Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.10.1 RC2

+1 On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:31 AM Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 1:58 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin >> 0.10.1 release. >> >> >> The commit id is 1654ce3847f4ebce7b228f54671340569d25a32e : >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.10.0 RC2

+1 Thank Jeff for preparing the RC. On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 7:24 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > +1， Verified most of the tutorial notes > > Jongyoul Lee 于2021年8月19日周四 下午12:20写道： > >> +1 >> >> I've checked the basic example about this RC >> >> 2021년 8월 18일 (수) 오후 3:28, 님이 작성: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>>

Re: CI plattform

Before, I tried to migrate to Github Actions. ZEPPELIN-4385 . Zeppelin project repository was not configured to trigger build (INFRA-19249

Re: [Draft] Zeppelin Board report Oct 2020

Thank Jeff, Philipp, Felix for the quick review! On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:49 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > Looks good > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:01 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > >> +1, Thanks moon >> >> moon soo Lee 于2020年10月15日周四 上午11:58写道： >> >>> Hi F

[Draft] Zeppelin Board report Oct 2020

Hi Folks, Since the report due date is 14/Oct, I made a draft of it. Please review this. ## Description: - Apache Zeppelin is a collaborative data analytics and visualization tool for general-purpose data processing systems. ## Activity: - 0.9.0-preview2 has released. Now we are

Re: Supported interpreters

020 alle ore 19:10 moon soo Lee < > leemoon...@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > You can find it from 'gh-pages' branch. > > > https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/gh-pages/supported_interpreters.md > > > > 'gh-pages' keeps the s

Re: Supported interpreters

Hi, You can find it from 'gh-pages' branch. https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/gh-pages/supported_interpreters.md 'gh-pages' keeps the source code of the website. Each version of Zeppelin documentation (which you can find source code under /docs dir of master branch) is added to the website

Re: [Proposal] Zeppelin Client API (Zeppelin SDK)

Looks really good! Do you think to have a CLI on top of high-level API be also useful? On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:13 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Thanks for your feedback, I have created ticket > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4981 > > Just like @Alex Ott mentioned, this api may

Re: K8s docker images

Sounds like a plan! On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:19 AM Alex Ott wrote: > Hi Philipp > > That would be nice to do finally :-) > from my side I'm ok with having only the latest one. > Thank you for moving it forward! > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:11 PM Philipp Dallig > wrote: > > > Hi Zeppelin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.9.0-preview2 (RC2)

+1 I tested - build from source - src package license file - bin package license file - new ui access On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:36 AM Alex Ott wrote: > +1 from me. What's done: > > - checked the checksum > - run spark samples > - tested cassandra interpreter > - installed some plugins

Re: [Draft] Zeppelin Board Report

Thank Jeff for writing a draft. It looks good to me :) On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:53 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Here's the draft for this month zeppelin board report, let me know what > you think. > > > ## Description: > > - Apache Zeppelin is a collaborative data analytics and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.9.0 preview2

I don't see a particular blocker and looks like it's time to have preview2! Shell we create an umbrella issue in Jira for 0.9.0 preview2 release anyway, so people can track the progress of the release? Thanks, moon On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:49 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We discuss

Re: [Announce] New Zeppelin Committer: Philipp Dallig

It's exciting news because I was always impressed by high-quality code contributions from Philipp Dalling. Congratulations! Welcome aboard! On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:23 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Zeppelin > has invited Philipp Dallig to become a

Re: Update Zeppelin Interpreter only leveragin Helium

What Helium does for the Interpreter is just downloading binaries from maven repository. *bin/install-interpreter.sh* is the CLI, which runs InstallInterpreter

Re: Apache Zeppelin in The State of Developer Ecosystem survey 2020

Curious if the result in [2] was chosen from a list provided with the question, or people typed their tool without a given list. Anyway, a very interesting survey! Thank Alex for sharing this. On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 8:09 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Thanks for the sharing, Alex > > Alex

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Yadong Xie, Hsuan Lee as New Committer

Excited to see great work with new UI. Welcome Yadong Xie, Hsuan Lee. On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 7:03 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Zeppelin > has invited Yadong Xie and Hsuan Lee to become a committer and we are very > pleased > to announce that they

Re: Logging doesn't appear to work with Docker version of 0.9.0-preview1

When I build my own Docker image based on master branch, I experience the same problem. But in my case /logs is not empty. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:50 PM Eric Pugh wrote: > I’ve tried with building my own Docker image of Zeppelin, and using the > apache/zeppelin:0.9.0 image: > > docker run -p

Re: Zeppelin Draft board report for April 2020

119 closed in the last 3 months On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:46 AM Alex Ott wrote: > Looks great for me - do we have statistics on closed JIRA tickets? > > moon soo Lee at "Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:21:26 -0700" wrote: > msL> Thank Jeff for the draft. > msL> Looks great

Re: Zeppelin Draft board report for April 2020

Thank Jeff for the draft. Looks great to me. On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > Here's draft of Zeppelin Report, let me know if you have concerns. Thanks > > > > > ## Description: > > - Apache Zeppelin is a collaborative data analytics and visualization > tool

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.9.0-preview1 (RC1)

+1 Tested - The binary package can run tutorial notebook out of the box - Can build docker image - scripts/docker/zeppelin/bin/Dockerfile give me some error on R dependency installation. But I think it's not a blocker. We can address it on next RC. - Zeppelin on Kubernetes - Everything

Re: [DISCUSS] Release for 0.9.0-preview-1

Definitely +1 On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:02 AM Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > Yes, +1, we have put in a lot of features. We should do it soon. > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 8:28 PM Yadong Xie wrote: > >> Big +1 >> >> Eric Pugh 于2020年3月16日周一 下午10:54写道： >> >> > Big +1 from me. >> > >> > >> > > On Mar 16,

Re: Autolink references in Github repo?

gt; >>> Ok. Thank you - I'll file Infra ticket > >>> > >>> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020, 03:37 moon soo Lee, wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I don't have admin rights to GitHub repo but ASF Infra does. > >

Re: Autolink references in Github repo?

Hi, I don't have admin rights to GitHub repo but ASF Infra does. Usually, configuration change on Github repo can be done by filing issues to ASF infra https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA. Let me know if anything else I can help here. Thanks! moon On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 6:19 PM

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Alex Ott as New Committer

little but late for the welcoming party here. I couldn’t appreciate more about starting 2020 with this great news! Welcome Alex Ott and appreciate your involvement and contributions! Regards, moon On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 02:21 Alex Ott wrote: > Thank > > Thank you for introduction Jeff, and

Re: [DISCUSS] Create a preview for Zeppelin 0.9.0 before making RC

Right, 3 days for each RC for a major release is too short. +1 for creating a preview and docker image as well :) On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:40 AM Andrea Santurbano wrote: > Yes please! > Would be awesome have a Docker container in order test it :) > > Il giorno lun 16 dic 2019 alle ore 16:24

Recognizing contributors

Hi, I'd like to have a discussion about recognizing contributors. Many people contribute Apache Zeppelin in many different ways, One way via code contribution, another way via non-code contributions like creating videos, writing articles, UI design, providing talks, and so on. I think code

Re: Automatic update of the Helium registry doesn't work?

cc ahyoung. Could you take a look?? And, any good idea how we can we move helium.json and related code zeppelin project source tree? On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 06:01 Jeff Zhang wrote: > + Moon > > I think helium.json on S3 is maintained by ZEPL, Moon should know the > details. > > > Alex Ott

Re: Why not all Pull-Request runs Jenkins?

Just filed an infra issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19249 Thanks, moon On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 8:25 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > I also notice this issue, My PR will run jenkins job, but lots of > contributors' PR don't trigger jenkins job. > > > > moon soo Lee

Why not all Pull-Request runs Jenkins?

Hi, I can see some Pull-Request does not run Jenkins, like below https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3480 [image: image.png] And some does run Jenkins, like below https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3479 [image: image.png] It looks like Jenkins is triggered only when github apache

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Zeppelin 0.8.2 released

Great work! On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 9:46 PM Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > Awesome! > > Thank you so much Jeff for taking care of this. > > Congratulations community. > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, 2:15 pm Jeff Zhang, wrote: > >> The Apache Zeppelin community is pleased to announce the availability of >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.8.2

+1 On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:16 PM Prabhjyot Singh wrote: > +1 > > I see a lot of issues are fixed in the past few months. This sounds a > good intermediate step before 0.9 release. > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 00:23, Eric Pugh > wrote: > >> The iPython related fixes would address some issues

Re: [VOTE] Creating feature branch for zeppelin new ui initiative

+1 Looking forward to On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:48 PM Xun Liu wrote: > +1 > Very looking forward to > > Xun Liu > Best Regards > > > On Sep 6, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Jongyoul Lee wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:17 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > > > >> Just to be clear that this thread

Re: [DISCUSS] Notebook serving

pelin/pull/3356/files>. > Is this project not going to be the part of GSoC any further? Is there a > scope for FE as a part of GSoC? > > Thanks, > > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 23:06, moon soo Lee wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > You're right. I joined the program as a mento

Re: New committer: Liu Xun

Congrats Liu Xun and welcome! On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:17 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Zeppelin > has invited Liu Xun to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Thanks Liu Xun's contribution to apache zeppelin.

Re: [DISCUSS] Notebook serving

o enable your >> signup. >> >> Thanks again >> >> >> >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 13:23, moon soo Lee wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for the interest in this topic. I realized mentor sign up period >>> is >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Notebook serving

ic. I did go through the design doc. Can you > please mentor me to implement this? I am very much interested in taking it > up. > > Thanks > > On 2019/03/26 21:31:16, moon soo Lee wrote: > > Hi,> > > > > There're some challenges bringing a model inside notebook

[DISCUSS] Notebook serving

Hi, There're some challenges bringing a model inside notebook to a production environment. Many many organizations, the most common practice I see today is something like 1. Data scientist develop a model in a data science notebook. 2. SW engineer rewrites the model, to meet the production

Re: Zeppelin in GSOC 2019

Hi, Great to see your interest to project. Thanks! Looks like we need volunteers for a mentor and some backend subject for GSoC2019. Any ideas? Best, moon On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:05 PM Vasiliy Morkovkin wrote: > Hi everyone, I'm pursuing bachelor degree at Moscow institute of physics >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 (RC6)

+1 Best, moon On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:40 AM NineQS CloverHearts < cloverhearts...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > From: Belousov Maksim Eduardovich > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 10:27:49 PM > To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 (RC5)

+1 Thanks, moon On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 17:08 Belousov Maksim Eduardovich wrote: > +1 > > > Regards, > > Maksim Belousov > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Zhang [mailto:zjf...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 10:18 AM > To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 (RC4)

+1 Verified - Signature - License exists - Build from source - Run tutorial notebooks - Install helium visualizaitons - Works with multiple spark version Thanks Jeff for preparing the release. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 8:54 AM Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer < miquelangeland...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.8.0 (RC2)

Thanks Jeff preparing the release. +1 - License exists in source/binary package - Signature - Build from source - Run tutorial notebooks I think ./bin/install-interpreter.sh does not work because 0.8.0 artifacts are not published yet. If ./bin/install-interpreter.sh command have a

Re: [Discussion] 0.8.0 Release

Cool. Thanks for the volunteer. Why don't we update issue link of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2385? I think issue link is bit out dated. We can remove issue links if they're not expected in 0.8.0, add issue links if they must be included in 0.8.0. So everyone can track the

Re: [DISCUSS] Review process

Hi, Current review process[1] does require either at least a +1 from committer or 24 hours for lazy consensus. Pullrequest can be open for 1 or 2 days for additional review, but i think they're not hard requirements. (e.g. Hotfixes are already being merged without waiting additional review) So,

Re: Disable cron runs

Hi, Currently, there's no easy way to disable cron. I think it's okay to add configuration parameter that disables all cron run, while the default value of the parameter enable the cron (for backward compatibility). Let me know if you need any help on this. Thanks, moon On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at

Re: Building a query service using Zeppelin

Hi Saksham, Thanks for sharing your plan. Programmatic universal query execution platform sounds interesting. I saw a lot of users use Zeppelin with various SQL backends. Your plan definitely looks like help many other users, too. If i can add few more idea * Search available table, columns *

Re: Issue with Paragraph Status API

Hi Saksham, Thanks for sharing the problem. I think that API shouldn't wants for execution to complete. I think it's not a known issue. If you can file an jira issue, it'll help track this problem. Thanks, moon On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:42 AM Saksham Srivastava wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.3 (RC5)

+1 for releasing this RC Verified - Build from source - Binary package runs tutorial notebook - License file exists - Signature Thanks, moon On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:17 AM Krishna Pandey wrote: > +1 > > Ran PySpark and Spark use-cases successfully. > Also verified

Re: Official Docker image build and release process

I think tag push automatically builds docker image. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12781 Thans, moon On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:31 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > Anyone? > > > From: Felix Cheung >

Re: Introduction

Hi Saksham, Thanks for the interest to the project and community. Interpreter binding mode is explained here [1]. For execution and parallelism, you can check Interpreter.getScheduler() method [2]. Each interpreter can override this method and implement it's own scheduler to achieve

Re: API to get/download paragraph result

Hi Saksham, As you mentioned, there's an API that returns paragraph result in JSON format [1]. Types of result can be TEXT, HTML, TABLE, IMG etc [2]. I assume you meant download TABLE data as csv/tsv format programmatically, right? One reason we don't have such API is that the csv/tsv conversion

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.7.3

+1 On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:05 AM Windy Qin wrote: > +1 > > > > Thanks > WindyQin > > From: Krishna Pandey > Date: 2017-08-29 20:01 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 0.7.3 > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Prabhjyot Singh < >

Re: What about the release of Zeppelin 0.7.3

there any possibility to include in 0.7.3 some critical functionality > (for Tinkoff) out of security scope? It will help us to upgrade our > platform in more stable mode. Now we are forced to use unstable version > built from development snapshot in production. > > > > > > > &

Re: What about the release of Zeppelin 0.7.3

Hi, An issue for Release 0.7.3 [1] has created and some security issues are linked. Please take a look and let us know if you have another security issue need to be included. Thanks, moon [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2864 On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:58 AM Yanbo Liang

Re: Broken link on Apache Zeppelin website

Thanks for reporting the problem Made a patch https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2494 Will deploy soon. Thanks, moon On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:54 AM Krishna Pandey wrote: > Hi All, > > Whenever we raise a Pull Request for Apache Zeppelin, we are presented with

New PMC member: Ahyoung Ryu

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Zeppelin has invited Ahyoung Ryu to become a PMC and we are pleased to announce that has accepted. Please join us to welcome. The Apache Zeppelin PMC

Re: Add version 0.7.3 in jira

Done! On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:19 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Could anyone create 0.7.3 in zeppelin's jira since 0.7.2 has been released. >

New committer: Park Hoon

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Zeppelin has invited Park Hoon (1ambda) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that has accepted. Please join us to welcome. The Apache Zeppelin PMC

Re: Official Docker Image for Apache Zeppelin 0.7.2

Great work! Tested basic features and it's working well. I think it'll help user a lot when http://zeppelin.apache.org/download.html have some guide (or link to guide) for docker image. Thanks, moon On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:24 PM Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, devs. > > > A few

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.2 (RC1)

Verified - Build from source - Binary package runs tutorial notebook - Build with JDK1.7 - Signature +1 for releasing this RC. Thanks, moon On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:14 AM Mina Lee wrote: > I propose the following RC to be released for the Apache Zeppelin 0.7.2 >

Re: How to change the python installation location for Python interpreter?

Hi, You can set your python executable path in 'zeppelin.python' property, Python interpreter setting in the interpreter menu. If your system has conda installed, then you can manage environment using %python.conda. Please take a look

Re: What is the user case for remote of interpreter option is false

The option is legacy and being used in few unit tests as far as i remember. I think we can either try completely remove this code (to keep code base simple) or we can try re-introduce this feature (to optimize resource usage, less restriction on data sharing between interpreters). I think

Re: Windows Build Support

Okay, then let me file an INFRA issue to turn off appveyor on pullrequest build, but keeping it for branch build. On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:39 PM Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Make sense for option 2 > > > moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org>于2017年5月3日周三 上午9:21写道： &g

Re: Windows Build Support

? Thanks, moon On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:31 PM moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Filed an infra issue to enable appveyor support. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14019 > > Thanks, > moon > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:22 AM Park Hoon <1am...@gmail.

Re: Travis jobs

> > -----Original Message- > From: moon soo Lee [mailto:m...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 12:07 AM > To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Travis jobs > > Right, seconds travis job seems doing nothing. > Second travis job supposed to test all c

Re: Travis jobs

Right, seconds travis job seems doing nothing. Second travis job supposed to test all core unit tests plus integration test (except for spark related test). Could you help fix this problem? Best, moon On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:04 AM Alexander Shoshin < alexander_shos...@epam.com> wrote: > Hi

Re: CI status is lost in PR page

Yes, somehow, PR page does not display CI status. I don't know exact reason. I filed an INFRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14005. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:42 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > I didn't see the CI status in the PR page recently, I need to check

Re: shiro.ini : Zeppelin interpreter authorization: lock to one user

Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2236 tracks restricting interpreter setting to admin group. And we're trying to solve this problem in 0.8.0 [1]. Please keep an eye on this issue and feel free to make any contributions. Thanks, moon [1]

Re: Access to Spark Context from a Custom Interpreter

Hi Michael, Interpreter does not close / open between paragraphs. That means you can just keep any object as member variable in your interpreter implementation. For example SparkInterpreter [1] keeps IMain as a member variable. Interpreter shipped in Zeppelin codebase is developed with the same

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.1 (RC3)

Verified - signature - no unexpected binary in source package - build from source - basic features on binary package I've found a problem that Note is refreshing when NoteList broadcast (e.g. Note creation, deletion, rename). Explained the problem in the issue

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

releases) We can even include formal vote for moving release from 'latest' to 'stable' in our release process, if it is necessary. Thanks, moon On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:59 AM moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Yes, having longer RC period will help. > > But if i recall 0.7.0 re

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

o heard from some users complain > about the bugs of zeppelin major release. A stabilized release is very > necessary for community. > > > > > Best Regard, > Jeff Zhang > > > From: moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org<mailto:m...@apache.org > <m...@apache.

Re: Roadmap for 0.8.0

Great to see discussion for 0.8.0. List of features for 0.8.0 looks really good. *Interpreter factory refactoring* Interpreter layer supports various behavior depends on combination of PerNote,PerUser / Shared,Scoped,Isolated. We'll need strong test cases for each combination as a first step.

Re: [CI] second job exceeds travis.org max job time

Nowadays, the second and the third profile takes around 40~45min. Which is very close to limit of travis 50min. I've seen sometimes second or the third profile just fails because of it takes longer than usual (by slow network download, etc). I think we need to split second/third profile so the

Re: Notebook Storage in Azure

Hi, Thanks for sharing the problem. Do you mind create an JIRA issue? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN That might help track this problem. Thanks, moon On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8:09 AM Gopikrishnan K. Rajaram wrote: > Hello: - I have done the settings in

Re: [DISCUSS] Scaling out CI capability

is setup and switch on travis-ci for Zeppelin folk, explained here http://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html#continuous-integration . Thanks, moon On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:30 PM moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for the feedbacks! > > Then let me merge htt

[DISCUSS] 0.7.1 release

Hi developers, Since 0.7.0 release, some critical problems reported. I think we need 0.7.1 release as soon as possible with those critical problems fixed. I created issue for 0.7.1 release https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2134 and link critical issues with "blocked by", that they

Re: [DISCUSS] Scaling out CI capability

://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2123 Thanks, moon On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:39 PM Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's good idea. :-) > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Great, can't wait to try this. &

[DISCUSS] Scaling out CI capability

Hi Apache Zeppelin contributors! Recently, it's not very difficult to see pullrequest is waiting more than 10 hours to get travis-ci build slot. It's because of all ASF project shares the same travis account and the account's capability is limited. Although ASF assigned 5 concurrent build

Re: Feedback on ZEPPELIN-1764

Thanks for the interest to the project! Just left a comment. let me know how you think. Thanks, moon On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 6:55 PM vipul modi wrote: > Hi > > I would like to take up > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1764 > I have added a proposed approach

Re: Require wiki edit permission

Your cwiki id is zjffdu, right? On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:05 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > Hi I am working on PIG-5126 to add document about running pig in zeppelin. > But it is not good practise to include corporate link in apache project. So > I would like to copy the content of

Re: Is there any way to cancel travis build in queue ?

AFAIK, no one has permission to cancel the job except for ASF-INFRA. On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:56 AM Jeff Zhang wrote: > There's lots of pending build job in travis build queue, I can cancel some > of my build as I would push a new commit. But I didn't find way to cancel >

Re: ZEPPELIN-1856

TE events as well? > > Regards, > Alexander > > -----Original Message- > From: moon soo Lee [mailto:m...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 8:28 AM > To: dev@zeppelin.apache.org > Subject: Re: ZEPPELIN-1856 > > onOutputClear() method is connected with

Re: ZEPPELIN-1856

HED status we will come in > situation where we always clear an empty 'Paragraph.results'. Does it make > sense? > > Regards, > Alexander > > -Original Message- > From: moon soo Lee [mailto:m...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2017 4:30 AM > To: d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.7.0 (RC4)

Verified - checksum and signature for release artifacts - build from source - LICENSE source/binary release - source release does not have unexpected binary - binary package functioning +1 (binding) On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:28 PM Hyung Sung Shim wrote: > +1 > Thanks

Re: ZEPPELIN-1856

Hi, Thanks for working on issue ZEPPELIN-1856. I think removing 'note.clearParagraphOutput(paragraphId);' from 'onOutputClear()' is not the best solution, because without the line 'onOutputClear()' does not do anything useful. InterpreterContext is constructed before call

Re: Beginner issue

Done! Thanks for contribution! Regards, moon On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:31 PM Viktor Boginskii wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to start contribute to Zeppelin. > > Could anyone assign issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2014 to me (vboginskii) in >

Re: Unstable travis CI recently

Hi, I fixed some CI issues today. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1583 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1857 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1986 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1749 Now, making CI green on PR wouldn't be too difficult.

Re: [Discuss] Move some interpreters out of zeppelin project

Thanks Jeff for staring the thread. Here's my thoughts 1. Do we need to do this yes. 2. If the answer is yes, which interpreters should be moved out If Zeppelin community has no problem maintaining certain interpreter, then no reason to remove contribution from community. However, if Zeppelin

Re: Notebook example

t; Thanks for reply. > > And do I need to create an issue first? Or I can just make a pull request > for adding a note to tutorial examples? > > Thanks, > Alexander > > > -Original Message- > > From: moon soo Lee [mailto:m...@apache.org] > > Sent:

Re: Notebook example

Hi, Appreciate for sharing a notebook and considering contribution. You can contribute your note as a tutorial under https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/tree/master/notebook by making pullrequest. So Zeppelin distribution can include notebook. Just sharing on the mailing list greatly helps as well

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.7 Roadmap

JIRA > > > > epic: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1525 > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the sharing this roadmap. >

Re: Disabling "run all paragraphs" button on notebook

Currently there's not. You'll need to modify source code to disable it. Thanks, moon On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:32 AM Sachin Janani wrote: > Hi All, > I was finding a way or property to disable 'run all paragraphs' button on > notebook but didnt find any can someone please

Re: Build error

Hi, A patch available for the error you have. https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1603 By the way, if you just want to build and use Zeppelin, you can try skip test by adding -DskipTests in your maven command. Thanks, moon On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:51 PM Andrii Pelekh

Re: Max text message size for Websocket connection

Hi, ZeppelinServer [1] sets Websocket text message size with default value defined in ZeppelinConfiguration [2]. Hope this helps. Thanks, moon [1] https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/server/ZeppelinServer.java#L214 [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.6.2 (rc1)

d if you share your opinion about this. > > > > And my bad for KEY location, I will use the correct url from the next > > release vote. > > > > Thanks, > > Mina > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1505 > > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin 0.6.2 (rc1)

Thanks Mina for preparing the release. Verified, - Build from source - LICENSE and NOTICE in the source and binary packages - Signature (KEYS file need to be along side with release artifacts. see [1]. I think keys location need to be https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/zeppelin/KEYS)

Re: Refactor time !

Thanks for taking care! On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:05 PM DuyHai Doan wrote: > I have created a JIRA epic to track down all the task: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1525 > > I think I would start by the synchronize blocks and then move onto Eric's > PR for

[DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.7 Roadmap

Hi, Apache Zeppelin users and developers, We're about to start a release process for 0.6.2 and i think it's good time to discuss about future release, 0.7.0. There were great discussion about roadmap [1] and we updated wiki page [2], but 0.7.0 section on the roadmap wiki is empty at the moment.

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin 0.6.2 release

Although 0.6.1 supports Spark 2.0, there were some bugs around it. Current 0.6 branch resolves many annoying problems and i think it's a lot more stable than previous release, 0.6.1. Let's start release process for 0.6.2. Thanks, moon On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 3:33 AM DuyHai Doan

  1   2   >