On 8/6/2012 12:00 PM, Matthew Gertner wrote:
I guess the interfaces directive is not support in the chrome.manifest of
bootstrapped extensions. We're using nsIComponentRegistrar.registerFactory to register
XPCOM components, but we also need to register some additional XPCOM interfaces.
I'm
On 8/15/2012 2:24 AM, Pedro Bessa wrote:
Ian,
Mozilla,
I thought all fast functional programming languages were
Lisp dialects, but that's not true and you can use other fast
functional programming languages, but now that you said
Rust, I think the programming language that you should use
must
On 8/15/2012 5:03 PM, Taras Glek wrote:
Hi,
According to metrics we have about 1TB of telemetry data in hadoop.
This is almost a year worth of telemetry data. Our telemetry ping
packets keep growing as we add more probes. As the hadoop database
gets bigger, query times get worse, etc. We need
On 8/17/2012 3:14 AM, orangespidermas...@googlemail.com wrote:
I maintain a binary XPCOM component for Firefox. While compiling it with the
Gecko SDK 15 I get the following error:
xpcomglue_s_nomozalloc.lib(nsStringAPI.obj) : error LNK2038: mismatch detected
for '_ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL': value
On 8/20/2012 9:25 AM, sebastiang...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011 06:16:50 UTC+1 schrieb johnjbarton:
I recall reading some rumors about Components.utils.import being cached
in such a way that devs can't change the source and see changes. Any
truth to this? Any workaround if
On 9/20/2012 9:14 AM, Estanislao Gonzalez wrote:
Hi,
This is probably nothing... but I was testing something else and I wondered why
there are so many calls to getrlimit about the size of the stack...
These are the top 10 calls from one second dump of strace for the xulrunner
process (first
On 9/20/2012 10:02 AM, Estanislao Gonzalez wrote:
I might have answered too fast...
#0 0xb653b8ec in epoll_wait () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0xb5b5ec97 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libevent-1.4.so.2
#2 0xb5b51c5a in event_base_loop () from /usr/lib/libevent-1.4.so.2
#3 0xb7330e80 in ?? () from
On 10/12/2012 10:25 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Do we require to maintain source or binary compatibility, or both?
Also, is it acceptable for us to add new preprocessor definitions such
as NO_NSPR_10_SUPPORT to optionally remove some of the NSPR feature
which we would like Gecko to avoid,
On 11/8/2012 2:20 PM, Honza Bambas wrote:
If a test runner doesn't currently support
resource://testing-common/, please file a bug and let's get it
implemented everywhere.
Alternatively, I suppose we could hack up the main manifest file to
include resource://testing-common if ENABLE_TESTS is
On 12/6/2012 9:21 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
The benefit is that the ECMAScript Internationalization API lets developers
create a more consistent localized experience for their users, with the correct
date, time, and number formats, the culturally appropriate calendar, correct
currency
On 12/7/2012 4:39 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 6:18 , Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 12/6/2012 9:21 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
The benefit is that the ECMAScript Internationalization API lets developers
create a more consistent localized experience for their users
On 12/18/2012 11:05 AM, Neil wrote:
While looking at tbsaunde's patch to remove the nsISupportsArray
version of NS_NewArrayEnumerator I noticed that many users of
NS_NewArrayEnumerator copy entries from a hash into a temporary array
which they then enumerate, which works by creating an
On 1/2/2013 2:34 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
Hi all,
Over in bug 794178, we're hitting cases where the combination of write
poisoning (crashing if writes to disk are detected after a certain point) and
logging are causes crashes. These same crashes are blocking testing for WebRTC
(bug 811764).
On 1/3/13 7:44 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
Hi
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Developer_Guide/Coding_Style
says that mozilla code files should have the following Emacs and Vim
mode lines:
/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil;
c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */
/* vim:
On 1/4/13 3:49 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Nicholas Nethercote
n.netherc...@gmail.com wrote:
But putting sts in would be
reasonable for those that don't have |smarttab| set.
So it sounds like the recommended mode lines should look like this:
/* -*- Mode:
On 1/9/2013 7:52 AM, al...@yahoo.com wrote:
Generally, opening a profile with version-1 of Fx or Tb works. But
conceivably an app upgrade could introduce a breaking change to the profile,
is that right?
If the programmer doesn't take care, then yes. In Firefox at least we
have in the past said
On 1/14/2013 2:05 PM, Jesse Ruderman wrote:
Should we make debug builds check casts to (vtableful?) pointer types?
This could be done by adding and calling an assert_cast function, or
by adding a new sanitizer mode [6] to clang.
In order to keep our custom goop to a minimum, I don't think that
On 1/22/2013 9:28 AM, Axel Hecht wrote:
How are the perf numbers looking?
One of the reasons for asking is that I expect RDF to be part of the
startup and window-open codepaths, at least.
I would not expect PGO to optimize any of the RDF code for speed, even
if they were in the startup
On 2/4/2013 4:27 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Brian Smith wrote:
2. AFAICT, we did not seriously investigate the possibility of
splitting things out of libxul more. So far we've tried cutting
things off the top of the dependency tree. Maybe now we need to try
cutting things off
On 2/8/2013 5:37 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
W3C is proposing a revised charter for the HTML Working Group.
For more details, see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Feb/0009.html
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/charter/2012/
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or
On 2/12/2013 12:41 PM, Axel Hecht wrote:
Hi Benjamin, Dave,
for mobile (and fxos) we're looking into doing sparse localizations of
toolkit. The work on the mobile side is bug 792077. The current
attempt is to leave the 'global' and other toolkit packages
untranslated, and use chrome
On 2/12/2013 10:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Context: bug 837985.
At times we can be flooded by OS-level mousemove events.
On what OSes? Windows by default coalesces mouse move events. They are
like WM_PAINT events in that they are only delivered when the event
queue is empty. See
On 2/25/2013 4:14 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
The current thinking is that we need *some* indication that a print
job is in progress, because we need to prevent the user from closing
the tab or window until the print job has been completely handed off
to the OS.
Why?
Is the user allowed to
On 2/28/2013 10:33 AM, Benoit Jacob wrote:
Please, please make your plans include the ability to get raw text files
(CSV or JSON or something else, I don't care as long as I can easily parse
it).
Could you be more specific? Note that while the text files currently
provided on crash-analysis,
On 3/4/2013 6:10 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
Q: Will this break websites?
A: Some, probably. Telemetry indicates that a bit under 10% of users
encounter at least one reference to Components during their browsing
session. Approximately half of these appear to be simple accesses of the
object itself
On 3/5/2013 12:11 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Peter has suggested making Components.interfaces.nsIXMLHttpRequest ==
window.XMLHttpRequest, for what it's worth.
Yes. I think this shim could be implemented entirely in JS:
window.Components = { interfaces: { nsIXMLHttpRequest:
On 3/15/2013 2:33 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I /think/ our current spaghetti configuration is a historical artifact
from using Makefile.in's to define the build config combined with the
complexity required to do things right.
Yes, I believe you are mostly correct.
With moz.build files, we
On 3/26/2013 12:07 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
This is awesome, thanks for writing this up, it's made me spot one
more place where Jetpack is failing.
Can we get some more definition around Runs on all trees that merge
into mozilla-central? In particular I want to make that true for
Jetpack but
On 3/26/2013 10:16 AM, Neil wrote:
Why does getter_AddRefsT have an operator nsISupports**? So far most
of the uses I've found appear to be people enumerating an
nsISimpleEnumerator directly into an nsCOMPtrT type, although the
documented idl return value is nsISupports. Is this an acceptable
On 3/27/2013 1:19 PM, Armen Zambrano G. wrote:
On another note, there could be a tree booked for win64 and move
nightly win64 users there (orthogonal to updating users to 32-bit
builds) since it would allow the community control which merges from
mozilla-central to take in (and back out from
On 3/27/2013 7:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Adding a subrepository just for Moz2D seems like it could add global
complexity for the benefit of just a small set of people. So it seems much
more worthwhile if we regard it as an experiment to blaze a trail other
modules would follow if the
On 4/8/2013 7:46 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
In this case, the crash report shows Available Virtual Memory as
303558656, but in fact the largest contiguous block of available VM is
64k.
Correct, I had wrong math. The largest block available is about 3MB, and
the allocation being requested
On 4/9/13 7:12 AM, Kevin Gadd wrote:
This is one of the problems Heap Profiler was written to solve:
https://github.com/kevingadd/HeapProfiler
It enables stack trace captures at allocation time, so at any given point
in the capture you can open the heap and see who allocated a given block of
On 4/10/2013 11:23 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
Mercurial and Git both support the ability to attach arbitrary key-value
string data to commits. There is an abundance of awesomeness that could
be realized if we started storing [machine readable] information inside
our commits (not inside the commit
On 4/11/2013 11:47 AM, jmaher wrote:
Great question- the main goal is to have each test type in a directory for that
specific harness.
Yes, but why is that a good thing? In general, I feel that our directory
structures are way too deep already, and it would be better to make them
as flat as
On 4/24/2013 3:13 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
and last time I checked there's no way
to get notified when a meeting's notes are up (via RSS or e-mail or
whatever).
https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes/archives/tag/mozillaplatform and
it shows up on the projects planet as well.
--BDS
On 4/25/2013 1:07 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-04-24 3:35 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 4/24/2013 3:13 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
and last time I checked there's no way
to get notified when a meeting's notes are up (via RSS or e-mail or
whatever).
https://blog.mozilla.org/meeting-notes
On 4/26/2013 2:50 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Andreas Gal g...@mozilla.com wrote:
Preferences are as the name implies intended for preferences. There is no sane
use case for storing data in preferences. I would give any patch I come across
doing that an automatic
On 4/27/2013 6:26 PM, al...@yahoo.com wrote:
... appear to be possible without the \ escape. In fact the \ can not be
present as it does not escape the newline but becomes a part of the string.
Once upon a time, prefs files were actually JS: we created a function
pref and user_pref and then
On 5/1/2013 12:11 AM, Andreas Gal wrote:
You propose SIMD optimization for the software fallback path. I wonder whether
we should focus on one fast GPU path via GLSL, and have one precise, working,
I-don't-care-how-slow CPU fallback. All hardware made the last few years will
have a GPU we
On 5/2/2013 7:43 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On 5/2/2013 4:40 PM, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Gregory Szorc g...@mozilla.com
mailto:g...@mozilla.com wrote:
We seemed to converge on a (presumably C++-based) storage service
that has named branches/buckets with
On 5/6/2013 7:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
Hopefully Web Components will provide a good solution to let authors extend
the browser with support for vocabularies that can be rendered via a
straightforward decomposition to HTML or MathML or SVG.
I think the layout requirements of MathML are
On 5/7/2013 9:55 AM, Byron Jones wrote:
i initially thought about using browser/config/version/version.txt
based on the version in the user-agent, however this reflects the
current default channel, and not necessarily the channel the user's
application is using. for example if someone
On 5/10/13 4:45 PM, Felipe Gomes wrote:
Hi, does OS.File guarantees that write tasks that have started will be
completed if a shutdown occurs? My use case is for writeAtomic but I'm
interested about the behavior of both write and writeAtomic.
Corner case: what if I call write/writeAtomic from
On 5/23/2013 5:32 AM, Scott Johnson wrote:
Members of dev-platform:
As part of the Web Rendering work-week in Taiwan, we had a discussion of
the process of code review, graciously led by roc. If you were unable to
attend, or were able to attend and would like to review the proceedings,
notes
On 5/24/2013 10:50 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
* I think we should experiment (again) with real pull-request integration
into bugzilla.
I'm totally in favor of better tools and real pull requests, and of
course the PRs need to be linked to bugzilla /somehow/.
But I want to qualify integration into
On 5/30/13 3:14 PM, Milan Sreckovic wrote:
Add public accessors, even if they're (currently) only used by the unit tests.
If it doesn't hurt, this seems like a pretty good solution.
--BDS
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
On 6/26/13 7:06 PM, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
d) Change xpconnect to use jsnativestack.cpp's ability to tell us what
the platform stack size actually is and/or nsThread's knowledge of the
stack size it was created with. So on linux we'd use whatever 'ulimit
-s' is telling us to do, etc.
The
On 7/1/2013 12:43 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I'm interested in hearing what people think. I outlined two issues
below, but I'm sure there are more. By the way, independently of the
parser bit, we are proceeding with implementing the URL API as drafted
in the URL Standard in Gecko, which
On 7/2/2013 6:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Note that some custom schemes may be relying on empty host names. In
Gecko, we have about:foo as well as resource:///foo. In both cases, foo
is the path part.
about URLs don't
On 7/10/2013 6:09 PM, Dustin Oprea wrote:
I've only been auditing the devs for a couple of months, but does anyone
know what's going on with the mail? I just received like forty messages.
Mail delivery for people subscribed to this forum (and many other
forums) via mailman was interrupted,
On 7/15/2013 9:30 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 13/07/13 00:36, Clint Talbert wrote:
This is all good stuff, and I want to support us being nimble. We also
need to balance that against security and quality in our builds. We go
through the release process for a reason, and we exert the energy to
On 7/15/2013 2:58 PM, Steve Fink wrote:
On Mon 15 Jul 2013 11:43:05 AM PDT, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/15/13 2:36 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
If reviewee submits a new version of (say) patch 1 of 6, should they:
* attach patch 1 version 2
* an interdiff between patch 1 version 1 and 2
Yes, to
On 7/16/2013 7:12 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
The W3C has released three RDFA-related documents, one proposed
recommendation:
HTML+RDFa 1.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-html-rdfa-20130625/
If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the
review, or if you think Mozilla
On 7/18/2013 2:43 AM, Tim Taubert wrote:
The proposal sounds good to me but I guess you wouldn't want to be
notified of every small addition/change to Makefiles in test
directories? I suppose you're targeting actual changes to dependencies
etc, but where do we draw the line?
I thought the
On 7/18/2013 12:45 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
A number of people use the bzexport Mercurial extension [1] to upload
patches from the command line so they don't need to muck about with a
browser. It would be awesome to integrate suggested reviewers into
that tool. That would require having an
On 7/18/2013 7:11 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
Seeing the filing of bug 895340 pushed me over the edge, because I knew we
had many other similar bugs on file about unreported JS exceptions.
I ended up filing https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=895548, a
tracking bug from which I could link a
On 7/29/2013 1:43 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I don't particularly care for our model of a single Mercurial
repository per logical entity. I think it makes sense for things like
twigs and to some extent integration repositories - you can do your
work in your own little world without disrupting
On 8/6/2013 8:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I was talking to people about plans for Flash on e10s.
Who were you talking to? John Schoenick currently owns that bug,
although I don't think he's working on it yet. We've talked about it on
an off.
Full support for windowed Flash on e10s is
On 8/26/2013 5:59 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
Immediate rebuild (no-op) was 10:13.05. A second no-op rebuild was
10:32.36. It looks like every shared library and every executable got
relinked.
This is a bug (rather serious at that!) which should be filed seprately
from generic build speed
On 9/4/2013 12:45 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
On 04-Sep-13 4:18 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I like to put virtual on all methods that are virtual, even when
it's not
strictly necessary because the method overrides a virtual method of the
parent class.
Other people disagree, especially when the
On 9/6/2013 2:32 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
In theory, this is as easy as iframe mozbrowser remote or browser
remote
html:iframe mozbrowser remote is what B2G uses. It requires the prefs
than Kan-Ru mentions.
xul:browser remote=true is what desktop uses. It does not require
special
On 9/13/2013 10:04 AM, Mike de Boer wrote:
…reliably from C++?
Some background: in bug 257061 I'm implementing to count and display the number
of found items in the findbar. Gavin mentions in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257061#c88 that there has to be
some prior art related
Right now our stability efforts are primarily focused on crashes.
However, as we have been very successful at reducing our crash rate,
some other stability issues which are not crashes have come to be more
prominent. Some examples:
* very slow startup
* very slow/hung shutdown
* hangs while
Currently, extensions are able to use the JSAPI via its exported
symbols. This pretty much invariably leads to stability or security
issues with extensions that actually do this:
* the JSAPI is complicated, and even within Mozilla we get reviews from
a select set of people on JSAPI code
* the
On 9/20/2013 9:23 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
We're already statically linking js libraries info libxul. Except on
windows, but that's work in progress in bug 915735
I am primarily worried about doing this on Windows.
, although we don't
know yet if it's going to work at all: after dealing with the
On 9/20/2013 3:12 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
What about JS_NewDateObject, JS_NewDateObjectMsec, JS_ObjectIsDate,
js_DateIsValid? Most of these are in jsapi.h, and we need it in
Lightning for this code:
On 9/23/2013 8:45 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Initially it seems it would be easy to replace calDateTime with a JS
component and I had started to do this, but unfortunately calDateTime
is instanciated directly (via constructor, not via xpcom) in a few
locations in our C code, so replacing
On 9/23/2013 4:29 PM, Hubert Figuière wrote:
Hi all,
Today Google said they'd drop NPAPI for good.
We also intend to someday drop NPAPI for good. I don't think that by
the end of 2014 is a realistic timeline for either Chrome or us, given
the number of users who still rely on Java and other
On 9/30/2013 2:48 PM, Jim Chen wrote:
So far I looked at the main thread hang monitor [1], but it seems to
make a lot of assumptions about the main thread.
Yes.
I think it would make
sense to have a separate, generic hang monitor that can monitor
multiple other threads. Each thread would
On 9/20/2013 9:06 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
So I would like to propose that we link the JS libraries statically
into libxul and stop exporting JSAPI symbols entirely. This will
effectively prevent extensions from using it.
This has been checked in for Firefox 27 in bug 920731
On 10/9/2013 12:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/9/13 12:01 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
In the spirit of learning from this, what's next on the chopping block?
RDF
I'm all for this, although the risk is probably quite small because we
don't expose RDF to content.
--BDS
On 10/9/2013 2:25 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-10-09 12:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/9/13 12:01 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
In the spirit of learning from this, what's next on the chopping block?
RDF
We use RDF in Firefox, in localstore.rdf among others I guess.
This is not that
On 10/10/2013 11:44 AM, Thierry Milard wrote:
I have a java Web application (www.free-visit.net). the way Mozilla
manages the java player is ... killing my users experience : they have not
choce to go to chrome, because I can not do otherwyse : java won'y run even
f they have the
On 10/10/2013 3:46 PM, Thierry Milard wrote:
Benjamin, here is my description of the java Plugin activation issue I
do have.
*
*
*1) Warning sign not displayd upper left when applet is in the middle*
The No entry sign is displaid on the upper left of the html page,
not placed where my java
One of the shumway goals has been to run most or all of shumway in a
worker, so that it can run in parallel with a web page the same way
Flash currently does. This will significantly help solve jank associated
with shumway loading.
However, we still need to support the Flash externalInterface
On 10/14/2013 12:06 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
How common are the blocking API calls?
Expect them to be very common or almost universal for real Flash. Much
less common for simple display ads.
Can we somehow predict whether
the SWF will need that, and optionally use a worker/non-worker context
On 10/14/2013 4:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
benja...@smedbergs.us mailto:benja...@smedbergs.us wrote:
Having this blocking interface will also support blocking shumway
on graphics rendering; there are a fair number of SWF files
With the landing of bug 853301, we are now shipping ICU in desktop
Firefox builds. This costs us about 10% in both download and on-disk
footprint: see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=853301#c2.
After a discussion with Waldo, I'm going to post some details here about
how much this
On 10/15/2013 1:18 PM, Brian Smith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Benjamin Smedberg
benja...@smedbergs.us wrote:
Do we need this data for any language other than the language Firefox ships
in? Can we just include the relevant language data in each localized build
of Firefox, and allow
On 10/15/2013 1:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
As far as JavaScript API features go, I don't think we should vary our
offering by locale. E.g. for Firefox OS we want changing locale to
just work and not require a new version of Firefox OS. The same goes
for a computer in a hotel or hostel or
On 10/16/2013 9:39 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 15/10/13 17:06, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
You have given on-disk footprint values, but surely download size values
are the important ones for the issue you are raising? After all, some of
this data may be very compressible, and some may
On 10/17/2013 2:28 AM, smaug wrote:
On 10/17/2013 12:09 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I'd like to write a patch to kill Moz Audio Data in Firefox 28 in
favor of
Web Audio. We added a deprecation warning for this API in Firefox 23
(bug
855570). I'm not sure what our usual process for this kind of
On 10/17/2013 7:30 PM, Look, Yuriy wrote:
I am working on GUI automation component of a performance monitoring product.
One of the common approaches to monitoring application is periodically capture
text from the control where changes are expected (content area of the browser
for Web
On 10/15/2013 12:06 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
With the landing of bug 853301, we are now shipping ICU in desktop
Firefox builds. This costs us about 10% in both download and on-disk
footprint
I'm going to try and summarize the discussion and indicate next steps.
==
First, I want
On 10/22/2013 6:19 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-10-22 4:06 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
I don't think that there is enough data yet to make a decision.
Hopefully funnelcake results which help make a more informed choice. If
it turns out that that Firefox wants this decision reconsidered
to, in this case,
Windows stuff. Google has provided alternatives though.
Can you be more specific about the alternatives in Chrome? We are
planning out the implementation of WebCrypto, but it's not clear from
your post whether that would meet your needs or not.
4- So, as encouraged by Benjamin Smedberg
Is there a chrome-only API like .elementFromPoint that will tell me
which XBL anonymous element is at a point?
Background: in the replacement binding for click-to-play plugins, we
have a div class=mainBox child which fills up the plugin area. So
that users can click on the binding, we set the
On 11/11/2013 10:23 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
In principle, the right way to deal with this would be moving code to
comm-central. However, this would involve annoyances like setting up a
new XPCOM component there and making sure the category manager merges
m-c-defined and c-c-defined category
On 11/10/2013 7:54 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.uswrote:
Is there a chrome-only API like .elementFromPoint that will tell me which
XBL anonymous element is at a point?
I don't think so. You probably need to add another
On 11/13/2013 3:11 PM, al...@yahoo.com wrote:
e.g. the first Fx24 esr update was 24.1.0, the next one is 24.1.1
what circumstances call for one vs. the other
We are spinning a Firefox 25.0.1 build to fix some important
regressions. So:
25 == 24.1.0ESR
25.0.1 == 24.1.1ESR
26 == 24.2ESR
I'd like to announce and welcome Nathan Froyd as a peer of the XPCOM
module. Nathan is a careful and thoughtful reviewer, and I'm happy that
he has agreed to help spread review load and serve as the resident
expert on performance and memshrink issues within XPCOM.
--BDS
On 11/20/2013 8:02 AM, Look, Yuriy wrote:
Hi,
On or around November 13 2013 Firefox of versions 25.0.1, 24.1.1 ESR
and 17.0.1 ESR were rereleased, along with XULRunner 25.0.1, but not
for ESR versions. My question is was any incompatibilities between Fx
and XULRunner introduced with these
On 11/20/2013 3:10 AM, fma spew wrote:
Our customers' end-users have their end-user certificates stored in the
Personal logical certificate store on Windows. The rest of needed
certificates, (Intermediary and/or Trusted Root Certificates) are also
stored on Windows certificate stores. Our
On 11/20/2013 11:16 AM, Wilkins, Brian wrote:
That's odd because on RHEL, Xulrunner 17 ESR is in the RHEL Repo. Is this just
a RHEL versioning mismatch with the official versions?
I don't understand the question. Some Linux distros build Firefox on top
of their XULRunner package, and so they
On 11/20/2013 2:11 PM, fma spew wrote:
The prompt part is not needed to be provided by WebCrypto. In the latest
releases, the prompt part has been taken care of our plugin. However, in
our new prototype, the scripting UI part (Dojo) will take care of it.
I expect that the browser will need to
On 11/21/2013 1:11 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Philip Chee schrieb:
I thought that there was a plan to pre-allocate on startup some memory
for the minidump/crash reporter?
For one thing, I'm not sure how far that went, for the other, we are
calling a Windows function to generate the minidump
Is for..of on live DOM nodelists supposed to correctly iterate even when
items are removed from the list? I have a testcase where this does not
seem to be working correctly:
http://jsfiddle.net/f8xzQ/
Is there a simple way to do this correctly?
--BDS
With the landing of bug 672843, the NS_ENSURE_* macros are now
considered deprecated. If you are writing code that wants to issue
warnings when methods fail, please either use NS_WARNING directly or use
the new NS_WARN_IF macro.
if (NS_WARN_IF(somethingthatshouldbetrue))
return
In crashkill we have been tracking crashes that occur in low-memory
situations for a while. However, we are seeing a troubling uptick of
issues in Firefox 23 and then 25. I believe that some people may not be
able to use Firefox because of these bugs, and I think that we should be
reacting
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo