* to parameters) to a macro is part of the
core feature set of a modern template engine. There was the further
implication that people who did not even understand what the feature was
and what it is used for well, these people don't understand much
:-)
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer
x as (x)?html
/#escape
Of course, you sometimes need to turn it off, so for those cases, you have:
#unescape
...
/#unescape
within the escape block.
For more complete information, see:
http://freemarker.org/docs/ref_directive_escape.html
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker
very
quickly shift to how to add some functionality to the tool that
addresses the problem. It is very telling IMO that, here, even the
supposed developers of the tool talk of its feature set as if it was
something fixed that they can't really doing anything about (!)
Regards,
Jonathan Revusky
Daniel Dekany wrote:
Tuesday, March 11, 2008, 12:27:00 AM, Jonathan Revusky wrote:
[snip]
Now, I'm not saying that we've reached this point because I occasionally
speak my mind on this forum. But OTOH, I don't think you have much
evidence that it is ineffective. There is not much evidence
answer in private or on the
list, but really, it should be the latter, since other people might want
to know, and after all, that's what these lists are for, right?
Cheers,
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years
in flux.
Well, just as a final point, if you get me back to me on this, you
should do so on a FreeMarker mailing list. :-) (The Velocity guys have
enough of an inferiority complex as it is... ;-))
Cheers,
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity
things were implemented You know, probably there is no way to make
it significantly better without undertaking a complete rewrite.
That's just the truth. The emperor is not wearing any clothes.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker
-Mozilla-Keys:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:00:13 +0100
From: Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Call a velocity macro
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
--- Adrian Tarau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, don't judge any online community based on
guys like Jonathan.
Just ignore them...
funny thig is, it' s spillover from completely
different community ;)
What different community? What are you talking about? The
it, but any
serious progress to make the tool competitive in its space would involve
completely rewriting major parts of the thing. It's a pretty good bet
that this will never happen.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5
interacting with other human beings. They should have warned you about
that. But, you know, everything has a catch...
Anyway, nothing for you to get worked up about. Relax, go eat some
vegemite. I hear that stuff does wonders for the brain.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 18:21 +0100, Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Adrian, you little dipshit, ...
To the moderator of this forum: doesn't this language constitute grounds
for banning this person from these lists?
You seriously are proposing banning somebody (me
Daniel Dekany wrote:
Sunday, March 9, 2008, 6:21:20 PM, Jonathan Revusky wrote:
[snip]
7 years ago (maybe closer to 8 years ago) Velocity was written by Jon
Monkey see, Monkey do Stevens as a copycat clone of an existing open
source project called WebMacro.
[snip]
But Jonathan... you Don't
.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years of Practical Experience
http://freemarker.blogspot.com/2007/12/velocity-of-freemarker-looking-at-5.html
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Gonzalo Diethelm wrote:
On Sun, 2008-03-09
a thought.
Well, thank you for that. I have responded (okay, maybe at too much
length, but it's more time-consuming to write a shorter note) to the
ideas you've thrown out there.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years
don't think I can accept the apology. I don't think I can accept an
apology that (a) contains an obvious lie and (b) is in a message that is
such a self-righteous lecturing tone.
Feel free to write a proper apology when you've cooled off.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project
won't be just venting. It will have served some purpose.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project http://freemarker.org
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years of Practical Experience
http://freemarker.blogspot.com/2007/12/velocity-of-freemarker-looking-at-5.html
Jonathan
.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years of Practical Experience
http://freemarker.blogspot.com/2007/12/velocity-of-freemarker-looking-at-5.html
.
Anyway, it is good to see someone who wants to give back and I hope my
comments are useful to you.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Velocity or FreeMarker: Looking at 5 Years of Practical Experience
http://freemarker.blogspot.com/2007/12/velocity
basic capability without which it is near-impossible
to organize one's templates according to the DRY (don't repeat yourself)
principle.
I think the above could be useful information for people.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org
Claude Brisson wrote:
Hi.
DVSL a small and simple project that slept for quite a long time but it
can be quite handy for small XML transformation tasks. I think it
deserves at least a 1.0 release.
It's actually true that, if Anakia deserves a new release, then so
does DVSL.
It's true
Microsystems.
Similarly, all the source code to these ASF projects state clearly that
the copyright holder is ASF. In these cases, the situation on authorship
vs. ownership is completely clear.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Nathan Bubna wrote:
In general, I wonder about the whole psychology behind the removal of
@author tags. After all, the technical/pragmatic arguments in favor of
removal strike me as extremely weak. So it has me wondering, what are
the *real
thing is a complete and
utter ersatz problem. It does not constitute a credible motivation for
removing the author tags. The real reasons for wanting to do this must
be different than the ones stated.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
HTH, Ted
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
--- Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lead developer, FreeMarker project,
http://freemarker.org/
For a lead developer of concurrent project you are
spending a lot of time on wrong list. Are you trying
to
paralize any discussion here?
LOL
Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
--- Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lead developer, FreeMarker project,
http://freemarker.org/
For a lead developer of concurrent project you are
spending
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
I simply pointed out that the reasoning offered for wanting to remove
the @author tags was quite tenuous, to say the least.
You did more than that... you went on to bash the project
expect a forthright honest response to this from any of those
poeple... :-))
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
As for removing my name... sure, whatever, i'll go with the flow
either way on that. i see value both ways. since the ASF in general
be happy to consider that.
Do you really think the users do care so much about cosmetics when
the concurrent
products/technologies get real improvements?
did you notice that this was on the dev@ list? we're not talking
about doing this for the users' sake.
Oh, good grief...
Jonathan Revusky
to me
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
WILL
On 5/3/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/3/07, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the primary reason for the recommendation?
Here's Greg Stein's reasoning:
* http
,
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Best regards
Henning
WILL
On 5/3/07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just sitting in Aarons' incubating open source communities talk and
a subject that came
is better fine, be my guest...
Besides, it's not true that they don't have new releases. Look, just
today they just had a new release of Anakia!!! ;-)
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
Jason Pettiss wrote:
Wow
it to be expected that people are, at some point, going to
make certain pointed comments about the lack of forward progress, say?
So maybe the person missing the point is actually you... maybe... just a
thought...
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
Jonathan
is a question I would like an
answer to for the record: Are you really truly encouraging people to use
these things?
Jonathan Revusky
--
The problem with wikipedia is that it only works in practice. In
theory, it could never work.
I'd like to be more specific on criteria: Please only vote +1
34 matches
Mail list logo
