checked-in that's associated with a non 2.0 Jira On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.0 RC4

Jira 4521 describes a regression ... the CLI parser rejects any option value spelled the same as an option. It's a 1-line fix. On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: Duccbook - chapter 20 seems partially not done - after a first bit, it is just showing headers

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.1 RC3

Download binary and updated our test cluster and ran 1.job Based on more extensive testing of RC2 ... +1 OK to release On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Eddie Epstein wrote: > sha1 and md5 signatures ok for binary tarball > > upgraded previous DUCC v2.0.0 test system to

Re: uima ducc installation

to compile class for JSP > > > > PWC6197: An error occurred at line: 24 in the jsp file: > /$banner/$image.jsp > > PWC6199: Generated servlet error: > > The type java.util.Map$Entry cannot be resolved. It is indirectly > > referenced from required .class files > &g

Re: uima ducc installation

Are you starting DUCC from the head node? You could try starting just the broker with "./ducc.py -c broker" and see if any error messages appear on the console. Or try starting a default broker using the AMQ commands directly, e.g. cd apache-uima/apache-activemq; ./bin/activemq start This should

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.0.1 RC2

Tested fine with megas and regular jobs. Typo in documentation that hasn't changed since 2.0 doesn't worry me. +1 OK to release On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Lou DeGenaro wrote: > oops: should be 2.0.1. > > Lou. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Lou DeGenaro

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA SDK 2.8.0 rc4

The release notes say no API changes, but the return type of org.apache.uima.jcas.getAllIndexedFS has changed from FSIteratorTOP to FSIteratorFeatureStructure which has produced a compile error in our code. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Marshall Schor m...@schor.com wrote: thanks, again :-)

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.8.1 RC3

- Checked signatures - Build from source (on Linux) - Checked signatures on that build - Started a broker and ran the quick async test - Ran large AS pipeline with remote services on both binary dist & the build from src - Spot checked readme & license files & notices Found 3 minor Jira's missing

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.8.1 RC6

- Checked signatures - OK - Started a broker and ran the quick async test - OK - Checked the README and list of Jiras - OK - Compared source and jars with RC3 - unchanged - Large pipeline tests on RC3 still hold - OK [X] +1 OK to release On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Marshall Schor

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.1.0 RC3 - migration docs needed?

They're described under Adminstrative Commands in the duccbook ... also mentioned in the ducc_update description. But we should add a reference to updating DUCC in the INSTALL file. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > Hi, > In one of the new files (

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.1.0 RC4

- Extracted binary & checked signatures - Spot-checked licenses and notices and documentation - Installed and tested on a multi-user multi-node system - Extracted source & built binary & checked signatures - Installed and tested that build on a single-user 2-node system [x] +1 OK to release On

Re: Implications of the UimaContextHolder

I have delivered changes that save & restore the UimaContext so it now should always be valid. Let me know if it doesn't fix your type-system problem. Burn On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Burn Lewis <burnle...@gmail.com> wrote: > In UIMA-5043 I added set/clear calls aroun

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.0 RC3

+ downloaded & checked signatures + installed binary on a multi-node cluster and ran a large experiment with jobs, services & APs + also ran a large set of test jobs & services on many simulated nodes (unprivileged) + built from source and checked signatures + ran that build with simulated nodes +

Re: Implications of the UimaContextHolder

In UIMA-5043 I added set/clear calls around all methods that passed control to user code, in primitive AEs & flow controllers. Recently in UIMA-5274 I added a set call in Resource_ImplBase.initialize so that all flavors of produceResource could use settings in parts of their descriptors. I

Re: Binary incompatible changes to framework-only code

Is of UimaContext, which I think is OK). > > -Marshall > > On 2/13/2017 8:17 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: > > Recently in UIMA-5274 I changed the return value of the static method > > UimaContextHolder.setContext(UimaContext uimaContext) from void to > > UimaContext (so it coul

Re: Implications of the UimaContextHolder

Good news - (and I'm glad I don't have to revisit the typesystem caching!) On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <r...@apache.org> wrote: > The changes in r1782182 fix the problem. > > Thanks Burn! > > -- Richard > > > On 08.02.2017, at 15:44, B

Binary incompatible changes to framework-only code

Recently in UIMA-5274 I changed the return value of the static method UimaContextHolder.setContext(UimaContext uimaContext) from void to UimaContext (so it could return the previous value). Although this doesn't cause any compile problems it does break binary compatibility at the byte-code level.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (UIMA-5043) Provide method to access individual external override settings

o access individual external override settings > > -- > > > > Key: UIMA-5043 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5043 > > Project: UIMA > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Com

Re: opinion on degree of backwards compatibility for Uima V3 experiment

Could the id assigned in V3 be the same as the V2 address, as if the offset in a heap? Unique and monotonically increasing. Burn On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Same here. > > > It looks like that we are now also starting to use the address, and

Re: UimaContextHolderTest is not a JUnit test?

It is run 3 times by TestAnnotator2 which is run by a JUnit test. On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > The class UimaContextHolderTest isn't a JUnit test, and therefore doesn't > get > run with the testing framework. > > Should this be converted to a JUnit

Re: [VOTE] UIMAJ SDK 2.9.0 rc1

- Checked signatures on tar file (would be nice if the files had unix linends) - Tested binary build on a couple of large pipelines - Checked signatures on source zip - Built from source and tested on the same 2 pipelines - Checked notices & licenses - no changes - Tested with UIMA-AS 2.8.1 [X]

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

But what is the purpose of this test? Currently it expects the major version numbers to match, and prints a misleading error message if they don't. Are we sure that UIMA-AS 2.9.0 will work with any V2 UIMA? Or should the test be for the version of core UIMA that UIMA-AS includes, and has been

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC2

- downloaded binary tarball and checked md5 & sha1 sums - unpacked, ran MeetingDetector as in README section 3.4 - also deployed with deployAsyncService and ran runRemoteAsyncAE from another node - installed in DUCC and ran a long test with 5 DUCC jobs using 3 UIMA-AS services. - verified that it

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.9.0 RC1

In examples/.classpath I see: but the jar is named: apache-activemq/lib/optional/xpp3-1.1.4c.jar On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > Hmm, looks like a hole in my testing script I don't import runtime > configurations from uimaj-examples. I

Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 2.10.0 rc1

- Checked signatures - OK - Spot checked ReleaseNotes, License, Readme, Notice - OK > But cannot open the api-change reports for uimaj-core uimaj-cpe uimaj-json (unreadable directories) - Ran documentAnalyzer - OK - Installed jars in DUCC (with UIMA-AS 2.9.0) and ran a couple of UIMA &

Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 2.10.0 rc1

the note that this external > overrides > behavior will be changed in the next release *without* introducing a flag > that > restore the RC1 behavior (i.e. a potentially breaking change)? > > -- Richard > > > On 04.04.2017, at 00:32, Burn Lewis <burnle...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 2.10.0 rc1

rrides would result in a breaking change > from > 2.9.0 - that is - this is already in the 2.9.0 implementation, is this > correct? > > -Marshall > > > On 4/4/2017 8:35 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: > > Certainly. I don't want to rush this change through without discussion

Re: Loading external override settings from the class path or data path

I mean that I'd prefer no prefixes ... just the presence or absence of /'s. On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > > > On 4/20/2017 2:20 PM, Burn Lewis wrote: > > Another suggestion is to use a schema-like prefix ...* name: *or an > >

Re: Loading external override settings from the class path or data path

Perhaps "path:" On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > a small potential issue with "classpath:" - the impl makes use of both the > UIMA > Datapath and the Classpath. > > -Marshall > > > On 4/21/2017 8:26 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > > On

Loading external override settings from the class path or data path

In UIMA 2.10.0 support was added for loading external override settings from the classpath or datapath, but the approach chosen introduced an ambiguity by looking first in the filesystem and then in the class path or datapath. A better approach would be to use a syntax that clearly indicates

Re: Loading external override settings from the class path or data path

s as files ... but this back-level support could be enabled by an environment variable. ~Burn On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > > On 4/19/2017 4:20 PM, Burn Lewis wrote: > > In UIMA 2.10.0 support was added for loading external override set

Re: [VOTE] uimaj sdk 2.10.0 rc1

My tests using an external variable as part of the value of an import's name or location attribute have been successful. The problem is with a UIMA-AS deployment of such an aggregate ... this fails when dd2spring processes the aggregate, as at this stage the external override settings have not

Re: Regarding Developing New Annotator in UIMA

There is a "Getting Started" section in the document "UIMA Tutorial and Developers' Guide" that describes how to compile and run the example annotators. You can then use one of these as a basis for your own annotator. ~Burn On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Sandhaya Choudhary <

Re: [jira] [Commented] (UIMA-4793) Unable to localize exceptions when using alternative classloader

Can't the InternationalizedException class be made serializable? On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > Marshall, my current fix for the Serialization problem is kinda what you > suggest. Since I can't Serialize this class I stringify it and > create a

Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-DUCC 2.2.1 RC5

- checked binary & source signatures (md5 & sha1) - installed binary on a 20-node cluster and ran some large jobs & services & APs - built from source and installed on a 5-node cluster and ran a job, AP & service - checked docs (duccbook & javadocs) - spot checked readme license notices etc. [x]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1

My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to win32: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1: Could not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x86_64:jar:3.104.1 from/to

Re: [jira] [Updated] (UIMA-5417) dd2spring should always ignore the scaleout value for sync UIMA-AS DDs

quot;. > > > > > >> dd2spring should always ignore the scaleout value for sync UIMA-AS DDs > >> ------ > >> > >> Key: UIMA-5417 > >> URL: https://issues.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1

went to > >>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/ > x86_64/3.104.1/ in a > >>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a > network error > >>> (reported by my browser...) > >>> > >>> Would

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1

Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7 On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> wrote: > that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME > > -Marshall > > > On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: > > man

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1

>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT > for > >>> advice... > >>> > >>> > >>> Peter > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1

iderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.6.1 RC1

ut any preconditions. > > What build environement do you have? OS, Java version... > > > Peter > > > > Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis: > > Failing assertion & stacktrace: > > > > Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType(" > my.pa

Re: [jira] [Commented] (UIMA-5587) DUCC Process Manager (PM) takes OOM on Apache DUCC demo

Since this affects all daemons how about a pre-fetch of 1? On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > Actually, the correct broker decoration should be: > > # # The broker *client* url decoration (ie - DUCC daemons). >

Re: [VOTE] uimaj-2.10.1 rc1

checked signatures: OK. (first had to convert from DOS to Unix format) installed binary and ran many UIMA pipelines - OK tested the new file: & path: prefix notation for external overrides - OK built from source & checked signatures: OK checked api change report: OK checked issues fixed OK [X] +1

Re: [jira] [Updated] (UIMA-5605) DUCC scheduler ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException

Ironically we also hit this problem yesterday ,,, I don't know why it has waited this long to show up. Removing that piece of code will be the simplest fix but I suspect its a sign of a problem elsewhere. On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Burn Lewis (JIRA) <dev@uima.apache.org>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >