On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:14 AM, kgilb...@mozilla.com wrote:
Is this behavior acceptable or would it be more desirable to always return
the actual scroll position in DOM methods?
All DOM methods that depend on the scroll position (not just
scrollLeft/scrollTop but getBoundingClientRect etc
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 4:59 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Saturday 2014-05-24 20:00 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I guess what I'm arguing is that smooth-scrolling vs. instant
scrolling shouldn't be a per-element CSS property, but rather a
per-callsite API argument.
I
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
How will scroll-behavior: instant work on platforms that use APZ? I
worry about authors expect it to enable them to do a bunch of DOM
mutations and then set the scroll position and allow them to be sure
that rendering
Android and B2G got fixed to use #pragma GCC visibility. So, we can go
ahead and remove all NS_HIDDEN-related code now.
This also means that when modifying Android and B2G-specific code that uses
symbols imported from other dynamic libraries, you will need to add to
config/system-headers (when
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:11 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
I wonder if the problem is that we're overusing namespaces (i.e., we
have too many of them or put many classes at places too deeply
nested in the namespace hierarchy)? Perhaps it makes sense to have
a guideline that
Seems to me we should indicate pings in the link status text (bug 401352),
indicate pinging in the status text while we load the next page, and retain
the about:config pref to disable pinging.
The first two measures seem low-cost and constitute a strict improvement on
the current privacy
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
drawFocusIfNeeded() isn't a particularly good name either, since you're
not drawing the focus, you're drawing the focus ring.
In the old email thread, Jatinder Mann objected to using the term ring
since the focus drawn might not
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2014, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
We could probably come up with a slightly better name, but only very
slightly better, so at this point I would rather not reopen the
discussion. If someone else wants to, that's
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW the discussion was public.
See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2014JanMar/0003.html
Haha, OK, apology withdrawn :-).
Thanks,
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
On 4/22/2014 7:31 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
It's all over the tree, inconsistently applied. Is it relevant anymore?
Can
we remove it entirely, or there some places where it's still relevant, and
if so, where
The Timelapse project is cool but this thread got derailed. We have a long
list of future improvements to make to rr, and improving support for JS
debugging is on that list.
The point of this thread is that if you're debugging intermittent test
failures and you don't need much JS debugging then
Building a debugger for a high-level language on top of a low-level
recording is unexplored territory but it's definitely possible and it would
have some nice features. However, you can't get much leverage from any
existing debugging support built into a VM.
We could build some JS debugging
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Vladimir Vukicevic vladim...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a prototype of VR display and sensor integration with the web,
along with an implementation for the Oculus VR. Despite there really being
only one vendor right now, there is a lot of interest in VR. I'd
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.comwrote:
If VR is not yet a thing on the Web, could you elaborate on why you think
it should be?
I'm asking because the Web has so far mostly been a common denominator,
conservative platform. For example, WebGL stays at a
We just released rr 1.2 and I think this would be a good time for people to
try to use it for one of the tasks it was designed for: debugging
intermittent test failures.
Consult http://rr-project.org for more information, but the gist is this:
you can use rr to record the execution of Firefox
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
4) Create a script somewhere called rr-record that does exec ~/rr/bin/rr
record $*
Sorry; this script, of course, needs to exec rr from wherever it was
installed.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
1) Install rr on a Westmere-or-later Linux system (or VM with performance
counters virtualized), build 32-bit Firefox (opt or debug) and verify that
recording Firefox works for you. If it doesn't, please file
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
gijskruitbo...@gmail.comwrote:
1) Is anyone working on something similar that works for frontend code
(particularly, chrome JS)? I realize we have a JS debugger, but sometimes
activating the debugger at the wrong time makes the bug go away, and
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ted Mielczarek t...@mielczarek.org wrote:
Do you have any idea on a timeframe for x86-64 support?
It's technically not that hard, but it's a reasonably large project so it's
not going to happen right away.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
I came across the following articles on source control and code review:
* https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabflavor/article/
recommendations_on_revision_control/
*
When you say debug, you mean the emulator is running a FirefoxOS debug
build, not that the emulator itself is built debug --- right?
Given that, is it a correct summary to say that the problem is that the
emulator is just too slow?
Applying time dilation might make tests green but we'd be left
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Joshua Cranmer pidgeo...@gmail.comwrote:
My original design for mozilla::Atomic was meant to avoid what I saw as
the biggest footgun: you cannot misuse mozilla::Atomic in such a way that
you combine atomic and non-atomic accesses on a single variable. You
DOMRect, DOMPoint and DOMQuad are defined in the Geometry Interfaces spec:
http://dev.w3.org/fxtf/geometry/Overview.html
GeometryUtils is defined in the CSSOM View spec:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/#geometry
The spec for the GeometryUtils methods is quite incomplete but we've
discussed the
Sounds good :-)
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t uTph eann dt
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Felipe G fel...@gmail.com wrote:
If I go with the clone route (to work on the snapshot'ed version of the
data), how can I later associate the cloned nodes to the original nodes
from the document? One way that I thought is to set a a userdata on the
DOM nodes
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
How feasible is just doing .innerHTML to do that, then doing some sort of
async parse (e.g. XHR or DOMParser) to get a DOM snapshot? That said, this
would mean that you end up with a snapshot that's actual DOM stuff, on the
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Botond Ballo bba...@mozilla.com wrote:
I think at least one of the goals of the standard drawing API is to
make C++ easier to learn by allowing people learning the language
to create simple graphical applications without having to set up
third-party libraries
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Reed Loden r...@reedloden.com wrote:
I do like the slickness and quickness, but it still seems
greatly-lacking usability-wise (as compared to mxr)...
A few things off the top of my head:
* Where are the non-mozilla-central repositories?
* Where's the
I've already given my feedback on the cairo mailing list. Summary: Moz2D is
the right thing for us, and probably for other application frameworks, but
for applications that just want to draw their stuff on the screen or to
print, cairo might be a better fit. Anyway ti doesn't really matter to us
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
I've already given my feedback on the cairo mailing list. Summary: Moz2D
is
the right thing for us, and probably for other application
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Masayuki Nakano masay...@d-toybox.comwrote:
I filed bug 968056 for changing our keypress event behavior for
conformance with D3E definition.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=968056
In D3E definition, keypress event shouldn't be fired for
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jrmui...@mozilla.comwrote:
On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Matt Woodrow m...@mozilla.com wrote:
- A fully transparent surface containing only text. It should be fairly
easy to get this to happen by 3d transforming a text element. I suspect
we
Congratulations! This has been an epic journey :-).
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr atnod
I agree that those are the current best practices.
We have a lot of places where we write void Method() { ... } all on one
line for trivial setters and getters. I wonder if we should permit that.
We have a lot of places where the opening brace of a class declaration is
on the same line as the
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Mike Hoye mh...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 1/7/2014, 3:22 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
Since people are introducing actual research information here, let's run
some numbers. According to Paterson et. al. [1], reading comprehension
speed is actively hindered by lines that
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Bobby Holley bobbyhol...@gmail.com wrote:
* There are a lot of SpiderMonkey hackers who don't hack on anything else,
and don't consider themselves Gecko hackers.
This has always bothered me a lot. It needs to change.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
AFAICT, there are not many rules that module owners are bound by.
There are lots of tree-wide or Gecko-wide rules that module owners are
bound by.
The
reason module owners can dictate style is because module owners
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Walden jwalden+...@mit.edu wrote:
JS widely uses 99ch line lengths (allows a line-wrap character in 100ch
terminals). Given C++ symbol names, especially with templates, get pretty
long, it's a huge loss to revert to 80ch because of how much has to wrap.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nicholas Nethercote
n.netherc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
That's a mistake. Module owners don't have the authority to make up their
own style. Who has been doing this?
I was under
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jeff Gilbert jgilb...@mozilla.com wrote:
Personally, there are a couple of things I don't like about moz-style
(though revisions to the central style guide at least have made it better
than it used to be), but instead of bikeshedding the central style guide,
I think the best way to expend energy on this topic would be to work on
tools.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875605 seems worth getting
over the line. Some other kind of checker, possibly based on clang-format,
could also be a fine alternative. Just get something working that is
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chris Peterson cpeter...@mozilla.comwrote:
On 12/12/13, 5:09 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
The preferred form would now be:
#include mozilla/Char16.h
const PRUnichar *comma = MOZ_UTF16(,);
I think char16_t is preferred over PRUnichar for new code.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Chris Pearce cpea...@mozilla.com wrote:
It seems to me that we should be optimizing for developer productivity
first, and use profiling tools to find code that needs to be optimized.
i.e. we should be able to use STL containers where we need basic ADTs in
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/12/10 Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
Keep in mind that proliferation of different types for the same
functionality hurts developer productivity in various ways, especially
when
they have quite
Don't these arguments apply to desktop Firefox used at work, in an Internet
cafe, or in a library, as well?
I think it's important to have an easy way to mute/unmute the browser, but
disabling autoplay is probably not the right way to address these issues.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy
Maybe we can build something clever based on the per-window volume and
muting infrastructure in bug 923247? I think easy per-tab muting is a good
thing to try here.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o
I can reproducibly (but nondeterministically) reproduce a problem where
setting NSPR_LOG_MODULES, but not NSPR_LOG_FILE, redirecting stdout and
stderr to a file using bash , and using mach mochitest-plain, the
occasional log message gets dropped. This can be very disturbing when
trying to debug
Bill McCloskey pointed me to bug 924253, and his patch there fixed my
problem.
So basically, don't trust mochitest output until bug 924253 is fixed.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei csha
If everyone puts using namespace foo; inside namespace mozilla {}, that
won't help much, right?
I'd prefer to minimize the source code changes required here. A tinderbox
non-unified build seems like the way to go.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fiwrote:
We have a concept of platform charset that goes back to pre-NT
Windows, Mac OS Classic, OS/2 and pre-UTF-8 *nix platforms. This
concept gets in the way of doCOMtaminating old code to use only new
facilities in
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Zack Weinberg za...@panix.com wrote:
On 2013-11-20 12:37 PM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
Talking about ideas for further extending the impact of UNIFIED_SOURCES,
it
seems that the biggest limitation at the moment is that sources can't be
unified between different
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
While true, in the new setup we have a different problem: adding or
removing a .cpp file makes other random .cpp files not compile.
I don't think we should worry much about this until we have more data on
how often it's a
Lovely!!!
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
- FINAL_LIBRARY defines what library your code is going to be linked
into. That needs to match an existing LIBRARY_NAME in some other
moz.build. Most code will go in either xul, gkmedias or gklayout. Note
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
FWIW, there's an open bug to fold gkmedias back into xul, but it looks
like it's not going to happen soon.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922912
Egad! Oh well.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:04 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
I expect that otherwise we'd get pretty frequent bustage with people
forgetting to add #includes, and that bustage would then show up
when we add or remove files, which would make it a huge pain to add
or remove files.
When you say iframes you mean content documents that aren't toplevel
content documents, right?
Can you explain why sessionstore.js needs to observe non-toplevel-content
documents at all? I assume there's an obvious answer, I just don't know
what it is :-).
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:09 AM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
dtel...@mozilla.com wrote:
Or we could not save dynamic iframes in non-current positions in the
history.
Does this mean that currently, if a page creates an IFRAME, loads url A
into it, then loads url B into it, sessionstore.js will
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
Is there a chrome-only API like .elementFromPoint that will tell me which
XBL anonymous element is at a point?
I don't think so. You probably need to add another parameter to
nsIDOMWindowUtils::nodesFromRect
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:24 PM, bbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Added to the etherpad too but here's the list I have so far.
I started a github project a month or so ago here: (Still pretty early)
https://github.com/bbondy/codefirefox/
And here are some videos, layout will be changing, that's just
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Watt jw...@jwatt.org wrote:
The style guide doesn't seem to address this:
When I have, say, a class in the global namespace called nsSVGUtils, what
is preferred:
class nsSVGUtils
{
public:
// blah blah
static mozilla::gfx::FillRule
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Nicolas Silva nical.si...@gmail.comwrote:
With OMTC these days the Layer classes don't hold any logic. All the fancy
stuff goes into classes inheriting from CompositableClient (and
CompositableHost on the compositor side). While Layer classes can only be
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Trevor Linton trevor.lin...@gmail.comwrote:
I have a curious question which probably won't be possible in any immediate
future. Is it possible to re-implement a layout/rendering/render tree
system within native JavaScript with DOM bindings (also written in
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
One thing that's come up that we're not quite how to deal with for
OMTcanvas is
how to modify GetCanvasLayer. Our problem here is that the context here
lives on the worker thread, and presumably we need to construct the
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
Having this blocking interface will also support blocking shumway on
graphics rendering; there are a fair number of SWF files that use an API to
get a synchronous bitmap of their stage, which requires a blocking
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
Is canvas-on-a-worker a short-term project?
WebGL is at least.
Also from reading the whatwg discussion, I thought you had proposed .toBlob
but not .toDataURI specifically so that the bitmap was not synchronously
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Till Schneidereit
t...@tillschneidereit.net wrote:
From talking to Kyle, it sounds like getting WebGL into workers is
much closer than getting all of Context2D, too. Specifically, we need
text rendering to work, because we have to be able to render device
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Peterson cpeter...@mozilla.comwrote:
I stumbled upon some layout code that for transparent colors using != or
== NS_RGBA(0,0,0,0):
http://dxr.mozilla.org/**mozilla-central/search?q=**
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Trevor Saunders trev.saund...@gmail.comwrote:
- virtual constants
Yeah baby!
- ability to say classes should only be used on stack / heap or not used
in one of those
That's another good idea!
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2013, at 16:35, Anthony Jones ajo...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 21/09/13 17:58, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily true on Windows. If we can find a way
to
generate Visual Studio projects
This should probably be a CSS property. We should write a proper spec for
it and propose it to www-style.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
This is a hard problem, and it depends on what question you're asking:
* Is a node visible if it's in the window but some other window is
covering the current window?
* Is a node visible if it's currently scrolled
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Jeff Gilbert jgilb...@mozilla.com wrote:
Could you clarify number 2? It's a little dense.
A better way to state it is this: every layer tree update by the main
thread eventually gets a response in the form of a vsync-driven request to
tick the corresponding
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
On some non-main thread:
1. Wait for vsync event
2. Dispatch refresh driver ticks to all windows that don't already have a
pending refresh driver tick unacknowledged by a layer tree update response
3. Wait for N ms
nsTHashtable and its subclasses no longer have an Init method; they are
fully initialized on construction, like any good C++ object. You can
specify an initial number of buckets by passing an integer parameter to the
constructor.
nsTHashtables are always initialized now; there is no uninitialized
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Kyle Huey m...@kylehuey.com wrote:
Did you fix LDAP in comm-central to not use nsInterfaceHashtableMT?
That's why I haven't finished Bug 849654. I guess that should get duped to
wherever this happened.
No, I completely stuffed up my search through
I had some off-thread discussion with Bas about lowering latency. We seem
to have agreed on the following plan:
On some non-main thread:
1. Wait for vsync event
2. Dispatch refresh driver ticks to all windows that don't already have a
pending refresh driver tick unacknowledged by a layer tree
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:34 PM, ay...@mozilla.com wrote:
I'm working on bug 853356 which requires to pass new permissions
'audio-capture' and 'video-capture' together to permission prompt dialog
via getUserMedia.
My current implementation is to replaced the string 'type' [1] with a
string
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2013-09-04 12:18 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I like to put virtual on all methods that are virtual, even when it's
not
strictly necessary because the method overrides a virtual method of the
parent class
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:51 AM, lchenneb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an html5 interactive player that works on most famous navigators
unless Opera and Firefox.
Because of lack of MP3 and MP4 support. It would be great if I could play
this kind of medias on firefox because I don't (and
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Julian Seward jsew...@acm.org wrote:
I am not sure how to deal with (4). Really it's completely unrelated
to the unwind mechanism -- it has to do with SPS' sampling policy at
the level above. There have been some ideas floated around to detect
when a thread
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Julian Seward jsew...@acm.org wrote:
That said, AFAICS the core problem is that once a thread blocks and we drop
the sampling rate, we have no obvious (direct, notification-based) way to
know when it has resumed, and hence are in danger of losing high-frequency
Can any platform people with AMD graphics hardware on Windows reproduce
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=837489, random-looking visual
corruption especially (but not only) in the chrome area?
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Bas Schouten bschou...@mozilla.com wrote:
From: Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
That would be good in some ways, but it doesn't handle off-main-thread
animation when the main thread's drawing is late (e.g. because the main
thread is stuck doing
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Jeff Muizelaar jmuizel...@mozilla.comwrote:
On 2013-08-12, at 11:05 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Tell me what you think.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Roc/VsyncProposal
A couple things that are not clear to me from this proposal:
- when the vsync event
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Bas Schouten bschou...@mozilla.comwrote:
Since you want composition to occur whenever drawing has occurred, I don't
really think it should really be what's working on doing any processing for
the vblank event. The VBlank event should just fire,
Tell me what you think.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Roc/VsyncProposal
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.rt sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r sGients uapr,e tfaokreg
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Tell me what you think.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Roc/VsyncProposal
Forgot to mention --- this is the result of brainstorming with Matt Woodrow
and Nick Cameron this morning.
Rob
--
Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n
Markus is moving with great speed and we should have the necessary Moz2D
support landed soonish.
I think the biggest outstanding issue is how to spec the canvas API for
this. The most obvious approach to me is to add a filter attribute to
CanvasRenderingContext2D that takes a CSS filter value and
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:29 AM, K. Gadd k...@luminance.org wrote:
Consider this my +1 in favor of a dedicated .colorMatrix attribute,
Good, then I'll expect you to back me up in WHATWG with usecases :-).
preferably in the form of a Uint8Array or Float32Array instead of another
*!@$ string.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
Why should color matrix become a property if other filters go through a
.filter property on the context object? Wouldn't it be more consistent if
we just introduced a color-matrix() CSS value?
To avoid string parsing
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.comwrote:
I think that it would make more sense to first try to see to what extent we
manage to fix these issues, see what is left of SVG filters after these
issues are fixed, and only then consider propagating these concepts
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Markus Stange msta...@themasta.com wrote:
On 07.08.13 06:39, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Running windowed Flash within the content process itself would mean giving
that content process access to the main window's HWND.
What would be the disadvantages of forcing
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
The primary reason I know for windowed Flash to be a huge PITA is because
of the deadlock issues caused by attached input queues. I'd love to force
Flash to be windowless and use our fullscreen support instead of
I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s.
Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is possible but would be a ton of
work. Flash is on a downward trajectory and it would be a shame to do a ton
of work to support something that may not be relevant for much longer.
One idea I had is
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Justin Lebar justin.le...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s.
Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is possible but would be a ton of
work
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
I think some people may interpret what you say in that last paragraph the
opposite of how you intend. I am pretty sure you mean something like If
somebody starts to complain to you about somebody else, then stop them and
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com wrote:
Many of the complaints I've heard have been from overhearing hallway
conversations, noticing non-directed complaints on IRC, having 3rd parties
report anecdotes, etc. *Please, please, please voice your complaints
directly
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:58 PM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
Is the idea here that nsRefPtr/nsCOMPtr/etc. would have move
constructors, and we'd just return them, and the move constructors
plus return value optimizations would take care of avoiding excess
reference counting?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Justin Lebar justin.le...@gmail.comwrote:
But if we return nsRefPtr, then if I have
nsRefPtrFoo GetFoo();
Foo* = GetFoo();
that compiles fine (I think?) because nsRefPtrT has an implicit
conversion to T*.
It doesn't leak, though. OTOH you probably get
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.comwrote:
On 2013-07-18 5:48 AM, mscl...@googlemail.com wrote:
r-value references 4.3@10.0! Yes
This is very useful. I believe the JS engine already rolls their own
tricks to implement this semantics.
201 - 300 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
