Re: rerunning jenkins test

Yes, "build now" button on the job (sometimes "build with parameters", depending on the config). Patrick On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:59 PM Benjamin Reed wrote: > is there a button on jenkins somewhere that we can push to rerun a test? > > thanx > ben >

Re: ZK-3034 Unable to compile C++ test files with cppunit-1.14.0

When is pkg-config needed? If you want to compile from source or if you want to compile from the release artifact? Do we already do something special like generate the configure script and ship that as part of the release? Patrick On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 6:44 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > This PR is

Re: ZK-3034 Unable to compile C++ test files with cppunit-1.14.0

he generated ./configure script and Makefile.in in > the release artifact. > > Andor > > > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > When is pkg-config needed? If you want to compile from source or if you > > want to compile from the relea

Re: Apache ZooKeeper meetup May 9th in Palo Alto?

Ok folks, here are the details. LMK if there are any questions or issues: https://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Cloudera-User-Group/events/250182745/ Regards, Patrick On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Ok, great. I have two speakers already line

Re: Apache ZooKeeper meetup May 9th in Palo Alto?

will try. I'll finalize things and send out a more detailed agenda. Regards, Patrick On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:33 AM, Shivam Goel <shivam@gmail.com> wrote: > Count me in !! > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:08 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi fol

Re: Bug in Zookeeper 3.4.11 release

Abe mentioned the following on the jira "Perhaps we should introduce a check of some kind?" I agree with Abe on this - if you're new to ZK in 3.4.11 and you split the directories this commit is going to result in unexpected, and likely very bad, situation. Abe - is there a jira to add this

Re: Failed: ZOOKEEPER- PreCommit Build #1427

Hi Jordan. You can add it to ./src/java/test/config/findbugsExcludeFile.xml which is used during the check. Patrick On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > > > [exec] -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new > Findbugs (version

Re: Failed: ZOOKEEPER- PreCommit Build #1427

Hi Jordan. You can add it to ./src/java/test/config/findbugsExcludeFile.xml which is used during the check. Regards, Patrick On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:35 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > > > [exec] -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new > Findbugs

[ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Abraham Fine

The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Abe and he has accepted. Abe has made some great contributions and we are looking forward to even more :) Congratulations and welcome aboard Abe! Patrick

Re: ZooKeeper 3.4.11 bug: dataDir and dataLogDir swapped

This is a good point Andor. I've updated the release page on the website to reflect the regression addressed in ZOOKEEPER-2960 and upcoming fix. Thanks! Patrick On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi all, > > Please be aware that 3.4.11 has a quite

Re: Criticism on ZK

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:47 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > > • Unlike Kafka it does not have a vibrant and huge community (merge > those PR’s please, anyone?) > > This is clearly true. The community was active 5 or so years ago but in > the past few years it's almost

Re: [SUGGESTION] Target branches 3.5 and master (3.6) to Java 8

Perhaps discuss on the user list as Flavio mentioned prior to calling a vote? Has anyone looked at dependencies, is this consistent with what the rest of the ecosystem has defined. Hadoop/Hbase/Kafka/... components, Curator, etc... Regards, Patrick On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Andor Molnar

Re: ZK Jenkins job updates.

/jenkins-tools if folks have ideas they can submit PRs against this similar to the rest of the codebase. Patrick On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > I've been monitoring and the jobs seem much less flakey, afaict the > changes have improved things

Recent ZK Jenkins failures due to SSL protocol changes on central

FYI - I believe we're seeing: https://blog.sonatype.com/enhancing-ssl-security-and-http/2-support-for-central ivy-download: [get] Getting: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ivy/ivy/2.4.0/ivy-2.4.0.jar [get] To:

Re: Jenkins jobs are not triggering

I updated the jira issue. There were a couple recent updates to the job config (me and Michael) but nothing obvious. Patrick On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:15 AM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Hi folks, > > Since yesterday, the Jenkins job on the PR's are not triggering. > I created a jira about it: >

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > > > > Il sab 21 lug 2018, 17:17 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 AM Enrico Olivelli > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Il sab 21 lug 2018, 09:22 Patrick Hunt ha

Re: Trying to find pattern in Flaky Tests

seeing failures on trunk which are unrelated to that issue. Perhaps someone can take a look? Patrick On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 3:49 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > FYI, there's also this which I just reported: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16808 > > Patrick > > On Fri,

Re: Hello from your ZooKeeper friends @ Facebook

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:23 PM Mohamed Jeelani wrote: > Thanks Michael. I've attached the inline image as an attachment; hope you > can see it now. > > > > On 8/16/18, 1:12 PM, "Michael Han" wrote: > > Awesome! Looking forward to the great additions from FB that will add > to >

Re: Trying to find pattern in Flaky Tests

Something that's significantly different about the 3.4 and 3.5/master Jenkins jobs is that 3.5/master has test.junit.threads=8 set while this is not supported in 3.4 (see build.xml). It's very likely that the paralyzation of the tests is causing the discrepancy. setting threads > 1

Interesting FB article on CM at scale; LAD

"Location-Aware Distribution (LAD), a new peer-to-peer system that handles the distribution of configuration changes to millions of servers." https://code.fb.com/data-infrastructure/location-aware-distribution-configuring-servers-at-scale/ Previously Facebook’s configuration management system

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

runk moved to kerby, wonder if that could be it (sasl fails at least)? Patrick On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:02 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > Thanks Enrico. Possible. However afaict Jenkins is running build 19 (build > 11-ea+19) and I didn't notice anything obvious in the notes for 19+ relate

Re: Trying to find pattern in Flaky Tests

FYI, created this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16785 for the security warnings, not sure if that's causing the issue. Likely it's the recent jenkins upgrade, looking into it a bit... Patrick On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:48 AM Michael Han wrote: > Hi Andor, > > >> I suspect it

Re: Trying to find pattern in Flaky Tests

you seen this before? Perhaps we should open an INFRA jira? Patrick On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:52 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > FYI, created this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16785 > for the security warnings, not sure if that's causing the issue. Likely > it's the re

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.13 candidate 1

ve the rest of the week for folks to try the release candidate > >> and provide feedback. As Pat mentioned, helping voting a release is a > great > >> way to make contributions to ZooKeeper, so any help will be very > welcome! > >> > >> I'll start publish

Re: Trying to find pattern in Flaky Tests

FYI, there's also this which I just reported: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16808 Patrick On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:01 AM Patrick Hunt wrote: > Something that's significantly different about the 3.4 and 3.5/master > Jenkins jobs is that 3.5/master has > > test.jun

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 1:21 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il sab 21 lug 2018, 09:22 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > Interestingly I don't see the auth tests that are failing in 3.4 failing > on > > trunk (they pass), instead a number of tests fail with "Ad

Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

Hey folks, I added a couple Jenkins jobs based on Java 11 which is set to release in September. Jenkins is running a pre-release https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_java11/ java version "11-ea" 2018-09-25 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11-ea+19)

Re: Test failures (SASL) with Java 11 - any ideas?

ybe it is related > > http://jdk.java.net/11/release-notes > > My 2 cents > Enrico > > Il sab 21 lug 2018, 08:03 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > Hey folks, I added a couple Jenkins jobs based on Java 11 which is set to > > release in September. Jenkins i

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.13 candidate 1

+1. the xsum/sig are good. rat seemed fine. ran through a number of cluster scenarios and it seemed to work fine. I notice that the dynamic IP change is in - I'd recommend folks that have been advocating for that change to give the RC a try and verify that it's working for them. Great way to pay

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.13 candidate 1

my own vote (as the release manager) does not count, so we > need one more vote from a PMC member before we can release this (currently > two bindings are from you and Rakesh). > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > +1. the xsum/sig are good. rat

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

I would like to cut 3.5.4. Need more eyes on 2901 though. Patrick On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 4:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: > I think ZK-2901 is close to being merged, yes? And with that, will we cut > a 3.5.4 release? > > -Flavio > > > On 7 Dec 2017,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 1

Hey folks. I've been on vacation. My 0.02 - given the release candidate is well underway, has sufficient votes/time to finalize, this is not a regression in 3.4.12 and it's not yet committed I would think we finalize/push 3.4.12 then quickly followup with a 3.4.13 that addresses this. Alex could

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 1

The voting timeline for releases is a minimum to ensure everyone has the opportunity to participate, it's not a max. The vote can run for as long as necessary. Patrick On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > The original email said: > > bq. vote by March 31st

Re: Jenkins build fail

I've been making some adjustments based on feedback from the infra folks. Hopefully we'll get it straightened soon. Thanks Norbert! Patrick On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Hi Devs, > > Just a quick update/notice: > My builds started failing last

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade 3.5 and trunk to Java8

zookeeper-trunk is our historical tip build (and does things a bit differently than the jdk version coverage builds). I updated it to use jdk8latest and disabled the standalone trunk-jdk8 build. LMK if you notice anything else. Also notice that I recently (early april) introduced a job for jdk10

Apache ZooKeeper meetup May 9th in Palo Alto?

Hi folks. I am interested in hosting a ZooKeeper meetup May 9th in Cloudera's Palo Alto offices. It's been a while since we last got together, lots of recent changes and some big plans, new additions to the PMC and committer lists, new contributors. I was hoping to use the mailing lists to gauge

Move github discussions from JIRA comments to the JIRA worklog?

Hey devs, I noticed this recently filed by the Apache Arrow team: "Change GitHub Bot to post to Work Log instead of Comments" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16426 which really resonates with me - I'm finding that the JIRA comments are being lost amongst the github updates related to

Re: Please add your release data for 'zookeeper'

I took care of this. Thanks Abe! Patrick On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:40 PM, Abraham Fine wrote: > Hello PMC Members- > > Would one of you please help me with this part of the release process? > > Thanks, > Abe > > - Original message - > From: Apache Reporter Service

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 1

+1. sig/xsum verified, RAT ran OK. I tested a few operational scenarios which seemed fine. Ran the tests and they passed. LGTM. Patrick On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:05 PM, Abraham Fine wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.12. It fixes 22 issues, > including

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.12 candidate 0

+1 - sig/xsum verify, RAT looks ok, was able to build/test successfully under jdk7/mac. Tested out a few deployment combinations and it seemed ok. Manually verified swapping data and datalogdir resulted in the server not coming up and human readable error in the logs. Patrick On Thu, Mar 22,

Re: [SUGGESTION] Target branches 3.5 and master (3.6) to Java 8

m> > wrote: > > > >> Okay, I dropped a mail on the user list to get some feedback. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Andor > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade 3.5 and trunk to Java8

+1. Patrick On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi all, > > Let's start the vote on upgrading to Java8. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3002 > > *Shall we upgrade the minimum required Java version to compile and run > ZooKeeper on 3.5

Re: 3.4.12

R-2184 can be pushed again and I don't think there is > anything else that we need to merge in before cutting a release. > > Abe > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018, at 21:52, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > There are 19 resolved issues http://bit.ly/2oK9aTx > > and 14 unresolved http:/

Re: 3.4.12

There are 19 resolved issues http://bit.ly/2oK9aTx and 14 unresolved http://bit.ly/2oFWywS ZOOKEEPER-2184 is the only unresolved blocker, however that's not a regression and was pushed from 3.4.11, we could do so again given it's still being worked on. Abe are you interested in taking a turn as

Re: Fw: Re: [osgi-dev] Invalid version in bundle org.apache.hadoop.zookeeper=: 3.5.3-beta

Hi Kevin. Is it the same issue as this? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2317 If so perhaps you could take on that JIRA and help drive a solution. I think the biggest issue is that no-one on our end has sufficient experience on OSGI to verify a fix. Regards, Patrick On Wed, Apr

Re: Decrease number of threads in Jenkins builds to reduce flakyness

iirc the number of threads was increased to improve performance. Reducing is fine, but do we understand why it's failing? Perhaps it's finding real issues as a result of the artificial concurrency/load. Patrick On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:12 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. >

Re: Wiki access

Send me your wiki ID privately and I will set it up for you. Patrick On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 7:35 AM Tamas Penzes wrote: > Hi All, > > Could you please give me permission to edit the wiki. > I should update a few thing related to doc generation. > > Thanks, Tamaas >

Re: Zookeeper at Twitter by Micheal

Very cool. Great article Michael. I've tweeted here if folks are looking to retweet: https://twitter.com/phunt/status/105125086834688 Regards, Patrick On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 3:27 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi Michael, > I just stepped into this very interesting post ! > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Fangmin Lv

Kudos Fangmin! Patrick On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 4:31 PM Michael Han wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Fangmin > and he has accepted. Fangmin has made some great contributions and we > are looking forward to even more :) > > > Congratulations and welcome

Java11 test failures with 3.5/master

Thursday night during the meetup at Facebook someone was asking about java11 and 3.5/master. I dug in a bit. Looks like master hasn't been passing for some time, https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-java11/ I just added a java11 job for 3.5 to jenkins, it is

Re: question about approach to take

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:59 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > I am going to push this feature out sooner rather than later. That isn't a > question. I and my team are going to do the work. Others are very welcome > to help and I am sure that there will be high value in getting reviews from > a wide

Re: Grant edit permission on Wiki

Hi Enrico - I added you to the cwiki. Please let me know if there are any issues. Thanks for driving this! Regards, Patrick On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:11 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > can I have 'edit' permissions on ZooKeeper space on confluence ? > I have to update this page >

ZK release mechanics update.

Hi folks, especially anyone doing releases. Apache has updated their requirements for releases wrt checksums on the release artifact: https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums I've updated the "how to release" page to reflect:

Re: ZK release mechanics update.

Sorry, should have mentioned, the main change is that Apache no longer allow md5 checksums. As such I've updated the release process to generate SHA 256/512 checksums instead (per the Apache guidelines). Patrick On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 3:13 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > Hi folks, especially any

Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox

Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the holidays? Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about? e.g. I see a reference in pom.xml pom.xml 63:scm:git: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git 64:

Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox

s ha > scritto: > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the > > documentation. > > Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People > might > > read them.) > > &

Re: Cannot find doap file: http://zookeeper.apache.org/doap.rdf

Andor I believe you modified the web site recently, could you take a look? Thanks for the report Sebb. Patrick On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 3:13 AM sebb wrote: > Please can you fix this error? > > The DOAP has moved. > > Either change the location in the projects.xml file, or restore the > DOAP to

Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

Are folks OK to wait on that OWASP issue I documented over the weekend? afaict we are not affected but it would be good to get another pair of eyes on it. Patrick On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:55 PM Andor Molnár wrote: > Hi team, > > > I'm proudly announce that thanks to the joint effort from the

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

e. I don't know how it is worth > > Enrico > > Il giorno lun 17 dic 2018 alle ore 07:02 Enrico Olivelli > ha scritto: > > > > Sure > > > > Enrico > > > > Il lun 17 dic 2018, 02:43 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > >> > >> Sound

Re: Cannot find doap file: http://zookeeper.apache.org/doap.rdf

at the root of 'website' branch. I think we > have to adjust pom.xml to copy it to the right place. > > > Regards, > > Andor > > > > > On 12/10/18 18:48, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > Andor I believe you modified the web site recently, could you take a > loo

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

t; Can we whitelist that jar in the meantime? > > Enrico > > Il sab 15 dic 2018, 01:28 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-owasp/204/artifact/build/test/owasp/dependency-check-vulnerability.html &

Re: owasp job just started flagging slf4j

lgtm, minor nit and then we're good to go imo. Thanks, Patrick On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 6:31 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Patch updated with a better approach > > Enrico > > Il ven 21 dic 2018, 00:29 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > Thanks Enrico, I commented on the PR,

Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox

gt; +1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move. > >> I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they > >> are WIP. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Norbert > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han wrote: > &g

owasp job just started flagging slf4j

https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-owasp/204/artifact/build/test/owasp/dependency-check-vulnerability.html https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8088 We don't use EventData but should consider upgrading. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3217

Re: Migrating ZooKeeper to GitBox

> 'https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git' ? > > > > I mean it uses https:// protocol, not git://? > > > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > On 12/15/18 00:30, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> FYI INFRA has updated the repo location. > >> > &g

Re: Java version (Oracle - OpenJDK) support

Historically we've always defined a minimum version and let users decide. That seems to have worked pretty well. It provides the most flexibility and hasn't really bothered us too much. It limits our use of new language features of Java, but typically Java is ensuring b/w compat from a runtime

Re: Java 11 OpenJDK/Oracle Java Release Cadence Questions

Hi Jeremiah. It's failing consistently on Jenkins, unlikely to officially support until someone addresses those: https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-java11/ We've been testing with openjdk for quite some time, those are supported. The docs are ambiguous in that

Re: Java version (Oracle - OpenJDK) support

t; - We should add more pressure on the testing side of 3.5: there’re only 3 > Jenkins job currently running on branch-3.5. Let’s add Oracle Java 11 > build, OpenJDK 8,9,10,11 whatever you think makes sense. > > Regards, > Andor > > > > > > > On 2018. Sep 13., at

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:47 PM Justin Ling Mao wrote: > Test for the* 3.5.5 candidate 2*: > > -[0]: Jepsen consistency check had passed. +1. >Look at the attachment: *jepsen_test_report.txt.* >how to use it: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/883 > > -[1]: zk smoke and

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:37 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > -1 (non binding) > > Good news: > I have build the sources with jdk-8 and all tests passed > checksums and signatures are ok > I run a few smoke tests running on JDK11, all is ok > > Bad news: > I see the following problems in the "binary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.14 candidate 3

-1. I notice at least a couple issues with license files. I used "meld" on 3.4.14 to compare it to 3.4.13. in "lib" directory * the file "jline-0.9.94.LICENSE.txt" has gone missing (and there is no license file within the jar itself) * jsr305 and spotbugs-annotations jars have been added. Neither

Re: Question on ZK commit/patch policy.

s without Jira ticket > and properly formatted title / commit message. > > Andor > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 5:38 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. > Now > > with the move to gitbox we are seeing i

Question on ZK commit/patch policy.

Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. Now with the move to gitbox we are seeing increased submissions (PRs) that don't include a JIRA - I just committed one and then realized that it didn't include a JIRA (sorry about that!). Given github and the recent move to

Apache ZooKeeper meetup in Palo Alto March 14th

Hi folks. Andor is visiting the USA and he asked if I could facilitate a meetup the night of March 14th - 530-8pm. This would be in Palo Alto at Cloudera's HQ - 395 Page Mill Rd, Palo Alto. I will reserve one of our meeting rooms and order pizza and beer. I plan to keep it low key, a bit of an

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.14 candidate 4

-1 - "spotbugs-annotations-3.1.9.jar" is still being distributed in the lib directory. (I highlighted this in my comments on RC3 as well) Regards, Patrick On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:48 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.14. It fixes 8 issues, mostly > build /

Re: Apache ZooKeeper meetup in Palo Alto March 14th

Huang wrote: > Hi, Patric > > Are we still on for the meetup? I'm interested and planning to be there. > > Thanks, > Jie > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > Hi folks. Andor is visiting the USA and he asked if I could facilitate a > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.4.14 candidate 5

+1 - sig/xsum verified, rat ran clean, was able to run various ensemble sizes successfully. Patrick On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:56 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.14. It fixes 8 issues, mostly > build / unit tests issues, > dependency updates flagged by OWASP,

Re: Re: ZooKeeper 3.5 blocker issues

t; > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > >> within ZooKeeper the same way. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards, Tamaas &g

Re: Opening 'retest maven/ant build' to the public

Seems reasonable. If it's abused we can always revert. Patrick On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:59 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi Zookeepers, > Currently only apache committers are allowed to restart pre commit builds > withon the 'magic phrase'. > But anyone can close/reopen his PR in order to

Re: ZookKeeper and 'released' artifacts

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 1:04 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi ZooKeepers, > > It's the first time I am looking deeply into the release procedure and > what ZooKeeper is 'releasing'. > I would like to share some thoughts, in order to understand better the > process. > > I see that in the official

Re: OWASP task failing again ! but is CI lying ?

Note the owasp job has been failing since the upgrade to dependency checker 4 due to "Target "dependency-check-update" does not exist in the project "ZooKeeper"" the jenkins job was explicitly running the update (which seems to not exist after the upgrade). I updated the job targets however it's

Re: Pull requests validation - Maven is active - heads up!

Looks good. Thanks Enrico! Patrick On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:32 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi ZooKeepers, > I have enabled validation of Pull Requests with Maven. > > In order to trigger the tests with ANT add a comment with: > retest ant build > > In order to trigger the tests with MAVEN add

Re: OWASP task failing again ! but is CI lying ?

Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno gio 31 gen 2019, 00:42 Patrick Hunt ha > scritto: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:13 PM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > > > Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019, 21:41 Patrick Hunt ha > > > scritto: > > > > &g

Re: OWASP task failing again ! but is CI lying ?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:13 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019, 21:41 Patrick Hunt ha > scritto: > > > Note the owasp job has been failing since the upgrade to dependency > checker > > 4 due to > > "Target "dependency-che

Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2

14e152fddd340f7d6d3/zkpython-0.4.2.tar.gzpython > setup.py installexport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/then I cd the > zk-smoketest dir,exec the following:./zk-latencies.py --servers > "localhost:2181" --root_znode="/zk-latencies_666" --znode_count=1 > --znode_siz

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 3

Andor, you previously said "None of the issues are showstopper for the RC, but let's fix them to get a clean sheet." Which meant to me that you are cutting a new RC, as such I haven't looked. What's the plan? Patrick On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:12 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi team, > > Just to

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 4

-1 currently. On the plus side things seem to be functional and I tested 3.4 against this release in a mixed ensemble and it seemed fine. I would recommend changing the name from zookeeper-3.5.5-source-package.tar.gz to apache-zookeeper-3.5.5.tar.gz - this is _the_ artifact. Everything else is a

Re: ZK Smoke Screen Test

Thanks for the submission David - I merged your PR today. Regards, Patrick On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:20 AM David Mollitor wrote: > OK, so the smoke tests I setup pull from docker hub. The latest tag is > 3.5.4-beta > < >

[ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Enrico Olivelli

The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Enrico and he has accepted. Enrico has made some great contributions and we are looking forward to even more :) Congratulations and welcome aboard, Enrico!

[ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Norbert Kalmar

The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Norbert and he has accepted. Norbert has made some great contributions and we are looking forward to even more :) Congratulations and welcome aboard, Norbert!

Re: Dropping ANT precommit script - last stept

Sounds reasonable. Have you looked at what Yetus provides? iiuc a number of the hadoop ecosystem projects use it to provide base/consistent experience wrt the build. Now that we're on Maven perhaps we should re-evaluate? re #8 - I don't think we should compromise given contrib is still not

Re: ZooKeeper-Find-Flaky-Tests job updated

"less problems"? TBH the maven job seems super flakey compared to what I'm seeing with Ant, a step down. I submitted a PR and it's failed maven multiple times with random failures: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/962 are we doing something different between the two? Patrick On Wed, May

Re: PostCommit- CI job ? Where it is ?

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:39 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il ven 14 giu 2019, 09:17 Andor Molnar ha > scritto: > > > +1 for dropping it. > > > > Enrico, have you created a Jenkins view which gathers all Maven based > > builds? > > > > No I don't. I am not an user of such views. > Feel free to

Re: Apache Zookeeper - Export Commodity Control Classification (ECCN) Needed

I don't believe we've updated it to include ZK, seems we need to go through this process: http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html I haven't been involved with this before - anyone have experience with this, perhaps on another ASF project? Patrick On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 7:01 AM DANOS, Bertrand

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

Good idea. Agree on including anything we've postponed to a new cycle - the patch from mapr is an obvious one to consider. We should also look at things we've disabled by default and consider whether we can turn them on by default. If not why not, and what can we do to fix this in a subsequent

Re: ACTION REQUIRED: disk space on jenkins master nearly full

Narrowing this down to just the ZK folks. We're currently discarding the builds after 90 days for both of the jobs. Perhaps we can narrow down to 60? The PRs link to these builds, are they valuable after that point (vs just retriggering the build if missing)? I also notice that

Re: ACTION REQUIRED: disk space on jenkins master nearly full

On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 10:29 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il sab 15 giu 2019, 18:18 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > Narrowing this down to just the ZK folks. > > > > We're currently discarding the builds after 90 days for both of the jobs. > > Perhaps we can n

Re: [DISCUSS] Is it time to remove Apache Ant from ZooKeeper?

What's the current status on maven replacing ant? Is there a current summary somewhere? Perhaps someone could create a wiki page to track the status across the three branches and plans/remainder for each? I noticed today that even with the "full-build" profile it doesn't look like maven is

Re: [DISCUSS] Is it time to remove Apache Ant from ZooKeeper?

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:02 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mer 19 giu 2019, 06:38 Patrick Hunt ha scritto: > > > What's the current status on maven replacing ant? Is there a current > > summary somewhere? Perhaps someone could create a wiki page to track the > >

Re: contributor permission apply

Some good "how to contribute" docs here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute Regards, Patrick On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:01 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mer 12 giu 2019, 11:43 leesf ha scritto: > > > Hi, > > > > I want to contribute to Apache Zookeeper. > >

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >