I would expect PKCS stores to work fine. Have you tried them and found
they didn't work?
Justin
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 9:59 AM, zollen wrote:
> I see all samples of ActiveMQ SSL clients using jdk stores, but I see no
> client example of using ActiveMQSslConnectionFactory with pkcs
> certifica
It seems to me that you're asking for an explanation about Red Hat's
official support policies on the ActiveMQ community developer's mailing
list which isn't the right place for such a discussion. If you want to
know more about Red Hat's policies you should engage them directly. As I
see it, this
> Is Apache Artemis supposed to be allowing connectivity from NMS-openwire
clients?
I'm not aware of any specific testing done with NMS clients using the
OpenWire provider and Artemis, but since Artemis supports OpenWire I would
generally expect such clients to work.
> The following lists a numb
I sent the PR to change the way routing-type updates were handled which
introduced the issue you're talking about.
That said, it wasn't even possible to update the routing-type on a queue as
noted on the JIRA [1]. Were you testing this behavior previously? If so,
what were the results of that pr
That's correct, Michael. Additionally, I've found that the current logic
for updating the addresses & queues causes a catch-22 where the address
can't be updated until the queue is updated and vice-versa. Something
fundamentally more clever will be required for this use-case. I'll let you
have a
The correlation ID is not used by the broker to dispatch messages to
clients. The correlation ID is set by a client and can be used in a
client's selector to implement a request-response pattern. There's lots of
documentation about this on the Internet.
For what it's worth, messages are never se
> So if client 2 sends "hello" with a correlation ID of unique UUID to
server 1 when server 1 sends the response will the broker know to send the
message back to client 2.
No. As stated previously, the correlation ID is not used by the broker to
dispatch messages to clients. I'm not exactly sure
Oddly enough, this same exact question was asked (and answered) 2 days ago
[1] by a user also named "Abhijith PA" but with a different email address.
Justin
[1]
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Backporting-host-verification-support-to-5-6-0-td4743547.html
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:55 AM Ab
There's a "Create a new Git repository" option on
https://selfserve.apache.org/. I clicked it and logged in, but apparently
it's restricted to ASF members and PMC chairs.
Justin
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:24 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I create an Infra JIRA for this:
>
>
> https://issues.apach
FWIW, the current community goal is for ActiveMQ Artemis to become ActiveMQ
6.x when acceptable feature parity is reached (which is actively being
worked on).
Justin
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jamie G. wrote:
> The idea here is to ensure that it’s development and maintenance
> moving fo
Where are we on this? Has anything actually happened yet?
Justin
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:22 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> For what its worth, I've now been through migration of the various
> Qpid repositories to the Gitbox service, it was very straightforward.
>
> I proposed we migrate shortly
As Clebert mentioned, you need to create a broker instance (e.g. using
'./artemis create'). Then in the instance's "bin" directory you will have
additional options for the "data" command.
In general, commands have different options and availability from the
broker's home vs. an instance's home.
+1
I have a slight nit-pick. The Wiki page [1] refers to the old git-wip-us
URL [2]. This URL *will* properly redirect to gitbox, but git itself will
display a warning about the redirect so it would be nice to use the gitbox
URL.
Justin
[1] http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-395-releas
This list is for discussions specifically about ActiveMQ development. It's
not for application developers who are using ActiveMQ and need help. That's
what the "user" list is for [1].
That said, your question is not really about ActiveMQ at all but more about
general application design. I recommen
I don't see it showing up at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/#activemq. Is that expected?
Justin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:33 AM Bruce Snyder
wrote:
> The new mailing list for git...@activemq.apache.org has been created.
>
> Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help.
>
>> go
> > >> > live
> > >> > >> > > with this? Then start working through the nice to
> > >> > haves/criticals. I
> > >> > >> > > think once we're live and the code is available, the
As I've been looking at updating the ActiveMQ website I've wondered about
the status of both NMS & CMS. Contributors, commits, and releases for them
appear to have been low historically and have dwindled recently even more.
As I understand it, one of the goals of updating the website is to be more
ttps://whimsy.apache.org/site/
>
> Robbie
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 14:54, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > This looks ready! What we need to make it official?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:53 PM Justin Bertram
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I
om my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message From: Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> Date: 04/03/2019 14:54 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Website This looks ready! What we
> need to make it official?On Fri, Mar 1,
a messaging platform
> with all the bits needed.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message From: Justin Bertram <
> jbert...@apache.org> Date: 04/03/2019 18:04 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Website > The current websi
roviding not just a broker, nor just limit our
> scope (today, past or future) to just being a broker.
>
> e.g. we provide (currently embedded)
>
> admin console
> libaio java journal (and in future other native features)
> provide core java clients
> provide open wire java
SOURCE PROJECTS FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE MESSAGING”
>
> Its bang on what the ActiveMQ community is about, for me.
>
>
> > On 4 Mar 2019, at 20:31, Justin Bertram wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't think "provider" is a good word at this point as it connotes some
&
usively broker only.
> Present
> > > it maybe. But past it wasnt and future i hope it isnt.Happy for an
> > > alternative. But atm i much prefer keeping it as Martyn had it.Sent
> from my
> > > Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> > > Original message ---
LGTM
+1
Justin
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:52 AM Gary Tully wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 01:25, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0
> > release. This is a second re-spin.
> >
> > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis N
the images appear heavily down sized and could probably be
> tweaked to improve their legibility and optimise for size a bit. E.g
> the ASF logo used at the bottom is actually 3495×1417 resolution and
> 150KB.
> - The bottom ASF logo text isnt that readable against the footer
> background
inal files went:
> https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/docs/img/I notice now I
> can read it that the footer should also mention[ActiveMQ] Artemis in the
> text when listing off terms.RobbieOn Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 17:58, Justin
> Bertram wrote:>> I assume some original
r.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would be fine making these projects deprecated but I think there was some
> pushback from users on this in the past. But I am all for deprecating
> projects that are no longer maintained actively and have
You're right. Both NMS and CMS are APIs + implementations. That's a fair
point.
However, the only two implementations for both which have releases in the
last 9 years are OpenWire and STOMP, and the STOMP providers have
limitations as compared to the OpenWire ones.
It's not clear to me that "its
Thanks for clarifying the condition of your NMS AMQP provider contribution.
To be clear, the NMS website [1] lists 8 providers:
- *ActiveMQ* - last release in 2016;
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-openwire
- *STOMP* - last release in 2013;
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms
of the last release alone
> 167k times according to stats here
>
>
>
>
> https://packages.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Like wise theres a quite active netstd (not apache) that uses nms api,
> last release 7 months ago.
>
>
>
>
>
>
y used and widely implemented.
>
>
> NMS is an API on this case.
>
> Correct me if I’m wrong here.
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:02 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> > Ultimately I'm much more concerned about the development resources
> > committed to the code-b
As you may have noticed in another thread on the dev list, I've been
looking at updating the website. When I was browsing through all the
content from NMS & CMS I was surprised to see how much of it was stale -
especially the NMS content. There were references to multiple providers
that had never b
s with Apache project policies as Robbie
> mentioned above, then I think it'd be good to go with these changes).
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 3:58 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
>
> > No worries, Mike. I took care of it using the SVG file that Robbie
> pointed
> > o
e.
> >>
> >>> On 16 Mar 2019, at 15:22, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> That is great work.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If no URL changes. This seems ready to deploy then.
> >>>
> >>>
>
that can comprise the site source. The
> repo is monitored by gitpubsub and whenever changes are committed, the
> contents dir gets synced to the actual webservers automatically. No
> build jobs etc needed.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 15:38, Justin Bertram wrot
You did mention Jamie Goodyear, but I would have expected him to speak for
himself in this regard. The vague reassurance that "others" will help when
something important comes up does not inspire me with confidence. I would
have also expected these others to chime in here to make it clear who is
co
> There has been activity even in the amqp impl last year as noted, yes it
didnt release but it shows activity and want.
I feel like I could argue the other direction with this. The AMQP
implementation work showed that one developer was interested and when his
priorities changed nobody finished th
uch earlier on there is also a netstd project hosted
> externally but impl the api. It’s maintained last release 7 months ago. It
> just shows that nms is not just adopted but also other projects building on
> its api. Far from being inactive.
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPa
.
> >
> > https://the-asf.slack.com/app_redirect?channel=activemq
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 18 Mar 2019, at 19:44, Justin Bertram wrote:
> >>
> >> I added the drop-shadow the the "Active" in the main logo. Let me know
> what
> >> y
This page [1] looks like it would have some good info, but it's just a
skeleton. :(
Justin
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75964385
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:05 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
> Mike, did you have any thoughts on how to get the conten
Jeff, I apologize for the confusion. I understand that not everybody
follows every thread, and I'm not under the impression that they must. I
tried to lay out my "problem" (although I'd categorize it as more of a
concern) in my initial email on this thread and have tried to clarify along
the way. I
As far as I'm concerned, this thread isn't about removing anything except
stale or unclear information from the website. Removing the projects
themselves has never been on the table.
Justin
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef wrote:
> So if this is an "outsider looking in," then as
I'm not following you here, Jeff. How does the statement you cited imply
"removing them"? If you're referring to my use of "deprecated," I actually
looked up "deprecated" on merriam-webster.com [1] before I wrote that email
to make sure it meant what I wanted to say. The relevant definition is:
>
Thanks, Art, for chatting with me today and digging into things.
For the record, I personally consider the *general* matter of status for
NMS and CMS as resolved - the website will stay generally the same in the
high-level presentation for these components. Thanks, all, who contributed
to clarify
t need to be a single
> > task.
> > > > If we want automation we can do that on a second time.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:35 AM Robbie Gemmell
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I envisaged people would run t
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.7.0.
Downloads are now available at:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/download.html
For a complete list of updates:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/release-notes-2.7.0.html
This was a large release with lots of new features a ton of
Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:02 AM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think writing up a README with detailed instructions would be necessary
> > if we want to deploy now. Everyone with access needs to know the new way
> > to update the s
t; >
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:23 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm pretty sure we would need an official vote thread and that voting
> > > here
> > > > doesn&#x
As most of you probably know there's been work underway to update the
ActiveMQ website for the better part of a year. That work has reached a
point where it makes sense to vote on whether or not it should replace the
existing website. The new website is available at:
http://activemq.apache.org/a
vide a script to build the site contents with the
> idea that
> >>>>>> we'd move towards gitpubsub for the main site once we transition.
> Also
> >>>>>> expanded the README with notes and some basic instructions.
> >>>&g
).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Robbie
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 18:54, Christopher Shannon
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>> This looks good Tim, what do other
There were 6 binding +1 votes, 3 non-binding +1 votes, with no other votes
received. The vote has passed.
I'm working to get the website updated ASAP.
Justin
buildbot process so it doesn't overwrite the new site anymore. I assume
> Infra has to do that.
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:28 AM Justin Bertram
> wrote:
>
> > There were 6 binding +1 votes, 3 non-binding +1 votes, with no other
> votes
> > received. The vot
I talked with Apache Infra today and got them to move on the ticket I
opened a few days ago [1]. As of today the new ActiveMQ website is now
live!
The instructions on how to update the site are available here [2].
I've also added a few mod_rewrite rules for compatibility with the
components from
releases, etc. I don't see it on the front page or in each
> component page. Has there been any consideration given to this one 'active'
> piece of communication on the website and what eliminating it might mean
> for the user base?
>
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2
The 2.7.0 release of Artemis was fairly significant. It included a large
number of bug fixes plus these notable new features/improvements (among
others):
- Support for advanced destination options like
consumersBeforeDispatchStarts & timeBeforeDispatchStarts
- Support for configurable delays be
You can find unsubscribe links for the various mailing lists on the Apache
ActiveMQ website [1].
Justin
[1] http://activemq.apache.org/contact/#mailing
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:51 AM Srinath Chowdary Gottipati
wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> i am no longer involved in this project, and would lik
LGTM +1.
Justin
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 5:47 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.8.0 release.
>
> This is basically a bug fix release, with the addition of the following
> feature
>
> [ARTEMIS-2306] - Support ActiveMQ5 feature JMSXGroupFirstForConsum
Is the site running into disk space limitations? I considered paring the
documentation down during the migration, but I didn't have any real
problems dealing with it. Also, I figured that since disk space is and
bandwidth are so cheap it really wasn't an issue. I think it's more
convenient to have
Couple of things:
1) This is the "dev" list for developers who are actually working on
ActiveMQ to discuss topics related directly to said development. You should
use the "user" list [1] for questions like this.
2) You should be getting the help you need on your Stack Overflow
questions [2].
You mean 2.8.1 rather than 1.8.1, right?
Justin
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:50 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to do a release tomorrow, to help with Wildfly release.
>
> I would really like to have Wildfly using an official release. In the
> past they had forked and created their own
A few points:
1) You've sent this email to the "dev" list which is meant for developers
working directly on an ActiveMQ code-base. You should use the "user" list
[1] for questions like this (since you are a user of ActiveMQ, not a
developer of it).
2) You said that you "amended the configurati
Since you migrated from HornetQ I would suggest that you use
"anycastPrefix=jms.queue.;multicastPrefix=jms.topic." in your acceptors (as
noted in the default broker.xml), e.g.:
tcp://${activemq.remoting.netty.host:jms.s1}:${activemq.remoting.netty.port:5445}?useEpoll=true;anycastPrefix=
I'm looking to get Artemis 2.9.0 tagged and sent for a vote this week so if
there's anything you want in there please send a PR, etc.
Justin
With the impending support for metrics plugins [1] as well as other
pluggable components which have been discussed in the past (e.g. Kafka
bridge [2] proposed by Mike Pearce) I think it would great to have an
official place where these things could be hosted and potentially included
as part of a br
or Android
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:38 PM +0100, "Bentley, Andy - 0553 - MITLL" <
> abent...@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Upgrade the OWASP plugin from the very very olf 1.4.3 to the latest 4.0.2
&
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.9.0 release.
This is one of the smallest releases we've done. It includes a handful of
bug fixes, a few improvements, and one major new feature:
[ARTEMIS-2308] - Support exporting metrics
The release notes can be found here:
https://issues.a
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.9.0 release vote.
Vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4 binding, 1 non-binding).
The following votes were received:
Binding:
+1 Clebert Suconic
+1 Christopher Shannon
+1 Justin Bertram
+1 Tim Bish
Non Binding:
+1 Howard Gao
Thank you to everyone who
Are you sure about that? Wildfly Common is ASL 2. See
https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common.
Justin
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michael André Pearce
wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>
> It’s a category x, in my understanding.
>
> > On 6 Jun 2019, at 20:46, Michael Andr
noted.
At this point I don't see a problem.
Justin
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:02 PM Michael André Pearce
wrote:
> Wildfly project:
>
> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
>
>
> > On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:01, Justin Bertram wrote:
> >
> > A
Case.java
> >
> > As such even so they declare it Apache, it isn’t because inside is code
> that is LPGL from wildly.
> >
> >> On 6 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Justin Bertram wrote:
> >>
> >> This was the dependency added:
> >>
> >>
> >
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.9.0.
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.9.0
As usual it contains a handful of bug
> How can I correct the documentation?
The ActiveMQ website is here [1]. Instructions for how to contribute are
here [2].
Justin
[1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/
[2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/#contributing-to-the-site
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:24 AM Aimee Quinao
There is no way to forbid sending messages to an address with no bindings.
However, you can set
true address setting as
appropriate so that any message sent to an address with no bindings will go
to a dead-letter address of your choice. You can also inspect the unrouted
message count metric on the
There is no way to command an entire cluster to perform a particular
operation. However, Artemis will automatically create queues and addresses
as necessary by default. Is there a particular reason you wouldn't leverage
the auto-creation functionality?
On another note, this is the "dev" list which
My guess is that you're sending non-durable messages. Can you provide the
client application code?
Justin
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:40 AM wei yang wrote:
> Hi, seems configuration is right, did you find the problem?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f
Do you have the full stack-trace of the exception? Also, do you still have
the damaged journal? It would be good to have it to test with.
Justin
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:57 AM yw yw wrote:
> Hi, All
>
>
> Yesterday our cluster experienced a sudden loss of power. When we started
> broker after
It appears to me that the releases have to be manually added to the report.
I wasn't aware of this and haven't added this for any of the releases I've
performed.
Justin
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:55 AM Bruce Snyder
wrote:
> While compiling the latest report for the ASF Board, I noticed that th
Didn't you already send this question to the User List? That question
already received a response from Tim.
The User List is the appropriate list for this question. The Dev List is
for individuals working on the actual development of an ActiveMQ component.
Justin
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:23 AM
Those files seem mistaken to me. I just generated the API docs for 2.7.0
and I don't see anything like that.
Justin
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 5:37 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> I'm not clear if they are actually unused or not. It would probably be
> good to understand how they come to exist regardl
Are you using 5.x or Artemis?
Also, the "dev" list (i.e. this list) is for developers who are working
directly on the code-base of an ActiveMQ component. The "user" list is for
users of ActiveMQ components who have questions, problems, etc.
Justin
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:55 AM BrSwPdx wrote:
idge to the other Artemis
> instance constantly shows the "All the consumers were busy, giving up now"
> debug message from line 2185 in QueueImpl.
>
> I was holding off on reporting anything until I had better documentation
> but I figured this might be a good oppo
ion from another dependency, this is version 2.7.0. That
> aside please accept my apologies for my multiple infractions and thank you
> for your work and effort on this project.
>
> Dustin
>
> On 8/2/19, 11:47 AM, "Justin Bertram" wrote:
>
> This message origin
Can you wait a couple of days? I'm working on a ring queue implementation
that I'd like to get it before you cut the release.
Justin
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:27 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I want to start a release, any time between this Thursday or Monday.
>
>
> I won't be able to do it on th
did ping all on it if any outstanding.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Get Outlook for Android
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > &g
t; > >> > Cool. Please update proton if there is a new version please.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 11:24 AM Timothy Bish
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 8/24/19 10:58 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> >
First you need to identify what kind of consumer you're using (i.e. API &
protocol). The broker supports multiple protocols and each protocol
potentially has multiple client implementations.
Also, please elaborate on:
- how you made your observations and drew your conclusions
- the message vo
I only have a passing familiarity with the MQTT protocol and the Paho MQTT
client so I can't provide any expertise there, but in general clients will
often "fire and forget" messages based on their quality-of-service
configuration. For example, many JMS client implementations will fire and
forget n
Looks good to me.
+1
Justin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:26 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.10.1 Release.
>
> The release contains bug fixes and improvements as you can see on the
> release report:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release
If it's simpler and documented that sounds like a win to me.
Justin
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:41 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 16:47, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:44 AM Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
> > > Thats what we do at Qpid and what I've seen
Very nice. This is a real win for website maintenance.
Justin
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:32 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Everything is on master now!
>
> no more playing with 2 branches.
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:35 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I have created the INFRA jira here:
The user list is, in fact, the best place for usage/configuration
questions. The dev list is for developers who are working on an ActiveMQ
code-base. For what it's worth most, if not all, of the developers on the
dev list are also subscribed to the user list.
In my opinion the best thing you can d
This is the ActiveMQ "dev" list which is really meant for developers
working directly on an ActiveMQ code-base. The "user" list should be used
for questions such as this. I see you've already posted this same exact
question to the user list. Please refrain from double posting. For anybody
subscribe
I think your implementation idea makes sense and it is actually quite
similar to what is done for clustering (i.e. each broker tells all the
other brokers how they can connect back to it). This makes sense to me as a
way to configure downstream brokers, but I'm still fuzzy on the "duplex"
part. Doe
My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
Votes cas
equirement:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>
> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from
> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise),
> which if cast would get the required 3.
>
> Robbie
>
Please direct this question to the ActiveMQ *User* Mailing list [1] which
is for end users to ask general questions about ActiveMQ. This is the "dev"
list which is for developers to discuss issues related to the development
of ActiveMQ itself.
Thanks!
Justin
[1] http://activemq.apache.org/conta
I plan on doing an Artemis release in early January. I know lots of people
will be AFK over the next couple of weeks so I wanted to give an early
heads up.
Justin
In the default /etc/artemis.profile there are these lines:
# Debug args: Uncomment to enable debug
#DEBUG_ARGS="-agentlib:jdwp=transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=y,address=5005"
Uncomment the second line and then start a debugging session in your IDE
and point it to localhost:5005.
Justin
uilt. Any guidance on
> this? It might be useful for new, potential contributors.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:58 PM Justin Bertram
> wrote:
>
> > In the default /etc/artemis.profile there are these
> > lines:
> >
> > # Debug args: Uncomment t
1 - 100 of 560 matches
Mail list logo
