Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-30 Thread Johann Nallathamby
Any thoughts on the above idea or did we fix it in a different way? On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Johann Nallathamby wrote: > See if this idea would work? > > We currently set a threadlocal variable inside the SCIM endpoint > component, to identify the SCIM service provider

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-22 Thread Johann Nallathamby
See if this idea would work? We currently set a threadlocal variable inside the SCIM endpoint component, to identify the SCIM service provider inside some of our implementations. Can we improve this variable value to also identify the SCIM version? This way the relevant listeners will check for

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Pulasthi Mahawithana
Hi Gayan, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Prabath Siriwardena > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Gayan Gunawardana >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 18,

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Gayan Gunawardana
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Prabath Siriwardena wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Darshana Gunawardana >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Prabath, >>> >>> We do have two

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Gayan Gunawardana wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Darshana Gunawardana > wrote: > >> Hi Prabath, >> >> We do have two endpoints for SCIM 1.1 & SCIM 2. But there are some >> listeners we need to enable in order to

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Gayan Gunawardana
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Darshana Gunawardana wrote: > Hi Prabath, > > We do have two endpoints for SCIM 1.1 & SCIM 2. But there are some > listeners we need to enable in order to populated relevant metadata such as > ID, Created\Modified dates against the correct URI

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Darshana Gunawardana
Hi Prabath, We do have two endpoints for SCIM 1.1 & SCIM 2. But there are some listeners we need to enable in order to populated relevant metadata such as ID, Created\Modified dates against the correct URI specified by the each specification. Given that, different clients may use different

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Darshana Gunawardana
Hi Gayan, Due to the limitation we have in the user core level, we don't support complex filtering, pagination, sorting. Refer [1] & [2]. [1]

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-17 Thread Gayan Gunawardana
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 for this as the global adoption of SCIM 2.0 is right on the track as > Ishara has mentioned. > @Vindula Do we support pagination, complex filters and bulk operation to resolve cyclic dependencies.

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-14 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
What do you mean by default...? Don't have the API versioned...? Thanks & regards, -Prabath On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Pulasthi Mahawithana wrote: > Hi, > > Shall we make $subject instead of SCIM 1.1? Any known issues on having it > as default? Users who are migrating

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-11 Thread Vindula Jayawardana
Hi, +1 for this as the global adoption of SCIM 2.0 is right on the track as Ishara has mentioned. Thanks *Vindula Jayawardana* Computer Science and Engineering Dept. University of Moratuwa mobile : +713462554 Email : vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-11 Thread Darshana Gunawardana
One aspect is that we don't have a SCIM 2.0 outbound provisioning connector available. So IS to IS provisioning will not be smooth until we get the outbound provisioning connector ready. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Pulasthi Mahawithana wrote: > Hi, > > Shall we make

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-11 Thread Harsha Thirimanna
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Ishara Karunarathna wrote: > HI Pulasthi, > > Initially, industry adoption to SCIM 2.0 was less compare to SCIM 1.1, But > seems to be its getting to the track[1] > so +1 let's make SCIM 2.0 as default. > ​+1 for this.​ > > -Ishara > > [1]

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-11 Thread Ishara Karunarathna
HI Pulasthi, Initially, industry adoption to SCIM 2.0 was less compare to SCIM 1.1, But seems to be its getting to the track[1] so +1 let's make SCIM 2.0 as default. -Ishara [1] http://www.simplecloud.info/ On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Pulasthi Mahawithana wrote: >

Re: [Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-11 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Pulasthi Mahawithana wrote: > Hi, > > Shall we make $subject instead of SCIM 1.1? Any known issues on having it > as default? Users who are migrating from older versions will still have > SCIM 1.1 configs and won't be affected as they would

[Dev] SCIM 2.0 as default in IS 5.4.0

2017-09-11 Thread Pulasthi Mahawithana
Hi, Shall we make $subject instead of SCIM 1.1? Any known issues on having it as default? Users who are migrating from older versions will still have SCIM 1.1 configs and won't be affected as they would keep the old configs. -- *Pulasthi Mahawithana* Senior Software Engineer WSO2 Inc.,