This is awesome!
What about if you file a bug and you CC/NI me and :bram? We can continue
the discussion on bugzilla.
Thanks!
b
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:36 AM, wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 11:50:11 PM UTC-8, Andrea Marchesini wrote:
> > Hi, I reverted the changes
Hi Andrea I created it here -
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1247988 :)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Thanks Andrea :) Ok will put it up on Bugzilla :)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Andrea,
Le 19 déc. 2015 à 02:17, Andrea Marchesini a écrit :
> This week I landed a set of patches to introduce 'about:profiles'.
Where is the initial bug?
With the change, we got a couple of orphaned bugs related to the new profile
manager (old-new, I should say. it's
Hey all, I filed this last week, but didn't assign it. I've been unable to
> open nightly at all since the new profile manager launched.
>
>
Hi John,
I asked your a question on bugzilla. Can you take a look? Thanks.
If you prefer we can talk on IRC. My nick name is 'baku'.
bye
b
kflow, it's a major feature of
> > firefox and I want to see it enabled by default on nightly :)
> >
> > I also landed a replacement of the existing ProfileManager, built on top of
> > about:profiles: instead having a XUL UI, we show a XUL browser element
> > rendering
On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 5:36:33 AM UTC-8, Andrea Marchesini wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Can you tell us some more about next phases of this work before it would go
> > into the product?
> >
>
> Mainly fixing regressions and improving the usability.
>
>
> > Have you consulted anyone from
On 12/18/2015 5:09 PM, Stephen Horlander wrote:
I am not sure I understand. Does "not intended to be product code" mean that
this won't be riding the trains and shipping in a general release of Firefox?
No. It means that, like the old profile manager, about:config, and other
things like
On 12/18/15 1:51 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
Have you consulted anyone from the Firefox front-end or Firefox UX
team about this already?
As it stands, this is not intended to be product code and so I
specifically advised Andrea not to spend UX/product time on this. It is
still a strict
Hi Stephen,
Can you tell us some more about next phases of this work before it would go
> into the product?
>
Mainly fixing regressions and improving the usability.
> Have you consulted anyone from the Firefox front-end or Firefox UX team
> about this already?
>
Jeff Griffiths, but there is
> Also @Andrea are we going to change how profiles.ini is used?
>
>
Hi,
no, I'm not going to.
Thanks I hope I can work closely with you here.
>
>
Why not! I just want to receive more feedback about what we want to achieve
from a UX point of view before changing the existing code.
b
Oh, do we have a clean profile API already? If so, I missed it when I
was looking for it, a few years ago.
On 19/12/15 21:24, Philip Chee wrote:
> On 19/12/2015 14:52, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
>> In that case, perhaps the first thing to land and let ride the
>> trains would be a clean
On 19/12/2015 14:52, David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
> In that case, perhaps the first thing to land and let ride the
> trains would be a clean profile API to let add-on developers
> (including Andrea and GoFaster) experiment with implementing
> prototype profile managers?
What's wrong with the
w, it's a major feature of
> firefox and I want to see it enabled by default on nightly :)
>
> I also landed a replacement of the existing ProfileManager, built on top of
> about:profiles: instead having a XUL UI, we show a XUL browser element
> rendering |about:profiles?man
; I also landed a replacement of the existing ProfileManager, built on top of
> about:profiles: instead having a XUL UI, we show a XUL browser element
> rendering |about:profiles?manage|. This new profile manager offers the same
> features of the previous one.
>
> There are still a
|about:profiles?manage|. This new profile manager offers the same
features of the previous one.
There are still a couple of open issues, and maybe more will come. But I'm
working on them and I'm having good feedback.
b
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev
I think we need to compact the new UI. The old profile manager shows me up
to 5 profiles that I can simply click on to launch the browser. With the
new UI the info for the first profile fills up the whole popup window, so
launching other profiles now requires me to scroll down, then click. That
ntainers have a completely different workflow, it's a major feature of
> > firefox and I want to see it enabled by default on nightly :)
> >
> > I also landed a replacement of the existing ProfileManager, built on top of
> > about:profiles: instead having a XUL UI, we show
On 2015-12-18 5:43 PM, Stephen Horlander wrote:
The current profile manager certainly doesn't meet our UX standards, so we
shouldn't try to make the replacement meet them either. That being said, we
should make sure it's no _less_ usable than the old one.
I might disagree that we should take
Note that there are add-ons such as "Profile Switcher" which allow you
to display the profile manager dialog without touching the
command-line. I don't know if that qualifies as "user facing" or not.
It's certainly an advanced user feature that most people will never
see.
kats
On Fri, Dec 18,
On 12/18/2015 4:07 PM, shorlan...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi Andrea,
This looks like a promising effort to improve profile management.
I work on the on the Firefox UX team and I do have some concerns about the
current design.
Can you tell us some more about next phases of this work before it
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 4:52:00 PM UTC-5, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> As it stands, this is not intended to be product code and so I
> specifically advised Andrea not to spend UX/product time on this. It is
> still a strict replacement for the old profile manager code which was
> very
of
firefox and I want to see it enabled by default on nightly :)
I also landed a replacement of the existing ProfileManager, built on top of
about:profiles: instead having a XUL UI, we show a XUL browser element
rendering |about:profiles?manage|. This new profile manager offers the same
features
I believe he means that the current profile manager isn't really
user-facing, since it needs to be enabled on the command line (at least
once): http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_Manager
The current profile manager certainly doesn't meet our UX standards, so we
shouldn't try to make the
;
> I also landed a replacement of the existing ProfileManager, built on top of
> about:profiles: instead having a XUL UI, we show a XUL browser element
> rendering |about:profiles?manage|. This new profile manager offers the same
> features of the previous one.
>
> There are still a
On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 5:16:00 PM UTC-5, Bobby Holley wrote:
> I believe he means that the current profile manager isn't really
> user-facing, since it needs to be enabled on the command line (at least
> once): http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_Manager
It's true that it isn't a feature
In that case, perhaps the first thing to land and let ride the trains
would be a clean profile API to let add-on developers (including Andrea
and GoFaster) experiment with implementing prototype profile managers?
Cheers,
David
On 18/12/15 22:51, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> As it stands, this is
27 matches
Mail list logo