ZooKeeper 3.6.2 release procedure finished - time to drop 3.4 from dist ?

Hi, I have completed the release procedure for 3.6.2. We have to drop stuff from non active branches from the dist area according to ASF rules. Do we have to remove 3.4.x from the "dist" area ? https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/zookeeper/ IIRC we decided to sent it to EOL On June 2020

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 released

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.6.2 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so

Re: Fix 3.6.2 release notes (was [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 candidate 1)

tems is CVE related fix. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:04 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > +1. xsum/sig validate. RAT ran clean. Was able to build and do manual > > testing with various ensemble sizes successfully. lgtm. > > > > Patrick > > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 candidate 1

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 6 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: - Ted Dunning - Patrick Hunt (binding) - Michael Han (binding) - Tison, Zili Chen - Norbert Kalmar - Enrico Olivelli (binding) There are no disapproving votes. I

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 candidate 1

t consider it a blocker https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3931 @Micheal I will fix the release notes during the update of the website, thanks for pointing out Enrico Il giorno mar 8 set 2020 alle ore 16:36 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > It looks like we need 1 more binding vote. >

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3931) "zkServer.sh version" returns a trailing dash

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3931: -- Summary: "zkServer.sh version" returns a trailing dash Key: ZOOKEEPER-3931 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3931 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 candidate 1

; > >> java.net.NoRouteToHostException > > >> > > >> Also missing a couple of items in release notes: ZOOKEEPER-3794, > > >> ZOOKEEPER-3797, ZOOKEEPER-3813 > > >> > > >> Neither is blocker IMO but would be nice to update

Re: Code coverage

Norbert I like this idea I have some experience with JaCoCo. For an OpenSource project like Zookeeper we should integrate it with services like CodeCov or Coveralls.io (I am using Coveralls for instance) Such tool will be useful for requiring a quality gate on pull requests and in order to

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.2 candidate 1

this candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: Test flakiness (was: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0)

tries, because that is a VM and the tests are > >>> somewhat flaky in that environment. But this is, as far as I know, a > >>> long-standing issue and completely unrelated to 3.6.2. Please let me > >>> know if you have tips/tricks for avoiding such temporary failures.)

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

I am cancelling this VOTE. I will send RC1 soon, the problem about license files has been fixed. Stay tuned Enrico Il giorno ven 4 set 2020 alle ore 02:35 Michael Han ha scritto: > Haven't fully tested the RC but I didn't experience any of the lag through > the cli. > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

Ted The branch is release-3.6.2 and not 3.6.1 Thanks foe testing Enrico Il Gio 3 Set 2020, 19:50 Ted Dunning ha scritto: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:23 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > ... > > > > Il giorno mer 2 set 2020 alle ore 22:03 Patrick Hunt < > ph...@apache.org > > > > > > > ha scritto: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

Patrick, Il giorno gio 3 set 2020 alle ore 08:48 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > > Il giorno mer 2 set 2020 alle ore 22:03 Patrick Hunt > ha scritto: > >> I'm also noticing a very long lag when using the cli. I tried with both >> java8 and java11 and in both cases t

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3925) Update Netty to 4.1.50Final on 3.5 branch

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3925: -- Summary: Update Netty to 4.1.50Final on 3.5 branch Key: ZOOKEEPER-3925 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3925 Project: ZooKeeper

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3924) Netty and JLine Licenses are inconsistent with jars in the binary tarball in 3.6.2 rc0

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3924: -- Summary: Netty and JLine Licenses are inconsistent with jars in the binary tarball in 3.6.2 rc0 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3924 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

ed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:55 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > -1 - the license files are inconsistent for both jline and netty > libraries. > > > > Patrick > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > >> This is a release c

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

; On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:35 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > This is a release candidate for 3.6.2. > > > > It is a minor release and it fixes a few critical issues and brings a few > > dependencies upgrades. > > > > The full release notes is avai

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

- checkstyle and spotbugs passed > > - apache-rat passed > > - owasp (CVE check) passed > > - fatjar built (-Pfatjar) > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 11:35 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > >> This is a release candidate for 3.6.2. > >>

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

this candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Preparing 3.6.2

Hi ZooKeepers, I have created the release branch for 3.6.2 Please let me handle branch-3.6 and branch-3.6.2, for any commit to be cherry picked. At this point I feel there is nothing more to add to 3.6.2. I have also cleaned up JIRA for 3.6.2, please do not assign any other issue to 3.6.2. If

Re: C client build is failing for branch-3.5 on new CI

C libraries? > No Enrico > > Best regards, > Mate > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:19 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi ZooKeepers, > > I am checking the new CI system and I noticed this error for branch-3.5 > on > > the C client

C client build is failing for branch-3.5 on new CI

Hi ZooKeepers, I am checking the new CI system and I noticed this error for branch-3.5 on the C client build, the error does not occur on branch-3.6 and on master TestClient.o `test -f 'tests/TestClient.cc' || echo

Re: Preparing for 3.6.2 release ?

aven't pushed the PR yet for > branch-3.6. > > Best regards, > Mate > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I would like to start the release process for 3.6.2. > > > > Any thoughts ? > > > > Enrico > &

Re: Creating a public fork of ZooKeeper

Hunter, If you simply want to fork the repository and use it in your company, respecting the Apache license then in my opinion there is no issue. As Christopher said problems will arise if you redistribute that code or binaries outside the limits of Apache license, call it 'Zookeeper'... We are

Re: Preparing for 3.6.2 release ?

Hi, I would like to start the release process for 3.6.2. Any thoughts ? Enrico Il giorno ven 24 lug 2020 alle ore 16:30 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > we have committed a few fixes on 3.6.2 release branch, in particular > bugfixes and fixes

Re: JDK 15 is now in the Initial Release Candidate Phase

Hi Rory, Apache ZooKeeper (current development version) builds and runs without issues with JDK15. Tested only on Linux/x64, that is the most used OS in production regarding ZooKeeper Enrico Il giorno ven 7 ago 2020 alle ore 10:32 Rory O'Donnell < rory.odonn...@oracle.com> ha scritto: > > Hi

Re: jUnit5 migration review

Il Gio 30 Lug 2020, 01:28 Tamas Penzes ha scritto: > If a project depends on a test jar based on junit5 then the project has to > upgrade to junit5. > Can you explain more? > With junit5 the tests can stay in junit4 format (using junit-vintage), but > then they complain about being

Re: ZK Transaction API multi()

Huizhi, If you want to achieve total atomic broadcast and have a greater throughput you can consider using Zookeeper brother Apache Bookkeeper, that is built over ZK, it is very lightweight and scalable (no central coordination servers). https://bookkeeper.apache.org Hope that helps Enrico Il

Preparing for 3.6.2 release ?

Hi, we have committed a few fixes on 3.6.2 release branch, in particular bugfixes and fixes for regressions This is the list: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.6.2 I would like to start doing the necessary housekeeping before the

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3895) Client side NullPointerException in case of empty Multi operation

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3895: -- Summary: Client side NullPointerException in case of empty Multi operation Key: ZOOKEEPER-3895 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3895

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

Enrico > > > > On 2020. Jul 20., at 19:34, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Il Lun 20 Lug 2020, 19:02 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:47 AM Enrico Olivelli > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Il Lun 2

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

Il Lun 20 Lug 2020, 19:02 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:47 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il Lun 20 Lug 2020, 18:41 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:20 PM Andor Molnar > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

; That's just maven master though. Not sure about the rest. Can we do > more > > of > > > a "matrix" config in the new system vs cloning all the time? > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:31 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: >

Re: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

t; > > Patrick > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:31 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:22 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:56 PM Enrico O

Re: JDK 15 is now in Rampdown Phase Two

Hi, Current master of Apache ZooKeeper works like a charm with latest EA, no new issues. In one of my latest emails I told about a problem with the migration from Nashorn to GraalVMJS in another product. I can share with you that the migration has been completed successfully, even on JDK14.

Fwd: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o

FYI -- Forwarded message - Da: Gavin McDonald Date: Gio 16 Lug 2020, 18:33 Subject: [IMPORTANT] - Migration to ci-builds.a.o To: builds Hi All, This NOTICE is for everyone on builds.apache.org. We are migrating to a new Cloudbees based Client Master called

Re: Use cases of client.portUnification

In my opinion you can use port unification during a rolling upgrade of your ZK cluster and you are moving your servers to TLS. Another case is that you have to connect to two different ZK clusters, one with TLS and one with plain connections, some configurations are system properties so it is

Re: An official API for starting ZooKeeper from a Java program

Il giorno gio 25 giu 2020 alle ore 22:48 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 1:45 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il Gio 25 Giu 2020, 22:13 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:20 AM Enrico Olivelli > > > wrote

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3874) Official API to start ZooKeeper server from Java

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3874: -- Summary: Official API to start ZooKeeper server from Java Key: ZOOKEEPER-3874 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3874 Project: ZooKeeper

Re: An official API for starting ZooKeeper from a Java program

Il Gio 25 Giu 2020, 22:13 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:20 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > we recently got into ZOOKEEPER-3803 FileTxnSnapLog.fastForwardFromEdits() > > throws NPE if TestingServer is started from another thread (see

An official API for starting ZooKeeper from a Java program

Hi, we recently got into ZOOKEEPER-3803 FileTxnSnapLog.fastForwardFromEdits() throws NPE if TestingServer is started from another thread (see [1]) and I have similar cases in other non OS products that run ZooKeeper from Java. The case of ZOOKEEPER-3803 is for Curator TestingServer, and here we

Re: JDK 15 is in Rampdown Phase One

Hi Rory, ZooKeeper master build correctly on latest jdk15 build available on https://jdk.java.net/15/ I have already built and run tests over a few projects that are using ZooKeeper and everything works fine. Not related to ZooKeeper but I can report that in one product I see a big show stopper

Re: NullPointerException while shutting down ZK server

scritto: > I got you. It would be nice to fix that anyway. > > Andor > > > > > On 2020. Apr 14., at 17:41, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Andor, > > > > Il giorno lun 13 apr 2020 alle ore 19:59 Andor Molnar > ha > > scritto: > >

Re: OpenJDK 15 EA build 24 is now available

Rory, ZooKeeper test cases are passing on Linux. I have tested a bunch of other applications that use ZooKeeper and all works as expected I feel we are in good shape Enrico Il giorno ven 22 mag 2020 alle ore 18:29 Rory O'Donnell < rory.odonn...@oracle.com> ha scritto: > > Hi Enrico, > >

Re: Failing precommit builds on H6

Thanks Enrico Il Mer 20 Mag 2020, 13:09 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > Hi, > > I see some recent builds failing on H6 jenkins slave. I opened an INFRA > ticket for that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20284 > > Regards, > Andor > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ZooKeeper participating in OpenJDK Outreach program

dy added the tests against jdk14 The version is the one provided by ASF jenkins Enrico > Best regards, > Mate > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am glad to share with you that we are now part of the OpenJDK Quality > > O

[ANNOUNCE] ZooKeeper participating in OpenJDK Outreach program

. This activity will also help us in keeping ZooKeeper in perfect shape on every OpenJDK version. Best regards Enrico Olivelli

Re: Is there a slack channel to ask about zookeeper internals and generally learning about ZooKeeper

should promote ML for lots of reasons. Enrico > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:49 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > We are mostly using the mailing list. > > We have a gitter channel but it is not very active. > > We have a slack channel but only for ASF comm

Re: Is there a slack channel to ask about zookeeper internals and generally learning about ZooKeeper

We are mostly using the mailing list. We have a gitter channel but it is not very active. We have a slack channel but only for ASF committers You can start by asking here Enrico Il Mer 13 Mag 2020, 17:47 Arthur Okeke ha scritto: > Hi everyone, > > Is there a slack channel to ask questions

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.8

Kudos! Thank you Mate Enrico Il Mar 12 Mag 2020, 08:22 Szalay-Bekő Máté ha scritto: > The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version > 3.5.8 > > ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed > applications. It exposes common services - such as

Broken download page for ZK 3.6.1 binaries ?

Hi, from my network it looks like that the download link for 3.6.1 is broken https://zookeeper.apache.org/releases.html click on the binary tarball link https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.6.1/apache-zookeeper-3.6.1-bin.tar.gz Other links are working well for 3.6.1 The

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.8 candidate 0

+1 (binding) - checksums/signatures ok (imported new gpg key) - apache rat ok - compiled on Fedora 31 + jdk14 - run C tests on Fedora 31 - compiled and run Java tests on Mac with JDK14 - run a few smoke tests using the provided binaries on Mac with JDK8 and JDK14 - compared with

Re: Backporting practices

Andor, In my opinion it is better to port few patches to released branches. Basically only CVEs and critical bugfixes. The rationale is: - every patch that has been prepared for master branch could not fit cleanly to other branches, even if the cherry-pick succeeds, we could break it - we should

Re: Jenkins PreCommit job failing

Il Mer 6 Mag 2020, 14:59 Szalay-Bekő Máté ha scritto: > Hello Guys, > > I noticed that the following jenkins job always fails on PRs on branch-3.6 > or master: > https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/ > > The reason is that this job uses ant during the build. > > We

Re: log4j SmtpAppender related CVE

I will suppress the warning for 3.6. I would like to stop delivering that jar for 3.7.0. If we are on slf4j we can use another implementation. We have to document well the change and how to manually rollback to legacy Logger in case of trouble. Maybe a suggestion about how to convert the config

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.1

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.6.1 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so

Updating website for 3.6.1 release

Hi all, I am updating the website for 3.6.1 release. But Apache mirrors still do not make 3.6.1 available I hope they will sync soon. I have updated the website too soon Enrico

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 7 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: - Enrico Olivelli (binding) - Andor Molnar (binding) - Patrick Hunt (binding) - Szalay-Bekő Máté - Norbert Kalmar - Matteo Minardi - Christopher Tubbs

Re: 3.5.8 release

now about anything else I should wait > for? > Nothing from my side Thank you! Enrico > Thanks, > Mate > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:25 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 13:43 Szalay-Bekő Máté > ha > > scritto: > > > > >

Re: Handle Java 9/11 additions of covariant return types to java.nio.ByteBuffer methods

o 3.6 branch and to branch 3.5 Enrico > > Thanks Chris. > > Andor > > > > > On 2020. Apr 28., at 9:34, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > > Il Mar 28 Apr 2020, 02:47 Christopher ha scritto: > > > >> Option 2 was implemented by me already as part

Re: Handle Java 9/11 additions of covariant return types to java.nio.ByteBuffer methods

fer. Enrico > If this didn't fix it, I'd have to look into it further. But, the > option 1 doesn't look too bad to me. > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:16 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > Optional 2 is the best. > > > > I have fallen into this problem while

Re: Handle Java 9/11 additions of covariant return types to java.nio.ByteBuffer methods

Optional 2 is the best. I have fallen into this problem while preparing 3.6.1 rc. I was using jdk14 and my binaries wouldn't run in jdk8 Enrico Il Lun 27 Apr 2020, 18:58 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > Hi folks, > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3215 > > has come up recently

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

. btw we need another one (we only have me and Patrick as binding voters in this thread) Enrico Il giorno sab 25 apr 2020 alle ore 18:09 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > We still need a couple of binding VOTEs > Please any PMC check this candidate > > Enrico

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

We still need a couple of binding VOTEs Please any PMC check this candidate Enrico Il Ven 24 Apr 2020, 06:31 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:20 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il giorno mer 22 apr 2020 alle ore 16:14 Norbert Kalmar > > ha scritto:

Re: Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

l/1321 > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:03 PM Christopher wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:39 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > > > Christopher > > > Maybe with your commit a93ff0fe631d1c96ee056a79e3c16535ab33c794 we have > > > broken the so

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

t). > > - I also built and executed unit tests for zkpython > > - checkstyle and spotbugs passed > > - apache-rat passed > > - fatjar built > > - I executed a quick rolling-upgrade test from 3.5.7 to 3.6.1. (using > > https://github.com/symat/zk-rolli

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 1

/release-3.6.1-1 ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS The staging version of the website is: https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.6.1-candidate-1/website/ Should we release this candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

alle ore 19:17 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > sg. Merged onto both. Thanks all! > > Patrick > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:08 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Patrick, > > Yes only to be merged to branch3.6 and release-3.6.1 > > > > Thanks > >

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3802) RAT check fails on fatjar module

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3802: -- Summary: RAT check fails on fatjar module Key: ZOOKEEPER-3802 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3802 Project: ZooKeeper Issue

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

ote: > > > I can take a look. Does this need to go into just 3.6.1 or other branches > > as well? The JIRA says just 3.6.1,is that right? > > > > Patrick > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 6:02 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

PR is finally ready https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1323 Looking for some committer to help me merge that patch Enrico Il giorno sab 18 apr 2020 alle ore 12:42 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Thank you Christopher > > We are iterating over #1323. &

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:16 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > This is my patch. > > Basically it adds back the fatjar module to the full-build profile > > this way we have only one profile that actually does the "full build" = > all > > maven

Re: Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

Enrico Il giorno sab 18 apr 2020 alle ore 08:28 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > Branch-3.6 is broken due to the fatjat stuff > > [eolivelli@localhost zookeeper]$ mvn clean -Pfull-build,fatjar > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > [ERROR] [ERROR] Project

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3797) Conflict between fatjar and full-build Maven profiles in branch-3.6

Enrico Olivelli created ZOOKEEPER-3797: -- Summary: Conflict between fatjar and full-build Maven profiles in branch-3.6 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3797 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3797

Branch-36 is broken - fatjar - WAS Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

'org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper-contrib-fatjar:3.6.1-SNAPSHOT' is duplicated in the reactor -> [Help 1] [ERROR] I am preparing a fix Enrico Il giorno sab 18 apr 2020 alle ore 07:08 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 08:50 Enrico Olivelli ha > sc

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 08:50 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > Thank you Christopher ! > > I have manually fixed the pom.xml files in branch-3.6 and release-3.6.1 > branches. > > I would like to port ZOOKEEPER-3791 to branch-3.6 (that is now > 3.6.2-SNAPSHOT) and to 3.6.1 (that

Re: 3.5.8 release

Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 13:43 Szalay-Bekő Máté ha scritto: > Hello All, > > On the branch 3.5 we have quite a few CVE fixes (netty, jackson) and bug > fixes (e.g. fix build on JDK14 and fix three different leader election > bugs, etc.). Plus we have the backward compatibility fix of >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

started a review. I hope we can fix this stuff soon, this way we can release 3.6.1 to the public Enrico Il giorno gio 16 apr 2020 alle ore 23:08 Christopher ha scritto: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:52 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > Christopher, > > answe

Re: committing changes

Il Gio 16 Apr 2020, 19:39 Benjamin Reed ha scritto: > i want to start getting christopher's maven changes in! starting with > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1313 it's been a while since > I've actually pushed. i wanted to make sure >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

giorno gio 16 apr 2020 alle ore 15:27 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Christopher, > answers inline. > Thank you for testing ! > > Il giorno gio 16 apr 2020 alle ore 15:12 Christopher > ha scritto: > >> -0 (non-binding), I did find some

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

using > > https://github.com/symat/zk-rolling-upgrade-test) > > > > Kind regards, > > Mate > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 5:45 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > > > +1 - xsum/sig validated, rat ran clean, I was able to compile and ran > some &

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.1 candidate 0

/release-3.6.0-1 ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS The staging version of the website is: https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.6.1-candidate-0/website/ Should we release this candidate? Enrico Olivelli

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 12:39 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > > > Christopher > > > Maybe with your commit a93ff0fe631d1c96ee056a79e3c16535ab33c794 we have > > > broken the source release tarball. > > >

Re: NullPointerException while shutting down ZK server

nly, leaving potential leaks in the JVM Not a blocker problem for anyone Enrico org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZooKeeperServerMain.shutdown( ZooKeeperServerMain.java:219) > > Andor > > > > On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 11:41 +0200, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > during the shutdown of > > ZooKeeper Server > >

Re: Contribs as separate git repos

Il giorno lun 13 apr 2020 alle ore 15:11 Damien Diederen < ddiede...@sinenomine.net> ha scritto: > > Greetings, all, > > > I would go with: > > - drop contrib modules > > - keep fat jar and python > > - move python in zookeeper-clients directory > > I, for one, would like not to see zkperl

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

this issue? Otherwise I can try to fix it or simply git revert that commit as it is not a blocker issue for the release Cheers Enrico Il giorno dom 12 apr 2020 alle ore 14:58 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Christopher > This is my staging area > https://pe

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

ulo with the > release candidate when it's ready. > Do you already have the binary tarball built and uploaded somewhere? > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:43 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > Il Gio 9 Apr 2020, 20:33 Norbert Kalmar > ha > > scritto: > > &g

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

I have merged Michael's patch. Running the release procedure right now Stay tuned Enrico Il giorno ven 10 apr 2020 alle ore 20:17 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Thank you Micheal > > I will pick up the patch. > > > Enrico > > Il Ven 10 A

Re: Contribs as separate git repos

t. That really depends on the decisions the PMC > makes on what actions should be taken. I can help do the work if the > discussion turns into a resolution for action... but until then, I'm > happy learning from the conversation, and would be okay with taking no > action on an

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

ires some understanding to configure it correctly). > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:04 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il Ven 10 Apr 2020, 04:35 Christopher ha scritto: > > > > > I don't anticipate any issues, but I can test Accumulo with the > > > release c

NullPointerException while shutting down ZK server

Hi, while testing 3.6.1 RC we have found an issue during the shutdown of ZooKeeper Server it is an NPE, below the stacktrace of the error. The problem is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2845 Data inconsistency issue due to retain database in leader election The issue

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

u build from release-3.6.1 on Linux with JDK8 the results should be the same. You can use the docker env dev/docker/run.sh I will use a Fedora 31 box directly Enrico > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:43 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > Il Gio 9 Apr 2020, 20:33 Norbert Kalmar

Re: Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

ording to this on 3.6 as well. So it should be > fine now. > Thank you Enrico > > - Norbert > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:00 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am going to prepare a release candidate for ZooKeeper 3.6.1. > > > > There is no

Re: Contribs as separate git repos

Answers inline Il Gio 9 Apr 2020, 05:28 Christopher ha scritto: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:01 PM Damien Diederen > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Christopher, > > > > > I am just curious if anybody has thought about, or perhaps discussed, > > > the idea that the projects in the zookeeper-contrib folder

Cutting 3.6.1 HEADS UP !

Hi, I am going to prepare a release candidate for ZooKeeper 3.6.1. There is no JIRA issue with fixVersion = 3.6.1 that is unresolved. I have tested a few projects that had compatibility issues and they are resolved (like Apache BookKeeper and other non OS projects in my company). I remember

Fwd: Github autolinks to JIRA issues

I am forwarding this message from Apache Calcite project. They are going to ask to link github comments to JIRA tickets. This will help a lot during reviews, because you will have a link from github to JIRA just by using the JIRA id. If they get this done I would like to do the same for

Re: Implement checksum against malformed packets

Il Gio 9 Apr 2020, 05:36 Michael Han ha scritto: > >> Why? > > A packet can be captured, altered its payload, and recomputed its > checksum(s) while transmitting, that's why encryption is needed. This > example sounds pedantic but serving the purpose of the argument. > With encryption the data

Re: Does ZK use protobuf?

h a git blame you can easily find the reason. We have some code copied from that project Thanks to you! Enrico > > Thanks, > Christopher > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:49 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > Il Mer 8 Apr 2020, 06:18 tison ha scritto: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Sending 3.4 release line to End-Of-Life status

Il Mer 8 Apr 2020, 12:34 Andor Molnar ha scritto: > Hi, > > I’ve finished my quick testing on compatibility and all combinations are > working fine in both ways: higher version clients are able to connect and > run basic commands on older servers and vica versa. > > Tested latest released

Re: Does ZK use protobuf?

Il Mer 8 Apr 2020, 06:18 tison ha scritto: > From the git history I think it is just old and need to be updated. > > FYI, there is an ongoing effort ZOOKEEPER-102 trying to add protobuf as an > option for serde and finally deprecated jute. > > Best, > tison. > > > Christopher 于2020年4月8日周三

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >