I believe for the committer list, you need to check the source location for
ICLAs as well:
https://github.com/hornetq/hornetq/graphs/contributors
John
On Thu Dec 18 2014 at 8:33:40 AM Gary Tully wrote:
> With regard to the ip-clearance document[1]. A little update.
>
> For the Copyright sectio
Hi,
So I'm tinkering around a bit to port TomEE to use ActiveMQ 6 instead of
ActiveMQ 5.10, mostly so that we can do JMS 2.0 support.
The original code is based around the original ActiveMQResourceAdapter. I
started porting the code over to use the new one, however I've run into a
hitch.
If I l
(ActiveMQRAManagedConnectionFactory.java:164)
John
On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 10:42:20 AM John D. Ament
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I'm tinkering around a bit to port TomEE to use ActiveMQ 6 instead of
> ActiveMQ 5.10, mostly so that we can do JMS 2.0 support.
>
> The original code is based around the original Acti
I'm resending this as I had my emails messed up. Sorry for any moderation
issues.
On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 11:06:43 AM John D. Ament
wrote:
> Ok, so got a little bit further. I see the broker starting with the in vm
> connector.
>
> 659 [main] DEBUG org.apache.activemq.ra -
off on my guesses for what the new
classes are, but comparing the classes I picked from 6 to what TomEE used
in 5.10 they appear to serve the same function. The only thing special
about TomEE's RA (which extended AMQ 5.10's) was that they used the JDBC
store for messages. For now that
the closing of the session automatically.
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/develop/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/resource/AutoConnectionTracker.java
So ummm need to think about this a bit more.
John
On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 1:29:31 PM John D. Ament
wrote:
> Cleb
ore/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/resource/
> AutoConnectionTracker.java
> >
> > So ummm need to think about this a bit more.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 1:29:31 PM John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Clebert
was
written to it was created. TomEE/OpenEJB seem to make heavy use of that,
at least within tests. I would imagine the users do as well. Any chance
that can be ported in? Currently AMQ6 will throw an exception if it
doesn't exist.
John
On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 6:59:14 PM John D. Ament
The vote seemed to run from 1/30 to 2/3. Three full days in there (1/31,
2/1, 2/2)
On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 12:17:18 PM artnaseef wrote:
> Hey - any thoughts on the length of votes? Did I misunderstand?
>
> By the way - my tests finally finished - after 17:42! almost 18 hours!
> Who
> said they
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:20 PM Chris Mattmann wrote:
> If it needs to happen, growing a community in an existing
> Apache project that has been around for quite a while is
> not something I would recommend for a variety of reasons.
>
> Note we recently went through a similar thought
> on OODT/W
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Perfect, but that was not the initial promise. What you suggest, David,
> can very well happen in the incubator.
>
I think it's important to read Clebert's initial email on the subject of
donation:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/P
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 11:27 AM David Jencks
wrote:
> great. I really can't tell what the naysayers are objecting to and so far
> they haven't explained in a way I can understand. I'm flailing around with
> wild suggestions in the hope they will clarify. Sorry I'm so dense.
>
Don't feel bad,
+1
On Apr 9, 2015 9:06 AM, "Hiram Chirino" wrote:
> Lots of confusion has occurred since we did not use a code name for
> the code donation from the start. Everyone refers to it as HornetQ
> which adds to the Trademark confusions. Also the current state of the
> code is not ready to become Act
I'd recommend replacing RH w/ RedHat, just to clarify.
John
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:50 AM Bruce Snyder
wrote:
> Thank you for compiling this info, Hiram. I have added a small statement to
> the working together to build community around the HornetQ code donation.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Fri, Apr 17
HornetQ can incubate (as the chosen code name) with full intentions of
graduating as a sub project. No rework would be required.
We would obviously strongly encourage members from AMQ to assist with the
mentoring.
John
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:16 PM James Carman
wrote:
> For what it's worth,
On Apr 20, 2015 9:36 PM, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
>
> > Yes. Almost exclusively done by the HornetQ team (going by the commit
logs and the team page at HornetQ’s website).
> >>
>
> That was done this way because we were getting ready for the IP
> Clearance and what was needed for the first release
Mmmm it wasn't particularly clear that your email was the standard 72 hour
lazy consensus vote we usually do for IP Clearance.
John
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:28 PM Hiram Chirino
wrote:
> Ok I've not heard any objections from the incubator folks either.
> I'll take care of pushing the releases u
Congrats to everyone involved! Lots of hard work went into this, and I know
its great to see a JMS 2 implementation from the overall Apache community.
John
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:22 PM Martyn Taylor wrote:
> Apache Artemis 1.0.0 is released!
>
> This is the initial release of the Artemis pro
Clebert,
I'm assuming you meant the upgrade to Netty, not Jetty. Unless you also
want to upgrade to Jetty 9.2 as well (seems like there's a mix of 8.1 and 6
in the code base).
Anyways PR is open.
John
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 8:38 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I did some admin on the JIRAs, cl
n't a simple update.
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:32 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Clebert,
> >
> > I'm assuming you meant the upgrade to Netty, not Jetty. Unless you also
> > want to upgrade to Jetty 9.2 as well (seems like there's a mix of 8
Actually its only a minor change. However, it seems like the current Jetty
runner doesn't do anything. I ran mvn jetty:run from the artemis-web
project, and while Jetty started there was no content. Is this intentional?
John
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:57 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Fai
Is this a big priority to pick up? Resteasy is already Apache V2 licensed,
so it doesn't cause a licensing conflict, though I agree being able to
leverage the rest api in containers that aren't deploying resteasy would be
beneficial.
The bootstrap code is resteasy specific, but it seems to be use
Added javadoc:javadoc to the PR builder job...
John
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:19 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I found a way to not require bumping the version of maven. just add
> annotation processing to the plugin on the.
>
>
> But if someone could please add javadoc goal on the PR builds and
>
All,
Been hacking with Artemis for a bit now. I was wondering if we could
simplify the dev build?
Building the artemis-website seems a bit long. Can we provide a profile
that doesn't build the website?
John
he dev profile doesn't do it.. we could take it out if it's
> doing it.
>
>
> I have been able to survive with building once and using an IDE such
> as Intelij but still takes some time to do it.
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:02 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Al
Is this maybe a case where you want to kick off a broker, and run client
tests against that broker?
John
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I can't run the whole thing in Parallel, I need to be able to tell
> which tests are safe to run in parallel.
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 20
Would this apply to all activemq repos, including Artemis and Apollo?
On Jul 7, 2015 1:34 PM, "Timothy Bish" wrote:
Hey, awhile back Robbie brought this up on the dev list but it didn't
get much attention so I thought I'd bring it up and see if anyone had
any issues with us asking infra to enable
Hey guys!
Following up on a conversation was having on github via stomp messages.
I think we do have a bug with the content length, where we can try to read
larger than the message.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/artemis-protocols/artemis-stomp-protocol/src/main/java/org/
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:17 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> (at this point I'm not sure if my vote is binding or not)
>
To answer your question...
PMC votes are binding. Non-PMC votes are non-binding.
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#activemq-pmc
According to that, this list
+1 (non binding)
- Built from the source distribution.
- Went through a sampling of recent commits to verify no licensing issues
were brought into the code base.
John
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:11 PM Timothy Bish wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just cut a release candidate for the ActiveMQ 5.12.0 r
For each Java Spec, The geronimo specs project within Geronimo is what's
responsible for generating the spec jar within ASF. The exception is
servlet which is owned by Tomcat. The JMS 2.0 JAR is apache licensed and a
pretty well working equivalent of the API JAR.
You can see what we did for Arte
Is activemq using JSPs?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks John and Hiram.
>
> I will use the Tomcat Serlvet and JSP api jars instead of the standard ones
> since they are ASL. That solves the problem for the API.
>
> Are the ot
sending side of
> the protocol encoder
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:57 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Hey guys!
> >
> > Following up on a conversation was having on github via stomp messages.
> >
> > I think we do have a bug with the content length, where we
>
> If there is can u send a fix ? :)
>
> -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
>
> > On Aug 26, 2015, at 18:22, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > What you're saying is true, but it's also indicative of a potential
> > overflow issue.
> >
>
+1 non binding
In the future, I'd recommend that you directly include the JSON license in
your LICENSE and an appropriate NOTICE.
TBH, it seems weird that you're embedding it, we have clearance to rely on
it per [1].
John
[1]: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#json
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015
but ideally we can address in a
follow up bug fix release.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:35 AM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
>
+1 nonbinding
On Sep 18, 2015 10:55, "Martyn Taylor" wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I've cut a 4th release candidate of Apache Artemis 1.1.0 addressing. This
> latest RC fixes the MDB regressions as discussed on the RC3 feedback.
>
> Since 1.0.0 a number of significant improvements have been made, main
Sorry but -1 (non-binding)
There are binary files in the source release, under artemis-native/bin/
Ideally, the source release would include the C/C++ code required to build
these so's, but I'm not sure that they're anywhere in the artemis codebase.
In addition, compiling on a mac, latest patche
ers to install cmake and make just to
> compile this small library. it should be an optional step for those
> who want to do it.
>
Nothing's stopping you from including them in the binary release. They
should be excluded in the source release.
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:4
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:34 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> > Nothing's stopping you from including them in the binary release. They
> > should be excluded in the source release.
>
>
> It's been easier to keep these .so there. I'm about to give up
> maintaining 32 bits. but right now you would nee
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:55 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> >
> > Actually, this is more serious than that. If I’m reading correctly,
> libaio is LGPL. Thus, we cannot use it from an Apache release unless its:
> >
> We are not redistributing libaio.. libaio is a Kernel functionality
> from Linux.
On Dec 21, 2015 1:42 PM, "Daniel Kulp" wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:41 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:34 PM Clebert Suconic <
clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> Nothing's stop
So... create a ticket to track this? I can compile other stuff with spaces
generally fine. Not sure what the issue is here w/ a space.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:30 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> > [ERROR] Command was /bin/sh -c cd
> > "/Users/johnament/Downloads/apache-artemis-1.2.0 2/artemis-comm
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:44 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:37 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > So... create a ticket to track this? I can compile other stuff with
> spaces
> > generally fine. Not sure what the issue is here w/ a space.
>
>
&
All,
I'd like to ask a broad question. What should the minimum maven version be
to compile artemis?
In order to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-326 I cleaned
up a bunch of defined variables. These variables were being duplicated in
every pom for checkstyle configuration it wou
Just wondering, does anyone plan to raise the LGPL question w/ legal
discuss? If we're waiting for the new year to do the next release, would
be good to at least start the discussion.
John
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM Andy Taylor wrote:
> Claus,
>
> fyi, Ive sent a PR with some of your sug
a
> > new discussions over this. the binary inclusion on the source was
> > something that was fixed now.
> >
> > The dependency on libaio on the C code is through through dynamic
> > linked library, and is the same as any C code depending on libc or
> > gcc.
> >
>
ement and such, something I
> installed there some time in the past must have caused it to install.
> (likely mysql)
>
> > We could change the cli to prompt for a choice at create time.
>
> That would certainly work.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 23
l
>
> Libaio is a platform API that we use if it's available.
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2015, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Dec 23, 2015, at 4:07 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you referring to the bin or src distrib
; user has to explicitly CHOOSE to use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:02 PM, Clebert Suconic <
>>>>>> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>
+1 non binding.
Source release looks clean, builds fine (even w/ spaces)
For next release: please update copyright dates for 2016 (damn that first
day after the new year)
John
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:19 AM Martyn Taylor wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I'd like to propose an Apache Artemis 1.2.0 rele
That is awesome to hear. One thing to point out - the ASF already has a
docker hub account, so likely this image should reside under the ASF
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/.
John
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:17 AM Victor Romero
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Apologies for resurrecting old thread.
>
> As res
I have been testing with local builds off and on. It's definitely working
quite well.
Have docs been update for the DB Journal?
On May 20, 2016 04:41, "Martyn Taylor" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a while since we last had an Artemis release and I think we're
> well overdue a 1.3.0.
>
> Since
Clebert,
Would you be interested in an impl based on the JSON-P spec? If so maybe
Johnzon would be a solution here.
John
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:21 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Accordingly to apache legal, we can use JSON on our codebase, however
> other projects may be unable to redistribut
While building the profile from the PR builder, the RAT checks seem to get
stuck on my machine. It's not a slow machine by any means - OS X 10.11.5,
2.3 ghz i7 w/ 16 gb ram.
It gets to this point in the build and just stalls. Anyone else get this?
John
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.17:c
ddress the
> issue going forward.
>
> Cheers
> Martyn
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Clebert Suconic >
> wrote:
>
> > Try cleaning the env.
> >
> > Git clean -xdf
> > Then repeat ?
> >
> > On Monday, July 4, 2016, John D. Ament
Hi,
Were you intending to run from the IDE, or did you want to use one of the
binary releases?
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/download.html
John
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:33 AM aries.aries
wrote:
> I downloaded Apache Artemis project from github. Artemis documentation
> mentions about se
Ed,
If you can share sample code that would be great. I'm curious though, what
are you sending as your subscription ID? It looks like if all clients send
the same subscription ID what you're describing could happen.
John
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:10 PM Ed Kaltenbach wrote:
> I am using Wildf
uot;,"clientAddress":"/
> 127.0.0.1:64627
> "},{"creationTime":1465943895399,"connectionID":"1668184153","clientAddress":"/
> 127.0.0.1:64628"}]
> >
> >
> >
> > apparently it would sta
piryQueue"/>
>
> entries="java:/jms/topic/ACRS_Exit"/>
> entries="java:/ConnectionFactory" connectors="in-vm"/>
> entries="java:jboss/exported/jms/RemoteConnectionFactory"
>
n Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:37 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Ed,
>
> Huh ok. Knowing that you're getting destination does not exist helps
> pinpoint the problem.
>
> I think I need someone like Justin, Andy, Martyn or Clebert to comment.
> The Artemis code is explicitly deletin
Ed,
Sorry one more thing to try. Can you try against the 1.3 standalone broker
instead of the 1.1 that ships w/ Wildfly? I'm wondering if the auto
creation feature fixes this error.
John
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:35 AM Ed Kaltenbach wrote:
>
>
> I just modified my test client application so
Hi Lahiru,
A good place to start is with Artemis' hacking guide, which helps get new
devs started on working on the code base.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/tree/master/docs/hacking-guide/en
Then you probably want to look for a JIRA ticket to work on.
John
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6
in summary, the problem seems to be fixed in 1.3.
>
> How confident are people that Artemis 1.3 will work in Wildfly 10
> seamlessly?
>
> Ed
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:22 PM
> To
.0.0.Final\modules\system\layers\base\org\apache\activemq\artemis"
> that contains subdirectories:
> - "main",
> - "protocol",
> - "ra".
> I see a lot of artemis-xxx.jar files in all of these subdirectories.
>
> Does anybody have any sugg
I'm getting this error trying to compile Artemis. Fails on DTO
generation. Tried upgrading to latest Java 8 version as well. This was
working fine a couple of days ago.
main:
[echo] Generating XSD to:
/Users/johnament/src/activemq-artemis/artemis-dto/target/schema/org.apache.activemq/dto
[
For whatever reason, I need to make this change in the schemagen task. Its
been fine for a while and this hasn't changed, so I'm not sure whats
different.
-
+
John
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:44 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> I'm getting th
I believe that's an infra question
On Jul 29, 2016 15:47, "Bruce Snyder" wrote:
> Well so far nobody has responded. So I have no idea who controls it. We
> need to find out who controls access to the ASF account at Docker Hub.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Victor wrote:
>
>> Hi
But yes I'll take care of it
On Jul 29, 2016 15:51, "John D. Ament" wrote:
> I believe that's an infra question
>
> On Jul 29, 2016 15:47, "Bruce Snyder" wrote:
>
>> Well so far nobody has responded. So I have no idea who controls it. We
&g
All,
I wanted to run this POC by you guys to see your thoughts. Obviously I
have a mixed background at this point, so it kind of makes sense to bring
two of my interests together. I started hacking together a CDI backed
client against Artemis Core/JMS. Looking at Artemis and its integrations
wi
Sorry, meant to link here -
https://github.com/johnament/activemq-artemis/tree/cdi-client
John
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:09 PM John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> I wanted to run this POC by you guys to see your thoughts. Obviously I
> have a mixed background at this point, so it k
n you verify the test still works?
>
>
> And how this would affect that Karaf integration?
>
>
> @Dejan can you take a look given you did a lot of work with this before?
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:11 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Sorry, meant to link here -
+1 release contents look good. A couple of nitpicks:
- Sign the release with your apache.org email
- You may want to verify your signature, get this warning when verifying it:
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signatu
Oh and your NOTICE says 2015.
I've raised a PR for the two simpler things, I can look at the DEP file as
well.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 7:04 AM John D. Ament wrote:
> +1 release contents look good. A couple of nitpicks:
>
> - Sign the release with your apache.org email
>
Yep absolutely!
On Aug 4, 2016 08:14, "Christopher Shannon"
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback and PRs. Some of that stuff (readme, etc) is
> pretty old and hasn't been touched in years so we can fix it up for the
> next release.
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 7
equire the
> apache dockerhub credentials to be store in the apache CI. And I'm sure
> someone, somewhere would have problems with that. Otherwise is a perfectly
> valid approach.
>
> So unless you have any other idea, I'd go for the option 2 as soon as I
> can.
>
&g
Hey guys
I wanted to put my key in to the main repo since I'm now a committer. My
PR to clean up the readme, etc is still open though. Is it safe for me to
merge this to master? Should I push to a different branch (e.g.
5.14.x/5.13.x?)
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/194
- John
ly follow the same PR model as
> Artemis. Committers just make commits themselves.
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:59 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys
> >
> > I wanted to put my key in to the main repo since I'm now a committer. My
> > PR to
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I already have an improved docker image with karaf and ActiveMQ. We have a
> discussion at Apache about where to put this.
>
>
Where is this conversation happening?
> For now it's on my local server. I don't think it should go
-1 - see etc/IDEA-style.jar in source release
Would be good to also give a heads up on pending releases as well, unless I
missed the email.
FWIW, I also cannot find your key. You may also want to point to
http://home.apache.org/~clebertsuconic for the website, since people.a.o is
going away (it
27;s fine. The key thing is a local and ASF issue. I was pinging
infra about it earlier, it seems like sometimes, keys disappear off of
ldap. If you don't have it listed in id.apache.org would be good to add.
John
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:35 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> &g
These are the contents of the JAR:
options/code.style.schemes.xml
options/file.template.settings.xml
fileTemplates/
fileTemplates/code/
fileTemplates/includes/
fileTemplates/includes/ActionScript File Header.as
fileTemplates/includes/File Header.java
fileTemplates/internal/
fileTemplates/internal/
th the source code. It's not used to build the software.. so
> there's nothing wrong from the document you just pointed.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:15 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > These are the contents of the JAR:
> >
> > options/code.style.schemes.xm
The error is referring to your connection factory. Could you please post
your entire broker.xml?
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM aries.aries
wrote:
> I am trying to use JMS to send message to a durable queue by referring the
> "SimpleQueueSender" example. Below is my code that I am using insid
Sergio,
All you have to do is replace the JARs in
modules/system/layers/base/org/apache/activemq (and subdirs)
John
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:59 PM sergio wrote:
> Hi, I i'm using STOMP over Websocket to connet to ActiveMQ.
>
> I installed WildFly 10.1.0.Final and I have a test client in Javas
gt;
> > The whole *latest is meant to be SNAPSHOT* is an open and broader
> > discussion. But if the greater apache, as it seems, consider latest is a
> > non repeatable SNAPSHOT build, I'm happy with it.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-14 9:06 GMT-07:00
e is
> in, the build would be impossible.
>
> The alternative, using the root folder, will leave us in a sub-standard
> situation where the readme for the dockerhub page is the general project
> readme, just like https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/thrift/ .
>
>
>
>
ame PR with some very short instructions on how to change the
> version
> >> in the Dockerfile (very simple) on every release.
> >>
> >> The whole *latest is meant to be SNAPSHOT* is an open and broader
> >> discussion. But if the greater apache, as it seems, consider l
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 5:40 PM Victor wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> No, that is not possible as the rest of the sources are not available and
> therefor the build cannot be done, i.e: cannot: ADD .. in a dockerfile
>
> 2016-08-30 7:27 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament :
>
> > Hi Victor,
All,
I wanted to bring up the topic of how to do docker integration. There's
some discussions I saw pop up on both the regular ActiveMQ distribution as
well as the Artemis project. This started from a potential donation to
Artemis to add a dockerfile (its apparently pretty popular on dockerhub -
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:59 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to propose an Apache Artemis 1.4.0 release.
>
> Since 1.3.0 we've had a lot of fixes and improvements:
>
> * Global Max Size for Paging (Default mode is now is paging)
> * Disk Size monitor
> * Interceptors suppor
Hey,
I know I've been busy the past few weeks. Wondering if anyone else from
ActiveMQ is planning to be at JavaOne next week? Would be great to meet
some other devs.
There's a proposed hackathon next week to make TomEE work with ActiveMQ
Artemis. Jonathan Fisher is running it and I'm planning
Hey,
Just wrapped up the hacking. Its looking good so far. Just curious, one
of the issues that was encountered is that there's no default rar generated
for Artemis. Should there be? there's an example that ships, maybe it
would make sense to include this in the main packages?
https://github.
anges required?
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 6:58 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Just wrapped up the hacking. Its looking good so far. Just curious, one
> > of the issues that was encountered is that there's no default rar
> generated
> >
Which timezone? Do you eat lunch at noon or 1 pm?
John
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:39 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I'm almost done. Will send a PR tomorrow morning us time.
>
> It would help if you guys could avoid merging or committing on master until
> tomorrow lunch time (us time)
>
> On Thur
Just wondering - considering where a number of committers work. Why not
leverage hawt.io as a new console?
John
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:45 PM Jim Gomes wrote:
> Thanks for getting the discussion going again. You bring up some
> interesting points. As stale as the console may be, I still fi
@Hiram
The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the top right corner).
I like hawt... and using it in a modular fashion embedded within activemq
and artemis would be a great solution. Forgetting any relationships.
John
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:46 AM Hiram Chirino
wrote:
> I'd lik
Dharmesh,
You'll need to send an email to "commits-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org"
John
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:27 AM Dharmesh Joshi wrote:
> Please help me unsubscribe from this mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Dharmesh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:jenk..
Bruce,
I can't edit the wiki page (not sure if I should be able to or not). But a
couple of things:
- The project description is a bit out of date. Might be good to include
things like JMS 2 support, STOMP, REST, MQTT, etc. I would say update the
doap file, but it seems the description isn't s
t go
> > anywhere.
> > >
> > > My $0.02,
> > > Hadrian
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1 on improving/adding a console. Providing a console out of the box
>
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
